User talk:SaturnsRings27SaturnsRings27, you are invited to the Teahouse!
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
SaturnsRings27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I am requesting that my account be unblocked, as I am a good contributor to the community, who is NOT spamming or abusing Wikipedia. SaturnsRings27 (talk) 08:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: Clearing an autoblock Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:
If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Max Semenik (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chartered Professional AccountantI've responded in my talk page to your queries. It's nice to know that someone else is interested in this field!Raellerby (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of CPA French.English.jpgThanks for uploading File:Logo of CPA French.English.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC) I was incorrectly blocked
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
SaturnsRings27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I believe my block was made incorrectly because I am not part of a sock puppet group. I am not sure what it is/was about my editing behavior that made the blocker believe I am part of the sock puppet group I was included in, but I assure you, I have nothing to do with any of those other users. I am not sure what solid proof I can give. I read about sock puppet behaviors, such as supporting other sock puppets in AfD votes, or similar things, and I don't believe I ever did that. So, as far as behavior is concerned, I think the evidence must be circumstantial in some way, that I am unaware of. I will admit to using a VPN, and perhaps that is my mistake, but I prefer that extra level of privacy when I am on the internet, and have never seen a recommendation or advice on Wikipedia not to use a proxy service, or that it is against any rules. Please clarify if this is wrong. I understand that sock puppetry is a serious problem and that Wiki editors are working hard to fight this abuse of the terms of service, so I understand that sometimes innocent people get swept into such investigations. I hope you can closely review my particular situation, including what I believe were edits that improved the encyclopedia, and unblock me as soon as you feel I am indeed a legitimate, individual editor that has the interests of Wikipedia at the forefront of my editing behavior. Thank you for your involvement. I am looking forward to good news.SaturnsRings27 (talk) 08:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: It will come as no surprise to you that blocked sock accounts normally deny all connections. Consequently, we need substantially more than a denial. To have any prospect of an unblock you need to visit Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tomwsulcer and explain why there is an established connection between you and the other users in your group. Failing a fully satisfactory explanation there is no possibility of your being unblocked. On the secondary issue, our policy on proxy use is at WP:PROXY. Just Chilling (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia