User talk:SISPCM

Invitation

I'd like to invite you to participate at this discussion (Iaaasi (talk) 14:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Warning

If you try to delete the content of whole articles, and then copy moving their content to whatever article name that you think of again I'm taking this straight to ANI for immediate administrator action. Hobartimus (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Kingdom of Hungary (medieval)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Kingdom of Hungary (medieval). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Kingdom of Hungary in the Middle Ages. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kingdom of Hungary in the Middle Ages - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Hobartimus (talk) 00:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editwarring

SISPCM, you are approaching 3RR on John Hunyadi. Please review the policy. Note that if you should violate the three revert rule (WP:3RR), you may be blocked for that.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always ground for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. --Nmate (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Such is not seemly to do that you consecutively make as many as 4 reverts without showing any willingness for the discussion on the talk page of the John Hunyadi article, because of which I should report you on the edit warring board If I had enough time for that. But because I have not, I defer the report for tomorrow.--Nmate (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

salut

potisa midai simie plz idul tau demess? (79.117.174.32 (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Pot fi contactat, pentru inceput, prin email. Numai bine. SISPCM (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Vandalism

This is the last warning you will receive for your removal of sourced contents on Aryan. You have already be banned for this before... If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.Rajkris (talk) 07:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement warning: Eastern Europe

Please do not engage in edit-warring (see AN3 report), or you may be sanctioned.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision.  Sandstein  06:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of WP:AN/EW report

Hello SISPCM,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 07:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)[reply]

August 2011

This [1] is not cool. I know exactly what wikipedia is about, and using reliable sources is part of it. The material you keep removing is perfectly well sourced, and 100% relevant. If you want to remove sourced material for any reaons, the thing to do is explain yourself in the talkpage. Edit-warring will get you nowhere. Athenean (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring—every edit you've made to Aromanians in nearly a month has been to revert multiple other editors in the same dispute and, as far as I can see, you have made no attempt at communication at all. If this continues, your next block will be for much longer. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Caca listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lady Caca. Since you had some involvement with the Lady Caca redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]