User talk:Runame

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Liss

Although you've withdrawn the nomination, you haven't mentioned whether the request from the subject was also withdrawn, which would determine whether Sue Rangell's support for deletion still stands. There's also the "delete" from FreeRangeFrog citing WP:GNG, so according to the Speedy Keep guidelines it looks like the discussion should stay open. Peter James (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The subject has withdrawn the request... and both delete comments seemed contingent on the subject wanting it deleted. You can of course renominate it or I guess undo my close, but the subject does no longer want this deleted... personally I would like my involvement with it to be over. --Runame (talk) 19:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the clarification - as the remaining argument for deletion now seems uncertain I'll leave it closed. Peter James (talk) 20:08, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Camm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WAVE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]