en User talk:Rubbaband Mang

Welcome!

Hello, Rubbaband Mang, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Ali Beary (talk) 15:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🍪 Rubbaband Mang (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My response

Please refer to the comment that I left on my Talk page in response to your edit about the Cardinals. Assadzadeh (talk) 15:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I added a footnote to the Canadiens' wikipage. Rubbaband Mang (talk) 18:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archive links

Please do not remove archive links from references as you did at Jake Allen (ice hockey). If a referenced link is live, you can add the parameter url-status=live to set the default link to the live page. If a link is dead, archives allow wikipedia to maintain its verifiability. Cheers! Wheatzilopochtli (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubbaband Mang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sure what this is all about (or what a "sock puppet" is for that matter, but I believe there has been some sort of misunderstanding here. Apologies if I did anything wrong on this platform. I certainly didn't mean to.

Decline reason:

Per Izno's comment on 29 December, you have engaged in block evasion in the recent past. Please review the guide to appealing blocks and return with an improved block appeal Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 19:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rubbaband Mang (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy, listen. We know it's you. It was obvious. You use the same writing style, and have a similar focus on the Montreal Canadiens. I, and everyone in that discussion I linked, was prepared to let you go since your behavior has improved considerably and your focus has been more constructive, taking help in stride, but evidently Bbb23 is not interested. I'm going go try and help you here: It is in your best interest not to play dumb and make an actual appeal for any chance at all. Don't play this game. In the event your best aappeal doesn't work, you should probably find a new hobby. You torched that bridge pretty good. mftp dan ^oops 01:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly have not the faintest clue what you are on about, but it looks like I've been lead out to the gallows here no matter what I say. Rubbaband Mang (talk) 04:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, since I'm not a checkuser I can't get a definitive answer myself on whether or not this is genuine, but in the event you're serious, I'll explain that your editing habits have serious overlap with this user. This would be the first (known) account registered to those addresses, though, assuming they're the same. mftp dan ^oops 04:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{checkuser needed}} Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Significa liberdade This account has indeed been used to evade at least one previous block. Izno (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno how? Rubbaband Mang (talk) 23:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are likely referring to your first block, under your previous username. Conyo14 (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not. Please don't make speculative comments. Izno (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]