The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Delamere Ball Laurens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello, Ali Beary, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! StarMississippi18:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red
Hello Ali Beary! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating entries for women's biographies and related topics and assisting contributors who run into difficulties. If you wish to participate, you can sign up under "New registrations", or feel free to ask for assistance on our talk page any time. Thanks again for your contributions! asilvering (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ali, sorry your first-article experience was rough. I closed the AfD as a redirect, so your work is still there, just hidden (see [1]), and if you end up finding more sources some day, you can spin it back out into a separate article again. I can't answer your question about the redlink beyond "sometimes, people put them places where they shouldn't", I'm afraid. I really recommend that you join WiR - many, many editors there have had similarly disappointing first experiences, and they're there to help. There's sure to be someone you're interested in who is notable and doesn't have an article yet, and they have lots of redlists to help you find one. Good luck! -- asilvering (talk) 18:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
George Washington edit - please read
Your edit to George Washington is throwing a Harv error. Please correct it and ADD the Hamilton book. The Randall/Hamilton is still not listed correctly in the cited sources for this article, I assume because you've included "ref=none".
I don't know if you have this script installed but if Harv error isn't ringing a bell for you, go to User:Ucucha/HarvErrors and consider following the instructions there to install that script - User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js on your common.js page. - Shearonink (talk) 19:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, glad to hear it. You can lay out your GA review pretty much how you like, but the key is to show that you have checked the article against the criteria. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:41, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you know that you actually didn't close either of the GANs; it's a modest bit of a faff doing it manually as it involves several steps on different pages, but is well automated by the script called "GANReviewTool", as is mentioned in the GA instructions. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but could you please mark Mandarin orange as a GA pass? The GANReviewTool makes this a quick and simple operation. If even that seems too much, then at least write that you are now satisfied at the bottom of your review and I guess I can run the bot for you without getting too much stick for it! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, despite the fact I've downloaded the script, it won't let me run it. If you could do so, that'd be great. Thank you! Ali Beary (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I unfortunately do not have the ability to protect an article, as I am not an administrator on this wiki. I just hope that very few people are misinformed so me and other editors on Wikipedia do not have to struggle reverting edits and arguing with people. I'll try to request a temporary protection over the page. Thank you! Ali Beary (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
What? Cordless Larry, I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m a simple fan just trying to write about stuff I’m interested in. I do not have any form of relationship with Thayne Jasperson. I also don’t know what I’m supposedly advertising. Care to elaborate? Ali Beary (talk) 00:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was just concerned that you'd included unsourced personal details in the article, which can often be a sign that someone has a conflict of interest with the subject as they know that information because of their personal connection. If you don't know Jasperson and all of that information came from published sources, that's fine, but please do provide references in future (see WP:BLP). Cordless Larry (talk) 08:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did source the personal details. His sexuality, religion, confidence, and his loving of the Wyoming Cowboys all came from references. Ali Beary (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ali Beary! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Time for Google to Index Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Please also note that statements about what isn't known (e.g. "No upcoming projects of Jasperson's are known") also require sources establishing that that's the case. It might just be that you haven't found a source that discusses his upcoming projects, and to infer from the fact that you've not found such a source that it's unknown is original research. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, alright. I am in the process of adding new sources, so I'll be sure to find stuff for that too. Thanks! AliBeary; (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thayne Jasperson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hi there! Welcome again to Wikipedia. I notice you explaining things to other editors. That's excellent but I would just point out that Wikipedia does not have moderators. If you would like to lean more about how new articles are processed, do have a read of WP:NPP and if there's any thing you don't understand there, let me know on my talk page and I'll improve it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung, please let me just use my vocabulary. They’re practically the same thing and, upon writing that initial post, I had gotten no sleep the night prior. I’m sorry for using the incorrect term, but I would prefer not to have several users coming at me for using the wrong term. I’m sure you can tell what I meant. I don’t need people telling me my vocabulary is incorrect!!! Ali Beary (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung please note I’m not a newcomer, I don’t need the welcome. Thanks though. Sorry if I came off as rude, I’m in a bad mood right now and I apologize for snapping at you like that. Ali Beary (talk) 17:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your thread has been archived
Hello Ali Beary! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Request a Block, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Hello Ali Beary! The thread you created at the Teahouse, susanhollowayscott.com reliable?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Thank you! I'm glad that you took the time to stick with me in the process of promoting the article, and thanks for the barnstar! Maybe we will cross paths again in the future... also, I'll definitely be checking out Women in Red! Thanks again.
Hello Ali Beary! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Old Image--Unknown Author or Date, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
