User talk:Assadzadeh

This user is a member of
WikiProject National Football League.

Welcome!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Alielmi1207, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Nobel X300 (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,423 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Seattle SuperSonics (talk) Add sources
314 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Communist revolution (talk) Add sources
566 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Cynthia Rothrock (talk) Add sources
154 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C 1993–94 NBA season (talk) Add sources
425 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cheez-It (talk) Add sources
472 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C 2002 NFL season (talk) Add sources
86 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B History of the Philadelphia Eagles (talk) Cleanup
288 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Oakland Roots SC (talk) Cleanup
108 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bay Bridge Series (talk) Cleanup
2,866 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Brexit (talk) Expand
534 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Doping in sport (talk) Expand
14,170 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA North Korea (talk) Expand
3,519 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Tropical cyclones in 2024 (talk) Unencyclopaedic
187 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Major League Baseball uniforms (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3,230 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Green Party of the United States (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub NTPC Port Blair Solar Power Plant (talk) Merge
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Qilun Square station (talk) Merge
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start North Whittier, California (talk) Merge
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Wally Buono (talk) Wikify
664 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B National Basketball League (Australia) (talk) Wikify
142 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Le Feuvre & Roze (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Letty Eisenhauer (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Anthony Viti (talk) Orphan
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C 2016 Minnesota Lynx season (talk) Stub
45 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 1974 Miami Dolphins season (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Connecticut's 112th House of Representatives district (talk) Stub
55 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 2000 Green Bay Packers season (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Our Lady Queen of the World Catholic Academy (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 1963 New York Jets season (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you attempted to improve the short description on List of Super Bowl champions. Short descriptions serve a specific purpose on Wikipedia. They are not definitions of an article's topic, and should not simply repeat the information contained in the article's title. Additionally, many articles intentionally have no short description when the article title is considered to be sufficient. If you have further questions, feel free to consult Wikipedia's information page regarding short descriptions, or leave a message on my talk page.

Thanks!

Remsense ‥ 论 05:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP: HOCKEY

Per consensus at WP:HOCKEY, we don't use maps. GoodDay (talk) 21:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay All the other major North American sports leagues use maps to show where their champions are located, so I don't understand why NHL would be the exception. Where specifically is the discussion that led to the consensus? Alielmi1207 (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See this discussion. -- GoodDay (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GoodDay Thanks, but it seems to be a discussion rather than a consensus. Anyways, as the old saying goes: "A picture is worth a thousand words". So, my opinion would be to keep the map, as it conveys a lot of information at a glance. Alielmi1207 (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Join the discussion at WP:HOCKEY. GoodDay (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand removing them from the season pages, but adds value to this page. Alielmi1207 (talk) 21:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We'll wait & see, what the other WP:HOCKEY members think. I'll go along with what they prefer. GoodDay (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GoodDay OK, will do. I'm curious why you deleted the map, undid the change, and then deleted it again? Alielmi1207 (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Initially, I mistakenly deleted the Cup champions below the photo. GoodDay (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background colors on team tables

Responding to your question about the NFL page. I had to look back to last May to refresh my recollection. The discussion I recall about the issue was actually on the NHL article's talk page (see here: [1]) simply because I asked other users for their thoughts there, but the same principles apply. I don’t really know anything about the MOS guidelines' origins beyond what the users there said, but maybe you could ask one of them. I don’t know whether there is some sort of umbrella "sports articles" clearinghouse-type talk page, but I kind of doubt it because of different conventions for different sports (e.g., for baseball the infobox includes former stadiums, but for hockey it doesn’t, and apparently the reason is because the respective WikiProjects decided that). Sorry I can’t give you a clearer answer. 1995hoo (talk) 02:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arizona Cardinals founding date

"One of the oldest North American professional sports franchises, the Canadiens' history predates that of every other Canadian franchise outside the Canadian Football League's Toronto Argonauts, as well as every American franchise outside baseball and the National Football League's Arizona Cardinals."

The foregoing text is derived directly from the Montreal Canadiens wiki page. However, if one was to follow the included wikilink (Major professional sports teams in the United States and Canada), the Cardinals have an establishment date of 1988. Do you see how this statement on the Canadiens' page cannot be corroborated without the edit I had made? Rubbaband Mang (talk) 14:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rubbaband Mang I'm not disputing the original establishment date of the Cardinals. What I'm telling you is that the article specifically states:
Est. represents the first year the team played in its current media market. For brevity, only the most recent names for teams that have had multiple nicknames in their current media market are listed.
So, if you're going to change it for the Cardinals, then you need to change it for other teams that have relocated as well, not to mention listing their original team name.
To give you an example, take a look at Atlanta Braves. You'll note that they were established as the Boston Red Stockings in 1871 and changed names seven times before becoming the Braves and then relocating to Milwaukee.
On a related topic, I considered listing all the former names for a team, but using the Braves as an example again, I would have had to list nine former names, so I just left it as is, as the list seems to list only the most recent name in the former city.
Finally, if you want to change the list, then post a topic on the article's Talk page so that consensus can be reached first. Assadzadeh (talk) 15:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rubbaband Mang I decided to update the established date for all the teams listed, just like what you had proposed for the Arizona Cardinals. Assadzadeh (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit on MLS team order

Alphabetical order is alphabetical order regaredless of prefixes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 00:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE I see that another user agrees with me. Assadzadeh (talk) 00:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That they might. But I was taught that prefixes count towards alphabetical order and most people within my area of Canada also count them. Even Wikipedia counts them when you sort the teams into alphabetical order, which makes me lead to think that it's an international norm to include prefixes in alphabetical order consideration 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course Wikipedia sorts them in alphabetical order, because it's just basing it on the first letter. If you look at some of the other sports leagues' tables, you will note that although a team's city is listed as St. Louis, it is listed alphabetically as if it were Saint Louis, thus appearing before San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, and so on. This case is similar. FC could just as well come after the team name, as is the case with some of the other teams. So, instead of getting into an edit war, I would suggest posting a topic on the article's page to get consensus before making additional changes. @Blaixx care to comment, since our edits keep getting reverted? Assadzadeh (talk) 01:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That may be, but if that's how the internal alphabetical order system works, that is how it should be ordered. If you and Blaixx wanna get into this edit war and are looking for more consensus, go ahead and make that topic page (also I have no idea how to do that). Until then, keep it ordered to how Wikipedia would have them ordered 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 02:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE I've already started a topic on the Talk page, but since you initially started the edits, then it needs to go back to how it was prior until consensus is reached. Assadzadeh (talk) 02:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Or it can be as how the site it sits on orders them until consensus is reached. It is as it is 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 02:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be missing the mark with what I'm saying. So I've just put the teams back into the way it was before we starting making edits. Let's leave it at that (no more edits from either of us 3 on their order until other's weigh in via that talk topic on the page) 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 03:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How am I missing the mark when you're the one making changes to all these pages? I would conclude that whomever created the other pages also agrees that they should follow the same format (alphabetized based on city). Also, if there is code that has been added, then Wikipedia alphabetizes based on that code. So, please take a look at the table on the MLS page and tell me if the sorting works based on what you would expect. Assadzadeh (talk) 03:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I say your missing it because you are ignoring that these teams either start with FC, CF and/or Sporting (in KC's regards) and not with their cities name ahead of the prefiex and thus shouldn't be looked over (even if MLS has), unlike myself. The table is fine as is now (even if it should be sorted taking the prefiexs into account), least until other's weigh in on the topic page that was created. Also the sorting code isn't any better and isn't needed as it's back to the order you want, let's leave it at that and not push this any further (with any more edits)! 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 03:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, we can agree to disagree until consensus is reached. Assadzadeh (talk) 04:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]