Regarding this edit, I would ask you to please take much more care when referring to an editor's good-faith contributions. For a new editor to spend a lot of time writing a referenced article in an area where Wikipedia is weak, and then to have their contribution labelled "unsalvageably incoherent" and "patent nonsense" within 4 minutes of submission... well... that's no way to make a new editor feel welcome. I appreciate that it's easy to make mistakes when you're making a lot of edits quickly, but please remember that you're dealing with real people who have volunteered their free time. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs)12:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh, user page vandalism. Funny how it's the little things you miss when you're away from wikipedia for a while. ;-) Thanks for the cleanup. --fvw*02:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Re: this edit, don't do anything hateful, just add it back somewhere else instead of deleting it! Also, I've replaced the second ref as it confirms the first, and either might become inaccessible; extensive refs are not generally considered a problem :) -- Quiddity (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there Rtyq2. You've been doing a beautiful job on improving the article and I admire your willingness to work on the article. (I wonder what happened to the nominator?) It really is almost there. Just a few more things to take care of. Concerning the rationale for the image, don't worry about it. I'll take care of that tonight. If you wish to learn more about it, just click on the other images to see how the rationales are done because those ones are okay, as far as I'm concerned. Just keep working on the references section of the GA review and it'll be finished. – Ms. SaritaConfer18:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's a tricky one. It seems like Tobin may have a song heard in the film but that it wasn't put onto the official commercially-released soundtrack. I took a look at Tobin's discography on Allmusic.com and it says that that particular song ("Saboteur") was not featured on the soundtrack for the film either. Since IMDb is not a particularly reliable reference (although I have seen it used in FAs), you may, unfortunately, have to remove the information if a source cannot be found. – Ms. SaritaConfer18:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tell you what. I actually own The Italian Job. What I'll do is take a look at it tonight (after my finals...ugh) and if the song is listed in the credits, we can cite the actual film. I tried to do a search for information on the Internet and turned up nothing, so the video may be our only chance of keeping this information in the article. So, for now, just focus on the other things on the list and don't worry about this particular citation. – Ms. SaritaConfer18:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I crashed and burned after my 4-hour final last night. As far as the website goes, I was concerned that since the information was labeled "Current", that it might be updated too often and the corresponding information would be pushed out within a few months. After looking at it, it seems that their information goes back almost two years, so it looks like it's okay to use. As far as format, just use the regular "cite web" template and put the address of the website; in small writing, I would write something like "Current > News". Make sure you input a date for the information (i.e. "2008-12-08"). I'll take a look at the citation after you've put it in the article and tweak it out if need be. I also incorporated the reference from The Italian Job into the article to support the related information, so that is finished. And I will be working on the rationale for the image later on today. Again, sorry about the late response. – Ms. SaritaConfer18:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. And ooh...another barnstar! You did some wonderful work on the article. If you ever need help with bettering it (or if you have GA nominations in the future and want me to review them), let me know and I'll come help you out! It was a pleasure working with you. – Ms. SaritaConfer03:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Amon Tobin
I just wanted to thank you for all your work on getting Amon Tobin promoted to GA-class. I took an extended hiatus during this semester, but it was great to come back and see the article with all those shiny green logos on it. --Sebquantic (talk) 17:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, thank you for this edit. That was much more work than anything I have done to the article, and the reason it got to GA class in the first place. If you ever want to improve it even further, just let me know (I've still been making little tweaks here and there to the article). Rtyq2 (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Hello Rtyq2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Aime (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Thanks for uploading File:Family Glue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
