User talk:Rtkat3/Archive 8

French spacing at The Bear (1988 film)

Hello. I don't know your reasoning for this edit, because you did not use an edit summary. Keep in mind, however, that French spacing in plot summaries or anywhere else in an article is perfectly acceptable per the MOS. The Bear (1988 film) uses this style of spacing, but other articles may not. There's no reason to change just one section of an article to have single spacing, so I've reverted it. BTW, it would be helpful if you could use edit summaries in future -- they tend to help. Thanks! María (yllosubmarine) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Happy Hogan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Symphony No. 3
The Amanda Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Josh Zuckerman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Man's Best Friend (1993 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Hybrid and Junkyard
3 Ninjas Knuckle Up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Charles Napier
Dinozaurs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Masato Hirano
Vampire Princess Miyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Naoko Watanabe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Forces of Darkness (Power Rangers), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Hopkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fluf, crtystal balls, and edit summaries

This is primarily about this edit, but some of it is about recurring problems with you edits.

  1. Edit summaries: Bluntly - USE them. Your constant lack of using them makes it impossible to understand exactly what you are trying to accomplish. This is beyond frustrating since a good chunk f you edits appear constructive.
  2. Fluff: Please stop adding unneeded plot detail to sections and articles. And yes, the majority of the plot info you add is unneeded. It either adds no value to the casual reader's understand of the topic(s) or is geared to fans only.
  3. Crystal balls: The articles are not crystal balls. That goes beyond making assumptions of future events or posible popularity. It means "The story is on going." does not get added to plot sections for ongoing comic books or characters apearing in them. It also means that an entire section devoted to the singular line "Info coming soon..." will not stand. Full stop.

- J Greb (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MasterTyrannomon

The article MasterTyrannomon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character. No reliable sources cited.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Milburn (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you been removing links from pages? ([1], [2], [3]) The links should remain unless there is a good reason for removing them. Spidey 104 21:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering the same thing, especially regarding links to subheadings, I don't know why you seem to keep removing those. Anyway, if you want something positive to work on, I think all the Avengers Academy characters now have their own pages, and they could use a lot of work. That sounds like a worthy project if you want to take it up. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 04:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Quack Pack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Richard Ryder, Tom Williams and David Doyle
A Pup Named Scooby-Doo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Carl Stevens
The Impossibles (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Messick

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect piping

I reverted your edit to Wild boar because Pig is about the genus Sus, which include the wild boar, domestic pig, and other wild pigs. It is therefore inappropriate and misleading to pipe 'domestic pig' to 'pig'. -- Donald Albury 00:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maggia branches

Do you mind if I remove the specific branches there in the articles because it makes the infobox look weak? 96.238.36.171 (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Characters of Spyro the Dragon

Hi, please do not add minor characters to Characters of Spyro the Dragon like you did here. It is very unnecessary. Each character should be able to have a good deal of information on them. If they can only be 1-3 sentences, they don't need to be in this article. This counts for both good characters like the "Dragons of Artisans", and the bosses like "Crush" and "Gulp". This is not a "List of every character in Spyro that has a name". There are Wikias for that purpose.

Also, naming the section "Moneybags the Bear" is as unnecessary as "Crush the Caveman". As far as I know, they are never referred to as such, so only their actual name should be shown.

I would appreciate it if you fixed the things I mentioned here. I would have reverted your edit, but you did good things as well, so I would have to go in and manually fix things. Plus, I want you to learn so you don't just do it again. Thanks, Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody needs to know about the minor characters to understand the series. They should be explained in the parent article of the game they appear in. Any further information is not needed. Wikipedia has standards, and I am hoping to bring the Spyro articles up to those standards. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Dragons from the first game are mentioned in the game article. They don't need to be listed and named. That kind of detail is not needed for the average Joe to understand the game. Details on minor characters like that can only be on guides or Wikis devoted to the series. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Redwall characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Slaver
Vampire (Blade) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Overlord

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sesame Street lists

Hi Rtkat3, I need to talk about your edits to these lists. Much of what I want to say is repeated in some of the other sections of this talk page; namely, your edits are unnecessary. You should also know that you're violating some WP policies. First, WP:SOURCES, which states that you shouldn't add any new content without including a reliable source. WP:OR, which is related, states that you shouldn't add any information you've observed yourself, even if it's an old episode you remember fondly. It's customary and good manners to bring up any substantial edits on the article's talk page; see WP:TPG. You should also know that a consensus and policy has already been reached on these lists [4]. We're trying very hard to provide reliable sources for this and other SS lists. I'll wait for your response, and then I'll have to revert your most recent changes because as I state, they violate a few policies. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Quantum Leap episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Tayloe
Polyphemus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Barclay
Puppet Up! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Brian Clark

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Dinosaur King characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ranger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget THE

Hey, just a quick note on your recent edits: [5], [6], [7]

The information you added is good, but The Amazing Spider-Man is the proper/correct title. So try not to forget that "The" when adding references in the future. Thanks! Spidey104 14:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Ed Sullivan Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D23 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing issues

A number of things:

  • As asked above in January: Why are you removing links from articles? And I'll go one better: Why are you tinkering with links that do not need to be tinkered with? With in an article or list it is acceptable to point to a header in another article.
  • Adding a sub head or a bullet point for or to a single item is improper. Period.
  • Converting multiple, sizable paragraphs into one massive, run on bullet point damages the legibility of a section.
  • Adding every actor and or character that has ever appeared in a show to the base article is unacceptable.
  • Start using edit summaries. It may not help with most of these issues, but at least you would be explaining why you are removing links or material and why you feel the need to boost list of examples.

- J Greb (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Rtkat3. You have new messages at J Greb's talk page.
Message added 18:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

April 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to List of Oz Characters does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Not providing a edit summary can sometimes lead to having your revision undid, if you would like to prevent this from happening, please enter a brief message on what and why you did something. WheresTristan Let's talk·Contribs 20:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rtkat3. You have new messages at WheresTristan's talk page.
Message added 21:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WheresTristan Let's talk·Contribs 21:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC) WheresTristan Let's talk·Contribs 21:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Storyteller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to George Little and Francis Wright
Carrie (1976 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nancy Allen
Halloweentown series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jeff Olson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Summer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Summer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Summer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe deckertalk to me 19:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Spider-Man

Hi. Do you have a source for this edit per WP:V/WP:CS? Nightscream (talk) 01:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. I never said otherwise. That's why I asked the above question: Do you have a source for the assertion that his real name will be Van Damme and not Von Doom? You cannot just assume that every single detail of the Ultimate comics universe will be exactly translated to the screen. Does Nick Fury train Spider-Man in the comics? Is Nick Fury in the cartoon a fascist jackboot who tells Spider-Man that her will become SHIELD's "property when he turns 18? We don't include material on the basis of assumptions. We cite sources. Nightscream (talk) 01:35, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rtkat3, please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with this edit. If you want to add such material, please include a reliable source with it per WP:V/WP:CS. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overdetail, blow-by-blow synopses

Rtkat3, you're a longtime contributor to WikiProject Comics, so I'm sure you're well aware that we don't do issue-by-issue, blow-by-blow plot synopses. You need to please stop adding them, and I ask that you consider this a respectful warning. You reinserted such Hulk (comics) edits after a deletion, without discussing this on the article's talk page. That's a form of edit-warring. Please do not this again. If you have an issue with another editor's edits, you DISCUSS it with them, please. Thank you. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Rtkat3. Much appreciated. I'll go over and take a look. Happy Wiki'ing. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of characters in the Camp Half-Blood series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Merperson
Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lawman
The Funky Phantom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Montezuma
The Land of Gorch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Hunt
The Mike Douglas Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Marty Allen
The Muppets on Puppets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tim Steele

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Hey Arnold! characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joseph Ashton and James Keane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Monster Man (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sean Cunningham
The Muppets: A Celebration of 30 Years (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Uncle Deadly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you still removing the piping of links from pages?!?!?! ([8], [9]) Please STOP doing it. Spidey104 21:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, considering the level of disruption and damage this can cause, you have a choice. Either stop now or you will be blocked for disruption with an eye to inadvertent vandalism.
Consider this a final warning.
- J Greb (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bluntly:
  • Take the time to use edit summaries. We cannot read your mind.
  • If you cannot be bothered - no I do not buy "FireFox is at fault" since I don't seem to have the issue with that browser - you are being willfully disruptive.
  • Removing "#section" or direct links to articles damages articles. Period. If you cannot edit without damaging articles, stop editing. You've gotten pinged on this way to often.
- J Greb (talk) 22:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I read your response and I agree with J Greb; that is not an excuse. I use Firefox and I have no idea what problem you're talking about; it has never happened to me. Just don't remove links or the piping of links. It's that simple.
Many of your edits are very good and helpful, but because you have so many bad edits and you never enter an edit summary I always assume your edits include a mistake and double check them if I see them. I don't want to see you blocked because you can be helpful, but I am also tired of frequently fixing mistakes like this (or my previous endeavor to get you to use the proper headings) because it takes so long for you to change your behavior. So please stop removing links and please start including edit summaries. Spidey104 15:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man Armored Adventures - Guardsman and O'Brien

"The O'Brian that works for Obadiah Stane in Iron Man: Armored Adventures has no relation to the Guardsmen from the comics." - And what makes you so sure of that? The two comics Guardsmen share the same name and - in a way - the same profession with the Iron Man AA O`Brien, and the entire series is regularly laced with hidden and not-so-hidden references to other Iron Man characters, some of them heavily altered. For instance, Whiplash and the Fixer (Mister Fix) have become cyborgs; the Gene Khan Mandarin is a youngster who rebels aginst the original Mandarin; the Titanium Man is not a Russian renegade scientist, but the name of Justin Hammer's battlesuit. So why can't O'Brien and the armored Guardsmen be two separate interpretations of the same character? Got any solid proof? Websites, interviews and such? DanielC46 (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The second season is really lagging behind. Must have stumbled upon some sort of production delay or something, and it's a bit of a pain since I've come to like the series pretty much. Wonder what the hold-up is.DanielC46 (talk) 20:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

God of War characters

I've requested for a Peer Review on the page as it currently is. Unless there are very minor things to edit (e.g. spelling, grammar), lets try not to edit the page until the Peer Review has finished to see what they say should be done. Thanks. Wikipedia:Peer review/List of God of War characters/archive1. JDC808 (talk) 21:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel: Avengers Alliance

Wikipedia is not at a gameguide, and links to a wiki are not reliable. Please do not restore that section again. If you feel there should be a plot section then feel free to write one, but per WP:PLOT it should be brief. Listing every boss and fight is not what wikipedia is for--Jac16888 Talk 10:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ron Rogge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Rogge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Rogge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Earthworm Jim characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tin Man
Peter Corbeau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Archie Goodwin
Rickety Rocket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Phantom
The Plastic Man Comedy/Adventure Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Phantom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The List of Transformers: Rescue Bots episodes page.

Now look, mister: if you break Wikipedia's 3-revert rule by vandalizing the List of Transformers: Rescue Bots episodes page one more time, you could be starting an edit war. You don't want that, do you? AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emile Dorian

The article Emile Dorian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability; a short biography of a minor character on an old show. Provides almost no information which couldn't be found on the page of the show

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grammarxxx (talk) 10:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series)

Hi. Please do not add unsourced information to articles, as you did with this edit to Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series). If you're going to add such material, please make sure it's accompanied by a source, such as an episode cite. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter where it comes from; it has to be specified. While readers and editors can presume that information from a movie can be found in its credits, this is not the case for a TV show, which is composed of multiple episodes. This is why we have the cite episode template. You can find it here, and it's explained in further detail here.
I only saw Part 1 of the premiere at the New York City launch party. I thought it was okay. It was different, with what appeared to me to be a manga/anime influence that I had not seen in other animated Marvel cartoons. Nightscream (talk) 02:49, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man (Miles Morales)

Hi. How is the qualifier you added to the article an "update"? To update something means to bring it in line with new information that has come into light. What is the new information that indicates that Aaron's death was only an apparent one? Miles' father flat-out tells him that Aaron was dead in issue #13, which is why that issue is cited at the end of that passage. Nightscream (talk) 22:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I think Miles' dad flat-out telling him that Aaron is dead makes it pretty clear. Prior to issue #13, you'll notice that I wrote the passage so that it said "This leads to an altercation between the uncle and nephew that results an explosion that severely injures Aaron." After his dad, Jefferson, confirmed his death in #13, I changed it. If you're reading the series, you should've read that (I guess you missed it), but if you look at the edit history and see that that material was added by me, that should've told you it was legit, since I don't add material without a cited source that makes it clear.
Spider-Men is pretty good, but I'm waiting for something substantial to happen on a character level. I'm not reading AvX. Are you on Facebook? Nightscream (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can look me up and see my artwork here. Nightscream (talk) 01:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Book of Imaginary Beings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Buffalo
The Amanda Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nancy Sullivan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About This Quote.

"Zeus sadden at the loss of the original three Cyclops decided to return them from Hades" My question is what source or book. Did Wikipedia get this information. Apollo kill's the the Cyclopes. Does Zeus return them from Hades did the Greeks or Romans ever said that. I'm searching for that information and I cant find anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.228.62 (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please find where you got that information. So I know it's true. A lot Greek Mythology website designer's and a Greek mythology teacher. Keep telling me they have never heard of this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.228.62 (talk) 18:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What you read about Zeus returning the Cyclopes. After Apollo was brought back to mount Olympus. Was it a book or website. How did you know the information was true. Because I want to make sure it is true. Because I trust the wikipedia all the time. Could you try to find where you got that information. So I know it's true. A lot Greek Mythology website designer's and a Greek mythology teacher keep telling me they have never heard of this. 24.12.228.62 (talk) 13:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rtkat3 if you dont remember thats cool. Can you at least tell me where you look up all your sources on Greek Mythology. My question was is it in a book or internet. I know you dont remember where you read it. What would you have read it off of. Thats my question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.228.62 (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Neighborhood of Make-Believe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Trolley
Snow Dogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Barclay
The Muppets Go to the Movies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to ABC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Voice Actors website

Hey Rtkat3, I'm not so sure that this website, which you used as a source in your recent edits of List of Sesame Street Muppets is very reliable. I could be wrong, but I need convincing. Please, convince! ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain that I've explained this to you, but I'll do it again just in case. According to the list's talk page, there has been a policy developed regarding appropriate and reliable sources. Also see WP:RS. My issue is that the Behind the Voices website simply doesn't fulfill WP's requirements for reliable sources. The YouTube clip, however, fulfills the criteria; if you cited it, I think that it would be a better choice. YouTube clips don't tend to list the puppeteers, which is why the Sesame Street.org bios are more reliable than YouTube clips. As per WP policy, if a reliable source can't be found, it shouldn't be included in any list or article. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jim Henson's Pajanimals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Paul Currie
List of Sesame Street Muppets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Hunt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Hercules and Xena characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Galatea and Peter Muller
31st Century Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Master of the hunt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man (Miles Morales) 2

Please stop adding plot details to the article. Such articles have to summarize the character, and should only mention major events. If you want to add details from each issue, might I suggest doing so with the List of Ultimate Comics: Spider-Man story arcs article? It only has plot details up to issue #8, so that's six issues you could fill in. Just a suggestion. Nightscream (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miles' first meeting with Captain America is not important. He's already met the Nick Fury and the Ultimates on prior occasions, which is already mentioned. Does the Spider-Man article detail his first encounter with Captain America? Or with anyone?
And how can we detail events to come? Nightscream (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In other media sections

WP:Real world. Feel free to add notes about how a character's portrayal differs from the comics, how a portrayal impacted pop culture as a whole, etc. But blow-by-blow, episode-by-episode, or scene-to-scene plot summaries of the spin-off material is not appropriate for comic character articles. The major/important plot information is generally either summarized on the article about the film/television series/video game, or trivial and not encyclopedic. -Fandraltastic (talk) 02:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hotel Transylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Brian McCann
Kaijudo: Rise of the Duel Masters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sentinel
List of MÄR characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kaori Shimizu
Muppet Classic Theater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dennis Lee
Muppet Treasure Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Nicholls

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Muppet Musicians of Bremen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Elliott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bold out random word in the articles

Bolding is for titles. --Niemti (talk) 18:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Pat Sullivan and Who Killed Cock Robin
Deadman Wonderland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Warden
Pinocchio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael Welch
Project Cadmus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dark Heart
Ugly Americans (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Squash

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

White space

Reorganizing the in other media sections of the comic characters to add a ton of unnecessary white space is not helpful and very counter-productive. The image does not need to be directly beside the line it pertains to, it can be near the relevant section. It is often much cleaner to do just that, especially when there are only a few blank spaces. Adding the space template (Template:-) only serves to break the flow of a page when the image only pertains to one item on a list of items. -Fandraltastic (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the page moved in the first place? I wasn't aware that it was. It should probably be moved back, as that was the show's formal/production title, and that's where all the links head. You should start up that discussion on the show's talk page, or just move it back. No explanation seems to have been given for the move. -Fandraltastic (talk) 19:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The picture overlapping the media section is intentional. That's why there's usually one image per "other media" section. The template just creates a bunch of unnecessary white space in most cases. That's a template that should only be used sparingly, when it needs to be to clean up a page's flow (for instance, if the section above "other media" has an image that hangs into it, or if something hangs into the "references" section). Cheers. -Fandraltastic (talk) 19:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dorothy of Oz (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jawbreaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulliver's Travels (TV miniseries), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lilliput (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm McDoobAU93. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wreck-It Ralph, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Unfortunately, you didn't provide a source for this information. If you have one that confirms these plot points, please provide them. -- McDoobAU93 23:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rtkat3. You have new messages at McDoobAU93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

04:15, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Heading edits at Werewolf

I removed your addition to the article heading. I looked at Loup Garou and it is a page about an album of music. Also, you didn't explain your edit in an Edit Summary or on the Talk page. If you want to re-add this change, please use an Edit Summary and the redirect4 template. Thanks! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 22:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey--the instructions on my Talk page clearly tell folks to keep the conversations together, i.e. reply to the message where it is. I've struck out what you posted on my Talk page and moved it here (below), where it should be. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 22:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Loup-garou addition was due to the fact that the loup-garou name (different from the other pages named that) redirects to Werewolf where it was mentioned that loup-garou is a French Werewolf. The redirect heads-up had to be mentioned somewhere. Rtkat3 (talk) 6:45, October 21 2012 (UTC)

If that is the case, then do so, but do it right: Use the proper template and explain what you did in an Edit Summary. If you want to discuss this, reply here; I'm watching the page. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 22:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hulk

Please do not add superfluous details or headings to articles, as you did with this edit to Red Hulk. It is not the role of articles to detail every single fight that a character has been in. As for headings, they are not decorative, nor arbitrary. They are used to when sections have grown so large that they need to be divided into subsections. Small, single paragraphs or sentences detailing each alternate version of a character do not merit their own subsection. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Muppets

If I didn't see your edit count, I would have thought you've only been an editor for a short time, from your recent edit. First, no edit summary at all; then, it looks as if you don't know how text in a table should be done. There's not supposed to be full sentences -- no periods (if it can be helped), no overlinking (repeating links for the same person), also use of present tense for fictional characters, not past. Response? --Musdan77 (talk) 02:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good explanation. Why?? And that was only one issue... --Musdan77 (talk) 02:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kaijudo: Rise of the Duel Masters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Thug
List of Once Upon a Time characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mike Coleman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your addition, as it didn't seem to me to be legitimate. WP:HATNOTE indicates that hatnotes are only intended to guide users to other articles. If a reader arrives at the article via the redirect that will be indicated, otherwise it's irrelevant information. William Avery (talk) 20:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Digimon locations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corridor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ThunderCats

Hi, you seem to be dealing with this article more often than me. Do you know what this guy is doing, i can't understand why he keeps removing the content. – Blue☆Stars83 22:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Question

I asked you a question 1 month ago. I'm still trying to contact the person. Who wrote the whole page on Asclepius on Wikidoc. She does not have a talk page. And the guy from the Cyclops page. Gold Dragon his account was deleted because he had more then on account name. untail I can contact the woman from Wikidoc to answear my question. I have one final question for you. and i'm going to bother you with it again. My question in responce to what you told me a month ago. You said you cant remember where you heard about. Zeus freeing the Cyclopes from Hades. That being said you also told me you read Theoi. So do I. I have read everything on Theoi. It's source of information. My question is how to you edit information. Do you copy off of other Wikipedia pages. I ask this because I read false information on Wikipedia before. Most of the time information is correct but I have seen. False information put on there before. Which is why I never trust what I read on Wikipedia. It's good I can Talk to you. To get to know you a little better. I would like to know do you use published sources. Do you read a lot of greek mythology books. Where does your knowlege come from. I'm trying to make sure that you didnt just copy what you put in. off another Wikipedia article. Or a website that copy's off of Wikipedia. Any information will help me out. I am a greek mythology nut case. I like the greek god Hades a lot. Which is why I am asking this question. The reason why I got concerned about the whole topic. Was I read what look like the source on the Cyclopes page. After I read the play it was not anywhere on there. I later found out that I mis understood what. Gold Dragon said. I got mad about it. Because I dont trust Wikipedia. Right now Wikipedia is the only source I can find that says. Zeus returned the Cyclopes from Hades. After their death. So what I am asking is what kind of sources do you use on everything. I hope dont just repeat stuff from unreilable sources. Do you use published sources. One's that can be trusted. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAST FEEDBACK YOU MOSTLY SOUND LIKE A NICE GUY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkSleach (talk • contribs) 07:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kaijudo: Rise of the Duel Masters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Enforcer and Sentry
Duel Masters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guardian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adventure Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Rock, Nut and Slime
Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Michael Dobson and Paul Dobson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nighloks

As the editor who removed the content, I am under no obligation to put it back in any form. Because you want the content to be included, it needs to be taken care of such that it is not 66% of the page's full length. You do not need to give a full biography of the character's appearance in an episode. Move the episode summary to the episode list and keep things to a minimum on the character list. You have to remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a Power Rangers fansite.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Home Alone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Heard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Once Upon a Time characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Deputy
The Land of Gorch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wasteland
Villains in Power Rangers Samurai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael Morris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anchors in the biographies of comic character articles

Why are you removing them? They break up the enormously long sections, allowing readers to jump in and not be overwhelmed. They also help with the table of contents at the top of the page. You're also removing issue tags without addressing the issues. -Fandraltastic (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The anchors help with maintenance, allowing users to edit a portion of the enormous section and jump right to it from the table of contents. You can use the main template right below the anchor if you want to link to an article on the storyline/series. I undid the whole edit so I wouldn't have to go back and readd the anchors one-by-one, sorry about getting rid of the Avengers stuff. Feel free to readd that. Thanks. -Fandraltastic (talk) 22:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You mean what I think of the actual comics? I like them so far, I think the new creative teams have been bringing interesting angles to some of the book. Cheers. -Fandraltastic (talk) 22:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite your Muppets post

Spotted numerous spelling and grammatical errors. Klantry01 (talk) 13:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some Examples (errors in bold italic):... Sam the Eagle is showin hosting "Everything Stinks" on WGF News, Scooter is working at Google, Crazy Harry is shown replacing the Abraham Lincoln head on Mount Rushmore with his head, and Sweetums is shown chasing after them again after leaving "Mad Man Mooney and Sons." After 'unseen pick-ups of Rowlf the Dog (who pick-up was shown' in a cutaway) and Swedish Chef, the Muppets head to Paris where they finds Miss Piggy working as Vogue Paris's editor for "plus-sized" fashion. Unable to convince Miss Piggy to return, the group replaces her with Moopet counterpart Miss Poogy. The Muppets pitch their telethon idea to several television networks like FOX, NBC, and Univision, but are rejected. There fourth attempt occured at CDE where it's executive Veronica shows the Muppets the popular shows out now and states that the Muppets aren't famous anymore. Matter of opinion, but this is not a plot "summary" - too verbose, too detailed. Klantry01 (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Groovie Goolies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dorothy and the Witches of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Billy Boyd
Quadling Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Utensil

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding superfluous amount of trivia and other details to articles, as you did with this edit to Doctor Octopus. I've been telling you this for some time, and you seem to just ignore this or go back to your old habits after biding some time: Material in articles needs to be summarized. An article on Doctor Octopus is not a rundown or index of every single plot detail from every media appearance he's ever made. That material was removed for a reason. Please do not restore it again. Also, please look up the word "update" in the dictionary. It does not mean "adding detail". Nightscream (talk) 06:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the role of Wikipedia to detail the plot of every story a given character has appeared in, whether that character is Doctor Octopus, Batman, Sherlock Holmes or Tarzan. An article about a character summarizes that information about that character. Articles on comic book characters will generally focus on major events that occur in the medium in which that character originated or is mostly known (comics), and then provide capsule information on appearances in other media.
To update something is to add new or recent information to make something up to date. It does not refer to merely adding detail. Nightscream (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is not my responsibility to choose your edit summaries for you. I just thought I would point out that you were using a particular word incorrectly, aside from the more salient issue of detail bloat. But if you really want a suggestion, when I add material to article, I generally use "Added material with source", or in the case of minor details, "Detail". Nightscream (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One more time: It is not my place to tell you what edit summaries to choose. I was merely informing you that the word update does not mean what you apparently thought it meant. That's it. What you do with that information is up to. The statement at the end of my last message above was, as I explicitly mentioned, a suggestion, one which I made as a courtesy. Had I known you were going to continue this line of exchanges over that matter, I would've refrained from even making it. I'm done with this topic, and will not respond to further inquiries on it. Have a safe and Happy New Year. :-) Nightscream (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2012 TV series)

Hi Rtkat3. Typically I have no quarrel with your contributions, because I can tell that you want to do a good job. However, some of your contributions are either too verbose, contain trivia, or are written in a way that is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Excess parentheticals for example (Some of the info you're submitting doesn't belong in parentheses, like this sentence). Additionally, I would appreciate it if you would not revert edits without explaining the impetus for your reversion. I chopped a lot of unnecessary info and drivel from this article, and I explained my edits on the Talk Page. I don't understand why you feel "Ninja Turtles" is more appropriate than "Turtles" in an encyclopedia. But to me, "Ninja" would be their title or honorific, similar to "Dr." Per WP:SURNAME, we don't need to repeat their titles, just like we don't need to keep repeating Chris Bradford's first name every time we mention Bradford. And if you can explain why: "In 'The Gauntlet', Bradford and Xever go after the Turtles again and are exposed to mutagen which transforms him into the spike-backed dog-like mutant Dogpound (with the mutation being contributed by Chris Bradford being previously bitten by Shredder's pet Akita Hachiko)" is better than" " In 'The Gauntlet', Bradford and Xever go after the Turtles again and are exposed to mutagen. As Bradford previously came into contact with a dog, the mutagen transforms him into Dogpound, a spike-backed dog-like mutant with a large left arm." As a follow-up to that question, I'm curious how you know Fishface's fangs are venomous, or that the dog that bit Bradford was an Akita. I'm reverting the wordier versions of the Bradford/Xever write-ups until I get a better understanding as to your reasoning. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rtkat3. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Adventures of Pluto Nash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Appendix and Android
List of Bleach characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chiaki Takahashi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Transformers: Prime characters

Hello. I noticed that once again you've removed everything I've contributed to the List of Transformers: Prime characters article without giving good reasons as to why. Don't think I don't notice. I'm sending you this message out of curiosity, what exactly is wrong with the things I contribute to the article? I made the lead section longer and more detailed because the "Multiple Issues" box says that the one short sentence you seem to love so much doesn't adequately summarize the article's contents. The lead section I wrote is more informative and gives a bit of background on the series. Why must it be only one sentence? Also, you have never given a proper explanation as to what is wrong with separating the character bios into sections like "Main Cast" and "Minor Cast". It's something that most List of Characters articles on Wikipedia do, it defines the character bios a lot more easily and it gives the reader a better idea of who each character is and what role they play in the series. You keep removing them but have never explained why they're bad. I've seen edit summaries like "Let's not do that", but I want to know exactly why. I want you to tell me why you don't like these certain things, but you don't seem to communicate with anyone, and you don't seem to be okay with any edit or contribution made to that article which wasn't done by you. This is not an appropriate way to act on Wikipedia and I don't think you should do it. MunkkyNotTrukk (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That didn't really answer any of my questions. I've recently been removing the "Deceased Characters" bits and merging them with the "Other" sections, like putting Cliffjumper and Tailgate along with Wheeljack, but other contributors put it back. I'm annoyed because you take out every single section title, including the "Main Cast" ones. There's nothing wrong with separating character bios into sections. Also, the reason I take out the bios of Seaspray, The Fallen and Solus Prime is because they haven't actually appeared in the show properly, they're only mentioned in dialogue, and I believe that only characters that have actually physically appeared in the show warrant inclusion in the article because, well, they've actually physically appeared in the show. Also, I don't understand your point about learning more about new characters in the third season, getting new characters in season 3 is a no-brainer, but how does that answer my question about why you shortened the lead section or take out section titles? You just seem to be avoiding giving proper answers. MunkkyNotTrukk (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have to include information about the Iacon relics at all. It's a character page, not a general information page. There's enough information on the Iacon relics in the episode article. I've noticed that you have a habit of stuffing articles to the gills with information that the article would be perfectly fine without, I've seen what you did to the Doctor Octopus article. Sometimes less is more and more is less, and you don't have to go over everything. And as I said, I no longer include a "Deceased Characters" title, but other contributors (who hide behind IP addresses) like to put it back when I remove it. It's a wee bit out of my hands. And as for other list of Transformers articles not being split into sections, look at the one for Transformers Animated, that is what I have in mind for the Prime article. And even outside of Transformers, other list of character pages such as this one separate character bios into easy-to-read sections. I have a feeling that our conversation is just going to go round in circles, you'll keep avoiding answering my questions until I smash my computer's monitor and you won't take anything on board. You still haven't answered why you shortened the opening paragraph when the Multiple Issues box says it's not an adequate summary. I'm going to continue to contribute to the article even if my contributions aren't valued or respected, because who knows? One day I actually might start being treated equally. Cheerio.MunkkyNotTrukk (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's No Original Research, Verifiability or Reliable Sources policies by adding unsourced material to articles, as you did with this edit to Ultimate Spider-Man (TV series) (your third time now being warned for this in regard to that article), you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 04:44, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care what you were trying to do. The point remains that material in articles needs to be relevant to the article and supported by citations. The article is not about the Avengers, so it is not important to detail their roster, and the mention of Osborn and Octopus' plans were not sourced. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Nightscream (talk) 16:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The "first season's main plot for Season Two debuts"? I don't know what this means, but I will refer to you my messages above throughout this talk page: Keep it confined to relevant materials and not WP:TRIVIA, and make sure the material you add is supported by citations. Nightscream (talk) 16:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing wrong with modifying a plot if you think you can improve it. (Just check out which edits I was made just now while receiving your messages.) But it has to be done according to WP policies and guidelines. Nightscream (talk) 16:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]