Hello, Remoore24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peoples Temple may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
>Jones, Jim. http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27309 "Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 1023."] ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jonestown may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
>Jim Jones, http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27349 ''Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 161'']. ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jonestown may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
>Jim Jones, http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27349 ''Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 161'']]. ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego
uploads/2013/10/letter_toFeodorTimofeyev.pdf Letter to Timofeyev] from the Jonestown Institute.]]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jonestown has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Sorry about that. A very common form of vandalism on this website is when people with too much time on their hands randomly change URLs so they don't work anymore. You happened to be doing the exact opposite (by the way, thank you!) but the anti-vandalism program failed to distinguish the two. Altamel (talk) 23:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Harvey Milk/Archive 7. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Since discussion may have related about the fact that the link was broken and needed replaced, it changes the context of the discussion if you update the link. I wouldn't change the talk archives, but on any non-archive talk page, you could add the updated link at the bottom of the thread. —C.Fred (talk) 05:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, thank you for updating the links in articles. These need updated. However, where the links occur on talk pages, noticeboards, or talk page archives, those should be left as-is. In one case, you even deleted a whole comment about the link needing updated. —C.Fred (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, to chime in, please don't modify talk pages and other archives. The purpose of an article is provide readers with working information, so updating links there directs readers correctly. Every page has a row of tabs at the top. To the left of the edit tab, there is a tab that says whether it is an article, a talk page, or something else. Talk pages are the editorial records of the encyclopedia. They are a log of who said what, a transcript essentially, so you shouldn't modify other people's comments to what they did not originally say. Notice how each and every comment on a noticeboard or a talk page is time-stamped. The comment should reflect exactly what the editor said at that time. Also, I'm reviewing your other changes to non-article pages to see if they should be reversed. Altamel (talk) 06:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
