User talk:ReissgoMessage for SPECIFICO: Lack of talk@SPECIFICO:: On this page its says "editors who ignore talk page discussions yet continue to edit in or revert disputed material may be guilty of disruptive editing and incur sanctions." On the talk page I have A) given an example of when a bank can make a loan without acting as an intermediary B) explained why your assertion that "if the bank had no deposits, it could not have made the loan" is incorrect. and C) shown how its not just the BoE that have a problem with describing banks simply as intermediaries, but also the Fed. If you ignore these things on talk then wiki tells me that I can assume that you are conceding these points. Please to not make edits to the main page as if you were not conceding them without contributing to talk first. Reissgo (talk) 08:41, 14 July 2014 (UTC) EDIT WARRINGYou are at 3RR on Fractional Reserve Banking. This warning is to facilitate reporting you to the appropriate disciplinary board. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
FEEWhile the Austrians have had influence on FEE & its people, the article itself does not mention AE. Nor does the talk page have an AE sanctions template. Thus, as long as no edits are made regarding particular people -- who are Austrian -- I do not think a TBAN violation occurred. – S. Rich (talk) 18:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
TalkbackHello, Reissgo. You have new messages at Theonesean's talk page.
Message added 13:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. theonesean 13:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC) FYII'm not banned from Schiff's article. You should not be stalking my edits. I suggest you find a good RS which verifies the article text or else replace the article improvement tag you deleted. I'm not here to discuss this, just to inform you and suggest you do the right thing. SPECIFICO talk 19:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Velcro / AspirinI hope you will also remove much of the content of the Aspirin article, and put it in an article called Acetyl salicylic acid Like "Velcro", "Aspirin" is a commercial trade name. It belongs to the Bayer company. DOwenWilliams (talk) 22:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Hi, User SpecificoI have had past problems with this editor trying to bully his way through a content dispute. His attitude was very similar to the one you encountered (telling you that you can't tell him on his talk page that he is violating a topic ban and making thinly veiled threats). If this continues I suggest taking him to WP:ANI. If that happens I will gladly report other incidents of his problem behaviors. Sundayclose (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I have just been through the Wiki text for Molyneux, the following text appears in this order:
Now let's consider the very close relationship between anarcho-capitalism and austrian economics (I would struggle to tell them apart). First of all it appears that Murray Rothbard is credited with having invented(?) anarcho capitalism. On the wiki page for Rothbard, the very first sentence is: "Murray Newton Rothbard was an American economist of the Austrian School". On the wiki page for anarcho-capitalism we see the following text samples:
Reissgo (talk) 17:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC) BTW, SPECIFICO's topic ban says "topic-banned from everything and everyone related to the Austrian School of economics". Now "related to" is a pretty broad term, it does not mean the same thing as "a signed up member of". So, is Molyneux related to Austrian economics? I think so. Reissgo (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Take another look at Specifico's TBAN. It is for Mises.org-related articles only. He is free to edit Austrian School-related articles (which might include Peter Schiff). See ArbCom decision here. Now that both of us are clear on the scope of the topic ban it is really time to close this discussion. (But to be clear, if Specifico edited Schiff's article to mention the Hazlitt lecture at Mises, he'd be in trouble.) – S. Rich (talk) 01:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC) 01:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
From wiki: She became friends with journalist Henry Hazlitt and his wife, and Hazlitt introduced her to the Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises. Despite her philosophical differences with them, Rand strongly endorsed the writings of both men throughout her career, and both of them expressed admiration for her. Once Mises referred to Rand as "the most courageous man in America", a compliment that particularly pleased her because he said "man" instead of "woman". Reissgo (talk) 08:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Edit Warring at Positive MoneyWhen your bold edit is reverted, you should engage on talk and present the reason for your removal. In this case, it is unjustifiable. The reason for these tags is to improve articles by attracting editors who can address whatever issue is tagged. In this case, editors will see all the tagged articles and some of them will come by with additions that will help bring the article up to WP standards. As it currently stands now, the article is likely to be deleted because it cites only self-interested and affiliated sources and is full of misinformation and citations of opinion as fact. I advise you to undo your removal and support WP process. At some point, if you continue a pattern of WP:NOTHERE, the community will tire of these disruptive edits. SPECIFICO talk 13:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Re: Fractional Reserve BankingHello, I know nothing about this subject so have no input to make there. Graham87 08:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Reissgo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) You don;'t seem to understand WP:VPlease read the fundamental WP policies about sourcing article content. If you are unable to confine your edits to what's said in the cited sources, you will continue to get no support for your efforts. King does not say what you've put in that article. In fact, King has said very little of what you attempt to attribute to him across the board. It's not surprising that you, not being trained in economics, finance, accounting, or banking, would misunderstand his statements. Nevertheless you cannot use King's words to promote your own theories and conjectures. Fair warning. You should undo your reinsertion of that revert. In general, once your edit has been reverted and the reason spelled out either in an edit comment or on talk, you should not reinsert prior to seeking consensus. SPECIFICO talk 16:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Mervyn You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SPECIFICO talk 09:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC) December 2016You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fractional-reserve banking. ... richi (hello) 22:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SPECIFICO talk 23:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC) Final warning RE: SYNTH POV and Edit Warring.You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You are a WP:SPA. You should revert your edit which has been challenged as SYNTH because it reads as if Mervyn is saying that the Great Depression would have been worse... This is the last time I'm going to ask you to stop your disruptive editing. SPECIFICO talk 18:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
A question for SPECIFICO@SPECIFICO:: On the money creation page I modified an existing sentence to become "in most countries today, most of the money supply is in the form of bank deposits, which is created by private banks in a fractional reserve banking system". The reason I am bringing this up on this talk page rather than the talk page of money creation is that I am pretty sure that you already know that the sentence is perfectly correct an uncontentious. So why did you undo that edit? Reissgo (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Do not reinsert a challenged edit without consensus on talk. Nobody has supported your POV edit on talk. SPECIFICO talk 13:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Do not use edit comments for personal remarks or disparagement. SPECIFICO talk 12:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SPECIFICO talk 14:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Reissgo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) COI Positive MoneyPlease read WP:COI and state whether you have any conflict of interest with respect to Positive Money according to site policy. You are a single purpose account and appear to be using WP to promote your pet agenda. SPECIFICO talk 01:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Sovereign Money InitiativeFor your information, see Swiss sovereign money referendum, 2018 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss sovereign money referendum, 2018. ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Reissgo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageFRBYou are looking for a block or ban, IMO. I very clearly stated the rationale for my edit and your drive-by reinstatement of your garbled conflation of the institution with some recent academic approaches is not only confusing to our readers. It's also a stupid presentation that obscures the real topic of Fractional Reserve Banking. I realize that after a decade or more as a Single Purpose Account here you have no constructive improvements to offer -- that's up to you -- but please don't dumb down what could eventually be a cogent article on the subject. As noted in my article comment, one constructive contribution you might consider -- if you are willing to devote any real effort here -- is to begin an article on the subject that seems most to rankle you, namely the ways in which misleading or outdated models are used in pre-2000 undergraduate textbooks. I suggest you self-revert your double dip, which is the third time you've made that edit and which I will report when things are a bit less busy here at the bank. Quarterly repoprting and all... SPECIFICO talk 10:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC) Look up the policy RE: BURDEN. You are a Single Purpose Account that has made no constructive contribution to this site in the years you've been here. You are pushing primary sourced cherrypicked content with no policy-based rationale. You have made no effort to find secondary RS on the subject, nor to relate it to the topic of the page. I am asking you to self-revert your second reinstatement of this unsupported content. Otherwise I will seek to have you banned at a time of my choosing. Everyone is welcome to edit this site, but nobody is welcome to ignore our methods of collaboration and standards for valid content. SPECIFICO talk 17:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia