User talk:Recoil16

Archives

Archive 1

Jagdbombergeschwader 34

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. If you can confirm whether material for this article was translated I’ll add the template to the talk page for you if it’s needed. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm aware of the requirements regarding translating from other wikis. I however did not translate the German wiki article, I simply wrote a new article based on some of the same sources that the German article also used, which unsurprisingly led to a somewhat similar result. M16A3NoRecoilHax (talk) 21:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mirza Ghulam Ahmad‎

As explanation for why I removed that discusion-section, the request was to implement a sectarian/religious POV by adding an offensive slur against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community because mainstream Islam hates them. DMacks (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks I see, I am not at all informed on the substance of the topic, I was just responding to what I found to be a somewhat odd and unclear edit request. Good on you for removing it then. – Recoil (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Katy Chevigny

I was hoping someone would be able to connect that. I was sure when I created the article, but it was SYNTH from the NAC source. Valereee (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, took some digging. Glad I was able to find it. – Recoil (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, M16A3NoRecoilHax. Thank you for your work on Naval Air Force Reserve. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Sorry, I get mixed up about US navy (dmy, sigh) and the others. Tony (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle Dynamics list of modules

Hello, - You've added a large list of DCS modules to this page, but this content has been removed several times as it breaks WP:GAMECRUFT (specifically #7). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DCS modules as well. I think you should remove the list from the article. HarryKernow (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I was mistaken that you were the one who added it, so I have removed it myself. Sorry for the confusion. HarryKernow (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I had only converted the already existing list into a table because I thought it presented the information in a more usable fashion, I wasn't aware that it had previously been removed. No problem. – Recoil (talk) 13:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

question

Hi I'm penguins4all, you removed an edit of mine saying the uss Ronald Reagan docked in bali on a scheduled port visit as being inaccurate. As I was looking at her with my own eyes and took some photos and the visit was reported in the press here can I ask what was inaccurate? Just trying to understand why accurate info can be removed when I'm looking at said ship with my own eyes? Thanks. 2404:C0:3092:1EB7:1:0:48E4:AA79 (talk) 09:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Penguins4all First, you seem to not be logged into your account. But as far as your question goes, as I explained in my edit summary, your edit was referenced to a Twitter post, a type of self-published source, which is generally not accepted on Wikipedia. Furthermore you looking at something is not an acceptable source. If you are correct and there is significant media coverage in reliable sources, you can re-add the port call with those as the citation. – Recoil16 (talk) 10:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Recoil16. Thank you for your work on Matthew Miller (spokesperson). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

332d Expeditionary Operations Group

Have now moved this to the inactive list because the source date was 2017. Any further changes you wish to make are welcome. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Buckshot06 I'm sorry, what is this in reference to? I don't recall editing the 332nd EOG article recently, or ever really. – Recoil16 (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your string of edits of List of Air Expeditionary units of the United States Air Force. I have just found however in the supervising 332 AEW article that the wing is attributed relatively recently still at al-Jaber in Kuwait; it almost certainly includes an operations group. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see now, yeah I hadn't really concerned myself with the accuracy/completeness of the list as such up until now but only edited certain entries of it when I was working on other articles. Expeditionary units are always somewhat elusive, it's really difficult to find authoritative sources on their status, which I suppose is to a certain degree how the USAF likes it. – Recoil16 (talk) 21:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK great thanks for your edits. They want to be able to continue operating in Arab monarchies, which means they fit in with the duplicity those monarchies utilize: their subjects know there are U.S. bases there, but the monarchies don't specifically admit their existence. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 66th Rescue Squadron

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 66th Rescue Squadron, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Recoil16. Thank you for your work on King Faisal Air Base (Jordan). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for your contributions to 45th News and Documentary Emmy Awards. Pachu Kannan (talk) 04:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

S-200 missile

Hello! I've seen you citing P. Kraus Luftverteidigung der DDR: Fla-Ra-Komplex S-200 »Wega« in S-200 missile system article, so I guess you have access to that book.

Can you please look, does comrade Kraus mention any specific inhibitor additive in "AK-27P" IRFNA?

Unfortunately, best source on rocket oxidizers that I know (E.W. Schmidt, Encyclopedia of Oxidizers) says about it only "73% nitric acid + 27% N₂O₄ + unknown additive". I remember reading somewhere in Russian textbooks on rocketry that AK-27P contains both phosphoric acid and hydrofluoric acid inhibitors, but can't find it now. Trasheater Midtier🐉(talk) 09:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trasheater Midir I'm afraid Kraus doesn't say anything on the composition of AK-27P beyond what I have cited in the S-200 article, i.e. "at least 69.5% pure nitric acid and 24–28% nitrogen oxide". Apparently AK-27P was codenamed "Melange", at least in the East German Armed Forces. Not sure if that may help in finding further sources. – Recoil16 (talk) 00:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]