User talk:Rdunn

um...

I don't think my comment was uncivil--the talk page is long, and basically unreadable. However, I do think that editing other people's talk page comments isn't a good idea. Please refrain from it in the future--if you have a problem with a comment someone's made, why not contact them before editing it out? --Akhilleus (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it was not the best thing for you to write when everyone is so heated.  rdunnalbatross  14:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps that's true, but editing other people's talk page comments is usually not a way to make things calmer either. --Akhilleus (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise then. the rules about editing talk comments conflict with the civil rules so I felt it best so that the talk page doesnt desend into a slanging match.  rdunnalbatross  14:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

Hi, thanks for the report. Vandalism, however, is not reported at UAA (which deals with promotional, disruptive, offensive, and misleading usernames. Would you mind moving the report over to AIV?

• Superblackjack (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) reason: vandalism only account  rdunnalbatross  07:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User has vandalized. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:24, 12

October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, ceranthor 12:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

woops.  rdunnalbatross  12:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was a fail? Heh, =) ceranthor 13:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi - I've added the flag for you. Please review WP:ROLLBACK if you haven't already so you are clear on when (and more importantly when not!) to use the tool. Please feel free to ask me if you need any help. Thanks for your hard work on Wikipedia. Pedro :  Chat  13:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For moving that post from my userpage to my talk page. It's appreciated. :) --User:Woohookitty ^Diamming fool! 13:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

moved from user:ikip

== Article Rescue Squadron newsletter on User talk Bb515200000001‎ ==

you placed a copy of the ARS newsletter on User talk:Bb515200000001‎. I ould like to point out that he was indef blocked in march.  rdunnalbatross  12:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out the delivery of the newsletter to the wrong editor. I strived so hard after the delivery of the last newsletter to make sure that these mistakes did not happen again, but I guess editor names change, people leave, and people get banned.

Thank you for your wonderful dilegence in catching this mistake. I am updating the list of editors now. Ikip

Wikipedia:Trading card game

The Wikipedia:Trading card game project needs your help in choosing the rules, which is essential for developing everything else of the game. Please consider !voting for a set of rules here. You may voice your opinion about a particular set here. Also, if you have a new idea on what the rules could be, you are encouraged to propose a new set of rules (instructions can be found at the !voting page). Thank you, ♠TomasBat 02:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are receiving this message because you signed your name at the project's list of members.

Wikipedia:Trading card game

We're wrapping up the democratic rules approval process. Please see Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 1:Rules/Rules approval‎ and review the ruleset. If no changes are made to it within 7 days, then we will proceed next week with the card nomination and approval process.

If you are no longer interested in helping out with the project, please remove your name from the participants list.

Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian ^(talk • contribs) 05:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User category proposed deletion

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]