|
User talk:Rami R/Archive 1
Welcome!Hello, Rami R, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place IsraelG'day Rami. I may re-re-edit the Israel page. While you have made it more neutral, my sentence was gives some reason for why peace is unsuccessful and shows while there is a disparity in force, neither side is a shrinking violet. Something like 'spectacularly unsuccessful', but descriptive. Also, the conflict is limited to Gaza and not the West Bank. Menswear (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
War in LebanonIsrael won the war in Lebanon. Whatever happened after the ceasefire was signed, IDF occupied significant part of South Lebanon. Israel therefore should be in the 1st column of the table. If you take look at other articles about wars, you'll see that the winner is almoust always in the 1st column, and loser is in the 2nd. Putting Israel in 2nd column implies that Hesbolla military defeated Israeli military, which is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keverich1 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Rabin page contribution deletionToday I added two references added to the Rabin page to balance the presentation. Kindly explain why you deleted them. Emesz 21:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Article talk page.I prefer content disputes in article Talk space. Italiavivi 20:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC) RabinBe aware that I did more changes except the external link. --TRFA 09:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
RE: Don't feed the trollsAye, I shouldn't, but that one had be particularily ticked off. I am many things, but anti-semitic I am most definatly not. Hell, my dad's family are ashkanazi. Narson 18:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC) why did you delete my improvements to Menachem Begin article?Rami R, Please explain why you deleted my improvements to Menachem Begin article, quoting reliable sources and including appropriate citations? Are you going to contest the undisputed historical fact that following Menachem Begin's involvement in the Deir Yassin massacre, many leading Jewish thinkers, philosophers and rabbis -- including Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, Sydney Hook -- published a letter in the New York Times calling Begin's party a fascist party, accusing him of terrorism, and warning the public to stay away from him? Moreover, are you going to contest the fact that many in the Yishuv considered Begin a terrorist? Please note that all my edits are supported by sources and citations, whereas the version of the article which I edited had absolutely no sources, and was not fit to be published in a reliable encyclopedia. Although it is hard to remain calm in the face of politically-motivated censorship, I will remain civil in my discourse and hope you can maintain civility too. Firstamend 15:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC) edits to Dem Primaries pageHi! I've made some changes to the image gallery on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_%28United_States%29_presidential_primaries%2C_2008 , and thought you might want to see if it's okay with you Enlightened Bystander (talk) 20:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC) "Attacks" on Obama's Talk PageI've been contributing for three or four years, and I'll thank you not to refer me to policy pages like I am a noob. I did not attack CltFn, I called him/her out for being intellectually dishonest. In future, please direct all correspondence with me to my talk page, at Scientz. And while we're at it, don't ever delete anything I've put on a talk page again. Edits to articles are fair game, but not in talk pages.Scientz (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
USS Liberty IncidentWhy did you remove my comments on the Talk Page and mark them as vandalism. You are pushing Jew POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.34.118 (talk) 19:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC) learned something new on WikipediaI learned that Obama is willing to invade Pakistan. Nobody else wants to so that's really important for an encyclopedia. Who knows? He could be right? See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=203674181&oldid=203673852 I saw the talk page then saw the history where you deleted someone's comment saying it's not sourced. Well, now it's sourced. I found an interesting article. Please restore your deletion. Thanks. 116.12.165.227 (talk) 04:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Menahem Begin's quoteWhy is that quote any worse than the other quotes? Since when does Wikipedia demand secondary and tertiary sources, if most of the material is completely unsourced?--Doom777 (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Rfb participation thanksHello, Rami. I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC) new sectionRami, Kindly contact me directly at furtiveadmirer@hotmail.com. I wrote to you on your home page in error. I do not wish to discuss your deletions of my Jonathan Pollard facts on this page. If you choose not to respond, kindly have your supervisor contact me with clarification of why you are so nasty and disrespectful??? Furtive admirer (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I didn't delete anything including the charlatan, Seymour Hersh's "sources and methods", which are definitely factually incorrect - just because it is published you allow the propaganda, most of which is written to sell magazines; so is the Margolis article on the Grabbe website which now does not exist, so it should be deleted. Everyone of those writers wrote opinion, not fact, and you allow them as sources. How hypocritical. You should go to law school and then you will be paid for your attempt to intimidate and impeach witnesses. I will not assist you, and your "uncivil" threats of blocking me only reveal your aggressive personality. Go find someone else to bully. You enjoy it a lot. I am going to email Dr. Morris Pollard, Jonathan's father, the link and let him correct the record. Perhaps his pen will not be rejected by you.... Furtive admirer (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC) p.s. the last sentence was to illustrate how omnipotent the government wants the public to continue to believe Pollard is; they tried him again and again with a negative media campaign with no factual basis for the character assassinations and continue to do so each time there is a consideration or movement towards his release....much like you!!! I sent my revisions to Carol Pollard, Jonathan's sister last night after responding to Rami's threats. I did not log on here to have such difficult interactions and verbal abuse. I thought this was a credible source; obviously, you can't handle the truth (Jack Nicholson). Carol's response is: "I wish you peace and thank you for such a nice job you did on the entry. XXX Carol" FYI: If you want verification of any of the additions I made, her email address is: <email deleted> I have also contacted Dr. Morris Pollard, Jonathan Pollard's father, and though he is in his mid-90's, I suggested he deal with you directly, and/or have author, Mark Shaw correct (see footnotes on Pollard Page) your errors with his sources. Obviously, you have serious issues here with writers and regretfully look at the glass half-full. I didn't realize how skeptical you are; you appear to alienate anyone with a triple digit IQ; it obviously reduces the quality and the integrity of your project, which now bears no weight in my ongoing acquisition of cultural literacy. My brother did warn me in advance about your treatment of contributors. Rami, it is obvious you did not realize i was a female. You probably would have behaved better. First impressions are lasting. My dad always said, "You can catch more flies with molasses than vinegar." This is definitely a waste of time and energy.... Furtive admirer (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Rami, i see u r hard at work on this site. i am happy it is important 2 u , but u really have 2 do more research: Pollard was in a ward for the criminally insane first (u deleted it) "Pleaded" is a syntactical error: Standard American English is "pled", both simple past tense, and past perfect tense (had pled). elaine zeitz began writing 2 jay (jonathan) in Israel 1 summer while she was there (she was a special education teacher in toronto and went 2 Israel 4 the summer). There were 2 prisoners she wrote 2 (pen pals )and she settled with jay. it is a safe relationship 4 her: he can neither reject her nor have sex with her, and she can claim they are married, and receive voluminous media attention focused on her alone. (if anything, it is a non-consummated common law marriage.) she never knew him before. he grew up in texas and south bend indiana, where his dad was an eminent professor at University of Notre Dame. Pollard went 2 Stamford and then Fletcher School of Diplomacy (Tufts University) before he landed his first job in naval intelligence. seems like you are wagging the dog, correcting and reorganizing rather than adding new facts and creating a clean, neat chronology. it appears as if you are fiercely protecting this site for some reason?? 2 many undos in 5 years: UNBELIEVABLE!! Furtive admirer (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC) Incident closed re Furtive AdmirerThe discussion at the administrator incident noticeboard regarding User:Furtive admirer has now been archived. In case you did not read the full discussion before archiving took place, you can do so here. If you have any comments about anything I said at the end of the discussion, please drop me a line on my talk page. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 10:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC) RfA thanks Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which closed successfully. I felt the process was a thorough review of my contributions and my demeanor, and I was very gratified to see how many editors took the time to really see what I'm about and how I can be of help to the project. As a result, some editors changed their views during the discussion, and most expressed specific, detailed points to indicate their opinion (whether it was A number of editors were concerned about my level of experience. I was purposeful in not waiting until a particular benchmark occurred before requesting adminship, because I feel - as many do - that adminship is not a reward and that each case is individual. It is true that I am not the most experienced editor around here, but I appreciate that people dug into my contributions enough to reach the conclusion that I seem to have a clue. Also, the best thing about this particular concern is that experience is something an editor - or administrator - can always get more of, and I'll continue doing that, just as I've been doing. (If I seem a little slow at it, feel free to slap me.) I am a strong believer in the concept that this project is all about the content, and I'm looking forward to contributing wherever I can. Please let me know if I can be of any help. In the meantime, I'm off to school... Thanks again! 17:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Yael "Yuli" Tamir You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 01011000 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC) AIVFor your recent report to AIV, the user had only a level three warning. Only report users who are currently vandalizing after a final warning. Thank you. لennavecia 13:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Celebrity draft dodgers vs."refuseniks"Shalom, Rami! I've added a response to your comment on the Refusal to serve in the Israeli military discussion page. I suggest that there's some serious confusion arising from the wording, so there are two issues I'd like you to address for the sake of clarity:
I'm describing these here for your consideration and (hopefully) action to revise them -- particularly the first point, which pertains to the further clarification I added. By the way, I hope I'm right that my linking to the Bar Refaeli page isn't a transgression of WP:BLP as her case is properly cited there, in contrast to the (rather contentious) wording in the deleted text initially posted by User:Zig-Zac. -- שלום וכל טוב, Deborahjay (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
reverting comments on talk page: Six day warYou reverted my comment at the talk page on the six-day war here. Rabin is listed as the commnader of the Israel army at the time of the conflict. I think my comment is relevant to the article. Please explain your revert on my user page here. Thanks—Fred114 20:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Ehud BarakTnx for your quick response w/ the fix for the Ehud Barak ref; sometimes i can't bear to look up the template docn. With a little luck, i'll be able to remember the perfectly logical url parameter. Happy editing to you.
Israeli legislative election, 2009: Opinion PollsHello. I am hoping we can come to a consensus as how to best expand and reform the Opinion Polls table on the Israeli legislative election, 2009 page. I am also hoping you can explain the comment "rv: serious WP:SYNTH issues and use of questionable sources (e.g. bhirot2009.co.il))" I spent considerable effort finding over 80 polls for this and sourcing this as best I could. While I understand some polls have better sources than others, I definitely don't understand a WP:SYNTH argument. There are no claims made in the table, just raw data. And I did not include only some polls as opposed to others; I included every one, most with 2-4 sources. Thanks, --Allstar86 (talk) 20:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Left blocPlease also keep in mind the official Knesset website mentions a left-wing - Arab bloc and a right-wing - religious bloc. The reason why it would be more accurate to write left-wing bloc over center-left is because the left-wing bloc (which is a more inclusive term) includes Meretz and Arab parties, which are not center-left. --Shamir1 (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC) HuggleYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. 20:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC) RfA Thanks
Shameless thankspam
FlyingToaster Barnstar 11:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Jayjg a POV editorWhy are you reverting edits like this one? He's barred from editing the topic because he's a POV editor - don't you want people to know about it and challenge him next time? Perhaps we'll find out if he accuses people of being anti-semitic too,that's theusual thing. 81.156.221.178 (talk) 12:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for moving my admin request to the proper spot. Billbrock (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.11.1 (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC) ZionismHi Rami, I am having a little argument on the Zionism page over the issue of "the protocols" and since you seem like an objective thinker and have edited the page I would be interested to hear your opinion. Telaviv1 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC) IDFHi Rami, why are you edit warring me re IDF etymology? I'm not anti Israel; I just want to make a valid contribution re the name IDF.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldfinger 93 (talk • contribs)
Please continue conversation
Thanks...Thanks hottie, for the update on my discussion contribution. I wondered what happened there. --A3RO (mailbox) 14:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC) RFA spam
Could We Talk about the Deletion of My Changes?Hi, Rami. When I first looked at the Yitzchak Rabin Assassination page, I noticed a few places where the previous editor(s) had used some very politically-charged terms, and had played down some aspects of the events while dwelling extensively on other aspects, again with a political message being the outcome. I noted the frequent notations to one particular book by Charles D. Smith as a source, and checked up on it using Google and Amazon. I found the book to give an (in my opinion) unbalanced view of the ongoing conflict, but others' opinions probably differ, so removing it entirely would be pointless. However, it did not seem right that the article should have been based so heavily on one book, so I decided to add a few points and to change some of the wording slightly, giving a less political slant to the page without destroying the story of the events. I found, however, that my edits were summarily undone by you, and I would like to have an opportunity to defend them here. I never deleted without substituting something in its place, and I have added quite a bit. I tried to stay out of controversial topics, except where the previous editor(s) had given one view already. Then, I simply presented the alternate view (or views) afterwards. The other views should not be taken as my own political leanings, I simply tried to present all the arguments together. In general, I tried to 'tone down' the article, rather than making it more inflammatory. I will freely admit that I am biased, as is every human on the planet... without exception. Bias is simply a name for our particular point of view. Without bias, we have no views on anything. Bias only becomes dangerous when we allow it to affect our reporting of events. I have tried to overcome my bias and present a balanced view of the Rabin assassination and its effects. If you dislke my phrasing, please leave a talkback and let me know what you think. If this is the wrong place to talk about it, we can move to the Rabin assassination talk page. Hoping to have a list of my changes for you shortly. Please don't ignore this (not that I'd suspect a nice Jewish boy like you of doing something like that). 66.227.183.99 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC) I swear, it wasn't meHi rami I've just pop up to read one of articles on wikipedia, when i get this message from you. The problem is IT WASN'T ME. I never heard about Gaydamek dude till now.
Is this vandalism was really sent from my comp (zombi terminal... I mean - is my comp is used by spammers or something)? Or is it provider, which gave me IP of some cyber-vandals? It's starting to be little scary, when I've visited wikipedia few months ago, i couldn't edit talk page because I was "banned". Any tips how to solve this mystery? Regards and sorry for my poor English M —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.51.28 (talk) 21:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for answer and take care :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.51.28 (talk) 22:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC) InterwikisThanks for the point! I realised it here, as well as in other language versions. I will know next time. ;) --Veron (talk) 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshopAs you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. ArbCom Election RFC courtesy noticeA request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. Manning (talk) 08:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
BoycottStart reading here. Cla68 (talk) 11:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC) My RfAHey Rami, and thanks for commenting in my RfA. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind clarifying a comment you made. I was wondering what exactly you think my priorities are if unideal? Thanks, Grsz11 16:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 11:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. GedUK 11:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Message added 14:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. GedUK 14:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Question about a vandal report from OctoberHelo Rami R. I saw this edit from October. You were requesting a range block of 166.205.0.0/16. Do you know if there is an official sock report? The fellow has come back. I was wondering what action I could take. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
