User talk:Raizen1984

Yayoi Wachi

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Yayoi Wachi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Project Sylpheed

Please read the guidelines and policies of this project. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate repository of information (WP:NOT). Neither does the WikiProject Video games recommend a full listing of staff and information (WP:VG/GL). As pointed out in the linked discussion on the article's talk page, concensus has been for the Infoboxes to only feature prominent staff members (namely those determined to be notable per Wikipedia's guideline on notability WP:N). Please revert your edits to abide the concensus and rules. I have also asked for administrator A Man In Black's opinion on your edits (User talk:A Man In Black#Request for comments). Jappalang (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So far, you have not bothered to discuss your changes. As stated, the concensus and rulings are for those staff who are notable (per Wikipedia's WP:N) to be in the Infobox. If you wish to change this, please bring up the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games since it is a project wide ruling. Jappalang (talk) 22:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the notability guidelines and the threads I have provided. The concensus is indeed for staff who have significant contributions; however, it is for staff who are notable (i.e. who have articles on Wikipedia that abides the WP:N rules). If the department comprises only non-notable staff, then basically the field should be empty. In this case, Nishi should be removed. Nakano, who has greater notability than the others (at least in reading his article here) has 9 contributions on the soundtrack, 6 of which are solo works, making his work on the soundtrack quite significant. Adding him would be inline with what has been pointed out. Personally, I am doubtful the three composers' articles here are truly notable (they need a lot more reliable third-parties to cover articles on them) and they might not survive an AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion), but that is not my concern. Jappalang (talk) 07:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Video game composers

You seem to be quite knowledgeable in the field of video game music. It's good to see someone correcting the errors that I tend to miss. Keep up the good work. The Prince (talk) 19:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raizen1984 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jappalang (talk) 00:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for edit warring and sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 19:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raizen1984, which was confirmed in part by CheckUser. MuZemike 19:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Raizen1984! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 18 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Yayoi Wachi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yayoi Wachi

The article Yayoi Wachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 21:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please do not re-add thet material about being laid off without also adding a reliable source. The one you noted on my talk page is not suitable, as it title of "02 Mar 2010 - Rumour: Square Enix Axes Music Staff" indicates. Kevin (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Keiji Kawamori

An article that you have been involved in editing, Keiji Kawamori, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keiji Kawamori. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Raizen1984. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Raizen1984. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Nintendo, Nintendo Research & Development 1, Intelligent Systems developed Warios woods not tec 2600:8803:590C:CB00:5948:9E27:389:4D54 (talk) 16:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TEC was a developer formed from an alliance between Nintendo and Intelligent Systems. They are listed as a developer on Wario's Woods in the US Copyright Database, which I sourced. Raizen1984 (talk) 16:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Show more proof of this besides this one website, or else we’re going to undo your edits about this STB (talk) 02:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8803:590C:CB00:5948:9E27:389:4D54 (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IceWelder. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IceWelder [✉] 21:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello! I'm Skyshifter. Your recent edit(s) to the page Yoshi's Safari appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skyshifter ^talk 01:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. Please familiarize yourself with WP:USERG. You keep adding/using sources like Reddit and Twitter. They're not considered acceptable here, and your additions will continue to be removed/rejected as long as you keep trying to use them.

Please note that I'm not even arguing that you're necessarily wrong, just that you keep trying to use invalid sources to prove things, and that won't work.

Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 15:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]