This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rahim231. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hello, Rahim231!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – dudhhrtalkcontribssheher14:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Remove the google search result page link as that is unreliable. Battle section needs sourcing and also Aftermath section which is entirely unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Jassar Bridge (1965) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page DealNews, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:
Thanks for adding sources - unfortunately, the "aftermath" section is still unsourced, and the sources added in the battle section are either not reliable (the obituary) or don't verify the content of the paragraph. Please improve this with better sources before resubmitting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Jassar Bridge (1965) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello! Thank you for your contributions and interest in editing Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted an edit you made to U.N.C.L.E. because it introduced links that did not aid readers in understanding the article. For instance, you know what the United States is, without a link to United States. In line with that principle, per our Manual of Style, we do not link to things that a reader is almost certain to be familiar with. Best, HouseBlastertalk19:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 2023 Balochistan Security Checkpoint Attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello Rahim231! Your additions to 1947 Operation datta khel have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi respected user Materialscientist, learned that I did the mistake of removing the belligerent. Now that i have found my mistake i would try not to repeat it again and edit the page and add citations to the infobox results. Rahim231 (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Operation Searchlight, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Dear user i couldnt figure out what templates which were removed, might've been by mistake or so, it would be a kind gesture if you would let me know intead of reporting me. Rahim231 (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You are clearly ignoring edit summaries, comments on the talk page and continue to add in material that does not meet the article inclusion criteria. This needs to stop. If you continue to add material that does not meet the article inclusion criteria - a list of wars - no incidents, or battles, but wars - you may be block from editing. // Timothy :: talk19:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Examples:
This is not a war [4]. No sources indicate this was a war. This was a fight against insurgents, not a war.
This is not a war [5]. No sources indicate this was a war.
This is not a war [6]. No sources indicate this was a war.
This is not a war [7]. No sources indicate this was a war.
This is not a war [8]. No sources indicate this was a war.
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello Rahim231 and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hunza–Nagar Campaign, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and Lashkar.
I wanted to mention that Pakistan provided diplomatic support to Azerbaijan during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh war, and it mentions as such in the Armenia-Pakistan relations page, with sources. It's worth mentioning.
Since the Korean war (where Pakistan provided mostly diplomatic aid) was added to the list, I assume the same can be done for the Second Nagorno-Karabakh war. I'd edit it myself, but I'm not too experienced with wikipedia.
Hi there, yes it is true that pakistan provided diplomatic support but also to noted the financial support in korean war although it denied to send troops, but the other form of support was such that it cannot be ignored.
However for Second nargono-karbakh war, there is all sorts of diplomatic support but there is no clear statement by pakistani military or political leadership for pakistani military involvement or arms sales, instead there are allegations or claims for pakistani support by armenian prime minister and some journalists claiming it with videos of JF-17 [9] The Government has rejected claims of any military support for the time. [10][11]
If you have any valuable sources for pakistani support kindly mention it here in Talk:Second Nagorno-Karabakh War to discuss the involvement with other editors and then after with agreement Pakistan can be added as a beligerent and then later in the war list.
if you need help with editing you can fee free to ask questions here on Wikipedia:Teahouse.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of wars involving the United States into List of wars involving Pakistan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
No, that is not right. The attribution is done via an edit summary at the destination article at the time you copy the content. If you forget, please do it in a subsequent edit summary. — Diannaa (talk) 12:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Lakki Marwat operation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nice on your new article. I would recommend including it in appropriate Wikiprojects, and adding appropriate categories.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have reassessed the article as B class. However, it would be easier for the reader to follow if you change "opposing forces" and "enemy" to Indian forces and Pakistani forces as appropriate. I appreciate your effort to vary the term occasionally but it makes it more difficult to keep track of the parties. The reader would also have to keep track of which units belonged to each army in those cases. Thanks for the comprehensive article. Donner60 (talk) 07:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the article, Sure i will change it shortly to Indian forces instead of enenmy or opposing forces. Rahim231 (talk) 06:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Mianwali air base attack
Someone may assess this for military history before I do. I tend to think this is only within the scope of the other projects listed on the talk page. I will look into this further and make a few inquiries before I decide. As I noted, someone else may assess it first. If they are a coordinator or experienced user, I will not look at it further. I only leave you this message because I have ended up doing many of the assessments recently. I assessed one of your articles a few days ago. I try to be as prompt as I can but this one could be delayed for a short time if I do it. Thanks for your work in this area. Donner60 (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I have left this message on the assessment talk page: After a few copy edits to the last section and deletion of the Aviation project and Aviation task force, I have assessed the article as B class, as I note on the assessment page. However, I will give further consideration and pose the question to coordinators as to whether this is really a military history subject or should only be under Crime and Terrorism projects (without changing the B class rating).
Also your signature appears to be placed manually without links to this talk page. Please use 4 tildes as your signature so that it is properly displayed. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 07:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for asessesing the article, what i know is that this attack is part of the ongiong insurgency in Kpk and Operation Radd-ul-Fasaad in which the militants affliated to the TTP conducted these attacks, by considering that it does place it in military section.
Your edit to Battle of Pandu has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
You have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license, and helps prevent mistakes such as mine. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from one Wikipedia article to another in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 21:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Would you help in List of wars involving Pakistan
Assalamualaikum brother,I don't know how to add in list format, so I'm seeking help from you some wars not mentioned in the list include
Walikum-musalam brother, no worries im trying my best to add wars to the list and then get its quality assessed. there are alot of wars which aren't included just like the dhofar war in which Pakistan helped Oman. I will add these wars soon with citations.
Also another thing i have seen your recent edits and pages you have created and i commend your contributions, it would be great if you complete the article and raise their quality. thanks Rahim231 (talk) 15:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
@Rahim231 Brother assalamualaikum some more wars involving Pakistan are first JVP insurrection, Rohingya conflict, second JVP insurrection, second Libyan civil war, first and second MQM insurrections M Waleed (talk) 16:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The thing is actually that there are alot of conflicts and adding them to the war list takes some time and research, And i have been studying these wars such as the Sri-lankan and Afghan civil wars. I will slowly add these to avoid mistakes. Also in addition to my exams coming up i will be less active but still i will add some wars before i become less active for 2 weeks. Thanks for pointing these wars out, Although i dont think MQM insurrection would be a war, its page is not not much developed and given attention, it does not even contain a infobox. Rahim231 (talk) 04:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Brother assalamualaikum,actually MQM insurrection has the following articles
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Hello, Rahim231. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sack of Bhatner fort (1398), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Rahim231. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Jassar Bridge (1965), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sack of Bhatner fort (1398) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
