|
User talk:Rahim231
Contentious topics - infoboxes
Your contributed article, Rawalakot Rebellion
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rawalakot Rebellion. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 1947 Poonch rebellion. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 1947 Poonch rebellion. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Rahim231. Thank you for your work on Battle of Rawalakot. Another editor, GreenLipstickLesbian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Battle of Rawalakot assessmentI am not sure whether Hawkeye7 finished this assessment. In any event, I think the lede (introduction) is too short. Please summarize the main points of the battle in a paragraph or two in the beginning. Usually, a very short introduction is viewed as inconsistent with the complete content guideline, which is in the text about B class but is not specifically set out in the five requirements. Also, the last two sentences of the last paragraph in the aftermath section need a citation. One will be enough if both points are covered in it, as I am sure you know. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Thorgo has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Action at Tsari has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Utopes (talk / cont) 12:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Action at TsariHi Rahim: I need to review this article before I can confirm the bot assessment and contest entry end date assessment mainly because of the template at the top. However, coordinators review bot assessments monthly (or sooner if necessary) in any case. I think that this is likely a minor matter and the article can be reassessed as B, if it needs to be temporarily kept at a lower level. That may require the contest entry to be split between August and September. I have been short of time in part because of numerous requests for B class review. I will get to this as soon as I can. If the template is due to minor sentence structure issues, I will change it. If it appears to be something else, I will let you know what I think needs to be added or changed. In the meantime, I have marked the contest entry as pending review. Sorry for the delay. Donner60 (talk) 01:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) Great workAssalamu Alaikum, I wanted to say your work is very good; keep up the great work! Also, can you please try to fix my articles if they have any issues, mainly Battle of Chumb (1965). Thanks Pilot From Pakistan (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of ThorgoHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Thorgo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Battle of ThorgoThe article Battle of Thorgo you nominated as a good article has failed Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Chunj has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! 48JCL 17:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Battle of ChunjHi there Rahim, I edited the battlebox on the Battle of Chunj using some research that I did prior, if anything looks wrong, or you need a battlebox made, feel free to contact me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret.Sayyid (talk • contribs) 09:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Thorgo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Battle of Chunj commandersSalaam again, I wrote an article for Major Alan Macfarlane Sloan and I linked it to the Battle of Chunj article, let me know if you want anything else changed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secret.Sayyid (talk • contribs) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the yearNominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awardsVoting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Battle of ThorgoI do not want to discourage you from working on new articles. I will continue to reviewing articles for B class in much the same way as I have been doing with respect to capitalizations and sentence structure, in particular. I can only suggest to you any substantive changes that I think you need to get or keep a B class assessment and perhaps a few points that could be expanded or clarified. I cannot write these additions or any numerous or large changes myself for reasons that I stated about sources, time, etc. More to the point, the GA assessment of this articles shows I cannot anticipate everything some GA assessors may require. And I do not have time or ability to work on meeting those requirements - other than making suggestions or recommendations, or to state why I think the requirements have been met by your later changes, which you may be able to discuss with the assessors. I noted as to this article that your further work and a little more work on a few facts should meet those requirements. Separately, as to reassessments, however, once assessors have closed assessment requests, they are only going to reassess based on a new request. At most, if you ping them, they might comment on your later additions but you probably need to start the GA process over if you wish to try that again. Donner60 (talk) 06:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
