en User talk:RJHall

This user may have left Wikipedia. RJHall has not edited Wikipedia since 5 December 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Oh dear, I just noticed this - sad, but look after yourself and keep happy. If you ever do decide to come back, we'll be here, cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Come Back RJH

RJH lives on. ElliottBelardo (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for NGC 6752

On 27 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article NGC 6752, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that NGC 6752, containing 100,000 stars, is the third brightest globular cluster in the sky? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NGC 6752. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 12:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Million Awards

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Earth (estimated annual readership: 2,632,000) and Jupiter (estimated annual readership: 1,762,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment--very few editors have earned one of these, much less two-- and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Earth to Featured Article status.

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Jupiter to Featured Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it!

I'm sorry to see you've decided to retire, but whether you someday choose to return or not, thanks for the millions of readers your work has helped, and will continue to help. Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bummer that you left

maybe good in a way for you (this site can be stressful). bad for the site though. really liked your contributions and interactions. if you can participate in fluorine's formal peer review, appreciate.71.127.137.171 (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

space exploration
Thank you for quality articles on astronomy and its history, such as History of Mars observation, and for pointing out the Seven Deadly Stereotypes, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (9 October 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 359th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 359 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today's Epsilon Eridani! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More reasons to keep

Hello RJHall, long time ago you have expressed your views on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_dictators. Now I have improved the related articles and lists with systematic findings based on published reliable sources from history and political science. However, two of them are currently submitted to Afds (by a Chinese Wikipedian who in the past has personally attacked me for my contribution to politics-related articles in Chinese Wikipedia). Your comments are welcome and appreciated: (1) Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_dictatorships (2)Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_modern_dictators_in_Latin_America. Thanks.--_{(comparingChinese Wikipedia vs Baidu Baike by hanteng)} 15:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lunar crater references

Template:Lunar crater references has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retirement

Hi,
I just noticed your departure. I will not dare adding my voice to those asking someone who's created {{Inline tags}} and done so much more for the project to return. I entirely respect your decision. If I may ask you for an ultimate favor, could you give us an idea of the reasons behind your decision?

Thank you very much --Chealer (talk) 04:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's natural to take a vacation, but hope to see you back one day, Mr Hall - at the place where the job is never finished. JMK (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! Same here, you are missed. BOZ (talk) 23:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks folks

Thank you for all your kind words.

The reason I departed is that I had just grown too frustrated about having to interact with hard-headed individuals regarding the minutia of page content and layout. I'd spent much time getting pages just so--exactly according to the MoS, only to have it switched around with useful information removed. Rather than spending endless time futilely battling over such details and engaging in what proved to be pointless debates, I retired.

Anyway, I've said my piece. At present I have a new and much more rewarding hobby in 3D modeling, so rarely spend time here any more. Wikipedia remains a useful source of information though, and for that I'm thankful. Good luck with your projects, and may you have more patience with narrow-minded people than I did. RJH (talk) 02:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that sounds fun - good luck with the hobby! Been buffing astronomy articles in your absence.....but take care of yourself. Leisure time is too valuable to waste if not unwinding and enjoying....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3D modeling is awesome; I've used Autodesk Maya in the past to make some cool stuff and it's always been fun... I'd say the reason I contribute here is because I find it to be a more productive and more rewarding use of my free time than watching random YouTube videos and the like, but if it ever stopped becoming fun, I wouldn't think twice about quitting. You gotta enjoy life! StringTheory11 (t • c) 15:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :)

Epsilon Eridani scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Epsilon Eridani article has been scheduled as today's featured article for February 15, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 15, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Feb 14 to avoid clash with an FP, sorry Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.

	Atoms.
	I'm Sorry. Blake Is Here (talk) 17:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA Review for Ceres

I have nominated Ceres (dwarf planet) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 20:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

FAR of Earth

I have nominated Earth for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your call has been forwarded to an automated voice messaging system. Le Panini (^{Talk to}_me?) 19:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jupiter Featured article review

I have nominated Jupiter for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We miss you. Today we enjoy Earth, on Earth Day. I run a little celebration on my talk, including Psalm 115. Enjoy what you do! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We thank you today for Globular cluster, introduced in 2006: "This is a significant general topic within the discipline of astronomy." You and your work are remembered! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Mars

I have nominated Mars for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 13:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Save Award for Mars

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Mars/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Supernova

I have nominated Supernova for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. BloatedBun (talk) 10:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, and all who helped with the review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Globular cluster scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Globular cluster article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 10, 2022. July 1 has a date-linked TFA already. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 10, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Nature

Nature has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boeing Aircraft Holding Company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Boeing Aircraft Holding Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickyCourtney (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Barnard's star in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Barnard's star in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Barnard's star in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"82 Eridani in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 82 Eridani in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § 82 Eridani in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Delta Pavonis in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Delta Pavonis in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Delta Pavonis in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Lalande 21185 in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lalande 21185 in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Lalande 21185 in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 21:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Delta Sagittarii in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Delta Sagittarii in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Delta Sagittarii in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 21:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Groombridge 1618 in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Groombridge 1618 in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Groombridge 1618 in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Epsilon Pegasi in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Epsilon Pegasi in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Epsilon Pegasi in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Beta Librae in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Beta Librae in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Beta Librae in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 21:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Gamma Draconis in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gamma Draconis in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Gamma Draconis in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Nature

Nature has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IC 4651 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IC 4651 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC 4651 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sir MemeGod  15:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Collinder 140 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collinder 140 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collinder 140 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sir MemeGod  17:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]