|
User talk:RJFF/Archive
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Yongyuth Wichaidit. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)  The article Trairong Suwankiri has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC) The article Sanan Kachornprasart has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC) MPLAHello RJFF: I have ben studying the MPLA since about 1970, and seen its ideological changes over time. In the 1950s/1960s, it started off with a nationalist ideology that was not very precise. Part of its leadership then absorbed "leftist" ideas (and/or rethoric) which in the 1960s/early 1970s were used as instruments for obtaining international support. The need for international support increased sharply during the decolonization conflict of 1974/75, and the discourse became more and more marxist. At the 1977 party congress marxism-leninism was adopted as the official doctrine - with the understanding, that Angola should try to evolve in the direction of what this doctrine defined as the "socialist" model; the "communist" model was explicitly refused. During the first post-colonial period, the MPLA established a regime inspired by the East European ones, but the attempts at implementing the "socialist" model were less than convincing and often frankly halfhearted. In 1990/91 the MPLA abandoned marxism-leninism at yet another party congress. Its joining the Socialist International symbolically expressed its rejection of marxist-leninist utopias - but did not (repeat: not) imply any option for a non-marxist model of socialism, certainly not for any brand of "African socialism". During the 1990s/2000s, the party's discourse and practice have been a mixture of "social democracy" and "neo-liberalism" (not to be confounded neither with the British nor with the US-American common understanding of "liberal"). If you told people in Angola today that the MPLA was socialist, the reaction would most probably be a grin or a shrug. Now, the info-box in the article has, of course, the reflect the contemporary situation, and do away with labels that may have been more or less appropriate in the past. Agreed? Aflis (talk) 22:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC) Your new article European Alliance for FreedomHi RJFF! I saw your article European Alliance for Freedom in the New Articles list. However, there's some holes that might need filling: The contents under the section "Criticisms" is confusing, I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're trying to say. It would be great if you could also help improve Alliance of European National Movements. As you know, there’s always room for more work to make articles even better.Kind regards and happy editing! Jipinghe (talk) 21:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Broken image due to use of Find LinkHi. This edit happened to break the image link. You might want to be a bit more careful when using the tool, thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 03:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC) August 2011 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Freedom (German political party). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 07:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Humala Cabinet A tag has been placed on Template:Humala Cabinet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: OR and unsourced
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lihaas (talk) 21:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC) RE: Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011ITS COnvention on election articles of which ive been editing for some more than a year now (most of them the primary editor). The editor didnt explain his edit as i said when undoing it. please see the talk page. for hwhich isaid and asked for consensus as oppsoed to the other editor who dint explain and wrote on the bottom of another talk section that couldnt gain consensusLihaas (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Kyrgyz electionDiscuss on the talk page , like id did for your tunisia election bit, if you dont do it and get consensus theres not chance of posting it whithout it being vandalism and warring. (as per your last rvt you did not see the ta;lk page)Lihaas (talk) 07:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC) Hamadi JebaliHello. I have made an amendment to the edit of mine you cancelled regarding the above subject. Though rather than restoring my original, I added an extra note to state that Tunisia had been a part of France at the time. The reason I and many other editors do this is because we observe historical accuracy ESPECIALLY where sovereign nations are concerned. Of course, there is no requirement to always state country, and often England or Wales suffice, just as might the U.S. state of Florida. With countries however, we often encounter jingoist editors whose only wish is to rewrite history and state that a person born in the Armenian SSR in the Soviet Union was actually born in Armenia. I appreciate the extant link to the French protectorate though to the reader, this alone is not sufficient and may even cause head-scratching once the person clicks on the link expecting to open Tunisia. I am normally easy on this sort of thing and I don't insist upon one usage over another, but somehow and somewhere the points need to be established: you can say Bitola, Republic of Macedonia (then Bitolj, Kingdom of Yugoslavia) or the opposite, Bitolj, Kingdom of Yugoslavia (now Bitola, Macedonia) and the like. Examples here and again. If you believe the existing piece needs changing, let me know your thoughts. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 22:22, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
UKIP articleHi. I'm not editing the article because of the shade of Purple. I'm editing it because there are significant problems with the image rendering which have not been addressed. Please see what it looks like to me : File:Screen shot 2011-11-14 at 21.29.42.png --Xijky (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 3rrStop edit warring, The Party for freedom article already states it is anti-islam, therefore, no to repeat it. If you revert again, i will go to a notticeboard. Pass a Method talk 15:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Talkback You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. GreyHood Talk 16:31, 19 November 2011 (UTC) SockTehre are a lot of single IP edits with no history cropping up on articles you've edited. Very strange. I have a feeling you know who's doing this. Alexandre8 (talk) 17:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
2011 Parliamentary Elections in EgyptHello RJFF This is concerning the Egyptian parliamentary election, 2011–2012 page. Please note that the Freedom and Justice Party and the Nour party were running as block coalitions, the Democratic Alliance and the Alliance for Egypt, respectively. Each of these two parties represents around 80% of the coalition nominees, but still, the number of votes (and seats) doesn't reflect just these two parties, but rather the coalition. Now a possible confusion may be that the cited source[1] , from "Jadaliyya", states "FJP" and "Nour", and not Democratic Alliance or FJP-led coalition. But Jadaliyya itself, on its results page, states explicitly[2] :
Keeping the results in the table as FJP getting 3,565,092 votes (36.6%), which will soon be translated into seats, is misleading. Basically because other parties within the Democratic Alliance grabbed seats too. Currently they are lumped in with the FJP (Same story for al nour). I noticed that other persons tried to address this issue before and after my attempt, and that you reverted all these attempts. Several references and explanations were added and then undone. What do you suggest to be done to clarify this issue? all the best Hous21 (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
El-Ghad PartyHello RJFF I am fine with the footnotes. The fielded lists were definitely lists for the coalition, since I have seen multiple names of Alliance candidates on the FJP lists. Jadaliyya reported several. Now the lists MAY have been registered under FJP name, I am getting conflicted resource about that. As for the El-Ghad party. There are two factions in the El-Ghad party, both of which claim the party title and insignia. There is current legal battles between them. One of these factions, headed by Ayman Nour, joined the FJP-led coalition and has gotten newly elected MPs under the Democratic Alliance umbrella. The other faction, headed by Moussa Moustafa Moussa, ran in independent list. So when you saw "el-ghad" party list, it is the Moussa faction that is NOT running with the Democratic Alliance. The Nour-faction results are reported within the FJP figures. Now the english El-Ghad wiki is misleading, because BOTH factions link to it. Hence the confusion. The arabic version is clearer, with two different wiki pages for the two factions of the El-Ghad all the best Hous21 (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hous21 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. In Graduate Institute of International Studies, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page HEI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC) Janša's populismHey! It seems we have a slight disagreement, I suggest we try to solve it here. I've read C. Nation's article; unfortunately, I cannot access Rizman's (but I'm familiar with his arguments from his Slovenian texts). In his (rather short and not particularly analytical) article, Nation quotes Rizman in his assessment of Janša. Is it also the other way around, that Rizman quotes Nation? In this case, it's a strange case of cross-reference, because it doesn't seem to me that Nation's argument is based on independent research (he would probably need at least the linguistic expertise, don't you think?): it's a comparative & descriptive article, and in the section on Slovenia, his only analysis is based on Rizman's insight. Now, although I think it's very important to mention these assessments & critiques (in Rizman's case, it's more of a political critique than a neutral assessment due to his own civic engagement), I don't think we should use them at face value and use them as neutral qualifiers. I'm also not happy at all to see Rizman's assessment all over the article: I don't want in any way to downgrade his judgement, but we cannot have the opinion/assessment of one single critic quoted on all the issues linked to Janša's political career. One could ask then why not to do the same with Žižek's assessments or Frane Adam? This is not an article on Janša, not on Janša and whatever Rizman thinks of him. See where I'm going? On the other hand, I think his opinion is important enough to be quoted, but either in a separate paragraph in the text or we can open another section (Critiques of Janša or Assessments of Janša), where we insert his critic's views. Anyway, thanks for the contributions, they're very valuable. If you want to continue the discussion, I suggest you leave a msg on my talk page. Cheers, Viator slovenicus (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
ANI noticeJust a quick note to inform you that a user you have had recent contact with is currently under discussion at ANI here. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Andaman sea bordering ThailandIf you place the Andaman sea as bordering to the west of Thailand, and also to the southwest, is it then also not to northwest of Thailand seeing that it is also northwest of Southern Thailand? - Takeaway (talk) 18:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Isn't your assertion that "every sources uses" "UK Independence Party" a bit odd given how the lead reads? --Nlu (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC) The listEritrea may not be communist, but according to the CIA they do have a "command economy" - are they anti-capitalist?? --TIAYN (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
RE: ENGVARnot sure how its not consistent, i think it is. ENGVAR doesnt call for 1 set across the board it explicitly notes that the variation is per the country of the article. European articles have more than once used the English spelling as that's the closest nom, and that as the UK are in the EU the covnention is to use that seplling where the USA is not concerned. (in Latam, hjowever, a case for the US spellign could be made). Ditto in India to use their variation (in this case with due wikilink to clarify)(Lihaas (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)).
Colors for Egyptian PartiesHello and thank you for correcting the changes I made to the colors of Egypt's parties. I initially intended to color them based on political affiliation, but I now understand that you're coloring them based on their logo color. I will try to give exact colors to each party based on their logos, and I would appreciate your help with keeping an eye on the changes I make and letting me know if you disagree with any of it, Thanks again, — Preceding unsigned comment added by B for Bandetta (talk • contribs) 17:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
OK to mention a candidate's race – but not sexual orientation?Hi! Yeah, I'm not indicating that Haavisto being gay would have any possible effect on his policies (at least in Finnish context), but could you please tell me why you don't delete from the 2008 US presidential election page the passage which says that Barack Obama is the first African American (or at least half African American) to have been elected a US president? -- Frous (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Source of Egyptian election resultsYou need to state clearly whether the voting figures you have posted come from the Election Commission website or from the Jadaliyyah website, because there are substantial differences between them, notably for Cairo I and Sawhag I and II. Curiously, Jadaliyyha's figures seem more credible, but there's no indication of what source Jadaliyyah has used to get these figures. Perhaps you can clarify this, and also why no figures at all exist for the constituency voting. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 10:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Thanks. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC) ThanksThanks for helping edit Next Israeli legislative election--Metallurgist (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Democratic PartyHi first i must say to you its true what you said but there is little problem. Its true that this Democratic Party in Serbia was in fact not founded in 1989 it was only Renewal of work because one party system of SFRY banned all party form that system. How i see connection, first since it was banned by the communist regime she continue work illegal. 1989 after collapse of one party system 13 intellectuals with help of old members of that banned party they help renewal assembly in witch they said that they would continue work of former Democratic Party. In 1989. and even in 1990 Yugoslavia was still existed, so renewal of work was connected for Yugoslavia not for the Serbia. We all know that Yugoslavia collapsed in 1991. by that time Democratic Party was re-established again full work on political map of Yugoslavia. That's all the facts that prove that was connection with Democratic Party form Yugoslavia, party wasn't founded in 1989 but in 1919. You can see that this party is legal successor of Democratic Party form Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Its not there fault that they get banned in 1948, otherwise we wouldn't talk about this. I add news paper and write section that proves that this party roots are in 1919. This man Desimir Tošić is proof of this claim. He was member of Democratic Party of Yugoslavia, and he get involved in re-establish Democratic Party (SFR Yugoslavia) in 1989. Snake bgd 18:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I will initiate discussion of merging these 2 articles in one, thanks again. Snake bgd 11:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC) There is a book thats write its called History of Democratic party 1919-2009. I cant find on internet. But its published. Snake bgd 12:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Here it is book in 4 parts. Snake bgd 12:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Yes that's it. About party but we can keep 2 articles, i only to mentioned that roots are in party in Kingdom of Yugoslavia. In the beginning of articles.Snake bgd 12:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Thaksin ShinawatraThanks for correcting my error, I was just doing some disambiguating on the link "Thai" and selected "people" as the most appropriate one without reading about his Chinese heritage. Apologies. danno 00:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC) Civic PlatformConcerning this [4].
Why then did you remove a referenced claim? Tymek (talk) 04:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Korean partiesWith all the changes in Korean political parties, could you maybe also update {{Parties in the South Korean National Assembly}}? Thanks! —Nightstallion 16:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Insurgency in the AzawadKindly discus this first. See Tuareg rebellions any of which could have the same name (and should do so)Lihaas (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Message by Spartacus MaratRJFF. This controversy has happened with Jobbik in the past. The controversy ended without including the ideology "Fascism" in the ideology template. The reason was that the party itself doesn't recognize these allegations. And here we are that a party is self-proclaimed National Socialist and we can't accept this characterization. I don't think it's sound at all. It's not something complementary, that's what happens with all the parties, we include the ideologies they give themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartacus Marat (talk • contribs) where?Who are the "users" who disagreed and where did they disagree? --B for Bandetta (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Then you need to do this with every single party. Otherwise everyone is using the sources they prefer. they didn't gave themselves a complementary, so to be considered a POV. The National Socialism tag stays. Good day to youo you. --B for Bandetta (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[1] [2] [3] [4] I talk of consesus when I see nobody objecting to what I say in the discussion section on the talk page. After all, you were the one who first told me to discuss things on the talk page when I first joined Wikipedia. Anyway, I will ask for the input of more users on this. --B for Bandetta (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Russian Presidential electionI have tried several times to delete the unrealistic so-called poll in the Russian presidential election 1/21-1/25 by the polling organization "superjob". This poll is so out of line with all other polls, it seems to me to be not in the category of information but political propaganda. Here is a reason for my deletions: for instance try this poll :http://www.redorbit.com/news/entertainment/1112462129/poll_shows_putin_retains_support_of_majority_of_russian_voters/ or even the poll by the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16750990 how did Prokhorov jump from 3% in BBC to 21% in the so-called poll? Answer this and I will consider your persistent rejection of my edits to be legitimate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwali6084 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC) In your post to my page you did not answer any of my concerns. Here are my concerns: (please answer them) (1) For a scientific article to be valid, it must be peer-reviewed. Similarly, if a poll is wildly distorted compared to other polls, a valid conclusion is that this one poll is off, not all the other words. In other words, what evidence do you find that the BBC poll is invalid? Why do you not explain how this poll represents reality better than the articles that I cited? it is you who are under the obligation to prove that your judgment of the BBC poll being invalid and irrelevant is the correct one. It is likely that you do not speak Russian and are not an expert on Russian politics (neither am I, for that matter). So how dare you invalidate the BBC and The Russian Public Opinion Research Center? Please explain you are qualified to do this. (2) To resort to form critique is not helpful. Stick to the issue. The issue is your claim that the superjob polls invalidates and renders irrelevant polls by the BBC and the Russian Public Opinion Research Center. You cannot defend this claim, so you resort to name-calling, form critiques, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwali6084 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC) The principle difference between our positions is that I relate this unusual poll to other events and trends where as you do not; sure, if one poll is off compared to other polls, it is irrelevant and will be discarded by the unbiased observer, and thus is not a cause for concern; moreover, in most cases, unless a polling organization is specifically proven to engage in fraudulent conduct, it is reasonable to assume that there is nothing wrong with their methodology, even if it differs widely from other polls with more standard sources. I accept this position if the issue is only this one poll in this one article. But to view this poll in isolation "scientifically" is both impossible and inappropriate. The fact is that wikipedia is a respected and trusted source of information, more respected and trusted than the news media or then blogs or commentary, as well as it should be. So, because of this, in a time of campaign season, with promotions and claims and counterclaims and uses of fronts it is extremely naive or even conniving to treat such an unusual poll as "fact unless proven fraudulent." It is doubly more suspect when considers that the candidate in question whose poll numbers are 6 times more than normal is a billionaire running without support of any political party, with no formal organizational support. You ignore these facts and context in a pose of objectivity and dedication to the letter of wikipedia law. Rather, the appropriate standard to use is "reasonably credible." And it is not reasonable nor credible to suspect that a poll that differs so widely from its respected peers is legitimate, especially under the circumstances of a campaign season as detailed above, where indeed, perceptions do affect outcome, and wikipedia is treated as unbiased when compared to other sources of information. I think that your rejection of the context of the issue in considering reasonableness is unjustified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwali6084 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC) I included some other VSCIOM polls - my conclusion is - my goodness Prokhorov was flying high for a substantial fraction of the day if that poll is equal to the other ones! Alas, the other wikipedia verified polls indicate otherwise. Thanks for the wikipedia tips and regards - I hope that I singed this right Mwali6084 (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion (Peru)Do you have a source for [v http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ministry_of_Development_and_Social_Inclusion_(Peru)&diff=472791939&oldid=454493665 this]?Lihaas (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC) FoEDo you actually read what you revert? Just asking ... --78.53.37.183 (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the warning. I reckon the phrase is: Look before you leap! Kind regards, --78.53.37.183 (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Sure, remove the Mises institute material from the article Right-wing socialismSure, remove the Mises Institute material. Right-wing socialism has existed however with Metternich's "conservative socialism" and Spengler's "Prussian socialism" (Spengler was a leading member of the Conservative Revolutionary movement. It is known that Hitler in public and private despised capitalism because he viewed it as being run by a Jewish-led rentier class, and he personally favoured a mercantilist economy. At the same time he was Machiavellian, and knew he needed support of big industry to prepare Germany for war. Beyond this, for Hitler it is hard to say much about the authenticity of his views on socialism - it is well known in retrospect that the man was psychotic and had an irrational toss salad of beliefs - for instance he sought to accommodate social Darwinism and anti-Semitism with Christianity in what he called Positive Christianity.--R-41 (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Perhaps a "conservative socialism" article should be created - especially for Metternich's viewsHow about a Conservative socialism or Conservative socialism (Metternich) article for Klemens von Metternich's open support of a "conservative socialism".--R-41 (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC) There's an amendment to the RM proposal here. Comments are invited; what do you think? Moonraker12 (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Aubrey (singer)hi, can you help me. I discovered that there had been a singer on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxm8T72Y84E Aubrey, with a music video New Day. I'm not sure whether she / song is notable enough (like internet phenomenon / Child singer) an article, or if she is notable enough to be mentioned in the article about the name Aubrey. Thank you in advance. 109.232.72.49 (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC) +autopatroller +rollbackAdded permissions for you on request -- Samir 18:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Ashrf1979 (talk) 22:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Where are you from
Edit-warring Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. . Adel (talk) 23:21, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Bahrani peopleConsidering the lengthy back and forth discussion between just 2 people at Talk:Bahrani people, you might find the Dispute resolution process of Third opinion a helpful one to try if you feel this is failing to reach a conclusion. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thai nameSure do need that template! "Ms. Shinawatra" is flat wrong and should never be used except when necessary to emphasize that it is a Thai no-no. "Yingluck" is acceptable in an English language article after full name has been stated, though Thai nearly always prefix an honorific of some kind anyway. "Ms. Yingluck" should be used when necessary to emphasize that the person so named is a she and not a Mr. By way of example, English "Dr." never indicates gender and most locutions with suffix "-ess" have been dropped, but not in Thai. Thai for "medical doctor" does not have a gender suffix, but the abbreviation always does. Thai does not have a polite second- or third-person pronoun for her, but she does have some particles with which to end a statement to signify that she is a woman grown; and, for politeness sake, others signifying junior or acknowledging senior status. --Pawyilee (talk) 14:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Dilma RousseffYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. K Party ideologyHi, I noticed your edit to the K Party page urging NPOV, which is fair enough, but I think changing it to "conservatism" somewhat misses the point because what commentators have drawn out, and what the party's raison d'être largely is, is that it explicitly blends reformist conservatism and progressivism --Tyrannus Mundi (talk) 18:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Belizean general and local elections, 2012We can try nom this for GA whenit settles down? Looks really good now. Up for it?Lihaas (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
ThaddeusB (talk) 23:25, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Salvadoran legislative and local elections, 2012Can you keep an eye on it...50% more to come through then can mark ready on ITN. I may pop back in a couple of hours.Lihaas (talk) 10:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Disambiguation link notification for March 11Hi. When you recently edited Nationalist Republican Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estado Novo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC) Sourcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Slovak_parliamentary_election,_2010_complete_results 85.237.227.40 (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
mark tyrantif you mean why i delete abhisit because i found in his birth certificates from toad face in parliament to discuss (attack mark from two nationality), he show mark's birth certificates don't have abhisit just mark vejjajiva only--โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 01:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC) Swiss referenda, 2012Nice work (got some good team work going here (are you following by contribs? ;)) Just a q. is there any issue on the gambling initiative like the others have/? i dont speak german so dont know.(Lihaas (talk) 07:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)).
bahrani peoplewhen will you clean the bahrani people page from all that chaldean and pheonician origins nonsense ashrf1979 put (it even says the phoenicians are originally from tylos (bahrain), not the other way around) + (he claims that the baharna spoke chaldean in the 4th century but the source he put says its in SOUTH QATAR) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.1.216 (talk) 13:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Some baklava for you!
Bahrani peopleAshrf1979 (talk) 22:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Do you read Arabic This historical study of Christianity in the historical region of Bahrain Your problem you are trying to limit the history of Bahrain and its people within the small state created by the British Ashrf1979 (talk) 22:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Discuss patiently!!! You do not read Arabic and Can not read my sources And want to discuss the article with patience !!! Such as the blind man who gives his opinion on the paintings Picasso the historical region of bahrain (qatar, bahrain, qatif, etc) the source you gave says its in south qatar a place which is not and wasnt inhabited by the baharna just because it was apart of the historical region of bahrain doesnt mean the inhabitants are bahrani — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.24.150 (talk) 04:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Ashrf1979 (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC) the name of Hasaitic Derived from the name of Al-ahsa Oasis Oasis in the southern region of Bahrain Some Arab geographers called this name on the entire coastal plains stretching between Qatar and Kuwait Even today there is a part of the Bahrani people called by that name al-Ahsá'í ashrf1979please remove all the nonsense he posted in the bahrani people article the "sources" that he now posted say that the chaldeans are originally from east arabia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.255.157.78 (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC) remove all the chaldean nonsense please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.24.15 (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Joachim GauckI have restored my edits, and I insist that this is how the article (concerning those edits) must remain until you clarify exactly what the factual error was. I contend that I did not amend any content and that the article states exactly what it has done previously only without POV language. As you've only edited just over a year I need to explain a few things to you. First of all, when an editor makes several changes whether it be from a single edit or several, the custom is - as we cannot always be right all of the time - to go back and amend those "errors" and even so, explain it in the summary. By blanking the full raft of contributions over several edits, it instantly spells bad faith, and by simply declaring "errors" in the summary without explaining which, is even non-constructive. Because there were many sections of text I edited, I cannot explain why I did what I did unless I go through each scenario one by one. Be aware also that my edits included copy-edits. I now await a reply from you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 23:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Abkhaziais there a source for this resulT? im trying to find Lihaas (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I started a discussion in the Template articlePlease dicuss before you revert...--Poarps (talk) 16:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
bahrani peoplecould you please remove the sealanders section in the bahrani people article? for some reason it gives me an error when i try to edit it strabo retracted his statement of gerrha being inhabited by chaldeans when he said "because of their trade, the gerrhans became the richest of the arabs" also petroglyphs were found in greece that were found out to be sent by a man from gerrha called taym al lat, which is undoubtedly an arab name + that section is also WAY off topic. at first it talks about the sealanders then talks about the phoenicians source: 1. Arabia and the Arabs: From the Bronze Age to the coming of Islam, Robert G. Hoyland p25 2. Strabon, Geography (strabos OWN book) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.53.8 (talk) 03:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Ashrf1979 (talk) 05:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 1-It makes sense to ask me about the sources of the Bahrani population in each country And their percentage of the total population of those States,But it is not logical that you delete the countries in which they live as long as you do not know their number,Especially if these countries were part of the historical region of Bahrain Such as Qatar and Kuwait Or part of the population is descended from Bahrani's ancestors Such as Iran, Iraq, Zanzibar. 2-Hasaitic language I did not say it is spoken in Germany or the Antarctic it was the first Arabic language Of the population of Eastern Arabia And i Had previously told you that so far there are more than a million Bahrani call themselves Hasaitic (People of the Al-Ahsa province) 3-It makes sense to most of the Semitic Semitic peoples Pre-Christian religion is Ancient Semitic religion,Do you have any idea about. Spartacus Marat —Preceding undated comment added 23:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC). t the ancient Semitic religions. 4-Why Bahranis only required them to give proof about their links with the ethnic groups involved with them in the language, history and religion I did not write that Bahrainis have links with Inuit or Maasai people Ashrf1979 (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)What about this The Bahrani (plural Baharna, Arabic: بحراني ، بحارنة) are the indigenous Shi'a inhabitants of the archipelago of Bahrain and the oasis of Qatif on the Persian Gulf coast of Saudi Arabia (see historical region of Bahrain). The term is sometimes also extended to the Shi'a inhabitants of the al-Hasa oasis. They are all Arabic speaking, and some claim descent from Arab tribes. and this Rabi`ah Rabi`ah (Arabic: ربيعة) purported patriarch of one of the two main branches of the so-called "North Arabian" (Adnanite) tribes, the other branch being known as Mudhar. Like the rest of the Adnanite Arabs, legend has it that Rabi`ah's original homelands were in the Hejaz region of western Arabia, from which Rabi`ah migrated northwards and eastwards. Abdul Qays, Bakr ibn Wa'il, Taghlib ibn Wa'il were inhabitants of the region of Bahrain in eastern Arabia, including the modern-day islands of Bahrain, and were mostly sedentary. Abdul Qays, Taghlib And Bakr ibn Wa'il were mostly Christian before Islam, with Taghlib remaining a Christian tribe for some time afterwards as well.
interesting, Thank you to claim Thai people only 75% but in my country thai also mean siamese (in central and southern-thai), western laos, lanna people. i think you should open more article, spread central thai, lanna people and write thai-laotian into laotian article so you mean uncle therd in my conutry they call offically uncle น้าเทิด because now he play at Chonburi F.C. --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 13:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Stuff
The intro of the Fascism article is a necessary sizeIt has taken a very, very long time to achieve an NPOV intro on fascism, the current intro is well-sourced, detailed and very precise. Many arguments and debates over it have occurred, reducing the size will reduce the content - it will open a Pandora's Box because people will begin questioning what fascism means again. This intro took years to develop and it has been one of the most stable intros I've seen on Wikipedia, there are rarely any disputes about it now. The intro is a necessary size commensurate with the necessary information about the topic it is describing.--R-41 (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC) An award for you
What was wrong?What was wrong with my edits on the talk page? They clearly stated my opinion on the vote, and I tried to help with closing and possibly making the title better. I don't see what was wrong. Jacob102699 (talk) 01:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Ok, so I figured out that it was my edit rearranged the page. but I don't know why. I have been having problems with when I type in something on Wikipedia, it messes up something else elswhere im the article, do you have any ideas why? Jacob102699 (talk) 01:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Your revert on IslamophobiaYou say that the source uses the word "anxiety"[6], but you know Wikipedia is not Wikisource or Wikiquote, and does not copy word by word. Social phobia is the same thing as social anxiety, so much so that social phobia links to a disambiguation page of social anxiety disorder, social anxiety, and specific social phobia, and specific social anxiety disorder redirects to specific social phobia. But saying "Islamophobia" connotes a social anxiety is confusing, because the article name is called Islamophobia, and "Islamophobia" connotes a social phobia would be much easier to understand. DontClickMeName talkcontributions 03:57, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Azawagh/Iullemmeden BasinFurther complicating the naming situation, it appears that Iullemmeden Basin and Azawagh are synonymous terms; check out the maps at both articles and the reference here [7] (p. 228). What I'd like to do is drop the proposed merge of Azawagh/Azawad now that the former has been moved from "Azaouad", and probably propose another merge, this time of Azawagh/Iullemmeden Basin. Thoughts? Thanks much for all your help with this. Khazar2 (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
bahrani peoplehi for some reason ashrf1979 put the oddysey as a reference that strabo said the baharna are chaldean the reference is bk xvi please remove this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.53.235 (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
my edit doesnt save for some reason maybe because im using my iphone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.148.53.235 (talk) 05:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5Hi. When you recently edited Egyptian presidential election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Centre-right"Right-wing means right-wing, not centre-right"
If you want to dispute whether Stalin was far-left then bring it to a dispute resolution boardThat is very historically revisionist to say that Stalin and Mao were not associated with the far left in general. Communism and Marxism-Leninism are far-left ideologies. That whole stuff of "left deviationists" and "right deviationists" refers to the internal discourse in their communist movements where they accused each other of either being too conservative or too radical, it is a narcissism of small differences. I'm in the social democratic New Democratic Party - I know people who accused leadership candidates of being "right-wing" - when they darn well know that they didn't join a social democratic party to be right-wing, such claims are the result the opinion of the person evaluating from their own perspective. A similar case is here, Stalin and Mao associated with a far-left movement - Marxist-Leninist communism. I don't buy the argument that Stalin and Mao were not far left, I see no evidence for it.--R-41 (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Synthesis on flagsA source on the AD fla. Further, in talk of synthesis how can we clain the MNLA flag as the cflag of the newly declared entity without a shred of source. Its as much synthesis here as the "flag of jihad" was removed for. And the source also indicated the MLNA has no writ left in most of the regionLihaas (talk) 10:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
Don't block mePlease, don't block me, right?--Danrolo (talk) 18:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC) WikiThanks You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.7.204 (talk) 00:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Democrat Party (Thailand)Dear RJFF My reasons of indicating Democrat Party as "conservative liberal" is that because it seems almost absurd putting "Liberalism" in one line and "Conservatism" in the next; they simply don't make sense unless you say they're the right wing faction of liberalism. This also fits perfectly with the fact that the party seems to be liberal but conservative at the same time. Most importantly, the source for "conservatism" cannot be accessed (only for Financial Times subscribers) so it doesn't really help. Therefore, I believe it should be "conservative liberalism" as original. Regards --125.24.37.243 (talk) 14:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
In The News/Recurring ItemsI am posting here to ask for editors to look at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Recurring_items and to comment at the talk page to discuss/vote on an amendment to the ITN/R list. I am posting this message on a number of editor's talk pages to encourage debate. In connection to an ongoing debate on which items can appear on the front page under "In The News", "Recurring Items" are nominated events which require very little debate in the nomination process. I propose the following amendment to the current ITN/R list. In addition I will put this on the talk page of as many editors as I can find who are contributors to ITN/C At Wikipedia:In_the_news/Recurring_items, I propose the following amendment to section 3:
Section 3, Line 5 would then read:
National electoral calendar 2012Yes, Puerto Rico isn't sovereign state but countries like Abkhasia are included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.112.114.181 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hungarian presidential election, 2012No more election articles? I see youre not at East Timor. ANyhoo, you speak german so can you verify this persource?Lihaas (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC) ITNR for electionsAs someone who regularly contributes to election articles: Due to recurrent discussions that lead nowhere, an open-ended discussion and proposals are invited Wikipedia talk:In the news/Recurring items/Elections for ITN on the main page as to what should be recurrent without ITNC discussionsLihaas (talk) 07:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 20Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 20 April 2012 (UTC) A barnstar for you
Why you revert?Why did you revert and undo the pages that I do? Why you revert?Why did you revert and undo the pages that I do?--Danrolo (talk) 20:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC) Some curious diffsMy apologies for the disturbance, but I hope you won't mind taking a look at something interesting for me. This diff comes from a discussion I've been having.[8] This diff comes from that article [9]. I think I've spotted something important here and I was curious to know if you agreed. Dolescum (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC) Panagiotis PikramenosWhat still needs to be moved? I thought it was all there now. --82.35.251.109 (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2012 (UTC) German presidentsI feel that it would be helpful to include acting presidents in their chronological place in the main table of the List of German presidents. Please see talk page. BartBassist (talk) 21:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC) read the dang articleThe '''Progress Party''' ({{lang-nb|Fremskrittspartiet}}, {{lang-nn|Framstegspartiet}}, FrP) is a political party in [[Norway]] which identifies as [[Conservative liberalism|conservative liberal]]<ref name=klass>{{Cite news|url=http://www.klassekampen.no/kontakt_oss/54853/article/item/null|title=Sier nei til Kjærsgaard|work=[[Klassekampen]]|first=Hans Petter|last=Sjøli|authorlink=Hans Petter Sjøli|date=25 September 2008|accessdate=16 November 2009|language=Norwegian}}</ref> and [[Libertarianism|libertarian]].<ref name=BriefIntroduction>{{cite web|url=http://www.frp.no/filestore/Introduction_To_The_Progress_Party.pdf|title=Ideology and Principles of the Progress Party|publisher=FrP.no|accessdate=11 November 2009}}</ref> The media and academics have described it as [[Right-wing populism|right-wing populist]]{{Sfn|Hagelund|2005|p=147–164}}<ref>{{Citation |first=Paul |last=Hainsworth |title=The Extreme Right in Western Europe |work=Routledge |year=2008 |pages=49–51 |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jCtm2UeUQFIC&pg=PA51&dq=progress+party+norway+right+wing&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A_JsT_j_Kcqo0QXz9cXpBg&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=progress%20party%20norway%20right%20wing&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |first=Marianne |last=Gullestad |title=Imagined Kinship: The Role of Descent in the Rearticulation of Norwegian Ethno-nationalism |work=Neo-nationalism in Europe and beyond |publisher=Berghahn Books |year=2006 |pages=80–82 |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zScJs9HjixQC&pg=PA80&dq=progress+party+norway+right+wing&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A_JsT_j_Kcqo0QXz9cXpBg&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=progress%20party%20norway%20right%20wing&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |first=Daniel |last=Oesch |title=Explaining Workers' Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland |journal=International Political Science Review |month=June |year=2008 |volume=29 |number=3 |pages=349-373}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | first=Pierre-Henry | last=Deshayes | title=Norway's government fights for survival | work=[[Sydney Morning Herald]] | url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/norways-government-fights-for-survival-20090913-fm44.html | date=13 September 2009 | accessdate=25 July 2011}}</ref> or [[Conservatism|conservative]].<ref>http://www.newsinenglish.no/2011/09/13/progress-party-vows-comeback</ref> It is currently the second-largest party in the [[Parliament of Norway|Norwegian Parliament]], with 41 seats. Appears to cite claims for "libertarian", "right-wing populist", etc. thoroughly. As well as "conservative liberalism" etc. to boot. Please restore the infobox, as I regard this sort of "stuff" as being quite inane at this point. Wuld you really like all these sources repeated in the infobox? Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:29, 19 May 2012 (UTC) unverifiable, unsufficiently cited and inaccessible source (or fake?)Ashrf1979 (talk) 08:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)The Ascetical Homilies of Mar Isaac of Nineveh Isaac (Bishop of Nineveh), Paul Bedjan (St. Isaac of Nineveh, or, as he is sometimes known, St. Isaac the Syrian, was born in the region of modern Qatar and lived during the seventh century. Ordained as a bishop of Nineveh sometime between 661 and 681 CE, Isaac withdrew from his ecclesiastical office after only five months, retiring to live as monastic hermit in the mountains of southeastern Iraq. Translated from their original Syriac into a number of other languages, St. Isaac's spiritual writings have been read by Christian monastics for centuries.) The Wisdom of Isaac of Nineveh, Sebastian p.Brock (St. Isaac of Nineveh, or, as he is sometimes known, St. Isaac the Syrian, was born in the region of modern Qatar and lived during the seventh century. Ordained as the bishop of Nineveh sometime between 661 and 681 CE, Isaac withdrew from his ecclesiastical office after only five months, retiring to live as a monastic hermit in the mountains of southeastern Iraq. Translated from their original Syriac into a number of other languages, St. Isaac’s spiritual writings have been read by Christian monastics for centuries.) http://www.gorgiaspress.com/bookshop/showproduct.aspx?isbn=1-59333-335-8 The Sign of Peace, VOL 2.1, Kyle Smith St. Isaac of Nineveh, a 7th century ascetic, was from the town of Bet Qatraye on the Persian Gulf. In 660 AD Isaac was ordained bishop of Nineveh, an ancient city on the Tigris River in present-day Iraq. But Isaac preferred the contemplative life of a hermit to the ecclesiastical life of a bishop, so he left his see “for a reason known to God” after only five months. From Nineveh, Isaac withdrew to the monastery of Rabban Shabur in Iran where he died at an old age. http://www.catholicpeacefellowship.org/nextpage.asp?m=2188 Bet qatraye sometimes also called (the isles) was the ecclesiastical province Kuwait ,eastern Saudi Arabia ,Bahrain and Qatar several Christian settlements, both monasteries and churches ,and have now been found within the province ,including two in Kuwait ,two more in Saudi Arabia ,and at least one in Qatar Source: Nestorian christanity in pre-islamic uae and southeast Arabia,peter hellyer,journal of social affairs,volume 18.number72.winter2011,p253,a refereed quarterly journal published by the sociological association of the uae and the American university of sharjah http://www.adias-uae.com/publications/hellyer01b.pdf
Ashrf1979 (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Bahrani person from Bahrain historical region(Bet qatraye) I proved this fact you are you have to prove that it is not Bahrani Or that he was not born there
Ashrf1979 (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)This is not my problem I did not write definition of Bahranis in Wikipedia I also did not write that Isaac of Nineveh was born in Bahrain historical region(Bet qatraye) This information are written By Other people Before I register my account on Wikipedia It is not my an original research I just put his name with the other persons Who belong to the historical region of Bahrain I think that this is not original research.
Ashrf1979 (talk) 11:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)I think I need years to understand what you want from me But I think that this person Ilikecod Can be understood that the page is not about demographics in the Kingdom of Bahrain Tell him that Socialist Party of SerbiaHi, I would appreciate, if you would comment on the dispute. The related edits can be seen here [10]. Estlandia (dialogue) 18:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC) KKELook this, and please stop the propaganda. --Greek Transistor (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2012 (UTC) As you have previously commented on the title of this article, you may be interested in commenting on the requested move. Number 57 13:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Disruptive editors on Coalition of the Radical LeftYou should check that page out. Some person put that on there. It stated that SYRIZA(Coalition of the Radical Left) is Communist, Marxist, Anti-Greek, Islamist which is not and he has no proof. The editor didn't have any username but I was able to find an ip address which is: 193.92.139.24 Thank You. Formal mediation has been requestedThe Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Golden Dawn (Greece)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 September 2012. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Disruptive editors on Golden Dawn (Greece)Did you see it? Now User:Surlyduff50 is now questioning whether the nazi party should be classified as "far right" at all and is saying we don't have enough sources that document it as such. The guy is NOT acting in good faith. Also, I would be EXTREMELY wary of Greek Wikipedians; the Greek version of Wikipedia is infested with Golden Dawn sympathizers and tries to avoid displeasing nationalist and nazi factions. Moderatelyaverage (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC) I see various ppl try to add "disputed" to the "Nazism" bit in the infobox, altho the nazi idenntity of Golden Dawn is confirmed & verified through numerous sources. You might want to keepthis in check. And be wary of editors from Greece,cuz the internet in Greece is full of racists & hardline nationalists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.135.9 (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC) Third Way article moveHi. I know you previously expressed support for a move of the Third Way (centrism) article to Third Way. I've started a discussion on the talk page and it would be good if you could support or weigh in on the proposal. Thanks. --Peter Talk to me 15:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC) A pro-AKP-troll is removing content in this article and adding non-sourced information about the ideology. He has been doing it several times per day since a week. Could you watch and fix this problem, please?--84.57.23.79 (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
please revert per Wikipedia:AC/DS#Affected_areasAFAICT, the article on East Germany is subject to the ArbCom sanctions, and repeated revrts may result in any admin blocking the person doing such reverts. The language had been stable, and I ask you to avoid any ArbCom Enforcement possiblility as a matter of courtesy. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2012 (UTC) prime minister of thaiif you mean about prime minister of thai in thai people article in term thai people looks like Spanish people with in thai culture is not census to define because want to merge into all thai, except Plaek Phibunsongkhram's era census as thai or chinese only if you try to remove about prime minister with thai origin you should write new article to spread sub ethnic in thai (siamese) (isan laotian) and (lanna) people articles in modern day Demographics of Thailand quite is hardly to definite their origin because country side move into town so in thai people article i mean combine of siamese laotains and lanna, you see about thai origin i write quite definite who are siamese laotian lanna people what do you think? --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 08:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejectedThe request for formal mediation concerning Golden Dawn (Greece), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. For the Mediation Committee, User:AGK (talk) 11:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC) WikifyHi, just to let you know that the Template:Wikify tag has now been deprecated. Please use Template:underlinked or Template:dead end from now on, cheers. Del♉sion23 (talk) 11:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC) User:BegalangoramThanks for doing some of the cleanup there, though I suspect more will be necessary. WP gets these single-purpose accounts every so often that are dedicated to labeling both rich businessman/bankers and Communists as Jewish. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC) Research Outputs by CountryI noticed you have reverted some edits on the page. However the move is appreciated. It was a new and Infant article. If you please you may help me review the article with the new references and citations which I have provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregorykarn (talk • contribs) 16:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC) IslamophobiaApologies, I reverted some edits by you on Islamophobia page. Kindly review what I have posted here. The edits by Gregorykarn state the opinions of academic jonathan turley who is a famous person "Champion of Rule of Law" and editor for several magazines. Kindly see the article. I would advice you to make relevant edits so that controversial aspects may be rooted out and correct views come out. FYI : http://jonathanturley.org/2009/10/19/just-say-no-to-blasphemy-u-s-supports-eygpt-in-limiting-anti-religious-speech/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adityasaxena.corp (talk • contribs) 16:39, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Your 3RR report
Infoboxes of Búfalo Barreto situationThis is Búfalo Barreto talking. Thank you for your comments. I will try to adjust my edits to Wikipedia policies. I would like you, however, to please review my edits to Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori (for example) and explain to me why these edits, which make the page look much better, are held to be against Wikipedia policies. I work hard in my free time in order to improve these pages. As a Peruvian high school student, I take these pages about our presidents seriously. With my thanks and best regards, Búfalo Barreto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Búfalo Barreto (talk • contribs) 02:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC) Second message of Búfalo BarretoMr. RJFF, why does the peruvian presidents infoboxes have to be a summary?, the US Presidents have a lot of details. Why shouldn't these have details?. Best Regards, Búfalo Barreto P.S.: I spend a lot of time in giving a better image to these pages by editing their infoboxes. Why do you keep it simple? Búfalo Barreto (talk
Third Message of Búfalo BarretoThank You for understanding my point of view. Of course, I will delete the seals or insignias. Also, for example, in the biography of Alberto Fujimori, he isn't the 90th President of Peru. You see, I've reviewed all of the Peruvian Presidents, and there is a difference, the Constitutional Presidents and the Interim Presidents. The Interim ones are not counted with a number, only the Constitutional ones. For example: 42nd. Fernando Belaúnde Terry-(1963-1968): Constitutional President (Elected) -. Juan Velasco Alvarado-(1968-1975): President of the Revolutionary Government-(He made a coup d'etat to Belaúnde's Government) -. Francisco Morales Bermúdez-(1975-1980): President of the Revolutionary Government-(Velasco's successor) 43rd. Fernando Belaúnde Terry-(1980-1985): Constitutional President (Elected) 44th. Alan García Pérez-(1985-1990): Constitutional President (Elected) 45th. Alberto Fujimori-(1990-1992): Constitutional President (Elected for a 5 year term, but made a self-coup to his government in 1992, dissolving many public institutions, creating a new Constitution) -. Alberto Fujimori-(1992-1995): President of the Emergency Government and National Reconstruction (During this short period, he signed a new constitution) 46th. Alberto Fujimori-(1995-2000): Constitutional President (Elected) 47th. Alberto Fujimori-(2000-2000): Constitutional President (Elected, but a few months later, Congress revealed videos in which his adviser gave money to the opposition (Corruption)) -. Valentín Paniagua-(2000-2001): Transitional President (After Fujimori resigned, the two VP's resigned also. In the line of succession there was the President of Congress Paniagua, who organized new elections for the next year) 48th. Alejandro Toledo-(2001-2006): Constitutional President (Elected) 49th. Alan García Pérez-(2006-2011): Constitutional President (Elected) 50th. Ollanta Humala-(2011-Present): Constitutional President (Elected) You see, only the Constitutional ones have numbers, the others don't, because they were not elected. Since Peru became an independent country, there were Presidents who lasted 2 days, a week, a month, or even hours. I've counted the Constitutional ones, and in total there are 50. Of course, if you sum all of them there 94. That's the problem, in the United States there is more order than Peru. The official counting is the one found in a documentary called "Historia de la República del Perú" in which lists the official an non official Presidents Thank you for your Comprehension RJFF P.S.: Also I don't know how to sign my messages in Wikipedia. You already told me, but I don't understand. Best Regards, Búfalo Barreto (talk) 16:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Búfalo Barreto Fourth message of Búfalo BarretoI'm very sorry, I won't revert the pages again. I'm very very sorry for making you waste your time. Best Regards 5th messageHello RJFF, I completely understand. But view history of the page List of Presidents of Peru and in 2008, some of them weren't Constitutional ones. Also, please just don't write President of Peru, write President of the Republic of Peru. The name Republic of Peru is the official name of the country. Check the spanish version of those Presidents that I've mentioned. Best Regards, Búfalo Barreto (talk) 16:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Búfalo Barreto P.S.: Please don't call me Búfalo Barreto, my name is Víctor. The BB nickname was for a peruvian politician. I wish to become a politician in Peru Hello again, please give me an answer about the APRA-NEC merger. I already added references. Best Regards Búfalo Barreto (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC) True FinnsAs you know, user Mocctur has recently been pushing the far-right label on pretty much all parties critical of the European Union. His action in the True Finns article isn't any more justifiable than in the EFD article or the UKIP article. In the True Finns article he has given two references on the far-right label: one of them is 9 years old and thus dated considering how much the party has grown in that time. The other reference is a treatise officially sanctioned by the EU. I checked that out and the primary label used of the party is populist (the term far-right is mentioned only in passing, whereas the term populist is repeated). Compared to this I have referenced six credible Finnish researchers who all say that the party's social views are conservative (you would agree with me that conservatism is centre-right) or explicitly say that the party is not right-wing. Tuomas Ylä-Anttila calls the party a "centre-left conservative party"[11]. Ville Pernaa says that the party's ideology is based on "moral conservatism"[12]. Laura Parkkinen says that the party is based on "traditional rural conservatism" and warns against simplistic comparisons with other countries.[13] Juha Ahvio says that the party has profiled itself as a defender of social conservatism.[14] Rauli Mickelsson calls the party socially conservative without calling it far-right in his book, which is referenced in the article. Erkka Railo says that the party is populist but not far-right, or at least that the far-right element is marginal. In addition Juho Rahkonen says that it is wrong to call the party right-wing populist, describing it instead as a centre-left party[15] and says that of all Finnish parties it is closest to the political centre[16]. From all this we can see that the consensus mainstream opinion of the Finnish political researchers is that the party's social views are conservative, not far-right. One or two foreign sources may call the party far-right, but according to the WP:UNDUE policy, the minority opinion should not usurp the mainstream consensus. --89.27.36.41 (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC) Urgent message from Búfalo BarretoHello again RJFF. I'm very concerned because I've been blocked in my spanish user by a uruguayan editor called Ganímedes, because I created the spanish version of the National Executive Committee of the Peruvian Aprista Party. Months ago, I created that page, and they told me that it was not encyclopedic. I sent a message to that user explaining. It's the same page that you proposed me to merge with another page. Please answer me. Best Regards Búfalo Barreto (talk) 01:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Recent addition to True FinnsYour edit summary: "no ref for "centre-right". What? Did you look at Talk:True_Finns#.22Far-right.22_not_appliable? Please contribute to the talk page instead of removing sourced information; centre-left is what the Finnish political scientists are saying. Foreign media commentators are not scholars. --Pudeo' 13:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC) ITN Lincoln AlexanderI've responded to your opposition to posting this as ITN on the candidacy page. It would be great if you could look over my comments. If it results in a change of heart, great; if not, no worries, no hard feelings. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Hello RJFF Thank you for your message. In the case of the Javier Alva Orlandini page, I created that page months ago, and I installed the full titles, for example, Barack Obama in his infoboxes says 44th President of the United States United States Senator From Illinois Member of the Illinois Senate
Stop undoing!Please, stop it --Danrolo 11:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 22Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Popular Party (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union of the Democratic Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC) Nomination for deletionThe article you have previously commented has been nominated for deletion. To comment please visit: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Actors in Negative Roles -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC) RMI just wanted to inform you that an editor expressed concern that you have been canvassed into discussion. Fell free to comment, if you care about this questionable actions, at the end... If not, no problem, nothing will be different. All best, be well. --WhiteWriterspeaks Hi! Thank you for your notifications. About Thailand intro section, I have just referred from internal wiki site, which is has already been cited. Also, population, with recent figures rather more accurate. Do I still have to link-linked those citations again? If it need to, I will. Please let me know again my talk page. Thank you! --okichan 06:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Azores regional electionHello. Can you please indicate where it states that election results are only limited to the top two candidates? As the regional elections of the Azores were fought by the five incumbent parties, their vote and summary statistics are relevant. I will be manually reverting your blanking of the remaining content, unless you can provide a justification from the Infobox parameters or Wikiproject discussion. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 07:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Same case scenario. You indicated that infobox should contain major political parties, yet without specifying a number you left only two. That is a political speculation. Ukraine does not have well established major political parties. Currently there are five political parties in the Ukrainian parliament and seven parliamentary factions. There is a 5% threshold for any party to gain pass for the parliament, which will be possible at very least for four parties , while there could be up to six of them. The infobox was showing exactly the major players for the elections. So what is the reason behind your corrections. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC) thai peopleYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Ok, since it is just a regional election and it doesn't have enough opinion polls to justify for having an entire article for itself, I agree to have it removed, since the election has been already held and there isn't enough data available to justify for an improvement of relevance (unlike other elections' opinion polls, which may have data for leaders' ratings and such). All data about opinion polls have been moved to the main page, so that it doesn't get lost in the article's deletion. Impru20 (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC) MalaysI believe that was not me who added the Malays into the content. But such as theory is very interests. I found some recent scientific research where ethnic malays made up of some population in southern of thailand and malay peninsular. I am waiting to the book mailing on the way. Not until I have read and make sure if the research is reliable source, the present information base on CIA (getting out of date) although still ok. Do you know if I can cited or reference Japanese research into English page? Or if this had to be proved by Thai gov or something?? talk--okichan 17:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC) I have raised an objection to your proposed deletion of the article "Italian Fascism and German Nazism"My objection has been raised here: Talk:Italian Fascism and German Nazism--R-41 (talk) 01:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC) The coups led to the removal of first, an original pro-US govermnent by a radical and neutral leaderhsip. The 1966 coup brought to power a pro-Soviet and pro-communist leadership... The Syrian Ba'ath Party played a major role in the Cold War. This is the short explanation --TIAYN (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC) A beer for you!
Cold war ... edit war ...Hallo RJFF, I see you're doing the same as me (only more so), removing duff entries from the Cold War template. I am afraid that some of them are continually being added back. We ought really to discuss this with the perpetrators, and if need be get admin attention to the subject. Part of the problem is that there's no terribly obvious way to support entries with citations, so people see this as an easy list to cruft. Ideas? all the best Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
ebook move requestSince you contested the move request E-book → ebook, I've started a full move discussion at Talk:E-book#Requested move. --84.44.182.148 (talk) 01:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC) talk backYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. error problemyou should see this article, it maybe understand. Thaification --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 16:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC) A message from zictor23Hi RJFF, Thank you for the kind message. I understand what you're saying about maintaing a neutral point of view and using reliable third party sources on Wikipedia, but I thought that if the official party websites stated that the parties were social liberal (as with the cases of the Australian Democrats, the Brazilian Social Liberal Party, and the Liberal Party of Ukraine) then you could not argue with that, because that is how those parties see themselves. You do see what I mean, don't you, RJFF? I didn't think that had anything to do with breaking neutrality. Also RJFF, some of those parties that were deleted, such as the Liberal Democrats of Germany and Peru Possible, had third party sources. Those sources were not taken from the official party websites. I'm not sure if you or others had seen that when the edits were made. zictor23 (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC) NTV7Thanks for supporting my move request for ATV Turkey. Now, can you do something on moving ntv7 to NTV7? My recent move request was not successful. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 17:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC) Stop it!Don't undo again, right? --190.22.248.130 (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC) My mistakeIt is a bad habit of mine to put "pp." rather than "p." for single pages. My apologies to you.--R-41 (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
SNCI'm sorry, I haven't noticed your edit summary, but insted I undo it without watching. Please accept my appology. --Wüstenfuchs 11:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Stereotyping political criticism in HungaryIt is true that there is a great deal of left/right polarization in Hungary, hence often it is the left criticizing the right or the right criticizing the left. But there is also a lot of stereotyping, and this tends to be done more by the right than the left: The right often reflexively classifies any view it does not like (or that does not like it) as "left-liberal." Often this is true, but sometimes traits are called left-liberal that are not, and criticism is labelled as left-liberal that isn't. This is the case with worldwide criticism of some of the new laws that have been adopted by the Hungarian supermajority government, including press control laws and, more recently, the gerrymandering of electoral laws. The criticism is coming from democrats on the left and the right, and so Wikipedia editors should not be allowed to stereotype all criticism of government policy as "left-liberal" (as is done with impunity in Hungary). Wikipedia is international. Much better to face the substance of the criticism head-on rather than to dismiss it as simply being partisan carping by the usual suspects. See the controversy section, where an edit war is going on about the insertion and removal of this descriptor. Stevan Harnad 15:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)harnad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnad (talk • contribs) Stop it!Stop undoing or I shall report you! --Danrolo 19:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC) AhOr I shall block you! --Danrolo 19:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC) RE: ItalyAh ! that way. Deletion is for other reasons per CSD. Usually a RM is there to move it. ut i understnd it should be uncontroversiall. Perhaps ask an admin to move it. User:Number57 is involved in election articles and can do it quick(Lihaas (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)).
--SpencerT♦C 00:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC) sweden democratsI saw the message on the Swedish Democrats. The fact that a part of the Swedish press defines them as far-right, does not mean they are. I read their political program and I have not found too many elements to suggest that it would be a far-right party. There are parties in Europe more aggressive, with much more radical messages than those of the Swedish Democrats and are not classified as far-right parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.97.134.8 (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC) Italian general election, 2013Hi, I do not understand why do you add Beppe Grillo at Italian Elections 2013, since he is not running at these elections as a candidate to deputy, nor to President of the goverment, nor is the leader of the 5 Star Movement. As the Movement statues say, he is not the leader but just a speaker of the movement. [5][6] Deletion on BJP articleI have noticed that you are unhappy with some reliably referenced info on the BJP article. It would be appreciated if you either posted your concerns on the articl's talk page or if you try to merge your edits ( most of which contributed positively to the article) with those of others
Jemappelleungarcon (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Stop it!That's enough! stop undoing and warring or I shall block you! --Danrolo 10:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Merge discussion for List of religious leaders in 2011
Bahrani peopleAshrf1979 (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)This article is about the Bahrani people (ethnic group) in the historic region of Bahrain and the diaspora And not for the Kingdom of Bahrain and its citizens TBYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC) NFA's ideologyIf leader of National Forces Alliance is saying that "Some channels started referring to the National Forces Alliance as liberals – that's not true," and that the NFA is a moderate Islamic movement that recognises the importance of Islam in political life and favours Sharia as the basis of the law and if NFA is eager to play down the "liberal" label then what is the problem ??? why it is not allowed to mention it as an "Moderate Islamist" party ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed 313-326 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC) DanroloHi, I've started a topic at WP:AN for help with range blocks in case you want to watch it or contribute to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC) Civic Choice Ideologies RemovalYou should be proud of your original contribute on Wikipedia. Congratulations. Regards--Walter J. Rotelmayer (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Islamic democracy tableHi, The table showing the indices of democracy in islamic countries (on the Islamic democracy page has been removed by Ahmed 313-326. I put it back with a request to discuss changes on the talk page, and he removed it again, and so I've put it back again. I'm not a very experienced wikipedia editor and dont want to get into an edit war, but I think it would be good to have some discussion and get some viewpoints about the table rather than just delete it. If the consensus is to delete it then that's fine, but I don't think one user should just remove so much material without discussion. I know you've edited this page before and I thought you might have an opinion and possibly get some other non-partisan editors interested. thanks Halon8 (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Kindly refrain from deleting my contributions in their entirety without explanation. I have provided quotable sources. If you have objections to any specific modifications, please amend the specific part of the edit you consider to be incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti.udbas (talk • contribs) 19:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Citations to reliable sources to all my edits have been provided. If you have any specific objections to my edits, please modify accordingly, likewise providing reliable sources for your edits. Please kindly refrain from removing my edits en bloc, and please kindly refrain making unwarranted accusations of libel, which I am not committing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti.udbas (talk • contribs) 19:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Gregor VirantI have responded to your communication on this article's Talk page. I have provided reliable references for all my edits. Please refrain from further reverts of my edits until the issue has been resolved on the Talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti.udbas (talk • contribs) 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC) FJPHello, Can you please explain why do you think that the cited sources do not explicitly describe the FJP as "Islamic democratic" ? --Ahmed 313-326 (talk) 23:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC) Avoid VandalismIn articles about Muslim world's politics, word "democracy" dose not necessarily mean "western democracy". democracy is a universal political value. if a party is not democrat by western standard, it dose not mean that party is not democratic by standards of it's own country. so please avoid vandalism and refrain from removing useful information without any strong reason. demanding citation or more reliable citation is better option then removing well established facts. --Ahmed 313-326 (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Help with sourcesHello RJFF, are you a native German-speaker, right? Could you help me to find more sources for "The Freedomites in Carinthia" (currently at Freedom Party in Carinthia) in order to move the article to The Freedomites in Carinthia? --Checco (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC) ThaificationFile:100-Baht Banknote Series 14 Back.jpg is now orphaned. Was that intentional? --Pawyilee (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Can you help me?In the page Italian general election, 2013 we don't know which images we can use for Pier Luigi Bersani. You are more expert than me in wikipedia so I want ask you if you can find a way to stop this edit warring between me and others users and User:EeuHP (talk... --Nick.mon (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Bersani againExcuse me, but I think that the conflict is not resolved. After five days, he suddenly said that my picture could stay. But hours later he suggested I replace it with another photo. I said that the new picture is, in my opinion, not good. The next day he filed a third photo. I could not answer him, but Danish Expert said that it was a good picture, Nick.moon placed it in the article. It seems that the picture is not licensed. I removed the photo. Now, he teaches me two new photos (in the last our, three photos). I think that this situation is a "war of attrition". Besides, I suspect that he is using two sockpuppets. [17] [18] (similar names, newcomers, defending the same photo...).--EeuHP (talk) 18:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sukhumbhand Paribatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pembroke College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Opinion polling in DenmarkYou seem to have some misunderstanding as to wikipedia policy, as there is no rule requiring polls to not be uploaded until after the election (or on any specific time frame, for that matter.) Indeed, opinion polls were uploaded for years before the Italian election, which we edited together! You helped format the Italian polling table, which stretched back two years, so I'm confused as to what misapprehension you're operating under now. If you have concerns it's taking up too much space, I myself was thinking of moving it to a separate article (like the Italian page we worked on together.) However, regardless this is something you should have brought to Talk for general discussion. Simply for the record, the election is also not "two years away" as Denmark does not have static elections; that's simply the latest possible date the election could be held. (P.S. You also have a minor misunderstanding in relation to infoboxes, as the largest overall party goes on the left, not the largest government party.) --4idaho (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Democratic Convergence of CataloniaNordsieck refers to the coalition as regionalist, I refer you to WP:NOR for your deletion of cited content. Feel free to bring counter-sources supporting your deletion of content to Talk, but otherwise it falls under the umbrella of OR. I'm also confused as regionalism simply means functioning in the interest of a particular region, which the Catalonia-only CDC clearly is. --4idaho (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Ongoing historic events in HungaryDear User:RJFF, As far as I can tell, you have no biasses one way or the other, based on your long editing history. So I just wanted to point out that there some extremely serious historic events transpiring (and in fact accelerating) in recent days and weeks in Hungary, chiefly in connection with the new constitution and its amendments, about which the EU and the international community are becoming increasingly concerned. I think it would be a great historic mistake to treat WP updates on these current goings-on as "recentism." This is an important unfolding current event, with very broad consequences. There are many other articles in WP in which it is an unfolding current event that is being updated. This is how the constitutional controversy (possibly heading toward crisis) should be viewed. Although I am pretty sure that that is not what is motivating your own suggestion that this may be "recentism," please do bear in mind that there are not-unbiassed partisans who would very much prefer that the mounting international criticism of the Hungarian constitution was not covered in WP but rather that it would simply subside and go away, and they have repeatedly invoked "recentism" and "soapboxing" as the justification for deleting my recent updates... --Stevan Harnad 17:49, 20 March 2013 (UTC) User:Harnad (talk)
Oleh TyahnybokHi, as we don't agree about this, as per wikipedia policy it will need to be resolved via discussion on the talk page, rather than edit war. Bensimo Bensimo (talk) 21:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Attack (political party), Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 11:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC) UPPleft-wing in s.korea, there are two forces a PD and NL. PD is a marxist and NL is a social nationalist. UPP was organized by NL. they are not claim a liberalism --Aua1422 (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)aua1422 Good editing on the Capriles article--Guiletheme (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC) Yes thanks for your watchfulness. I was just about flagging for [citation needed] and [neutrality is disputed] this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henrique_Capriles_Radonski&oldid=551497002 Ledjazz (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 17Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Union of the Democratic Centre (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Popular Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC) PhotoHi, I have just posted a photo of Bersani in the Talk page of 2013 election. Can you said to me if it is good to insert it in the main page...thank you for your time. -- Nick.mon (talk) 11:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 25Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guasú Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guarani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC) DYK for Horacio Cartes
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 21Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thanin Kraivichien, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC) i do not understand your behaviorcan you please explain to me why you reverted my edits inconsistently? why did you remove my mafia state edits while still agreeing it should be included in the most imprortant article Vladimir putin itself. if you make changes on putinism and mafia state and you should do it in vladimir putin article as well! 95.195.211.226 (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Citizens – Party of the CitizenryAn IP keeps removing the sourced ideology at Citizens - Party of the Citizenry and replacing it with the party's self-described ideology. I've reverted too many times to take it to WP:AN3, so I was hoping you could intervene. --4idaho (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
HEY! dont forget to respond to my earlier threadyou seem to give no responce, please do! 95.195.219.124 (talk) 19:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Award
The history of anti-Semitism in Germany is at the very heart of the matter in the Nazism article's history of originsThe history of anti-Semitism in Germany and what influenced its rise, particularly from the 1870s onward, is crucial for people to understand why an anti-Semitic movement like Nazism rose in Germany the first place. What I added was from one source, Roots of Hate: Anti-Semitism in Europe Before the Holocaust by William Brustein, Professor of Sociology, Political Science, and History at The Ohio State University, and the book was published by Cambridge University Press; it is a valid academic source, and it is not a synthesis.--R-41 (talk) 21:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC) In fact, in the preface of the book, the author precisely says that the purpose of his study of the roots of anti-Semitism in Europe is to investigate what caused anti-Semitism to become the significant phenomenon that the Nazis utilized.--R-41 (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Lega NordWhat are you talking about? I stopped to edit Lega Nord's ideology with "Righ-wing populism". I have just wrote "Padanian nationalism", and it is obviusly a Lega Nord ideology. Tell me what does not go well? -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC) I don't remember to have edit it with Padanian Nationalism, or least recently. Maybe I have done it months ago, I know the guidelines of Wikipedia, but if you can never edit articles (with this minor edits) without talking about it, you do not end more. Anyway, ok, I understand your reason, but I repeat, I don't remember to have edit recently LN's ideology with Padanian Nationalism. -- Nick.mon (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 28Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puea Pandin Party, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Surin and People's Power Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC) that's problem againi think you just a troll, you are not mongoliod and you careless to read what i contribure. please don't waste my time. i will reverse again.--โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 03:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC) DiscussionHi. If you continue to follow me around and revert sourced material, and generally display a confrontative edit pattern, I will take the matter to the incidence board. Best Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 25Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newin Chidchob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Power Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Hi, do you think that this user is a sock of User:Danrolo?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC) WP:ObviousHonestly, for some strange reason you think the Syrian coups had nothing to do with the Cold War, its peculiar... Why? Well, the Ba'ath Party took power in 1963, aligned itself with Soviet, and in 1966 a bunch of half communists took power... Who do you think they allied to??? Was it the USSR?? Yes.. Where do you think Syria got the weapons to fight Israel??? Was it the USSR??? Yes??? Why is this not included in those articles, because that doesn't explicitly have anything to do with the coup... But when you're on it, why don't you ask something to reference if the Portuguese Colonial War had anything to do with the Cold War, or the more obvious ones, the Peoples Power Revolution and the Argentine Revolution .... THis is an extremely strange request. --TIAYN (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Convergence of Catalonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC) CompromísPlease, read Talk:Coalició Compromís--Coentor (talk) 19:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC) DYK-Good Article Request for Comment
German Democratic Party, sourceCould you please help solve the open question regarding this source you added? Thanks. --bender235 (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Revolutions of 1989 online Wikipedia challenge
--Kippelboy (talk) 15:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Drassi copy/pasted from DrasiThanks for clarifying and sorry about hastily doing this. I see you have rolled my changes to Drasi back. I guess what is needed now is for Drassi to be deleted so Drasi can be moved to Drassi. If I understand correctly, it takes an administrator to do a deletion, right? So, what happens now? Best regards, Ageor (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC) Valdostan vs. ValdotainianHi, I saw you renamed all the articles with "Valdotainian" to "Valdostan". Would you provide me with some reference according to which "Valdostan" is a more proper version in English? --Simoncik84 (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
related Between Baharna and othersCan you understand me what resources are needed to prove it Especially not I notice that this thing required Other articles> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germans I also do not understand why readied the old one external links ,It is a link to the Old project stopped and the new link is the alternative project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Migmirage (talk • contribs) 08:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Dear RJFF, could you please help me to move The Libertarians back to its real name? I was unable to do it. I strongly oppose the arbitrary transalation of proper nouns.--Sajoch (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Graphical summaryHi RJFF, why can't we insert the graphic? Which issues? I have read the Talk page, but I haven't find any recent discussion about my graphic. -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Ok you are right, I have not uploaded correct data, now I will do it exactly, bye! -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Talk:Brazilian Social Democracy PartyHi, would you be interested in engaging in the discussion there regarding the party's ideology. My belief is that it's a neoliberal centre-right party named so only because of sinisitrisme, but others claim it's a genuine left-wing party (cf infobox) - sth I find unfounded. I'd be glad if you could offer some insight because my knowledge of Brazilian politics is limited. Regards, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 11:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Cisleithanian legislative election, 1911Thanks for adding the links to the article - I couldn't be certain from my source what parties they really were. How did you know? I'm just wondering if there's a more useful source out there. Also, re the German-National Party, the original name I gave the article (German Nationals Party) was the one used for the party in the Dieter Nohlen book. I'm just wondering if you found an English source giving it an alternative title? "German National" is obviously the correct translation of "Deutschnationale", but I wonder whether this could have been a case of a party name becoming known abroad via a mistranslation. Cheers, Number 57 22:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Space (Uruguay), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broad Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC) My editsRJFF, sorry you are right. I just wanted to improve Wikipedia as you, but I forgot to insert the quotation which are necessary. Excuse me for my edits. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:387, 17 December 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 23Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muttahida Qaumi Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohajirs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Requested move for Buddha Loetla NabhalaiI've opened a new requested move for the article. You may want to add to the discussion. Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:47, 23 December 2013 (UTC) January 2014
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 15Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Convergence of Catalonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC) DoubtsHello. Excuse me, but I need to resolve a doubt. In a edit war, should prevail editing to pre-war until the users arrive to consensus? Is that a user is reversing this edition and threatens me with a lock.--EeuHP (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
RE: Offline sourcesI never said it didnt. Buit in thios case, on some insatances the same outlet did have verifiability. In fact, I did the work for him and found it. Some didnt not have representation on the same outlet. Nevertheless, his "i dont know give a s***" for references certainly indicates some doubt further. Please that is not vandalism by any stretch of the imaginagtuion. And dont come along with threats. I have gone out and found sources. Per BRD, the onus then is on the person adding the material to show it so. That is for any source. Im perfectly in my right to ask for this (there have been hoaxes on WP) and fuirther i have taken the initiative to look for them.(Lihaas (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)). UnreferingWhy you unrefer the ideologies of the Chilean parties? --201.239.203.53 (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC) blankingplease explain this edit and why its okay to remove what svoboda says about the Regions, but include criticism of svoboda in a huge section is fine? Double standards? Or do you think Regions criticism should be removed from the other article too? --Львівське (говорити) 21:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Reference Errors on 21 February
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Right-wing populismHi RJFF, now I will revise it, anyway in Turkey there is the Nationalist Movement Party which is considered ultranationalist. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:14 26 February 2014 (UTC) Far-left politicsStop such reckless reverts and argue your point at talk, first! The section I re-added is well-sourced to a reliable scholar. even if it takes lots of space at the moment, this is not an argument for removal, but rather developing the article further. It is the sad fact that some far-left affiliated users have been trying hard to get the article reduced to something like disambiguation page. I hope you don't belong to their ilk. Regards, Lokalkosmopolit (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC) SvobodaWe had a consensus over there, right? Concerning the lede. I mean, I remember you and I went back and forth on that till we eventually stopped fighting and it stayed that way for a while. That was what we found to be neutral and all encompassing, right? I ask because I just realized the lede had been completely transformed into a POV piece and wanted to know your thoughts before 'it' inedibly goes down again. --Львівське (говорити) 21:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC) There is a merger discussion at the above page. Your input could help.Lihaas (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Question about the boxes in European Parliament election, 2014 (Austria)You wrote "REKOS did not run in the last election. They only have an MEP by defection. But the same is true for Europe different (Ehrenhauser). It would be arbitrary to include REKOS and not BZÖ or EA; Unlike these NEOS is very likely to be a major force in this el" Its correct that the NEOS play a major role, I just thought candidates are to be listed in the order they will appear on the ballots according to results from the 2009 election(ÖVP, SPÖ, MARTIN, FPÖ, Greens and REKOS (because Stadler was lead candidate of sixth placed BZÖ before). But you might be right that criteria for the boxes is the order the proposals are passed to the federal electoral authority. I now removed Martin who to diepresse will not contest. And NEOS is now on 5th, REKOS on sixth position. I don't really think that Ehrenhauser or BZÖ would take away the sixth position on the ballot. Because both BZÖ and "Europa Anders"(didn't take advantes of M. Ehrenhausers MEP signature) are currently collecting signatures to contest. So its very unlikely that Stadler (who already brought in the REKOS canidates list) on 11th march) will be placed 7th, 8th or even 9th. Thanks for the Updates in the article "The Reform Conservatives" also. --Ukrainskij254 (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Hillary Rodham Clinton move requestGreetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Template:Costa Rican presidential election, 2014Thanks for making the Template:Costa Rican presidential election, 2014. I filled it in with the percentages and number of votes. Great job!! Mvblair (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Sonny1998 = Mafia1960 ?Hi, I guess we ran into the same person see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sonny1998. If you have anything to add that might have happened recently in relation to these users, please do not hesitate to add at SPI. Thanks. - DonCalo (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC) May 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC) Can you explain why you removed Libertarian Movement (Costa Rica) from the List of libertarian political parties? The heading to the list says, Although these parties may describe themselves as "libertarian," their ideologies differ considerably and not all of them support all elements of the libertarian agenda. Thus, regardless of whether any particular person considers them to be libertarian, they ought to be listed if nothing else because their name says they are libertarian. Their specific political position can be described in the notes column to the table. In addition, the party is described as libertarian by such sources as Reason.com and the Independent Institute. If you have sources that say that Libertarian Movement (Costa Rica), you can cite those as well in the notes column of the table, but even so that doesn't mean that the party should be kept off the list entirely. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
German pirates in EU parliamentDear RJFF, thank you for your excellent contributions to listing correct results of the 2014 EU parliament elections. In a recent bulk edit, you moved the German pirate party to the Greens-EFA group column. Even though the Swedish pirates were sitting in that group since 2009, this bears no relevance to the German pirates, whose newly-elected MEP Julia Reda hasn't professed any affiliation yet.[7] Besides, both Swedish pirate MEPs just lost their seats. I had pointed out this error earlier, and I still don't see any relevant announcement, so I moved Piraten back to the New parties column for Germany. If they ever announce a group affiliation, this fact should be sourced and noted in the Group reshuffling section. Hope this helps clear any misunderstanding. — JFG talk 05:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Number of local councillors for Spanish political partiesI'm going to restore the party strength in local government figure that you recently removed. While you're right that that is impossible to keep up to date, that's the type of valuable info that should be in an infobox to give people a quick overview. The better solution is to treat it exactly like party membership figures, by noting when the figure is relevant for. Valenciano (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Janusz Korwin MikkeHi, you typed "wikilinks that are not in line with text should be avoided) (undo)", and removed link to the intelligence. Could you explain what you mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JegoKrulewskaMosc (talk • contribs) 07:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC) --JegoKrulewskaMosc (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
European parties and national legislaturesYou wrote: "AECR is not represented in national parliaments. It only exists on a European level."[24] The same could be said of PES and EPP, yet the infoboxes in those articles do include figures for representation in national legislatures. --Jaakko Sivonen (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Infobox improvement, "Leaders", Spitzenkandidaten & editingFirst thing, if we are to develop an infobox for EP elections, I thought I might run some ideas by you first, perhaps hash out a rough consensus between the two of us. I was thinking that we could see:
I hope that makes some sense to you. Anything you'd like to see? Do you want the main party line? Secondly, I'd like to make the case that the current infobox shouldn't attract deference. Firstly, I did state reasons prior to editing on the talk page, and edited it a day later, having received no adverse comment. The initial revert wasn't done according to consensus, as two others had indicated approval of the change at that time. Moreover, the infobox with the Spitzenkandidaten represents a major shift from past practice in EP parliament articles. If anything, that's the status quo that should require consensus to change. I'm not arguing that the infobox should be changed on that basis alone, but that I can't see why the current situation should attract deference or the protection of requiring consensus to change it. Thirdly, I've been a little frustrated that while some editors have replied with an initial objection, none save yourself have interacted with the critiques Jaako and I have made of their rationales. It's difficult to build consensus around political topics in general, but it's pretty impossible if editors don't engage in a dialogue. Any suggestions? Lastly, any chance you're coming around to preferring the change to the infobox yourself? I hope the changes to the infobox template I proposed above allay some of your concerns. I also think we ought to have a table to summarise the results by Europarty, so that would at least present that information within the article as a whole. Thanks, Gabrielthursday (talk) 07:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC) @Gabrielthursday: Sorry for answering late. I have replied at Talk:European Parliament election, 2014. I principally agree with your proposals. I am afraid that I won't find the time to realise the template myself. In my opinion, the box should not identify a "main party". G-EFA and EUL-NGLA are confederal groups - EGP resp. EL are not the "main parties". In EFDD there is not even a main (European) party. Neither of the major MEP contributors (UKIP and M5S) is in MELD (which will perhaps collapse anyway after LN, DF and Finns defected and other member parties are weakened). Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 13:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 23Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European People's Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre for European Studies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC) July 2014
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Talking about this [25]. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Your opinion?Hi! Your reasoning in Talk:Middle Italy (political party) was very interesting. I would to alert you this discussion to also have your opinion: Talk:Sgarbi Liberals. In this case the original name "Liberal Sgarbi" is translated into "Sgarbi Liberals", but I am not convinced that this translation is correct. In effect, for me, "Liberal Sgarbi" could be an italian word game. I am not really very interested to this little party, however, I think that the original name is preferable if there is a doubt about the correct translation. What do you think?--Maremmano (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyediting complete
@RGloucester: Thanks a lot! I had to make some contentual corrections (probably based on misunderstandings, e.g. only Dollfuss was assassinated, Schuschnigg wasn't.) Moreover, I have noticed that you did not just do copy-editing in a strict sense, but also added some contentual information. While I am convinced that the added material is both correct and suitable, it would be great if you could add corresponding references, as these pieces of information are not supported by the references in the original article. Thanks again, and kind regards. —RJFF (talk) 11:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Thank youI just would like to say thank you for reverting unreasonable reverts of my edits. I am not an active wikipedian, so your help is greatly appreciated. Hethokrilliondata (talk) 14:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC) Labour Party ideologyFour of the five people who've commented are supportive of the change, and it's been open a week. I think the discussion has more or less run its course, and has been as productive as its going to be. I feel like it's beginning to go in circles. Do you think there's consensus for the change, or do think it should wait until more people have had the chance to comment? --4idaho (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
ECRWhile I agree that the ECR article is not the correct place for detailed analysis on the Finns Party or any other individual member party, sources related to that discussion do become relevant when another user (Jeppiz) seeks to use the party as an example of "far-right" elements within the ECR. --Jaakko Sivonen (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heimwehr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Question about Kach etc.Hello RJFF. I saw that you removed my part about Kach in the neo-fascism article, that's ok but I would like to know WHY it's NOT a fascist organization according to you. What aspects of the description of fascism in the article 'fascism' do not apply to Kach? According to Ehud Sprinzak Kach and Meir Kahane was in fact quasi-fascism: http://members.tripod.com/alabasters_archive/kach_and_kahane.html. I recently read a newspaper article about an Israeli peace activist, he said that there are extremist right-wing Israelis wearing the same black t-shirts as neo-nazis and right-extremists in Europe reading: 'left side, good night'. I think this shows how there are facist elements in Israeli society with a significant influence on the politics of the country which is right-wing, I think that Kach is a very good representation of this. Bokareis (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Bolivian resultsHi RJFF. I've reverted your addition to the results table of the Bolivian elections - the figures you added were from an exit poll, and not actual results. Cheers, Number 57 20:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC) TBYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Hi RJFF. Could you tell me where there is a long-standing consensus regarding the number of parties in the infobox? I don't understand your reason for reverting. Thanks, Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 23:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Propose moving Call of Tunisia to Nidaa Tounessee Talk:Call of Tunisia. --PanchoS (talk) 10:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC) Third Way article 1st referenceHello! I have just examined the very first reference in the mentioned article. Firstly, it has only one author, the other is the translator into English. Secondly, the single author, Norberto Bobbio is a socialist, so one could ask if his work is objective? The definition of third way seems to be extremly narrow in the article, knowing that even Hitler used the term. However, i think we can handle it together with rightist third position, as a pair, so there might be no need for modification at all :/ Tamás http://cnqzu.com/library/Politics/Bobbio-Norberto-Left-and-Right-Significance-Political-Distinction.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.224.72.132 (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Finnish Political PartiesExcuse me, but there's NO WAY that The Swedish People's Party of Finland is a centrist party. It's at least centre-right or even right-wing, and as a Finn I know this. You deleted my edit where I claimed the party to be cente-rightist, because there were no sources, but there isn't neither sources in the article for the party to be centrist. And then The Finns Party-article, where the party's political position isn't announced. I edited the article by writing the party's position to be centre to centre-right, 'cause party leader Timo Soini says the party to be centrist, but there are also party members such as Simon Elo and Jussi Halla-aho who are clearly right-wing politicians. So I ask you, why would you delete the editions? --Tohtori Koira (talk) 10:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Emigrants to/expatriates in ThailandI completely understand your point in changing these. The fact is that categories are a blunt instrument and the manner in which they are nested is not always meant to express 100% logical truth in all cases. There has been a consensus to categorize the "FOOian emigrants to BAR" and the "FOOian expatriates in BAR" categories as subcategories of "BARian people of FOOian descent" in all cases. This is not meant to communicate that all FOOians in this situation became or are BARians, it's simply a nesting for convenience and to recognize that emigrants to BAR and expatriates in BAR should be accessible through easy navigation of the "BARian people" category tree. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC) Reference Errors on 22 December
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Iraqi Accord FrontHello colleague. Just to avoid misunderstandings: did your request 'citation needed' in this edit, May 2014, refer to IAF being Islamist — as I assumed yesterday, while editing it — or also to its being Sunni? --Corriebertus (talk) 06:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Pegida or PEGIDA?I wasn't convinced that "Pegida" is more common than "PEGIDA". Therefore, it was moved back. You can request a move. --George Ho (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Thai citiesMaybe we can create a chart of how different authorities give the various cities and try again in a few weeks, without Buriram or Sisaket. The chart could have columns for DOPA, BGN, Bangkok Post, various atlases, and so forth. Several editors involved this time around seemed to be unreasonable just for the sake of being unreasonable. NotUnusual (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sip Song Chau Tai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC) Sipsong Chou/Chu/Chao ThaiI noticed you needed a complete list of the cantons for your recent entry on the Sip Song Chao Tai- The names you list are in vietnamese but look like transcribed Lao/thai (since muong likely is muang). Here is an article from the Journal of Mon-Khmer studies which lists all twelve with the Lao/Thai and Vietnamese names (see the footnotes)http://sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/chamberlain1992black.pdf Also the French added a few cantons bringing the total up to 16 during the colonial period- Hope this helps StampyElephant (talk) 15:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Sing-Akademie zu Berlin listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sing-Akademie zu Berlin. Since you had some involvement with the Sing-Akademie zu Berlin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Cavalier and RoundheadsCavaliers "Wrong but Wromantic"; Roundheads "Right but Repulsive". Thanks for the thanks. Is there any particular reason why those two edits pleased you? I ask because there are two templates which the same IP address edited: Template:Roundhead/meta/color and Template:Cavalier/meta/color. I think I know why the Roundhead colour was chosen (it was Earl of Essex's colour, warn by the parliamentarians at the Battle of Edgehill the first major battle of the Civil war) and has been as mistaken by some as a general Roundhead colour. Green would probably be better, as per Green Ribbon Club. I have no idea why purple has been chosen for the Royalists other than purple as a Roman senator and royal colour. Do yo have any ideas? -- PBS (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Papademos cabinet
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngathrek Golop Lhakpa. Well spotted. Dougweller (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Pretentiousness"Nazi" may be used as a handy shortcut among scholars rather than repeating the breadth of National Socialism ad nauseam, but the same can be said for Jobbik, a right-wing (to quote the outdated terms of the dichotomical political spectrum) party whose article FIRST refers to it by its full name, but many scholars just call it Jobbik. We must be neutral for every subject, just because you don't like it means nothing.--Sigehelmus (talk) 21:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Government of Extremadura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mérida. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move DiscussionHi, This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question. Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mường Thanh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tai Dam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
