User talk:Quasihuman

Archives

Note: All relevant page history is in the archives. March 2010–March 2012,

Re: Kyrra Grunnsund

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I'll take a proper look at it tomorrow. FWIW, he did indeed receive a Medal of the Order of Australia and an Australian Sports Medal, and this is his profile from the International Paralympic Committee. Graham87 15:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? :-) Graham87 09:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've copyedited your talk page notice; hope you don't mind. Graham87 09:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Methylazoxymethanol acetate

Hello! Your submission of Methylazoxymethanol acetate at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Humphrey or Humphry?

"Humphry" was a common variant spelling of "Humphrey" in Lloyd's day. For instance, Humphry Davy was a contemporary of Lloyd, and that (to modern eyes) odd-seeming spelling of Davy's name is definitely the correct one. Do you have proof one way or another of the spelling of Lloyd's name?

Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well this profile from Trinity College, Dublin, where he was provost, uses Humphrey, but if you have sources that use the other spelling, I've no problem with changing it. Maybe we should continue the conversation on the talk page of the article if this doesn't resolve it. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 21:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been researching this for the last several minutes and found this: Elementary treatise on the wave theory of light. So it looks like "Humphrey" is correct. At the time I was working on this article, two of my sources used the "Humphry" spelling, and two used "Humphrey" so I pretty much flipped a coin. Obviously not a reliable means of scholarship... Cheers! :-) Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 22:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great find! Thanks. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 22:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Animal models of schizophrenia

On 25 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Animal models of schizophrenia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that rats treated with methylazoxymethanol acetate (molecular model pictured) during gestation are an animal model of schizophrenia? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Methylazoxymethanol acetate

On 25 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Methylazoxymethanol acetate, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that rats treated with methylazoxymethanol acetate (molecular model pictured) during gestation are an animal model of schizophrenia? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/2012 SCO summit

Updated as requested.Lihaas (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating the fine article on Animal models of schizophrenia. Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 12:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good Articles.

Good Articles ( My edits)

This was posted and I do not think it actually went through :P

Hey there. I am failing them due to the Citations. You need the citations in certain areas correct?

I try to add them to the hold list but it is to much in the Citation errors so I have to.

I have only approved only 1 article and I have read that one early this afternoon while pulling some information.

Thanks

DEUNICK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deunick (talk • contribs) 23:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1769 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily! We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, TheSpecialUser ^TSU

Heads up

In case you didn't notice, Deunick's GA reviews have been restarted. Malleus Fatuorum is reviewing the Charles Boycott article and has made some comments at the review that I've responded to. Graham87 05:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1769 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH! News Good article nominee 04 Aug 2012 – Parental brain (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Carina1205 (t · c); see discussion AFCH script improvements 1.16 to 1.17 Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU

• Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My condolences!

I'm sorry to see no one has picked up your good article nomination at Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations#Biology_and_medicine from July yet! If I at least get the ball rolling by providing some feedback on the talk page, might you be interested in providing some feedback at Wikipedia:Peer_review/Interstitial_cystitis/archive1? I'll notify that editor of this thread. Maybe you two could do some sort of trade. They also want to get interstitial cystitis up to good article status. Best wishes. Biosthmors (talk) 20:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biosthmors, thanks for the kind condolences (luckily much of the waiting time coincided with being busy in real life). My time available to edit is limited right now, however, I'd be happy to review that article, as long as the other editor doesn't mind waiting a few days for a review. Also, I haven't done much content reviewing before (except for DYK, which is a different kettle of fish). Thanks, Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 23:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quasihuman, I would certainly be waiting to wait a few days to better accommodate you. Just let me know when you are ready. Thanks! TylerDurden8823 (talk) 01:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I left some comments for you at Talk:Animal models of schizophrenia. There aren't many, but I can provide more later if you wish. FYI, I should probably caution you that I have been criticized for going over GA-level standards when providing feedback for good article candidates. =) Best wishes. Biosthmors (talk) 21:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you thought my comments were helpful. I just commented again and I did a copy edit to the first sentence too. Maybe you like it, maybe you don't. =) Biosthmors (talk) 17:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my lack of responsiveness to your comments, I have exams in the next two weeks. After them, your comments will get the attention they deserve. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 23:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on your exams! Biosthmors (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's! Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 23:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1769 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script! Thanks in advance, Nathan2055^talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Peer review

Hi. Since you gave comments on articles that are currently listed at WP:PR, I was wondering if you could give some helpful comments to Wikipedia:Peer review/Cher/archive1? Thanks, Lordelliott (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

Delivered 01:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phil Pickett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electric Dreams and It's A Miracle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

There may be controversies surrounding people and people's points of view may be diverse. However, Dr. Zhi Gang Sha received as I noted in my own posting, the Martin Luther King Jr. Commemorative Commission award (given out by the US government for peace and humanitarian efforts), so I believe these things should be noted in his biographical sketch. He was also cited by Boston Globe as 'peace leader of the world'. So I guess the current posting under his biographical sketch should be maintained under 'Controversies' and my posting should perhaps become the main article, since it is an official review of his activity, accurate and taken from one of his published books. I am also new in posting on wikipedia so I may make some editing mistakes - I accidentally removed the citations from the controversies-section and I apologize for that, it was unintentional.

Thank you for your time,

Christina Rugina, affiliated with Imperial College, London, UK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crissy02453 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Animal models of schizophrenia

The article Animal models of schizophrenia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Animal models of schizophrenia for things which need to be addressed. Tomcat (7) 16:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review

I am currently cleaning up the backlog over at Editor Review and I found this in the backlog. As it is no longer posted on the main page at Editor Review, I was wondering if I should remove it from the backlogs and put it to rest or if I should repost it for community review. I will remove it from the backlogs three days from now if I am not given a response.—cyberpower _Offline^Happy 2013 22:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year! I hope you're doing well. Best wishes to you. Biosthmors (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 14:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Hill

Please see Talk:Karen Friedman#re-creation as redirect. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 13:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for A Frank Statement

On 4 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article A Frank Statement, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an article in Reader's Digest about the health effects of tobacco led to an advertisement disputing the science? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Frank Statement. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge/AfD merge backlog elimination drive

Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge/AfD merge backlog elimination drive, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge/AfD merge backlog elimination drive and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge/AfD merge backlog elimination drive during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. NickPenguin_(contribs) 18:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

Hello Quasihuman:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) Josve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} ^(t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emmanuel Amoroso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted FAC for Charles Boycott

Hello, just in case you missed it, I reverted a malformed attempt to start another FAC at Charles Boycott; see my message at the talk page of the user who attempted to nominate the page for featured article status. I'm not sure if you're willing or able to help out with such a FAC at this point, but I'm just letting you know anyway. Graham87 12:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (Emmanuel Amoroso)

Thank-you for the article on Emmanuel Amoroso. I assessed it as start, but it probably is better than that if you want me to take another look at it. I came across it as he gave the Darwin Lecture of the Galton Institute in 1967, see User:Carcharoth/Article incubator/Darwin Lectures. Carcharoth (talk) 11:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Blair

There is no reference to assert that Amanda Blair is on the board of the Adelaide Festival, and their own website here http://www.adelaidefestival.com.au/board doesn't list her as a board member. In addition the article uses slang and poor language such as this "...gave writing the flick and packed her bags to come to Adelaide" which makes one wonder if she wrote the article herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.32.117.171 (talk) 04:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is no reference to support that claim, however you used speedy deletion criterion A7 to try to delete it, that criterion says: "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines." If you still think the article needs to be deleted, I will list it on WP:Articles for deletion for you if you give me a deletion rationale (you need an account to list it for technical reasons). I would advise you to read WP:BEFORE and WP:N before nominating. I would also note that the quality of the writing is mostly irrelevant for deletion, because we don't delete stuff that could be fixed by editing. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 07:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geraldine Butler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candida. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Floyd Carothers

Quasihuman, there has been a response to your review query at the above DYK nomination. Were you planning to return to complete the full review, or should I find a new reviewer to continue it? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review needs your help

Hi Quasihuman,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Quasihuman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animal models of epilepsy has been accepted

Animal models of epilepsy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 15:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a linguistic editor, can you please help me out with the linguistics around digital dependencies and global mental health

RfC open there and social media addiction. Its quite basic linguistics but now the article is being suggested for deletion based on the linguistics. Any thoughts appreciated! --E.3 (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Methylazoxymethanol

Hello, Quasihuman,

Thanks for creating Methylazoxymethanol! I edit here too, under the username Graeme Bartlett and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

See if you can find a textbook or review article covering this

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Lebedev

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuroscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 01:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]