|
User talk:Qiushufang
2022At Economy of South Korea, These are facts that you can be confirmed by going into the documentation. Will you delete all i did again, if i edit? Antwerpant (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC) If I edit, will you erase everything I've done again? I feel you are attacking me. You keep looking through my records and erasing everything I've done. Antwerpant (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC) I really appreciate your contributions btw Antwerpant (talk) 23:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC) JoseonI just added reliable source. And changed "tributary state of Qing" to "protectorate of Qing". Bcs the difference between the member of the Chinese tributary system and the tributary state cannot be distinguished. Antwerpant (talk) 23:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC) I deleted failed source but i didnt change translation Antwerpant (talk) 23:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC) And added a define of Korean historian from the source Antwerpant (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC) I added some details from the source. NP:NPOV Antwerpant (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC) WP:NPOV** Antwerpant (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC) AnswerNo, I don't want edit war. I'm making an encyclopedia using reliable sources. But you are doing act of vandalism. I think you need to be careful Antwerpant (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC) You should not delete it, If i wrote based on reliable source. That is vandalism. Antwerpant (talk) 09:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The name of Balhae was officially removed in 982???Please add the specific page of the reference source to the comments, otherwise there is no way to p Rove that the country name was not cancelled until 982. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.64.1.6 (talk) 04:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
By the edits of the Kingdom of TungningThose were not "disruptive edits", all my edits contain and attach reliable references which could be traced and proved. I did not invent any of those idea from my personal point of view. Every edits I made with clear explanations of why and how I made such revisions. Someone barely proved their own point by accusing my works as "desruptive edits" who should better provided a better references to confirm their points, not me to do their own jobs.123.192.182.76 (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Strategic Policy Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Regarding the sources of the Battle of JupilThere are scarce original information available since most Goryeo history record was lost, and only available source is from the Old Book of Tang, which was compiled based on the edited record of Li Shimin by Li Shimin himself. New Book of Tang is revised/derived of Old Book of Tang, and Samguk Sagi is copy & paste of New Book of Tang (while compilers complained about the honesty of Tang by neglecting available source that was unfavor to Tang, which the source I used for Tang casualty. Kadrun (talk) 10:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disruptive editing
The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for May 30An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 6An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhuang people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandan. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ミラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Korean nationalist editorsSee the timing of: [1] + [2] ([3]) and [4]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.17.33.134 (talk) 04:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Regarding early history of VietnamDear Friend, Wikipedia User, Firstly, thank you for your contributions for the expansion of Wikipedia. I see you do not agree with me. You have the rights to your own views and opinions. I am not going into a revert edit war in Wikipedia with you and your friends. Judging by your user name, I am assuming you are of Chinese ethnicity? Therefore, you might interpret Vietnamese’s history differently. You see, it doesn’t matter what ethnicity we think the ancient elites were, which side of the border they were born in, or, if they were more or less sinicized; their aspirations were all the same. They all sought independence, fairness, and justice for their country and people of modern day Vietnam. This made them who they are and who the Vietnamese are today. Nevertheless, whether we are Viet or Chinese, we are all descendants of Thần Nông/神農. This fact is embedded in both of our history and traditions. Furthermore, the border had long been drawn for over a thousand years between the two countries. The cultures, values, customs, speech and grammar have been developed differently on both sides. Because the ancient elites thought of their future generations, we Viet remember their great deeds forever. Here is something worthwhile to note. During the Song and Lý era, the Song vanquished the Northern Han and the last of remaining ancient royal bloodline. The Emperor of Northern Han, Liu Ji Yuan (劉繼元) died in 992. While in Đại Việt of Lý of Vietnam, the last remaining descendant of ancient royal bloodlines of the Lưu (劉) clan, Lưu Kế Tông (劉繼宗) proclaimed himself as Rajadhi Raja (King of King) of Chiêm Thành/占城 (Champa) sixth dynasty in the year ~986. Lưu was originally a Đại Việt’s military officer during an offensive against Cham's Great King, Indravarman IV. After Indravarman IV was defeated and fled southward, Lưu’s order was to remain in guarded position at the defense line, at the northern tip of Champa, but took the opportunity to claim Champa and it's vassalages for himself. Nevertheless, Lưu poorly ruled Champa independently for several years until he was apprehended, trialed and beheaded by Đại Việt's army for disobeying his military command. Both the Song's and Lý's actions in removing the 劉, which meant ‘kill’ safeguarded the 100 clans of the ancient lines. See if the character 劉 is listed in the 100 family surnames (百家姓). The listed surname 柳/Liǔ written as Liễu in Vietnamese means ‘willow’ and is not a replacement for 劉. In recent years, there have been many aspirations among Chinese youths to restore the so-called “Han” culture seen throughout the internet. Since Han refers to an ancient imperial dynasty of China governed through feudalistic values (phong kiến/封建), restoring Han culture and values would mean reviving a society based on its feudal systems. In a modern era that inspires human rights and equalities, reverting back to imperialistic ideology would mean one is willing to give up theirs rights and freedom. The time is not there for us to act rashly anymore. The time we waited for is here, right now, for us to act brightly and create a brighter future, for the generations to come. Let it not be because we do NOT think about our future generations, that they will never forget us. This is all I have to say. 2607:FB91:29E:9F27:3946:50B4:9FE1:7070 (talk) 12:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. ReProbably I misunderstood Zratsky([May be WP:AGF).Because Zratsky added external links to baike.baidu and used a lot of abnormally formatted references,like <ref>衣冠南渡 ．在线新华字典[引用日期2013-08-09</ref><ref>唐宋时期的北人南迁 ．内蒙古教育出版社官网．2008-01-15[引用日期2013-08-09]</ref><ref>六朝时期北人南迁及蛮族的流布 ．内蒙古教育出版社官网．2008-01-15[引用日期2013-08-09]</ref><ref>东晋建康的开始—永嘉南渡 ．通南京网．2012-10-10[引用日期2013-08-09]</ref><ref>从衣冠南渡到西部大开发 ．中国期刊网．2011-4-26 [引用日期2013-08-12]</ref><ref>中华书局编辑部．全唐诗．北京：中华书局，1999-01-1 ：761</ref><ref>参阅范文澜蔡美彪等《中国通史》第二编第五章第一节﹑郭沫若《中国史稿》第三册第四章第一节</ref>. So I think he copied and translated the content from baike.baidu.Otherwise, there can't be so many abnormal references. By the way, the original baike.baidu link has been placed in this link(3 links of baidu.baike in external links). If you've checked that it's not copied from baike.baidu, I won't check it again. Rastinition (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Sorry both. That was a form message that wasn't worded very well. The issue was that of WP:DUE, which has been discussed on the article talk page. So there is no need to continue further here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. AskI have some resource that is of research interest to you and would like to show it privately. Do you prefer email pgp done or some other means of communication? This is potentially time-sensitive. Rrnggrrl (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Many thanks Qiushufang 兄弟
 SimeonManier (talk) has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking! Thanks for standing with me Qiushufang 兄弟 in getting rid of the pesky self-centered disruptive vandal JordanKSM. Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! SimeonManier (talk) 17:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 7An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Horde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarai. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Regarding, History of TaiwanDon't reply here but instead reply me in the link I send you. I have seen your contributions in the History of Taiwan and I have a very good suggestion concerning the History of Taiwan and it's relationship with Chinese. I want you to know what the suggestion is but posting the sources here would fill up quite a lot of blank spaces. If you don't have a reddit account, create one and message me https://old.reddit.com/user/Normal_Echo_8569/ It won't be a waste of your time.82.36.220.78 (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soonNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Provide the sourceYou wrote this in your edit summary " the Zheng forces were the ones defeated and the ones who put up a good fight according to the source ". Where does the source say Zheng forces were defeated. The original edit was like this which says " Zheng Jing's navy defeated a combined Qing-Dutch fleet commanded by Han Banner general Ma Degong in 1664 and Ma was killed in the battle."82.36.220.78 (talk) 20:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 8An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minnan. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Correction to previous election announcementJust a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soonVoting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. French Colonial Empire's mapI saw that you undid my 2 maps because you said that you agreed with an IP, also the IP did some edits that are factually wrong, for example a map of the Mongol Empire, in the map there's all Siberia with Mongolian control, and that never happened. I meant that Guinea-Bissau is included in the actual map of the French Colonial Empire's page, and that's a giant mistake, Guinea-Bissau was always controlled by Portugal, called Slave Coast at the time. Portugal controlled it since 1588 until 1974! Also, the "Additional Texts" were dates and some links that sends the reader to the extended page. Also, you can compare my map (Second French Empire (ColonialBEL).png) and you can see that my map isn't wrong, and Guinea-Bissau is not included. Thank you! Gabriel Ziegler (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Balhae ControversiesHello, Thank you for bringing to my attention that the references were missing some information. I have put the information below, if you have no issues with the formatting I will redo the edits with the below references.
Masatoshi, Ishi (2001) "Japanese Bohai Relations History Book" Yoshikawa Kobunkan Publishing, ISBN 4642023631. p 416-417 石井正敏 (2001) ,"日本渤海関係史の研究" 吉川弘文館,. ISBN 4642023631. p 425-426 石井正敏 (2001) ,"日本渤海関係史の研究" 吉川弘文館,. ISBN 4642023631. p 416-417
Hino, Kaizaburo, (1984) "Kaizaburo Hino Oriental History Collection", Sanichi Shobo Publishing Co., Ltd. NCID: BN00321010 p 78. Hino, Kaizaburo, (1984) "Kaizaburo Hino Oriental History Collection", Sanichi Shobo Publishing Co., Ltd. NCID: BN00321010 p 486-487
日野開三郎 (1984) "日野開三郎 東洋史学論集" ,三一書房, p 486-487
Considering that lines aren't really a thing may I ask how you would go about quoting, say the old book of tang?
Ruiji Kokushi vol 193
類聚国史 vol 193 Vaebn (talk) 05:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Return : November 2022 Your recent editing history at Silla shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Kor Ph (talk) 10:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 20An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xinjiang under Qing rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aksu. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Use plagins to get history diff linksTo quickly link to history edits you can use Wikipedia plugins like this: HistoryHelper. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 09:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Notice
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC) Opposition to Casey T. Arrowood nominationI added some material to Casey T. Arrowood, specifically that article contained no mention of opposition to his nomination. -- M.boli (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Playing cardPlease see my comments at Talk:Playing card since your original reversion. Zelchenko (talk) 01:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Descent from Han Chinese Li LingYou removed my information two time saying the same thing "already mentioned above". I will explain what you did is wrong. In the section of Ethnicity and language [edit] it only cites historical evidence from Chinese perspective from The Tang Huiyao (961 CE). From the Kyrgyz perspective, it is Kyrgyz tale that was passed down for generations and should also be included. What I edited is already from the source, I simply added Kyrgyz perspective to make more equal and fair narrative. The problem is this sentence " It is possible that this was an invented tradition used to claim a blood relationship with the Tang imperial house who claimed descent from Li Ling's grandfather, Li Guang. " But from the Kyrgyz perspective they truely believe the Kyrgyz Khan is descendant of Han dynasty general Li Ling. Compare it to this?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Horde#Genetics What does a 2016 genetic study of Golden family (pre-1200) of Genghis Khan from Mongolia have anything to do with Golden Horde (1240-1502) in Europe? The only thing they have in common is the world 'Golden' but it suppose to refer to Kipchak. It says it is not sure if R1b ,D4 is Golden family of Genghis Khan or from his daughter's marriage with other clan. Why talk about if the Golden family is the result of a male genetically carrying a haplogroup west eurasian R1b mixing with east eurasian women D4 in the genetic section of Golden Horde? And that such mixing represent ancestral lineage of Genghis Khan family or that it represents his daughters lineage marriage to other clan, when they are not even sure? Regardless, I'm pretty sure the Golden Horde study from 2018 is about the 2 individual of Mongol male C3 and Caucasian male being slave. But if that is allowed. I see no reason why you should remove my edit on Kyrgyz perspective 77.103.186.178 (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Close paraphrasing and copyright
If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. I have deleted the article for copyright problems. Please heed the bolded warning carefully - the longer your tenure, the less leeway you get. MER-C 05:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Thank youI thank you for your contributes. I didnt mean to do that. But im really appreciate that you solved everything. User10281129 (talk) 12:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC) HiI am sorry to edit it. I was really didnt want to delete your work but it was confusing texts. So i edited it User10281129 (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Hi. I checked your message. I want to discuss with you about Goryeo and Joseon. User10281129 (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Tbh I want to restore it. Because first of all, It could be confusing if Joseon or Goryeo was part of China or not, for those who don't know about the system. And ive seen some problems with Goryeo. During 1356–1392, Didn't Song dynasty already gone? And in case of Joseon, Joseon was not independent during 1882-1895 User10281129 (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Okay User10281129 (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC) I didnt see your message. Im moving out to page Joseon User10281129 (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Join in talkUser10281129 (talk) 19:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC) To Qiushufang.China's tribute system was not even a means of controlling other countries, but an example of a hierarchical diplomatic method that existed in East Asia in the past. Hierarchical relationships were a natural thing in East Asian diplomacy. Im letting you know that i edited it. I wonder if you genuinely disliked redundant. I tried to write concisely and specifically for those who lack understanding of the system, but you continued to oppose it because the years overlapped. So let's try to make it more concise. Because the tributary relationship and the period of vassalage overlap. Subsequent explanations have been moved to 'a' and 'b'. In personal, i think we need to include both tributary relations and the period of being independent. If such explanations are omitted, it's insufficient of explanations. User10281129 (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Februaryyou are tailing me, and deleting all my edits. It may be WP:EDITWAR. User10281129 (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hunan201p obvious bias western eurasian and fake editingThis editor Hunan201p seems to be doing this quite awhile. There is not a single edit in his Asia-related topics that doesn't promote western eurasian racist theories. Ignoring what he has been doing is the same thing as person as unable to do anything about it even when you know is wrong. Red hair on Odegei Khan.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Red_hair&diff=prev&oldid=1099032131, his beard clearly looks brow. The source clearly says light colored beard but Hunan201p still edit red beard Hovering caption of Ogedei Khan portrait reads: "A portrait of a man with a light-colored beard and mustache and a turquoise cap." and is not even sure that represents his image because the other image of him all black hair, dark brown eyes. In the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Red_hair, Hunan201p guy now commits original uses secondary language blog as evidence, instead of using a first independent source.
NOTE: 1) Thing he doesn't include: All member of the Golden family belong to the Mongoloid physical type 2) That R1b is related paternally with other clans with Genghis Khan daughter rather than male lineage of Genghis Khan This is from the same genetic study Hunan201p uses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023095/ " All physical anthropological parameters indicate that the skulls of the Tavan Tolgoi graves were all anthropologically Mongoloid https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023095/ "Additionally, Tavan Tolgoi bodies may have been the product of marriages between the lineage of Genghis Khan's Borjigin clan and the lineage of either the Ongud or Hongirad clans, indicating that these individuals were members of Genghis Khan's immediate family or his close relatives." " it seems most likely that the Tavan Tolgoi bodies are members of Genghis Khan’s Golden family, including the lineage of bekis, Genghis Khan’s female lineage, and their female successors who controlled Eastern Mongolia in the early Mongolian era 'instead of guregens of the Ongud clan, or' the lineage of khans, Genghis Khan’s male lineage, who married females of the Hongirad clan" It should be edited that it as likely the Golden family is related only to the female lineage Genghis Khan not male lineage.Gemmaso (talk) 15:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC) File:Genghis_Khan's_Middle_Eastern_campaigns_1216-1224.jpgHi Qiushufang, I've used the above file in Siege of Bukhara, which is now at FAC; personally, I think it's excellent, but it's being criticised for its readability. Is there any way you could improve that aspect? I would be very obliged. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Thoughts?A lot of content recently got removed for original research on Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States. 126.77.236.24 (talk) 16:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Battle of Myeongnyang and Battle of NoryangIf you have any objection to my editing, please read my opinion on the talk page carefully, write your own opinion. たたたたたたたたったポンタ (talk) 06:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Battle of Busan(1592) and Battle of MyeongryangHello, Qiushufang. It seems that there have been revisions against consensus in some articles explaining two battles of the Japanese invasion of Korea(1592~1598), so I have opened talk pages discussing about the revisions in articles of Battle of Busan (1592) and Battle of Myeongryang. Would you give some assistance to facilitate better discussions in talk pages of two battles? User:John21716(talk) 10:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC) Warning about edit warring at JoseonI made a comment about this at AN3 where you reported the other editor, but I wanted to comment here as well so that it wasn't overlooked. Please be aware that your edits on Joseon are also edit warring and that if they continue you will very likely be blocked for edit warring as well, as you very nearly were blocked for the edits on 2 April. The two of you are edit warring slowly across multiple articles over the last few months which, even though that isn't a 3RR issue, is still edit warring. There has been no talk page discussion since January, and you went right up to 3 reverts yesterday and stopped which is also still edit warring; there is no entitlement to make 3 reverts a day. Please do not continue to revert on Joseon or any other talk page; seek dispute resolution such as WP:3O and get a consensus for your preferred content rather than repeatedly reverting the other editor. Thank you. - Aoidh (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disambiguation link notification for May 18An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tibet under Qing rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kokonor. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC) RE potential sockingHi! Recently I had a new editor with an inappropriate name (you can probably guess which one) post on my talk page complaining about being reverted at Propaganda in China. After looking into the situation I don't disagree with your revert (the added content needs work) but I wanted to let you know that "rv likely sock" is not an appropriate edit summary its a WP:PERSONALATTACK if you believe that an account is a sock you either need to open a sock puppet investigation case or keep it to yourself. There is no middle ground where you don't do the work and get to make personal attacks. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Are you familiar with the Shennong clanI just saw you editing Shennong. Are you familiar with the idea of the Shennong clan, I think also called the KuiKui clan which was founded by Shennong and the last Yan emperor was a descendant of? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 21:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Yuan Dynasty inappropriate editingIt is clear that you have been advocating for biased, unsubstantiated, and unverified assertions in the article for Yuan Dynasty that need intervention from multiple other editors to clean up the page. Your use of edit reversions multiple times (more than 3) in a single day due to unfaithful and biased editing is cause for censure. Your comments around the ethnic origins of other users (using the term "Arabic" in theorizing about a user and username) is completely inappropriate. Disrupting edithi i see you have edit wrong information in the List of monarchs of Vietnam and i want to correct you that not only the accuracy of the site is base on our country historical account but also from archaeology discovery in our country of Vietnam and your country of China so yeah stop disrupting edit or you will be blocked Kimhanh1554 (talk) 04:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Stop disruptingi beg you please stop disrupting edit it's annoying if you don't stop I'm gonna blocked you Kimhanh1554 (talk) 07:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Suppression objet "Hand cannon"Bonjour, L'objet récemment supprimé sur la page "Hand Cannon" est justifié : l'objet ne daterait pas du XVe siècle, cette pièce d'artillerie est aujourd'hui considéré comme un faux fabriqué au XIXe siècle. MarineMuséeArmée (talk) 08:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. October 2023
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Ngô QuyềnHi, I am Vietnamese and I want to say that the source you use from "Ngô Vui" is not a book, never publish and don't have in Vi-Wiki. And about "Châu Ái" all Vietnamese know that it's Thanh Hóa province, not Nghệ An province. You can translate from Vi-wiki. Thank you. Chris Vineyard (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC) Qiushufang, can you help out the Genghis Khan pageI saw your changes in the history archives of Genghis Khan and you were the one who suggested edited ruddy complexion but the sentence need to be re-edited so that viewers understand this wasn't just about Genghis Khan talking about Kublai Khan had ruddy skin complexion (not red hair) but also members of his families ( Genghis sons) also didn't have red air should also be stated in the edit however Airshipjungleman29 edited trimmed sentence in a way that doesn't explain any of that. All it says is this this "Jami al-tawarikh, which states that Genghis Khan and his Borjigin ancestors had blue-green eyes and either red hair or a ruddy complexion. The way that sentence is edited make it seem that only Kublai Khan having was the only person who had either red hair or ruddy complexion ( it should also be "skin color" complexion) so many important things were removed on purpose, all for the sake of Airshipjungleman29 trimming. It trimmed so much to the point that only the Genghis Khan caption and any important historical information to his appearance is trimmed. The reason to trim so much In the Cultural depictions section when it's not even half of the size of other section. Data on 2.5 years of edit gone because of Airshipjungleman29 trimmings-https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genghis_Khan&diff=prev&oldid=1148906384#Cultural_depictions RED HAIR Sources about red hair: "However, according to John Andrew Boyle, Rashid al-Din's text of red hair referred to ruddy skin complexion, and that Genghis Khan was of ruddy complexion like most of his children except for Kublai Khan who was swarthy. He translated the text as “It chanced that he was born 2 months before Möge, and when Chingiz-Khan's eye fell upon him he said: “all our children are of a ruddy complexion, but this child is swarthy like his maternal uncles. Tell Sorqoqtani Beki to give him to a good nurse to be reared”.[188]" 1278 PORTRAIT Also the portrait of Genghis Khan from 1278, "According to sinologist Herbert Allen Giles, a Mongol painter known as Ho-li-hosun (also known as Khorisun or Qooriqosun) was commissioned by Kublai Khan in 1278 to paint the National Palace Museum portrait." [180] The story goes that Kublai Khan ordered Khorisun, along with the other entrusted remaining followers of Genghis Khan, to ensure the portrait reflected the Genghis Khan's true image.[181] From historical archives-https://archive.org/details/introductiontohi00gileuoft/page/162/mode/2up?q=ho-li-ho-sun AND NO HISTORICAL DATES EDITED IN THE CURRENT PARAGRAPH "The two earliest statements come from the Persian chronicler Juzjani, who relied on Khorasani eyewitnesses, and the contemporary Song diplomat Zhao Hong—both record that he was tall and strong with a powerful stature.. A much later description is found in the Jami al-tawarikh:" There is no date on Persian chronicler Juzjani and Song diplomat Zhao Hong (which was suppose to be from 1220 and 1221). There's also no date on the Jami al-tawarikh (which was suppose to be from 14th century). Any reader or viewer who have no previous knowledge would confuse those records for happening in the same century. It all seems very strange how the section is edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sengoku-lord (talk • contribs) 11:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Size of the Song Economy talk pageHello , I called on you many times in good faith to participate in the debate of the talk page of the Song Economy because since you reverted me then disappeared; a lot of suspects accounts ( probably Socks are emerging) ; if this continues and there is no positive interaction; I will notify the notice board for action on sock puppet accounts. It seems from this page you have an history with vandalism and other issues. High Regards SeriousHist (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Okay thank you as a sign of good faith ; I m asking you to stop trying to impose your point of view by putting prosperity instead of wealthy ( it is the same in the end most prosperous or most wealthy it was neither but one of the most prosperous or most wealthy ) ; and let the community interact in the talk page. The history of this page is making me suspicious but I want to trust you so please refrain until a consensus emerge on the talk page. Believe me it is better in an encyclopedia not to be totally affirmative with incomplete facts ( one of the most prosperous is much more plausible, logical and acceptable) High Regards SeriousHist (talk) 10:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) You reversed me and another author; you removed a major source; you are refusing to wait for a majority to decide on the talk page; I m reporting you .SeriousHist (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC) You caused all of this with your bad faith and refusing to compromise; and insisting on imposing your point of view ; you are even refusing to letting the community decide. No wonder all these people complain about your behavior in your talk page.
Hello I see below others are complaining of your behavior of reverting them, I m warning ⛔️ you about WP:OWN" ; you are removing everything I put : 1) when I describe you are using one source for your claims which is the truth 2) When I describe European achievements in comparaison to China they are a facts plus you don’t decide on reliability of Palmer 3) The description of Byzantine annual fiscal revenues is simply to compare them to the song revenues inside the song economy article. Thank you SeriousHist (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC) November 2023
Tsien on printingFYI, the Tsien book Science and Civilization in China 5.I is available to borrow from the Internet Archive here. I found it cleared up one major misunderstanding. You may find it useful? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC) Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598)I was embarrassed because there was an editing conflict while revising the items for the Imjin War.. If there is a problem with the Hamgyeong-do campaign and the Joseon Army item, I will correct it. Win8050 (talk) 06:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Disambiguation link notification for November 28An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mongol invasions of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsushima. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Can't we do more?Either we are incapable or he is too intelligent for us to deal with. He is just editing everything the way he wants. I was hoping based on your historical experience with him you can do more but I feel like you too are struggling to keep up with his reasons to remove your edits, don't worry though. I'm try my best to convince him. Here again.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan#Character_and_achievements Why did AirshipJungleman29 removing the date o 1220 and 1221 by Juz and Song that recorded Genghis Khan before he died in 1227? It's as if he doesn't want people to people actually recorded during Genghis Khan life time existent. Also why he removed the info to 1278 PORTRAIT " Also the portrait of Genghis Khan from 1278, "According to sinologist Herbert Allen Giles, a Mongol painter known as Ho-li-hosun (also known as Khorisun or Qooriqosun) was commissioned by Kublai Khan From historical archives-An introduction to the history of Chinese pictorial art : Giles, Herbert Allen, 1845-1935 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive" Anyway this guy focus so much about Mongols and Genghis Khan and removes and interpret it the way he wants even the caption he removed, he doesn't do this do any other page which has 5 to 9 lines caption but only to the Genghis Khan page. Sengoku-lord (talk) 11:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC) "동여진" == Eastern Jurchens "20여" == over 20 Dallcomm (talk) 11:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 6An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. It is in alphabetical order. And if you do not like the part, do not revert all and try discussing it. Dubukimchi (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC) Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) Oh wellSorry you think I'm a troll, just wanted to drop this here in case I end up blocked or banned... User:Guizotthehistorian. I think you might recognize them[6]. You're welcome and I hope we can get along better in the future. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Military history of TaiwanHi! Appreciate your help on adding content to Military history of Taiwan. However, I noticed you seem to be moving whole sections from other articles, if not whole articles, to the point that this article now contains way more words than optimal. I think there is a balance to keep here, where we could keep a summary of events but reference other articles appropriately. Let me know if you agree. Butterdiplomat (talk) 04:11, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
Song EconomyPlease stop the destruction or any effort to make the article better ; you are destroying team effort plus you are making the article worse by claiming it’s ownership WP:OWN you were already refuted many times ; your talk page show your conflicts with many users . This is a warning ⛔️ against WP:OWN and meatpuppets SeriousHist (talk) 10:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
I did report it during the board discussion; also on the Talk page of the article and its history but I have the feeling they want us to cooperate; perhaps it is why they are not interfering; also I m ready to accept their judgement if they support you , I m ready to move on. SeriousHist (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Qiushufang, take a look at thisYou should really take a look a this user who I think is anti-Chinese ( even though you can't accuse him of being anti-Chinese his edits shows his agenda and motives). He is a wikipedia user with Indian written name.The same person who created this page-https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shajing_culture&action=history&offset=20231104215044%7C1183529796 When you read every edit his made related with Chinese it's like everything he is doing so far trying you make Chinese people less than what they and less proud of being ethnic Chinese. If you look at all the wiki page he created and what he edited so far. Behind his agenda is to do everything to undermine Chinese people's creativity, intelligence and a disguise in protoming indo-european supremacy. He invest a lot of time in editing Saka/Indo-European connections with China. For example this is the map he created-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka#/media/File:Map_of_the_Saka_realm.png The Saka page-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saka SOME CONTROVERSIAL CLAIMS HE ADDED. All of these are hypothesis not proven but he edits it like it's neutral-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afanasievo_culture#Possible_links_to_other_cultures Numerous scholars have suggested that the Afanasievo culture may be responsible for the introduction of metallurgy to China.[56][57][58] In particular, contacts between the Afanasievo culture and the Majiayao culture and the Qijia culture are considered for the transmission of bronze technology.[59][60] Similar paragraph again that's edited in Afanasievo culture also in the majiayao culture page he edited-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majiayao_culture#Bronze- And as for this-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shajing_culture#Final_period the final centuries, the Shajing culture was bordered to the south by the first Great Wall built by King Zhao of Qin in 271 BCE, and by the Xirong Majiayuan culture which had been incorporated within it.[20][21] No matter how you look at it there's a clear agenda of trying to link some Chinese achievements with indo-european influence, introduction. I hope someone rebukes all of this because it's clear to me that all the things he edited only make Chinese people look bad ( is a disguise to make achievements of Chinese look non-Chinese) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sengoku-lord (talk • contribs) 10:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Economy of South Korea edit war
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. This link showed that you made three reverts on 10 February 2024.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Joseon's international statusAlthough Japan won the Sino-Japanese War and interfered in Korea's internal affairs, it was not until after the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905 that Korea was officially classified as a dependent country of Japan. Before that, it was advertised that it made Joseon independent. On the other hand, the Qing Dynasty claimed that it had a similar dependency relationship with the Western world based on its traditional relationship with Joseon. However, this is only the Qing Dynasty's claim, and there is no agreement from Joseon, no treaty, or any documented data to prove it. It must be clearly stated that this is the Qing Dynasty's claim. Win8050 (talk) 14:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
??!For what did you undo my addition? BulgarChanyu (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Bro why are delete start year of Chagatai khanateit can be redundant for you but for others is important Vishgor (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kaidu–Kublai war ?Thank you to edit the article. I think their fault from my side Vishgor (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue 217, May 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. inquiry about the Sihang Warehouse pagehi Qiushufang. i'm curious about what's been going on the Sihang Warehouse page. based on a quick view of the page's history there seems to be some aggressive edit warring going on. would you mind filling me in on the loop on whats going on there, because im pretty interested in the topic. Wahreit (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 218, June 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiProjectHi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ainu people, would you maybe be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 16:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. a request for moderationhello again qiushufang, hope everything's been well. i made some new edits to the sihang warehouse page for old time's sake, but i think we both know where this is going. when the inevitable pushback comes, would it be possible for you to act as a mediator for all parties? it would be much appreciated, bc you know much more about wikipedia's policies and guidelines. thanks. Wahreit (talk) 00:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Qiushufang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I would like to appeal the 48hr block for being overly harsh given the circumstances. The pages involved (Crank (mechanism) and Crankshaft) had not been previously edited by the other user, I did not initiate by altering their content, I provided a reason in each edit summary, and attempted talk resolution explaining why the material constituted a contravention of Wiki policies when it became obvious the other user was not responding with anything other than reversions. This can be seen in both the pages' history and talk page. They did not provide any reasons for their reversions in any of their edit summaries and refused to provide material to substantiate their claims in talk, stoking my frustration unfortunately. I've discussed productively in recent talk discussions involving opposing viewpoints and have shown that in most cases I was able to come to agreement or compromise. I would like to appeal a shorter block or block removal on the basis of having dealt with an extremely frustrating editor that should have just been avoided and having stopped reversions both at the above pages and previous ones such as History of Taiwan where the user has once again restored their version. Qiushufang (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Decline reason: I think the block length is reasonable given that you have been blocked for edit warring previously. In fact as Yamla notes, you could have been blocked for a longer period. I suggest you consider reverting once a day in future, and using dispute resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This is your third block for violating WP:EW. You promised back in 2018 that you'd avoid edit wars in the future, but instead have continued to do so. It's more common for blocks to escalate. Given that the 2018 block was for a week, I'd expect this one to be for a month. That said, I'm not reviewing this request as it seems that you may indeed have significant mitigating factors. --Yamla (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Töregene Khatun's Campaigns
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC) Invitation to participate in a researchHello, The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey. You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement . Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. Kind Regards, BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the yearNominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add The Bugle: Issue 223, November 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awardsVoting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Former countries in Chinese historyHello Qiushufang. Thanks for your edit on Buyeo. Following your edit on Buyeo, a user is asking to redefine the scope of countries that should be included in "Category:Former countries in Chinese history". He/she has posted on Category talk:Former countries in Chinese history, stating that he/she would remove the existing definition if there is no reply to his/her post. I would assume that he/she would then proceed to remove countries that he/she deem unsuitable to be included in the category. Based on his/her post, it is clear that he/she is attempting to remove historical countries that are shared by multiple modern-day countries, including of course Buyeo. Based on this user's past edits, he/she has a tendency to push for an exclusively Korean narrative to histories concerning historical countries that straddle the borders of modern-day countries. Many of the countries that he listed as examples that should be removed from the category are: 1. tributary states of China; 2. countries that existed substantially in Chinese historical records; 3. countries whose territories overlap with that of present-day China; 4. countries that declared independence from China but were unrecognised as such. I was thinking that you might want to voice your opinion given your great expertise in this area, before one user changes a longstanding definition of a category. I should note that including a historical country under "Category:Former countries in Chinese history" does not preclude it from being included in the categories of other relevant countries, such as Korea. Would be happy to hear from you on how we should go about dealing with this issue. Thank you. Morrisonjohn022 (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) December 2024
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. See Talk:Water_wheel#China? Andy Dingley (talk) 01:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue 224, December 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. |
