User talk:Pyrrhus16/Archive 6
Well doneCongratulations on all your hard work, he have more GA's, FL's and FA's thanks to you. Well done. — R2 14:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Take careMichael Jackson could become your life's work if you're not careful xx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.99.30 (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC) Relationship article and DYKBe prepared for the possibility of a backlash. I'm watching lol. — R2 16:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Nice work. need helpNice work on the relationships article. I was wondering if you could help organise and contribute to this article I'm making on Michael Jackson. Write now its a sub page on my user space, click on my name and then click on the link there and help me improve it so we can launch it onto the wiki mainspace. What do you think? If it is worthy of inclusion then please do help me organise it and make it better. Right now its just parts lifted from other articles but I'm sure with your help it can improve. Reply back on thoughts, thanks. JTBX (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Michael JacksonYou've removed my entries on the 1993 allegations against Michael Jackson --entries which supported Michael Jackson's claims he was an extortion victim -- with the remark "sloppy and widely unsourced". "Unsourced" is absolutly untrue because I cited pages of Geraldine Hughes' book and parts of Feldman's Grand Jury testimony. My native language isn't English... but if you find any mistakes you could correct them instead of deleting the whole text! Furthermore I just went back to correct something... but my entry was already deleted. Not okay what you did imo... by Stephanie Hu, 09-11-11 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanie Hu (talk • contribs) 02:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC) I'm not too familiar with the TOS here. Thanx for the information. Nevertheless I think it's important information: Larry Feldman and Johnnie Cochran settled.... and soon later (what I wrote in the entry - before - was wrong) Feldman represented Cochran (the attorney of the counter party!) in his own case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanie Hu (talk • contribs) 02:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC) You actually should be interested in further information which boosts that he's innocent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanie Hu (talk • contribs) 02:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC) DYK for Personal relationships of Michael JacksonSoWhy 01:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC) We Are the World questionHello. I've started work on your request for an audio version of We Are the World for WP:SPOKEN. It's a great article and will make a nice addition to the project, thanks for requesting it. I have one small question; would you happen to know the preferred pronunciation of Ken Kragen's surname? If nothing else I can use the default German pronunciation (sort of rhymes with "toboggan") but if he pronounces it differently I'd like to get it right. Thanks! Rob T Firefly (talk) 11:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
123Look I know that "123" is a unreleased Jackson 5 song BUT, it is still a work on Michael Jackson (R.I.P), so souldn't there be some mention of it on that page shouln't there?--69.72.86.24 (talk) 01:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Now wait, what about Kreeton Overture? That song was written for the Jackson 5 to sing for the Victory tour, that isn't a work of JUST Michael!--69.72.86.24 (talk) 01:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Okay, no hard feelings and I'll remove "123" BUT I suggest someone should create the "List of unreleased Jackson 5 material" page pretty soon!--69.72.86.24 (talk) 01:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC) DYK for What More Can I GiveMaterialscientist (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC) DYK for Dancing the DreamMaterialscientist (talk) 19:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC) TDCAUIt's not random adlibs. I heard it myself! Mjfan98 (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC) MJfan9you are still deciding whether to delete my Dangerous - The Remix Collection Replie from User talkpage: ok! but I think it is. anyway you should check google. actually about half of the page Dangerous - The Remix Collection was edited by another User and the original name was Dangerous Remix.
p.s. how do you get those Rewards —Preceding unsigned comment added by MJfan9 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Replie from User talkpage: you got the barnsters but how did you get that Dangerous (album) award thingy Replie from User talkpage: ok! thank you Replie from User talkpage: oh yeah I thought it was a link didn't think. MJfan9:
Replie from User talkpage: yeah mine's smooth criminal too
MJfan9:
MJfan9: how do you get those boxes on your user talk: Pyrrhus16 MJfan9: say is this Jay? you don't have to answer MJfan9: Checkout my new Questions and comments and my new Audio sample and Tracklisting on my Userpage MJfan9: is taking a short WikiBreak and will be Back on Sometime in January 2010. Disruptive!Wikipedia is for everyone to edit the reason why your saying im disruptive is silly. You reverting back things you believe should be there is that disruptive as well? Back to the point. I dont think subsequent years is really necessary. I think King of Pop is fine without subsequent years but at the same time King of Pop shouldnt even be mentioned in a page about his music videos because its irrelevant to them. A Star Is Here (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Secondly. Pop singer is a acurrate title for Jackson but not apart of the body of a wikipedia article. Labeling what kind of artist they are should be mentioned in the intro. We do not go around in the middle of articles calling them rock/pop/R&B singers. The best way to do it is to call them by their last name regardless how often that may occur. Im trying to help you understand that. Nobody is trying to disruptive the other. Its just different opinions. Do you get it? A Star Is Here (talk) 20:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Dont come to my page writing nonsense about telling an admin about a disagreement and saying there has been a throughly review because there has'nt. Subsequent is fine your right, but pop singer is not accurate as a I said before in a prior paragraph. So changing it is constructive not disruptive. We have to work together here and not have a false sense of authority. You should go to an admin because this edit war won't stop until someone mediates. I dont agree with pop singer being in the body paragraph because like I said it sounds too much like internet article or a newspaper describing Jackson. Yes theres nothing wrong with him being called a pop singer but not a part of the body paragraph. I'll wait for you to get mediation. A Star Is Here (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC) DYK for Move Like Michael JacksonMaterialscientist (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC) MJfan9please stop Deleting things from My Userpage
Replie from Usertalk:
Smooth Criminal Songannie are you ok are you ok annie
the song Speed Demon Hasn't got enough information
whyHave you checked youtube.com and Google for these songs
User talk ReplieCool!
DeletionMy subpage article User:MJfan9/Rye or the Kaiser (Theme from Rocky XIII) Has finally been Deleted
MJFAnPlease look at his talkpage history, he has recvd the warning you gave him today two days ago. He's wiping clean that part. At this point I myself think a block is nec. This is atl least the fourth or fifth time he is putting non free material on his pages. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC) Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia