User talk:Prism/Archive 5

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please help page Miracle (Paula Seling and Ovi song)

Hello, I saw that you help to add a audio sample for Katy Perry songs , please cand you put an audio sample for Paula and Ovi song in the infobox, to this page Miracle (Paula Seling and Ovi song).

Thanks a lot, I speak in the name of Paula manager, means a lot for us. Audio Sample for Miracle 2A02:2F0E:D25F:FFFF:0:0:BC18:917C (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!

Hello Prism, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 15:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Legendary Lovers

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Legendary Lovers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 23:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trouble (Natalia Kills album)

The article Trouble (Natalia Kills album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Trouble (Natalia Kills album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WonderBoy1998 -- WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Just so I know you've seen it, please see this. As long as the reviews are fair and thorough, I don't mind- I don't think anyone does. J Milburn (talk) 15:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Legendary Lovers

The article Legendary Lovers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Legendary Lovers for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trouble (Natalia Kills album)

The article Trouble (Natalia Kills album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trouble (Natalia Kills album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WonderBoy1998 -- WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legendary Lovers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Legendary Lovers

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MTV Unplugged (Katy Perry album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MTV Unplugged (Katy Perry album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 23:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi Prism, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism, spam and blatantly unconstructive edits; using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 20:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of MTV Unplugged (Katy Perry album)

The article MTV Unplugged (Katy Perry album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:MTV Unplugged (Katy Perry album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 22:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "Double Rainbow"

Sure I'd love to help :)! Is it in your sandbox?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 22:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm it looks like you've got most of the good-sourced information. Overall it looks like a well written article, should have no problems passing GA! I'll be more then willing to review it if you'd like! --(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 22:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind doing a second look of "It Takes Two"? The reviewer before it did no actual review, and judging by his history, don't think he is suitable to be reviewing GA's.--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, another big reason why I failed the GA review is because the nominator @(CA)Giacobbe: was also the creator of the article, which I seriously doubt is a valid nomination. It's like "favoriting" your own tweets or "liking" your own Facebook status. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Once again a personal attack and is not grounds to fail a GA. You did NO review of the article whatsoever, just stop.--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not so much personal attack as it as questioning validity XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@XXSNUGGUMSXX: It is allowed to nominate your own created article. Failing a review just because someone created the article and nominated it is wrong. I nominated Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song), which you reviewed though I think I should get a reassessment, and I created that article. I will review "It Takes Two". prism △ 11:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't the only reason I failed it for GA- another reason was that it didn't have much coverage compared to other GA's I've seen (though (CA)Giacobbe says it was enough for a "deluxe edition" article). XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 13:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@XXSNUGGUMSXX: Still not enough of a valid reason to quick fail it. The sources are reliable, there's plenty of good information and the coverage is sufficient for a deluxe edition song, since not many editors review such songs. prism △ 13:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Walking on Air (Katy Perry song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Walking on Air (Katy Perry song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Double Rainbow (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Double Rainbow (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of (CA)Giacobbe -- (CA)Giacobbe (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Double Rainbow (song)

The article Double Rainbow (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Double Rainbow (song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of (CA)Giacobbe -- (CA)Giacobbe (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roar

Just thought to give you a heads up that Roar's gold in Mexico now --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It Takes Two

Hey Prism, I was wondering when you'd be starting your review of "It Takes Two"? After everything that's been happening I'd just like to know that someone will give it a fair and honest review. Thank you so much.--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 23:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@(CA)Giacobbe: I'll start it as soon as someone replies to my query on WPTALK:GAN. prism △ 23:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! Is that involving this situation?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 23:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is. prism △ 23:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you happen to have a link to the discussion?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I've fixed all the issues you listed!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Walking on Air (Katy Perry song)

The article Walking on Air (Katy Perry song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Walking on Air (Katy Perry song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 19:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Roar (song)

The article Roar (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roar (song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wide Awake

Hey Prism, I was wondering if you'd like to do a co-nomination of "Wide Awake" with me? I had originally created the article a while back and built it up, but wasn't able to promote it to GA because of other commitments at the time. If you were interested that'd be great, because we could promote Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection to a good topic, it'd be the first one of Katy's to do so. Let me know, thanks!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Choose Your Battles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Choose Your Battles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choose Your Battles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble themes

Hi, Prism! As per your request, I went through the interview and I have highlighted some themes. I have not gone through the article to see if you've already listed some things but I'm just going to list them all-

  • One of the themes is of her troubled childhood, and the problematic and destructive household she grew up in. Also how she got into more trouble after she escaped. Basically one prominent theme of trouble is indeed, trouble.
  • "The funny thing is, everyone has always said to me all my life, 'Don't let those bad thing define you. Brush it off. Think positive'. I don't want to do that - I want to do the f**king opposite" - this is very important. It defines the approach to the songs.
  • "Worst moments" is the key word. The theme of the album revolves around the worst of her memories.
  • Her "erratic feelings of love and passionate desperation" and the "suicide" ballads
  • It deals with dealing her problems first hand and looking back at them, which she described as "torture".
  • A motif of being "sad and trapped"

I guess that's all I could flesh out. I wish she had sold a little more of that album, and the process of making it a featured article would be easier, because maybe some reviewers will hold that against it. I suggest reframing some of the article in such a way that the least emphasis is on its commercial performance, such as a removal of a "Commercial performance" section altoghether, and sticking it into a section entitled "Reception" only. You can also remove "Critical reception". Just some suggestions. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the article. It looks good to me. Don't worry it takes time for peer reviews to begin. Also, do you think mentioning Kills' lipstick product "L'Oreal Colour Riche 178 in Cardinal Plume" really important? It seems like product placement lol --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WikiCup question

Hi there Prism; I'm sorry to say that if the GAs are deleted, delisted or merged, the points will be removed. J Milburn (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you tell me where these discussions are taking place? Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Natalia Kills at the Cherrytree Pop Alternative Tour.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Natalia Kills at the Cherrytree Pop Alternative Tour.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Natalia Kills discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The [[discography]] of [Natalia Kills]], an English singer-songwriter, consists of two [[Studio album|studio albums]], seven [[Single (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

4 FAC

Hey! Thank you for your comments on the 4 FAC, however, a moderator has now asked that they are to be elaborated on as to why they specifically meet the FA criteria as the chances of it being promoted are otherwise poor. If you can, I'd appreciate it greatly! Thanks! —JennKR | ☎ 02:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Peer review

Hello, I'm currently peer reviewing Katy Perry. However, I would be able to PR Trouble once that review has finished which shouldn't be too long, if you look on the Katy Perry article talk page, did you want something as extensive as that? Cheers. —JennKR | ☎ 02:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Natalia Kills discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Perfectionist, Saturday Night and Mirrors
Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chorus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 22 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See You Again cover

Hi, can you please post the link to which you said the original See You Again cover originated? You said it came from a 'Disney Channel fan blog'. Aaronboy123 (talk) 02:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FL

I will, either later today/tomorrow. Cheers, —JennKR | ☎ 17:24, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Choose Your Battles

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Flatline (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flatline (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 04:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, thank you so much for passing Your Body (Christina Aguilera song)! — Simon (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@HĐ: No problem! Since it didn't have a lot of problems and the ones that it did have were easy to fix, we all knew that this would be pass fast. Thank you for reviewing Flatline! prism △ 13:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. It's my pleasure :D — Simon (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Flatline (song)

The article Flatline (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Flatline (song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 13:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, so much thank for your support on Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Lotus (Christina Aguilera album)/archive1. I really appreciate your GAN review for "Your Body" so that this topic is now completed! Cheers, — Simon (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of What Love Is Made Of

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article What Love Is Made Of you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Double Rainbow (song)

Orlady (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

I just saw that your nomination of Natalia Kills discography for FA was a success. Good work and I'm happy that I was able to help you a little bit! :) decodet. (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Acabei de descobrir que você é de Portugal! Compartilhamos o mesmo idioma, legal! :) decodet. (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Decodet: Acabei de ver que a nomeação foi aprovada, ia agora mesmo agradecer-lhe! Foste mesmo uma ajuda muito importante para conseguir isto; de outra maneira não teria conseguido. Obrigado! (já agora, se alguma vez tiver um artigo em nomeação para GA, FA ou mesmo outra FL, me diz que eu ajudo) :) prism △ 16:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Com certeza, digo o mesmo para você! Por enquanto minha única nomeação é The Pretty Reckless discography porém ninguém mais comentou, estou no aguardo. Fora isso, minha maior meta é o artigo Ashley Tisdale, venho tentado há anos conseguir uma promoção para FA. Espero que na próxima nomeação eu finalmente consiga! :) decodet. (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Decodet: Eu sou um grande fã da Tisdale, se quiseres ajuda, simplesmente pergunta! Se bem que "You're Always Here" foi um pouco de uma desilusão... prism △ 16:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
O maior problema do artigo é a prosa do mesmo. Nas últimas duas nomeações, essa foi a questão principal levantada. Eu tenho tentado há meses deixar a prosa melhor, e pretendo voltar a nomear o artigo daqui uns meses, quando eu sentir que está pronto, de fato. Foram três nomeações fracassadas! A última foi essa Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ashley Tisdale/archive3, se te interessar. A questão é que conseguir a promoção de um artigo para FA é mil vezes mais difícil do que para FL :( decodet. (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble (Natalia Kills album)


Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Flatline (song) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Flatline (song)

Hello! Your submission of Flatline (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! C679 22:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
Great job with your contributions to music-related articles! Keep up the solid work! Simon (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I was not expecting this at all! Thank you a lot! :) prism △ 17:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, it's my pleasure. Keep on the great work you have done! Cheers, — Simon (talk) 09:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of What Love Is Made Of

The article What Love Is Made Of you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:What Love Is Made Of for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 11:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna book

Bravo! You did a great work on the article. I really appreciate it! Keep it that way. Made a few adjustments just to make it more beautiful :P. — Tomíca(T2ME) 14:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomica: Thank you for the recognition! And thank you again for the edits, I'm sure we're getting a new GA for the Rihanna WikiProject! Though I haven't been active there, I still love Rihanna and we should keep working on her articles. prism △ 15:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I am very open for collaboration. Especially on the tour articles if you are interested in. They are kinda in a bad shape (except the Diamonds World Tour which I tried to maintain, although additional info is needed there too so can be complete). — Tomíca(T2ME) 15:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomica: Sure, although I do think we should work on the remaining album articles so they can become GAs. prism △ 15:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that too. Rated R needs some paraphrasing, while Talk That Talk is a mess! Unapologetic can be fixed up easy according to me. — Tomíca(T2ME) 15:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Tomica: Rated R should have the problems I noted in its GA review fixed. We should start with Unapologetic, though. prism △ 15:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rihanna (book)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rihanna (book) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rihanna (book)

The article Rihanna (book) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rihanna (book) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Miley Cyrus

Hi there! I recently nominated List of songs recorded by Miley Cyrus for FL; if you wouldn't mind stopping by and leaving some comments on the nomination page, that would be greatly appreciated. If you're not interested or don't have the time, don't worry about it! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Flatline (song)

The DYK project (nominate) 17:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BlackBerry Bold 9700

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article BlackBerry Bold 9700 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FACs/FLCs

Hi Prism, could you please leave some comments at my FAC for Can't Hold Us Down and/or my FLCs for Christina Aguilera concert tours? Much appreciate, and well done with your most recent works! — Simon (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HĐ: Simon, I didn't forget about this, I'll leave some comments later today or tomorrow. ;) Prism △ 18:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Quick question

It's over. We're now in the interim period. The judges are working to get things sorted for the start of round two in March. Anything promoted on the 27th or 28th of February can be claimed in round 2. J Milburn (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Juicy J performing.png

Thanks for uploading File:Juicy J performing.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BlackBerry 9700 cropped.png

Thanks for uploading File:BlackBerry 9700 cropped.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

  1. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
  2. Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
  3. United States WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Sophie Ellis-Bextor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nick Jones, Sean Moore and Union Chapel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Take Me Home (Cher song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Take Me Home (Cher song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Take Me Home (Cher song)

The article Take Me Home (Cher song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Take Me Home (Cher song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of BlackBerry Bold 9700

The article BlackBerry Bold 9700 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:BlackBerry Bold 9700 for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 22:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Sky Ferreira

Hey there, I recently created/nominated List of songs recorded by Sky Ferreira for FLC (taking into consideration constructive criticism from my first nomination List of songs recorded by Miley Cyrus), and I was wondering if you'd be interested in leaving some comments at the nomination. No worries if you're not interested! WikiRedactor (talk) 01:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: So...

Haha, nothing much really. Actually I have my IGCSE pre-boards going on, so I'm a little busy preparing for them. I plan to dive deep into WP work as soon as they end. I'm thinking of working on some articles already. Thanks for appreciating my work :D --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of the files that you have uploaded may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 March 8#OTRS pending since January for details. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Katy Perry performing Unconditionally.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katy Perry performing Unconditionally.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night Time, My Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topless (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unconditionally

Before submitting our work to the main article, should any more detail else be added to the sandbox on sales, certifications, reviews, or anything? I personally am quite eager to submit it for GAN. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 02:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Congratulations!

Thank-you! Yes, I'd be more than happy too. I believe I'll be able to look at it tomorrow in fact! —JennKR | ☎ 23:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I've said this before but I always forget Natalia Kills is Verbalicious who made "Don't Play Nice"—a song that was all over the music channels in the UK a few years ago. —JennKR | ☎ 23:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Lazy Song

Hello

Shouldn't the talk page for The Lazy Song already have the WikiProject Songs and Reggae WikiProject updated for GA class in the criteria and quality scale? Thank You. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble (Natalia Kills album) [Review]

Overview
  • The lead should be three paragraphs long for an article this size; having four is not a huge problem but I'd try and condense it.
  • So So Gay may not be the best source for the album's reception. I know that there aren't many reviews available but that is a more of an LGBT-oriented publication than a credible music publication.
  • A whole paragraph on the album's artwork may be slightly undue, especially considering that the Composition section is around the same size (a section which is more important).
  • Ref #1 needs fully citing.

I'll look at the prose in-depth soon... —JennKR | ☎ 14:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Katy Perry Prism digipak.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Katy Perry Prism digipak.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Choose Your Battles

The article Choose Your Battles you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Choose Your Battles for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


DYK

Could you check your cher song at DYK, its stuck and needs a bit of tlc. thx Victuallers (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

I just wanted to thank you again for giving me my very first barnstar- made my day :D! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
Impressive work on List of songs recorded by Sophie Ellis-Bextor! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Take Me Home (Cher song)

Hello! Your submission of Take Me Home (Cher song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Prism, if you have time to review and comment on an FA nomination, then you have time to do a quid pro quo review of a DYK for this nomination. Please take care of this soon. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Prism, I'm marking this nomination with a more serious icon, since you've been active on Wikipedia and not returned to this. This was first noted as an issue on March 15, and it's been more than two weeks since you were reminded here. I really hope you return to this nomination before it ends up being closed because you haven't responded. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup error

Hi there- this is just a quick note to apologise for a small but important mistake in the last WikiCup newsletter; it is not 64 users who will progress to the next round, but 32. J Milburn (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:18, Saturday, February 15, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:18, Saturday, February 15, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


DYK for Take Me Home (Cher song)

Thanks for your article Victuallers (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

@XXSNUGGUMSXX, (CA)Giacobbe, and WikiRedactor: Hi everyone! I was thinking about this earlier when I was reviewing the GAN for "Adore You" and I actually think it is a good idea. What if we, on a weekly basis, reunite on a Tinychat (or another site of the same type) and discuss improvements to music-related articles; our GANs among other stuff and maybe even chat a bit about our musical preferences and stuff. (Don't get me wrong, I think this is a good idea because we all get along and we all like pop music in general, so...) What do you say? prism△ 20:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good idea, I'd be interested in that! WikiRedactor (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting idea, I'll give this some thought..... XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 21:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to join eventually here is the room. prism△ 21:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

E.T.

@(CA)Giacobbe and XXSNUGGUMSXX: So I've been envisioning a restructured article for "E.T." and here's a diagram with some information. If you agree, let's make all modifications to the structure here so we have a basis for our work.

→ Lead: First two paragraphs could address the original song while the third gives an overview on the remixed version.

→ Background and release: Information on the conception and on the release as a promotional single as well.

→ Composition: All the information on the song's musical style, lyricism etc. however without info pertaining to Kanye's verses.

→ Critical reception: All the critiques for the original version.

→ Commercial response: Entries on charts and peaks of the original version.

→ Credits and personnel: Credits according to booklet of the 2010 edition of Teenage Dream.

→ Charts

→ Release history

→ Remix featuring Kanye West: The section pertaining to the remixed version, obviously. Before the sub-sections, an introduction on them.

→ Background and release: Why Kanye participated on the single and details of its release;
→ New verses or Composition: Considering the song maintains its original sound and lyrics for Katy, this section would only elaborate on West's verses.
→ Critical reception (?): There are only a few reviews of the single version so maybe this could be merged to the previous section.
→ Commercial performance
→ Credits and personnel: New information on mixing, recording etc. of the single version (which can be found on the booklet of Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection)
→ Charts
→ Release history

→ References

prism△ 10:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent revert of edit on Trouble (Natalia Kills album)

Hello. Hope you're well. I just wanted to know the rationale of reverting my recent edit. I fixed url errors in the references as the article is listed on this category: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pages_with_URL_errors.

Also I changed reference list to width based as the article is on this list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_using_fixed_number_of_columns_in_reflist. I had thought that all articles were moving towards having reflists without fixed columns but fixed widths. Cowlibob (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowlibob: Thank you for your edits; the only reason I reverted you was because of Checklinks, that denoted it as a problematic link due to its changing path. Which was actually just the removal of "http://" once you clicked on it. However if it is needed I won't revert you again. prism△ 16:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick reply. For some reason, wikipedia sometimes doesn't allow links without http:// to appear in the references. I'll make the relevant changes. Cowlibob (talk) 16:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flatline (song)

First of all, good job with this article. However, there's some things that have been missed I think from the GA review. See Talk:Flatline_(song) for my suggestions of things which I think need doing to preserve the GA status. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 22:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lil-unique1: I have seen your suggestions but I haven't had time recently to carry them out. Let me just finish a project I'm working on and I'll do them right away. prism△ 22:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

there's no rush. I just thought I'd let you know. I won't demote the article don't worry. i think its really good and almost there :P → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 22:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trouble (Natalia Kills album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirrors (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katy Perry Prism digipak.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katy Perry Prism digipak.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legendary Lovers Reassessment

Legendary Lovers, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

It Takes Two Reassessment

It Takes Two (Katy Perry song), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Double Rainbow Reassessment

Double Rainbow (song), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Your GA nomination of Trouble (Natalia Kills song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trouble (Natalia Kills song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished the review. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trouble (Natalia Kills song)

The article Trouble (Natalia Kills song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trouble (Natalia Kills song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive Me (Leona Lewis song)

Big red link here!  — ₳aron 16:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

 

Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Portal : Agama
Agama
Portal : Bahasa
Bahasa
Portal : Biografi
Biografi
Portal : Budaya
Budaya
Portal : Ekonomi
Ekonomi
Portal : Elektronika
Elektronika
Portal : Film
Film
Portal : Filsafat
Filsafat
Portal : Geografi
Geografi
Portal : Indonesia
Indonesia
Portal : Ilmu
Ilmu
Portal : Lingkungan
Lingkungan
Portal : Masyarakat
Masyarakat
Portal : Matematika
Matematika
Portal : Militer
Militer
Portal : Mitologi
Mitologi
Portal : Musik
Musik
Portal : Olahraga
Olahraga
Portal : Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Portal : Politik
Politik
Portal : Sastra
Sastra
Portal : Sejarah
Sejarah
Portal : Seni
Seni
Portal : Teknologi
Teknologi