User talk:Prism/Archive 4

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roar (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Pedro João [talk] 11:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sebextor-tp-2003 99563 zoom.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sebextor-tp-2003 99563 zoom.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Haha well, maybe I was a little overly excited when I awarded you that, but I wouldn't take it back. It sure did mean a lot to mean. I am sorry to hear that your efforts have been ignored since then, but I'm sure some day you will be recognized for your contributions. This is actually my first time signing in in well over a year, and I don't plan on being active anymore. However, please do keep up the good work! --Cprice1000 Talk That Talk to Me 22:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wrecking Ball (Miley Cyrus song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Takes PDX!

WIKIPEDIA TAKES PORTLAND 2013! You're invited to participate in the upcoming "Wikipedia Takes Portland" campaign, to be held during the month of September. The local campaign occurs annually in conjunction with Wikipedia Takes America and Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Photographing sites included on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the main focus of Wikipedia Takes Portland. In typical Wikipedia fashion, you can work individually or create a team. Details and signup here!

--Another Believer _(Talk) 17:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Kills

Hey this is the official artwork for "Kill My Boyfriend":

Artwork

Could you upload it to its page? Heres "Kill My Boyfriend" wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kill_My_Boyfriend_%28Natalia_Kills_song%29

And i saw you did a page for "Saturday Night", could you do one for "Problem" too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.102.244 (talk) 11:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sophie ellis-bextor TOur.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Sophie ellis-bextor TOur.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Idolator

Trouble (Natalia Kills album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Idolator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sebextor-tp-2003 99563 zoom.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Sebextor-tp-2003 99563 zoom.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hi there, I didn't review your article, I simply patrolled it, which indicates to the new page patrollers that the article has been checked and is suitable for Wikipedia. Good luck with getting it to GA. Taylor Trescott - ^my talk + _{my edits} 20:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Edit-athon!

WIKI LOVES LIBRARIES 2013! You're invited to attend the upcoming "Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon. The event will be held from 1–4pm on Sunday, October 13, 2013 at the Portland Art Museum's Crumpacker Family Library, located on the second floor of the Museum's Mark Building (formerly the Masonic Temple). The edit-athon will focus on the local arts community (but you can work on other topics as well!). It will also kick off the Oregon Arts Project, an on-wiki initiative to improve coverage of the arts in Oregon. Details and signup here!

Hope to see you there! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicole Scherzinger - Poison.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicole Scherzinger - Poison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2014

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 02:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prism (Katy Perry album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unconditionally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deluxe Prism tracks

As you requested, I have now added commentary on the bonus tracks from Prism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hello. Regarding images, I noticed an edit summary on "By the Grace of God" and should mention the following: The reason I removed images in the past is because those were images of people who did not contribute anything to the song. Since Greg Wells contributed (as you included his photo), it is one I would in fact add. Adding images of people who did not contribute is essentially pointless. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the "Roar" article, it really is unnecessary to have images of people/things that are not related to the song/did not contribute to the song. Therefore, the Ellie Goulding picture and bridge photo are really unnecessary, even if she performed at the bridge. The bridge isn't some significant part of her career or anything, and Ellie has nothing whatsoever to do with the song and did not contribute anything to it. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited By the Grace of God (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Programming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Read My Lips (Sophie Ellis-Bextor album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keyboard and Alex James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of By the Grace of God (song)

Hello! Your submission of By the Grace of God (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some magic for you

For passing the GA Magia review. Thank you very much, and have a great day. 和DITOREtails 22:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Some magic for you

Sure. Since its a 1991 album, it might not be as good, but you still might be interested in some of the tracks. 和DITOREtails 22:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Roar (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roar (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 02:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song)

The article Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saturday Night (Natalia Kills song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night Time, My Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topless (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your work on Bangerz

Thanks so much! I appreciate it! WikiRedactor (talk) 16:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for By the Grace of God (song)

On 8 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article By the Grace of God (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one reviewer described Katy Perry's 2013 ballad "By the Grace of God" as having a "humming, dark tension in which Perry and melody float like red balloons"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/By the Grace of God (song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP Oregon

Thanks for reverting my reversion and explaining your removing a name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon/Participants#Signed up in 2008. I see now that if I had looked more carefully (e.g., at the redirects of the user pages), I would have realized that you were deleting your own entry and not someone else's. Please know you are always welcome to return to WikiProject Oregon. Cheers! YBG (talk) 05:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Dark Horse"

Hello, and thank you! I'm still working on finishing up the critical reception, live performances, and chart performance, but after that I'll move it over to the "Dark Horse" page. In regards to "By the Grace of God" I think that the page could use some expansion since there's tons of information regarding the composition and a few other things, but otherwise it looks like a good article. Personally, I'd recommend taking it off GA nomination and expand on it more, and I'd be plenty willing to help! Just let me know. -(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 19:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yea sure I'd be willing to help. (CA)Giacobbe (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Katy Perry dress.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katy Perry dress.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Katy Perry's Teenage Dream Dress at Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katy Perry's Teenage Dream Dress at Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

		Holiday Cheer
		Victuallers ^talkback is wishing BM Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same

File permission problem with File:Bonnie McKee 3.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Bonnie McKee 3.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonnie McKee 3.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bonnie McKee 3.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

I checked the link you provided with the upload, and it clearly states license terms as "all rights reserved." —C.Fred (talk) 22:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wishes

Turn up your volume and enjoy :D! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of By the Grace of God (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article By the Grace of God (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for taking up the review of Spinning Around and passing it! It's got to be my quickest GA pass till now! Thank you so much again, I really appreciate it! Oh, and congrats for your own new good article contribution!--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for passing two of my nominations in one day! You're awesome! Do tell me if you have a song article you'd like me to review! I'd do so gladly! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I went through Birthday, and I think you should nominate it for GA. I have some corrections in mind that would certainly improve it. If you nominate it, I'll be happy to take up the review. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Birthday (Katy Perry song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Birthday (Katy Perry song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WonderBoy1998 -- WonderBoy1998 (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Katy Hudson album

Date format was clearly mdy and per WP:DATERET should not be changed. Also, per WP:STRONGNAT should be mdy as the subject and label are both American. As for the copy edits, the too were necessary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Katy Hudson (album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. It's not my way, it's the right way, and since you clearly don't understand the subject of Christian music and should not be writing about it. I'll bring it up with the project and have others fix your poor writing. It's not a GA article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need a warning for my edits. I didn't revert them again, instead of you. First and foremost, I'm not English so I can't speak at a native level, which I have specified in my user page. Second, if you want it to stay as the poor article as it was before I expanded it, do it. But the Katy Perry WikiProject could use this good article. Third, I don't appreciate Christian music but I respect the fact that you do. But for any album article of good quality, a lead section discussing important factors about the album, including genres and composition, is necessary. Plus, don't just mix it in one paragraph because it looks terrible. Can we reach some sort of agreement? Thank you in advance. Prism △ 23:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you do need a warning. You've changed the article three times which puts you at the border of the three revert rule.

No agreement is necessary. Now that I know you're not a native English-speaker that explains the poor grammar and other problems. The fact that you reverted my attempts to improve the article's grammar simply show you're too close to your edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: We're way past the grammar issues, I still want to know why do you not want the genres to be addressed in the lead. Prism △ 23:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I notice Walter's request for another set of eyes Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Christian_music#Katy_Hudson.2FKaty_Perry. I read the article through once and had some comments. First the month/date format needs to be mdy - this is an American topic. And the Contemporary Christian genre definitely needs to be addressed in the lead like it is right now. Why does the article call her Perry instead of Hudson since Hudson was her name used when the album was released? Other than that issue, I don't see any major obstacles for it being a GA. The Contemporary Christian genre is the Christian version of the mainstream genre Contemporary hit radio. It includes a range from soft adult contemporary up through Christian rock. Royalbroil 01:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Birthday (Katy Perry song)

The article Birthday (Katy Perry song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Birthday (Katy Perry song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WonderBoy1998 -- WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Katy Hudson (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Katy Hudson (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Katy Hudson (album)

The article Katy Hudson (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Katy Hudson (album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Trouble (Natalia Kills album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trouble (Natalia Kills album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WonderBoy1998 -- WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:52, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.