en User talk:PoliticalPoint Archive 1

PoliticalPoint, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PoliticalPoint! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, PoliticalPoint. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ^Leviv_ich? ! 23:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:OL

While I applaud your great contributions to the Florida Parental Rights in Education Act article, I don't understand why you manually reverted my edits here and here removing linking of common terms such as parent, family, teacher, etc. This seems to be exactly what MOS:OL advises against. Heavy Water (talk) 03:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Heavy Water: Thank you for your most kind compliment. That was likely the inadvertent result of having had begun the edit prior to yours. Do feel free to remove any excessive links or duplicate links per MOS:OL and MOS:DL as you see fit. Kind regards, --PoliticalPoint (talk) 05:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. You're welcome! Heavy Water (talk) 05:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations

Hello. For the proposal at Talk:Conservative_Party_of_British_Columbia#Request_for_comment_on_the_inclusion_of_content_regarding_the_conspiracies_and_controversies_of_the_Conservative_Party_of_British_Columbia, can you please do WP:Inline citations, as opposed to citations just at the end of the paragraph? It will make it much clearer to see which sources say what. Currently, I don't know which exact source says The BC Conservatives have been variously described as racist, anti-Indigenous.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vice regent: It is difficult to do inline citations as some of the sources, particularly the first source, are the reliable sources for several of the statements, which would cause the paragraph to become cluttered with citation numbers. The statements that you are looking for are in the fifth source. --PoliticalPoint (talk) 03:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:PoliticalPoint/Archive 1