User talk:PizzaMan/Archive 4

Westworld edits

Hello, just wondering what to do about the edit war on Westworld's main page. Wondering if you have any suggestions? Bremen (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bremen: How about not edit-war and allow the status quo to remain while a discussion is in place? -- Alex^TW 15:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bremen: Let's keep the discussion on the talk page. As far as i'm concerned, the majority consensus is clear now. Let's give everyone a few days to let that sink in. Ideally Alex, as clearly the most adamant proponent of going into Bernard's origins in the character list, would accept the majority consensus and remove it himself. PizzaMan (♨♨) 19:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaMan: Sounds good, thank you. Bremen (talk) 05:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaMan: Sorry. Not happening. At all. No consensus exists other than your personal wishes, beliefs and desires. Cheerio. -- Alex^TW 08:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Westworld Request for Comment

FYI, I have opened a RfC for Westworld since consensus was unable to be reached. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 11:42, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PizzaMan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<b>[[User:PizzaMan|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#4d0000; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">PizzaMan</span>]] [[User talk:PizzaMan|<font color="darkred">♨♨♨</font>]]</b> : PizzaMan ♨♨♨

to

<b>[[User:PizzaMan|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#4d0000; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">PizzaMan</span>]] [[User talk:PizzaMan|<span style="color: darkred;">♨♨♨</span>]]</b> : PizzaMan ♨♨♨

—Anomalocaris (talk) 02:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 08:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages for articles: Purpose

Note that the Talk pages for articles are not the place to ask questions about the article's subject, or related subjects. The Talk pages exist to discuss the article.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Quisqualis I agree and rarely do this in stead of adding information myself, but in some occasions, pointing out an omission in information can be useful imho. I found a whole lot of unreliable info on this by manufacturers, so nothing (yet) good enough to add to the article. And i'm not sure if i'm qualified to dig into the scientific articles on this. But i appreciate how there can be a thin line with just using a talk page for asking questions. I hope my edit history speaks for itself in that regard. If you feel my post doesn't contribute, feel free to delete it. PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 22:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PizzaMan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Obi2canibe

Hello, PizzaMan. You have new messages at Obi2canibe's talk page.
Message added 19:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Obi2canibe (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]