en User talk:Pinus pinea

Proposed deletion of Dieter Anhuf

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dieter Anhuf, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.K. (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Dieter Anhuf, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Consequentially 09:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of the Dieter Anhuf stub

I d' ont agree with the speedy deletion. More details about Dieter Anhuf are to be found in the french and german wikipedia. Dieter Anhuf is one of the rare german experts of francophone Africa (Tunisia, Senegal and Côte d' Ivoire. If the page is realy deleted (speedly or not) one could think that expertise about francophone Africa is not important for the english wikipedia. I will continue to translate the article from french to english in the next days. One closing remark, the article about Dieter Anhuf, was written a stub - and as stub the article has enough information ! Pinus pinea 09:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dieter Anhuf

Hi, you should try to include some claim of notability in the very first version of the article when starting one. Translating the bibliography section from either the french or german wikipedia would help. - Bobet 09:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the message - i will translate the bibliography section in the next hours and days ! Pinus pinea 10:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Pinus pinea! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 02:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Metdepenningen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marc Metdepenningen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Marc Metdepenningen. Terraxos (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Susanne Andreae

An article that you have been involved in editing, Susanne Andreae, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Andreae. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mr.K. (talk) 15:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jane Daniel

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jane Daniel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.K. (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AAFES Depot Grünstadt

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AAFES Depot Grünstadt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.K. (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christophe Neff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christophe Neff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christophe Neff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacques Hiron

The article Jacques Hiron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No cited sources but may not strictly meet WP:BLPPROD per external links in the authority control template. I did try to find potential sources but I'm not seeing anything that would meet WP:NAUTHOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacques Hiron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacques Hiron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Hiron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Pinus pinea