|
User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 39
I got your e-mailDear Phaedriel, I got your lovely message of encouragement and I will try my best to get a reply to you soon. Love, Kyoko 19:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Your sixth award today Award #7 Will (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
First award of the dayThank you for your support... -Dear Phaedriel, thank you so very much for your kindness and support. Because it's now past midnight GMT, this would be the first award of the new day if you were there. I've sent you an e-mail. Love, Kyoko 00:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC) — Kyoko An overdue barnstar has been checked in!Here's another starry little treasure to add to your collection :).
Problem with kd lvrKd lvr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is back to his old games. If you look at his talk page, he is back to attacking me and homer. He has been blocked for this before, I would suggest he receive a long term block (he has had 3 already). He always says we are kids wasting his time, when really, he wasts the most time with his antics.(kdka)--T. Wiki 03:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
3-day late replyEeek! Sorry about the lateness. I really can't type much tonight, just about to doze off ;) I'll write you an email tomorrow. Looking forward to your response, –Sebi ~ 11:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Majorly's DayHi Phaedriel - thanks for making June 8th Majorly's day! And guess what - today is my 1st Wikibirthday as well! Yey! Thanks for doing this. See you around. Majorly (talk | meet) 11:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Dear Phaedriel
cute? indeed. Lsi john 15:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking of you
A random barnstar for you!
Hmmm...maybe you'll be needing this? To hang them all on? AKRadeckiSpeaketh 16:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC) SharonHi Sharon. I just wanted to give you my best wishes in your current personal delimma, and I await your return! Karrmann 17:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
My RFA
Happy Phaedriel's Day!
You really really deserve this, and others will agree with me. I noticed that you hadn't done one for June 9th, so I thought "this could give Sharon both the recognition she deserves and cheer her up a bit at the same time". Of course, my skills with poetry are not as good as yours, but I think I did right by selecting Mr. Poe :) Happy Day, Sharon! Love, Will (talk) 23:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
By the wayThank you ever so much for your Support vote. It really is much appreciated :) SirFozzie 00:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Oh, dearWhat??? Melancholic and personal problems? We need to fix that with a nice glass of non-alcoholic red wine. :) There ya go! --SWEETCARMEN♥ 00:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 
Some reservations about the Cherokee articleI am still a bit leery of Jeffrey and my difference of ideas, and I'm not sure exactly how to approach it. I wrote up a little paragraph with a series of (6) diffs, which I would like some clarification about. I'm not trying to say that all of the material (or even any of it) belongs in the article, but rather that Jeffrey's removal of cited material in these instances was disruptive and frustrating, and I want to have some idea what, if any, changes he will make in the way he approaches material like this in the future. Anyway, I want to make sure that my presentation is as constructive as possible, and that it is not out of line. So I was wondering if you (and any other interested parties that may watch your talk page) could have a look at it and let me know if it would be appropriate to bring up at Talk:Cherokee. Right now the material can be found at my sandbox (this changes often, so if you find this link next week, you might see something completely different), User talk:Smmurphy/Stream of conscious. Thank you, Smmurphy(Talk) 19:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC) An honour I could never have expectedTo be named as your wikipedian of the day... I am speechless. Thankyou for this most prestigious of honours, and I hope that I can further prove myself worthy of it. Thank you once again. Maybe you should make yourself wikipedian of the day sometime! Anonymous Dissident Utter 06:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Would you considering reducing this to semi-protection? The day or two since it was unprotected, there have been a lot of productive edits by long-term editors; it's mostly been anonymous IPs who have revert-warred (7 reverts). These IPs have never shown up at talk. - Merzbow 21:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!Wow, thank you for the kind (and unexpected) message. That's certainly improved my day. WaltonAssistance! 17:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Inbox (1 new message)You have 1 new message from me :). BTW, would you give that wheely guy a day? I think he deserves it :). --SWEETCARMEN♥ 23:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
My RfA :)
Thank you, Phaedriel, from the bottom of my heart. Your support meant a lot to me. I hope we can work together again soon, and feel free to...squeeze my neck if you think I'm not living up to the mop :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Got your mail!Hi Phaedriel, I got your mail, and I'll try to reply soon. Love, Kyoko 23:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC) welcome back!Hey, welcome back! :) Did you receive my e-mails? --SWEETCARMEN♥ 23:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow, those are a lot of e-mail =0. Anyways, I love the userpage you designed for me... but I thinks it's time to let *sniff, sob* let go. I just really want to copy the layout of your userpage. May I? :). Still, I'll always keep the copy of the one you designed for me. --SWEETCARMEN♥ 01:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC) My Day. Thanks for the day! This is a surprise! Thank you so much for it Phaedriel! Acalamari 01:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Userpage DesignCould you please re-design my userpage when you're done with your current request? I know you said you're not taking anymore, but you also said first come first serve so I wanted to get in line ^_^. When ever you get around to it, even if its within the next few months. Go ahead and change it, you don't need to tell me ahead of time. Thanks! --~ Wikihermit (HermesBot) 02:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: UserpageOoh, go for it! I hadn't considered what it might look like not on a mac with firefox, silly me.. thanks a lot! - Zeibura Talk 04:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC) My RFAYour kind words are most comforting, and your attitude refreshing, but, rather than being discouraged by my recent RFA, I have been further spurred on to improve myself and better my contributions. I take it not as a blow, but rather as just another step along the way. And, just so you know, Gaff and I were merely discussing image policies - it was infact a disputed speedy deletion tag I had placed on an article. But it doesn't matter; I will work hard over the coming months, and hopefully earn the support of my fellow Wikipedians. It is also good to hear that you got the email I sent you, and that that user is being considered for the Wikipedian of the Day. Kind regards and wishing you a great day, Anonymous Dissident Utter 05:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC) HiThought I'd drop by & say hi. Might be getting my Portal:Dinosaurs featured soon. Other than that, everything's normal. You? :) Spawn Man 09:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
RabbitThanks for protecting Rabbit. It was needed, silly anons adding their POV to the article. At least they weren't vandalising the article, like earlier on. I mean, who would want to vandalise the Rabbit article! Poor little thing... oh well, thanks again ;) –Sebi ~ 10:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC) :-)Hi Phaedriel. Thank you for everything and I will try my best to dissolve any bad reputation and become an asset just like you to Wikipedia! Lots of love! ˉˉDuranDuran╦╩ 12:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC) My god Sharon I need you nowOk, maybe not as bad as the title suggests ;) First, welcome back! Anyways, I have been involved in a dispute on the Eagle Talon page, where a user called User:Spoolintsi added images of a heavilly modified facelifted Talon. Now, images of highly modified cars are obviously not allowed, since they would fail in being discriptive of the details of the car. Anyways, me and User:IFCAR, a friend of mine, reverted his edits a few times. So he took to creating a sockpuppet called User:MikeTSIawd, and continued edit warring. I thought that since the accounts were new, I got the page just semi protected. But, the original account got around it, and continued to edit war. They also took to trolling on the talk page, talking about how teh current images disgrace the car. All that aside, Checkuser confirmed that MikeTSIawd is a sockpuppet of Spoolintsi, and all my work to get this taken care of through the systems has gotten nowhere. I can tell from their contributions that they all they done is edit war on the Talon page, and that is all they will continue to do. Pretty much, I am hoping that you will able to do sometthing to end this, so I will not have so sit forever with teh page protected, so this petty dispute can be ended before it gets out of hand. Karrmann 01:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow, those are a lot of e-mail =0. Anyways, I love the userpage you designed for me... but I thinks it's time to let *sniff, sob* let go. I just really want to copy the layout of your userpage. May I? :). Still, I'll always keep the copy of the one you designed for me. --SWEETCARMEN♥ 01:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC) Hmm. This user may be becoming a problem. I will probably see to get Spoolintsi blocked indefinately, since I think that he has now 3 sockpuppets, all used to attack me, edit war, and troll on the Eagle Talon talk page. Oh well, if I see any more of his sockpuppets again, I will just report them to AIV, mark them as vandalism only accounts, and have them quickly blocked. Otherwise, I am going to try what I can to finally stop this guy, as they only blocked him for 24 hours, so tomorrow morning, he will be vandalizing again. But, I know that the page protection for the Eagle Talon page is not going to get removed anytime soon, and after he gets blocked, I will semi protect it in order to keep his sockpuppets from editing it. Karrmann 10:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Hrm. Daniel 05:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Gaah Karrmann 00:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Q reg inclusion of possible damaging infoHi again. I've a coupla questions reg an article about an Institution. 1) There is a discrepancy with regard to one of the heads of the departments on the Institution's website. It is specified as one person in a document which is given for accreditation purposes, but in the actual write-up of the department it is mentioned as another staff member. Could this be included in the article or is it too damaging and unnecessary? 2) In February 2005, the students of the institution staged a demonstration and brought the functioning of the institution to a halt. This was reported in all local dailies, however, no references are available on the Net. I have the said newspaper clipping from a leading national daily (The Hindu) and photos of the said demonstration in progress. Again, is it too damaging to be included in the article? These questions may appear too amateurish - I apologise, if they do. I just had the doubts and couldn't find much in the guidelines for the exact, specific situations. Thanks for your help. aJCfreak yAkBaK 11:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
SmileSharon, thanks for the wonderful surprise. :) I needed it, especially on a Monday. Wikidan829 14:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Smile poemSharon, thanks for the poem, pic, and thoughts. I'm not quite sure how our paths crossed, or why you felt the need to send it, but I certainly do appreciate it! God bless. - BillCJ 17:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC) IssueI'm having a problem with an editor on the Walt Disney World Monorail System article. He thinks this is very very good. One of the first problems is having a section header called introduction. The article is very trivial and written like a visitors guide. I put a re-write tag and he takes it off and calls me names on the articles talk page. Here, you will find what I have done to the article. I think it is much better than whats there. But he will go revert it, so if you think that my version is better and should be the one on the article, please tell him and explain WP:OWN. Thanks super, have a wonderful day --trey 20:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC) dog meatI'm sure this is the typical "stupid fucking white man" thing to say, but I just wanted your opinion on the accuracy and cultural sensitivity of this section. Thanks! VanTucky 22:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC) WikibarometerPhaedriel, your rating seem to be set permanently on melancholic. Ther must be many, many editors who are distressed by this, as you are in my view the most lovable person on wikipedia. I know that this is an open channel and I will bet that no-one will disagree with me. Can anyone do anything to help your melancholia? E-mail response is obviously ok if preferable to you.--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Eagle_Talon_TSI_1992_owner_mike.JPG){kind=link}
![[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Eagle_Talon_AWD_TSI_owner_Mike.JPG){kind=link}
![[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Eagle_Talon_TSI_AWD_1992_owner_Mike.JPG){kind=link}