en User talk:Peter39c

Deletion discussion about Conserve Italia

Hello, Peter39c, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Siroxo, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Conserve Italia, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conserve Italia.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Siroxo}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—siro χ o 04:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Whpq (talk) 12:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peter39c (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have absolutely not copied, or adapted the company story in my own words, I have no connection with the company, I do not take money to write articles and other slimy things. I wrote simply to give accurate information but without copying anything, the text is different, if there is any similar part, I can change it. But blocking me indefinitely is abuse. The text as a whole is different, totally different. It may be that due to fatigue I have inserted a word similar or equal to the translated text. But my aim is not to advertise the company, but to give readers accurate information. I am in absolute good faith. Furthermore, I would have added information that would not have been present on the company website. I always write objectively and exhaustively. Very pertinent to information sources. the company history is too long-winded or detailed, what's the problem we change it, correct it, shorten it, but I don't accept this blocking myself because I'm in good faith. I worked a lot to be accurate, and trying to complete the articles quickly but also costs a lot of effort, even often as in this case poorly rewarded. I apologize if I have unknowingly infringed copyright. I ask for immediate release for my good faith. Or at least a limit on my user blocking. Peter39c (talk) 14:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is false. Your edits to Conserve Italia were copied and/or closely paraphrased from here. It was blatant. More direct copying than paraphrasing, though even close paraphrasing would have been sufficient to block you. Yamla (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note - You have been previously warned about using copyrighted material. Conserve Italia is closely paraphrased from the company's own history web page. You must write in your own words. -- Whpq (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No I just saw that it was move in draft, I wanted to finish quickly, I didn't see the other notes because I was disconnected. I was tired and wanted to finish the article. And when I logged back in I was already blocked. Peter39c (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The translated text that appears on the site of the company's history is not the same as the text I wrote on the article, the two texts are not the same, it may be that in the rush to complete the article something remained similar but it is not a copy paste. But because instead of giving an alert, the account has been blocked indefinitely. This is an abuse, a clear abuse of a position of privilege instead of responsibility. I also apologized because my intention was only to give accurate information, not to promote the company in any way. I made a mistake for my haste, I was tired and wanted to finish the article quickly. Also because for me it represented an uninteresting article, I just wanted to be very accurate. Unfortunately, this is also an error, but due to tiredness and the desire to finish the article quickly.

I see that apologies are not enough anyway, I also asked for a non-indefinite but temporary block.

Then I simply wanted to add an article, an item not present and not destroy information present or create damage or mystify reality or worse, vandalize. The article was not deemed eligible for copyright infringement, patience, the article is deleted, but don't block my account indefinitely! this is abuse! Peter39c (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article was not deemed eligible for copyright infringement is contradicted by the editor who tagged it for deletion as a copyright violation (Liz who is an admin), me, the deleting admin who reviewed and agreed it was a copyright violation, and the Yamla, the admin who reviewed your unblock request. Your talk page history shows that this is not the first difficulties with copyright, and you have been previously warned about copyright issues. -- Whpq (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peter39c. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq - this user has been caught socking as Doriath77. Might be worth looking at their creations from a copyvio perspective? Girth Summit _(blether) 09:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would given the history of close paraphrasing / copying. The challenge will be with Italian language sources that have been translated. I can put that on my to-do list. -- Whpq (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Policy would allow for them simply to delete them all per WP:G5; I'd be comfortable doing that if checking them for copyvios is a pain? Girth Summit _(blether) 17:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, checking would be a pain for a couple of reasons. The use of Italian language sources means it is more difficult to use a tool like Earwig to assist in the work. As well, the history needs checking as I suspect this editor copies material in and then makes alterations in subsequent edits so it isn't as simple as just comparing the current version of the article to sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ferrari Vision Gran Turismo

Hello, Peter39c. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ferrari Vision Gran Turismo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Antonio Codognelli

Hello, Peter39c. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antonio Codognelli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2005 European Rally Championship

Hello, Peter39c. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2005 European Rally Championship, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Antonio Codognelli

Hello, Peter39c. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antonio Codognelli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bruno Sterzi

Hello, Peter39c. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruno Sterzi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving immigrants in Italy

Hello, Peter39c. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving immigrants in Italy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bruno Sterzi

Hello, Peter39c. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bruno Sterzi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Doris family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doris family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doris family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving immigrants in Italy

Hello, Peter39c. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of accidents and incidents involving immigrants in Italy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]