en User talk:Peachseltzer Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Peachseltzer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art House Productions (organization) has been accepted

Art House Productions (organization), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Subtractive drawing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DK. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Ben Archuleta

Please explain your relationship with this person. Were you paid to move this article from draft to main space? What is your relationship with Aspiresumellc? According to what I am seeing at User talk:Aspiresumellc, that editor appears to be one of the authors of this content, and yet you are claiming almost complete authorship, which appears to possibly be plagiarism and possibly a copyright violation. Why did you bypass the Articles for Creation process? Please provide a complete description of what happened here. Cullen328 (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hey there, I have no relationship with this person and have never been paid for editing anything. A friend of a friend who knows that I edit Wikipedia for fun at my job and teach college students how to edit told me that their friend was trying to create a page and was running into issues. I decided to try to create the page myself because I thought it was a fun challenge. I searched for the person and emailed myself all of the articles that seemed to meet credibility standards (see screenshot). The phrasing sounds the same because the biographic information at the sources is phrased similarly. I stuck to information that could be corroborated at the sources. I am a hobby editor and did not realize I was violating any policies. I have written articles in my sandbox and moved them to the article space in the past, which is what I did here. The Articles for Creation page you linked to says "Established users in good standing, however, are encouraged to not clutter up the AfC queue with pages that do not need support or guidance from AfC reviewers. If you are not required to use the AfC process but still need time to work on a new article before it's ready for mainspace, please do not submit it for review." Please feel free to delete the article! Peachseltzer (talk) 04:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Ben Archuleta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ben Archuleta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Typo

Re:Special:Diff/1176762257 – anything I say can /and will/ be used against me, but Titivillus: 'Marc Drogin noted in his instructional manual, Medieval Calligraphy: Its History and Technique (1980), that "for the past half-century every edition of The Oxford English Dictionary has listed an incorrect page reference for, of all things, a footnote on the earliest mention of Titivillus.'

Thanks, though. It was good while it lasted ;) Ponor (talk) 05:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

I figured it couldn't be a coincidence. I'm glad Titivillus infused the OED with some chaos, at least. Peachseltzer (talk) 13:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)