Hi, it was very nice to meet you at the meeting. I'm excited about your excitement and your desire to wish to hear from community members. When you were bringing up edit filters, I thought of Oshwah. He's someone who actively does work there so maybe you'd be interested in having a conversation.
I was very glad to hear your thoughts on mobile editing as well. Someone you might want to talk to about what's possible (even if he's a bit of an outlier) is Cullen328. He does his mobile editing via the desktop site (many editors do this because mobile lacks functionality). Then of course there's me if you ever want to hear about the app. :) Given the MediaWiki comment, I'm assuming you've seen my Signpost essay? If you haven't, it's an interesting read. The comments from other editors about mobile editing could be valuable to you. Clovermoss🍀(talk)18:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm so happy to meet User:PPelberg (WMF) today. We need to bump heads a bit. Lots churning. Promoting and assisting literacy seems such a natural extension of the Foundation's mission. If they can read, they can engage. Making product which helps enable better literacy cements the Foundation even deeper into the surrounding org and biz community. BusterD (talk) 18:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy to have met you too, @BusterD – thank you for making time in your day to come ^ _ ^
I felt energized hearing you name Edit Check, and contributing to Wikipedia more broadly, as an opportunity for people to learn and practice ways of thinking and skills that they think will benefit them inside and outside of the Movement.
In fact, I think what we're talking about here – helping people to see Wikipedia as a place for them to learn and develop skills – is an idea the Growth Team is exploring...
If I'm not mistaken (although @KStoller-WMF, please tell me if I am!), I think part of what has motivated the team to prioritize work on the positive reinforcement project is research that suggests that, "...broadening the appeal beyond ideological motivations may improve diversity of retained editors on Wikipedia."
@Clovermoss, hi! It was wonderful to meet you too – thank you for making the time to attend ^ _ ^
When you were bringing up edit filters, I thought of Oshwah. He's someone who actively does work there so maybe you'd be interested in having a conversation.
Oh, great! This is the first time I'm hearing of this person – I'm glad you thought to mention them here. I've added a note to T327959 to remind myself to follow up with them once the team gets closer to working on the on-wiki configuration side of the Edit Check experience.
Someone you might want to talk to about what's possible (even if he's a bit of an outlier) is Cullen328. He does his mobile editing via the desktop site (many editors do this because mobile lacks functionality).
Then of course there's me if you ever want to hear about the app. :) Given the MediaWiki comment, I'm assuming you've seen my Signpost essay? If you haven't, it's an interesting read. The comments from other editors about mobile editing could be valuable to you.
I have, yes! I'm eager to hear what you think of the mobile experience and you can expect a ping from me when we have a prototype ready for you to try!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SD0001/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, PPelberg (WMF)!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, is there any place where I can keep track of the current development work on the sandboxing aspect of fixing the Graph extension on phabricator ? -- Sohom (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Peter! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. Looking forward to collaborating with you on the development of Edit check in the coming year! Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk
Solstice Celebration for PPelberg (WMF), 2023, DALL·E 3.
Hi Peter! From what I've noticed, it doesn't seem like the current implementation of permalinks allows them to be generated from archive pages. I sometimes want to link to a comment that has been archived, so I would find that useful! Sdkbtalk16:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where I say very rare in this comment is a recent example where I would've preferred to link to my comment rather than a diff but didn't have an option to link to my comment. Sdkbtalk03:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
