|
User talk:PM800/Archive 1
Welcome! Hello, PM800, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place Hi thanks for the comments but as the person in question admits he has no qualifications in the discipline I think you would agree the comments are in fact constructive. Or is it your subjectiviity getting in the way of what Wikipedia is supposed to be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.253.235.159 (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Brian Hunter (card player) A tag has been placed on Brian Hunter (card player) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding AfD nomination of Brian Hunter (card player)I have nominated Brian Hunter (card player), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Hunter (card player). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -Zeus- [t|c] 16:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Jonathan ChuA tag has been placed on Jonathan Chu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding AfD nomination of Jonathan ChuI have nominated Jonathan Chu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Chu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -Zeus- [t|c] 20:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Jonathan ChuA tag has been placed on Jonathan Chu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding Notability of Justin Desai Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Justin Desai, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Justin Desai seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. Can you give reliable sourcing that everything he mentioned in The Glory of Their Times is false. If there is no sourcing I have to revert, as BLP applies, especially the section on the deceased. Secret account 14:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC) February 2009
Please visit the Wikipedia:Quotations article to better understand when quotations should be used. DeletionHi. The total content was: "Ziggy Hasbrouck was a reserve infielder for the 1916 and 1917 Chicago White Sox." That's a speedy for lack of content. He's certainly worth an article, but there isn't anything here other than an opening sentence. Furthermore, there's no need to come onto my talk page with an attitude. I'm only too happy to help resolve things like this. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Jim Duncan (baseball)A tag has been placed on Jim Duncan (baseball) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
Fred SnodgrassI like all the edits you made to the Fred Snodgrass article. I do a lot of this kind of cleanup myself. However, I noticed that you ran his New York Times obit verbatim. This is clearly in violation of WP:CP so I removed the material. If I might suggest, you could quote a portion of the obit and summarize the rest. Just make sure that the amount of material you use from the Times adheres to the guidelines. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake. The entire section was in red, so I probably read the edit dif wrong. My apologies. Allreet (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Disambiguation linksWhile your work on baseball team-season pages is appreciated, it would be more helpful if you would create links to the proper pages. For instance, on the 1912 Boston Red Sox season page, you created two links to Joe Wood. If you click on that, you will notice that rather than going where you want to go, it goes to a list of people named Joe Wood. I have fixed this so that the link points properly, to Smoky Joe Wood. Many of your recent edits have been pointing to these disambiguation pages, which means that other people have to go in and clean these pages up so that they link properly, which means that the same job is being done twice. If you could be a bit more careful in making these edits, it would be greatly helpful. Thanks very much. -Dewelar (talk) 21:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Removal of maintenance templates
AfD nomination of Kevin ShannonAn article that you have been involved in editing, Kevin Shannon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Shannon. Thank you. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC) April 2009
James Stephen SmithI am not particularly interested in getting into an edit war with you, but I consider it very rude to undo an edit which was originally done because of POV considerations. It is not "common knowledge", and even if it were you are obligated to provide a source to back it up. This event is 23 years old and is basically forgotten in the minds of most fans. Perhaps YOU thing the story of Steve Smith begins and ends with this one goal, but I disagree. Please add a reliable source, or do not undo edits done in good faith.--Freshfighter9 (talk) 23:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC) File:Paul-waner.jpg in the 1927 World Series ArticleHi, could you not put File:Paul-waner.jpg in 1927 World Series? This is a non-free image without a rationale for use in this particular article, and the use of this image would only be decorative, and would not be considered fair use. If you really believe it is fair use, you're more than welcome to write a rationale based on WP:NONFREE. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 22:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Mc/Mac sortingHi, you undid my edit of Fred McMullin. I have changed it back, and I just wanted to point out to you that the correct sort key is Macmullin, Fred. Please see WP:MCSTJR for more information. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 00:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Vaughn SnyderA tag has been placed on Vaughn Snyder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — 141.156.165.77 (talk) 11:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Assume Good Faith
October 2009
Repost of Macy's Day Parade (Green Day song)
To comply with Wikipedia's No Original Research policy, can you please cite reliable sourcing linking Ray Schalk's 1919 World Series performance to his Hall of Fame induction? Any help is appreciated.Orsoni (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)  The article Tom Savage (football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:LerynFranco.jpg Thanks for uploading File:LerynFranco.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC) Non-free logo in 2000 Anaheim Angels seasonI don't understand why you keep inserting the non-free logo in 2000 Anaheim Angels season. There's no FUR for these season articles, and logos should not be used for season articles. --Mosmof (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
Calm DownThere is no need for things like this:[1]. You should read this Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals--Yankees10 17:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Looks like PM800 has the temper of a little child! He never explains his edits in a reasonable way, whereas he´s a king with simple-minded remarks and likes to insult his fellow human beings without cause! I just saw another edit of PM800 with "N00b": [2] Hi PM800. Sorry to remind you of something you're probably already aware of, but Wikipedia encourages editors to be polite to other editors, even when they're wrong, and to encourage newcomers, even where their efforts don't actually end up being helpful. I'm specifically referring to this edit you made, where it probably would have been more gentlemanly to explain to the user what they did wrong, or failing that settle for reverting their edit without insulting them. Thank you. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Brady AndersonSo instead of discussing it, like you should, you just want to keep reverting? If not, I guess I could just report you for violating WP:3RR.--Yankees10 01:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
ReiserHere we go again. Are you going to continue to immaturely revert, or are you going give an explanation to why?--Yankees10 02:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC) Immature reverts are Yankees10's nature.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 09:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC) Please don't bite the newcomersPlease remember to Assume good faith, and not to bite the newcomers as you did with this edit. Thank you. Pilif12p : Yo 21:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Rollback Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
 Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. --Two for the price of one! While I'm here, please do remember to warn the vandals you revert. :) Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC) July 2010
Coach KHi there. I saw you added back a bunch of external links to Coach K's page. I'm not sure why, as you didn't include an edit summary. Anyway, take a look at the policy for external links when you get a chance so you can ensure that your edits are as productive as possible in the future. More broadly, it also seems like you may want to consider re-evaluating your general approach to editing here. While I'm glad not to have had any problems with you myself, a review of your talk page suggests that you sometimes act in a way that reasonable people could construe as running afoul of WP:DICK. In short, be nice to people and extend them the courtesy of letting them know why you're reverting their changes (especially when they've taken the time to explain theirs). As you surely know, failing to do so leads to more serious sanctions, including a block on your account. Happy editing. — Bdb484 (talk) 06:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Arky VaughanI dont have a link since it was like two or three years ago, so you can bring it up to WP:Baseball since it was so long ago I guess.--Yankees10 22:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Beg pardon?Before you, again, accuse me of vandalism by omitting an edit summary, please read my edit summary in that removal of those inappropriate warnings. Şłџğģő 20:23, 31 July 2010 (UTC) ReversionsHi there PM, VASCO from Portugal here, regarding your reversions of my edits as anon (Jesús Gámez, Josemi and Cristian Díaz), i agree that the summaries might have been a little "suspicious", but i did the following: fix redirects, correct wrong info and revert some inaccuracies. Does that merit a reversion? I fail to see where. In this case (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jes%C3%BAs_G%C3%A1mez&diff=376877342&oldid=376876763), i also fail to see which word in my summary striked you as "uncivil" or "offensive". I have zero tolerance for "wise guy" edits and zero+1 for vandals, no respect for those whatsoever. As you can see in my account, as you i have rollback rights too, so i must be on the right side of WP... :) That said, i apologize for any incovenience and/or misunderstandings, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Unhelpful commentsPlease try to be more courteous to anonymous contributors. Your comments here in response to a perfectly valid query were less than helpful. Please also remember to comment on content not contributors. I note that this is not the first time someone has expressed concern regarding your comments towards other editors. I fully expect that if you continue in the same vein, you will find the issue being escalated to a more formal venue. Regards, wjematherbigissue 17:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Family
Umm....What's the problem with this IP address - 216.155.153.104 (talk)? Could you try to check why with another administrator? みんな空の下 (トーク) 06:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC) greek dipi removed it because that dip is not turkish. its greek. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.140.211 (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC) AIV page mistakeJust to let you know - I'm sure it was a mistake, but this edit of yours accidentally removed a report I made about a serial vandal. I was wondering why the guy hadn't been blocked yet... TheRealFennShysa (talk) 13:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC) RollbackPlease stop using rollback to undo my legitimate edits, as you have been doing on Eddie Collins and another article. Rollback is only to be used against vandalism or other instances where it is perfectly clear why you're reverting. It's totally unclear why you would revert my edits, which first removed slanderous content, and then added a page number and additional content from a reference. See Wikipedia:Rollback#When_to_use_rollback. If you keep following me around and reverting me, I know where to report you. --74.138.214.5 (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Devthis is regarding me posting sources on the article im wondering why u reverted my posts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.161.153 (talk) 22:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC) September 2010
 {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Rickyrab here. For some reason I was autoblocked because of PM800 because I use similar IPs. Which makes me wonder if PM800 goes to Rutgers University (who owns the IPs in question). To PM800: Wikipedia is a respectful community. We may have our disagreements, and they may be fierce sometimes, but NOBODY is an "idiot" or "moron" in the Wikipedia community. We are all (presumably) people (well, maybe the occasional e.t. from outer space or faery or god or demon chimes in, but I doubt it). The point is, respect other people and other beings, and they will respect you. — Rickyrab | Talk 02:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Warnings
On a side note, I'm suprised you didn't complain about being blocked. 74.89.58.36 (talk) 02:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC) ARE YOU SERIOUS? I am not vandalizing anything. It will be a lot easier to get you blocked then me right now 74.89.58.36 (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
