User talk:OutlasterGuto

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Grinstead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Littleworth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Explanations/references

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Guliolopez (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try my best. OutlasterGuto (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's all we can do. Please also take a look at MOS:LISTBULLET and MOS:FULLSTOP. Bulleted items, that are not a complete sentence or are a sentence fragment, do not necessarily need terminal punctuation. This type of edit for example isn't really adding a lot and isn't entirely consistent with the related manual of style. Guliolopez (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice that you are still adding full-stops in places where MOS:BULLETLIST would advise against. Seemingly across lots of articles. Can you take another look at the related guideline? In short, unless a list item is a full/proper sentence, terminal punctuation (a full stop) is not used. Guliolopez (talk) 10:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. OutlasterGuto (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. We're all learning/improving over time. In that vein, could I recommend that you also take a quick look at the MOS:LEADSTUB and MOS:OVERSECTION guidelines? (The first which talks about how and why short stub articles [<400 words or so] don't need much subdivision. And the second of which covers how and why overuse of section headings can interrupt article flow and that "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading".) I propose maybe taking a look at these guides as quite a number of your edits (like these [1] [2]) seem to be to add section headings where, perhaps, they aren't strictly needed or in line with those conventios. Guliolopez (talk) 02:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. By way of explanation, and as noted above, short/stub articles (<400 words or so) don't necessarily benefit from splitting into sections (not "for the sake of it"). Also, while past tense, a primary school's recent/2021 enrollment isn't "history" (not as much as Knights Hospitaller/Crusades). Guliolopez (talk) 00:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Again. Me again. Same two points. Again. In terms of:

• Using edit summaries (to explain content changes), I note that you still aren't using them. You mentioned that you would try. Could you please?
• Using/dating citations (to support content/changes), I note that you are adding "access-dates" to URLs that appear to be dead. Or which otherwise don't support the text. As per the docs for 'cite web', the "access-date" parameter is for the "date when the content pointed to by url was last verified to support the text in the article". Some of the links you are dating are dead, do not support the text or otherwise no longer support the text. Unless you are actually undertaking a verification check there is no reason to change or add access dates.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abadas (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abadas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OutlasterGuto! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/(contrib) 23:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tony Holyoake Band (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Tony Holyoake Band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX v CAT

Hi. Me again. I have a quick question for you: What, in your view, is the purpose of the Template:County Mayo navbox?

Relative, say, to the purpose of the Category:Townlands of County Mayo, Category:Towns and villages in County Mayo and Category:Baronies of County Mayo categories?

I ask because, to my view (and my read of the WP:NAVBOX guidelines) there is limited value in having every single member of these types of categories repeated/listed in a NAVBOX. Not least when the subjects do not refer to each other or might otherwise be a candidate for a "see also" section.

To put it another way, we now have a situation where Ballindine (a village of 350 people which is a distinct subject in its own right) is listed alongside Ballymacrah (a small townland which is effectively part of Castlebar). In the NAVBOX. As if they were somewhat equivalent or related. Or as if the reader might reasonably need assistance navigating from the article on Ballindine to that on Ballymacrah. .

While I already have my concerns with this recent movement to replicate and republish every single entry in Townlands.ie as a standalone Wikipedia article, I really don't see the value in adding and inter-linking articles on every small townland in that NAVBOX (especially those that already geographically overlap with subjects already in the NAVBOX. Like Castlebar).

Frankly, by adding every townland to that NAVBOX, I think we are hindering the reader's ability to distinguish the wood from the trees.... Guliolopez (talk) 20:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good purpose, to be honest. OutlasterGuto

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cloghans has been accepted

Cloghans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Got good news for you.

They announced that one of Shichio Kuzu's light novels would be getting an anime adaptation. [1] SimonLagann (talk) 16:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aghnahoe (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aghnahoe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 18:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2023-10-05/mushoku-no-eiyu-novel-series-gets-tv-anime/.203169