User talk:Oronsay/Archive 58

Archive 55Archive 56Archive 57Archive 58Archive 59

Wikidata weekly summary #654

A barnstar for you

The Women in Red Barnstar
For keeping an eagle eye on Humaniki and regularly updating key statistics on the main Women in Red page.--Ipigott (talk) 13:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you kindly, @Ipigott. As a matter of fact, I am talking about WiR statistics and Humaniki later today in Adelaide. Also, when the time comes, I will start reporting them as 19.99x, instead of rounding to two decimals, as they move towards 20%.

Wikidata weekly summary #655

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #656

oops

oops, dont fix template errors on the talk page unless subst, it needs a couple of updates any Gnangarra 07:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I did make changes to the biomechanicist editors Talk pages when I realised that I'd welcomed them all as !1day! I should have thought more about it beforehand, and perhaps undone my Twinkle add and then redone it. They seem ok though. Let me know if I need to fix anything. Oronsay (talk) 07:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Hello Oronsay, I came across your work on the Women in Red project, and I must say, it's truly impressive. Please keep up the great work! If there's any way I can contribute to this project, do let me know. Baqi:) (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for this Barnstar, @Jannatulbaqi, and your kind words. It is special to receive recognition for what I do for WiR. Happy editing! Oronsay (talk) 07:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Barbara Nowak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Nowak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Nowak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SolxrgashiUnited (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Pages about women

Hi. I just discovered you after your edit to the page I wrote on Emily Belle Freeman. I think it's really cool that you focus on writing articles about women.

I just wrote another article about a woman since the prior article about her was deleted six years ago, allegedly due to not being notable. I put almost 30 sources on the new article to establish her notability. I'd be interested in any feedback you have about the article: Margaret D. Nadauld.

Kind regards, Davemc0 (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Could you please help me avoid deletion of this woman's article?

Could I please get your help? Someone has nominated the article Margaret D. Nadauld for deletion, claiming that Nadauld is not notable. It was the same person who did it 8 years ago. I'd appreciate if you could support keeping it. See the talk page on that article for my arguments why she's notable, or peruse the article's 25+ references yourself. Personally, I believe the person who proposed deletion deserves a trout for claiming that she's not notable, given the contents of those sources. Davemc0 (talk) 16:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

 

Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia