User talk:Opera hat/Archive 6

Peer creation

Oh, so you mean one can only be created a peer once? Can you back that claim up somehow?

How about for instance Robert Smith, 1st Baron Carrington? He was created a peer in the Peerage of Ireland in 1796. He was created a peer – again, apparently – with the same title, but in the Peerage of the United Kingdom, the next year. That seems to contradict your claim. There are more examples.

HandsomeFella (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Let me pick your argument apart.

1. Robert Henley was created Earl of Northington by George III.
2. An earl is a kind of peer.
3. Ergo: Henley was created a peer by George III.

Also, please note that the name of the category is *not* "Peers of Great Britain first created by George II".

FYI, the redirect Robert Henley, 1st Baron Northington is placed in category Category:Peers of Great Britain created by George II. This would reflect his first creation, as Baron Northington, by George II, hopefully to your satisfaction.

I am now going to change the categorization of the main article back. Please discuss, with me or someone else, before reverting again.

Cheers.

HandsomeFella (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been off Wikipedia for a few days. I'll reply at Talk:Robert Henley, 1st Earl of Northington. Opera hat (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we centralize the discussion at WT:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage#Discussion about people being receiving multiple peerages.

Will you move it there?

HandsomeFella (talk) 20:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Hamilton, 1st Lord Bargany

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on John Hamilton, 1st Lord Bargany requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tagishsimon (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

consistency, as much as possible

Howdy. I recommend you consider modifying your point #4 at NCROY to Monarch (country), since an increasing number of monarchial bio articles are dropping Monarch of country via RM results. Just a thought. GoodDay (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Noble titles created in 1737

A tag has been placed on Category:Noble titles created in 1737 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 16:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

The Richard Gaudin-Martin AfD notice that you created points to the wrong discussion. Schwede66 17:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Noble titles created in 1808

A tag has been placed on Category:Noble titles created in 1808 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 16:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knights of the Golden Fleece of Spain has been nominated for deletion

Category:Knights of the Golden Fleece of Spain has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 04:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knights of St Patrick has been nominated for deletion

Category:Knights of St Patrick has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 18:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maltese nobility for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maltese nobility, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maltese nobility (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cromwell's Other House

With this edit Revision as of 15:33, 16 May 2018 to Cromwell's Other House, you changed the information on the page using a more reliable source than Noble (1787), which you mentioned in the edit history "Young's Parliaments of Scotland says only three Scots (p. 436)", please could you add the full source (year, publisher etc) to the article with an inline citation as previously Noble (1787) was cited. -- PBS (talk) 08:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donogh O'Brien, 4th Earl of Thomond

Dear Opera Hat. Thank you very much for your recent attention to the article Donogh O'Brien, 4th Earl of Thomond. You added him to the category "Chiefs of the name". The article's text does not at present mention this title. Could you please add a corresponding passage in the text and provide a citation to support it? With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scots Guards

Hi, tried to stick my oar in and assist with the list in an area vaguely familiar to me, but got stuck after Grinfield and before Osborn. Having recently written up Grinfield this was rather disappointing! Hope you manage to do better than I. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The National Archives have the 1754–1879 annual army lists on microfilm which is useful for this sort of thing. Opera hat (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not a source I've used before but certainly one I'll use in the future. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thames Head article

Hello.

Please always use converters when adding imperial or metric units in articles. In English Wikipedia articles, both units of measurement need to be included, but not just one unit of measurement. See Template:Convert.

Thank you. 31.200.12.202 (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abassia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abassia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abassia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"William Keith, 1st Earl Marischal" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect William Keith, 1st Earl Marischal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 10#William Keith, 1st Earl Marischal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Parsons, 1st Viscount Rosse

Dear Opera hat, Senior Editor III (34,301 edits). You are a far more experienced user than I am (~8000 edits). I had not realised this when I intervened on the redirect page Richard Parsons, 1st Viscount Rosse, which you created on 25 March 2019, by requesting its speedy deletion. It redirects to Earl of Rosse. I guess you thought it would help readers by giving them the opportunity to read about the context of the dynasty. However, it creates a circular link on that page. It also gives the wrong impression that an article exists about Richard Parsons, 1st Vicount Rosse, which is not the case. I felt disappointed when I followed the redirect. The existence of the redirect also discourages editors from creating the corresponding article as the link is not red but blue and it is less rewarding to convert a redirect to an article than to create a new article. I may be wrong. I see you have created many redirects of that type. What do you think about this? With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This section is empty

Dear Opera Hat,

You have edited the LSWR article to say that three sections were empty, which I think everyone could see. Are you planning to complete them? I was formulating some material for those sections myself, but I'll hold back if you are getting something ready to insert.

Or were you simply handing out homework for other people? Afterbrunel (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, and Yes. Opera hat (talk) 10:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel Herne

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathaniel Herne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David La Touche

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David La Touche requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Friedrich Ludwig, Prince of Orange" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Friedrich Ludwig, Prince of Orange has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Friedrich Ludwig, Prince of Orange until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Friedrich Wilhelm, Prince of Orange" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Friedrich Wilhelm, Prince of Orange has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Friedrich Wilhelm, Prince of Orange until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]