|
User talk:Omicronpersei8/Archive 5
September 2006Re: Super Bowl XL editYou reverted a change I made, stating neutrality, and accused me of vandalism. Yet the change I made deleted an unreferenced, biased sentence and added a factual statement describing an actual event. You, sir, are the vandal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.170.7.202 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Edit: Reading the above comments, it seems you have a history of vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.170.7.202 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Um, thanks for reorienting my spastic attempt at de-vandalizing. Stuff happens! --Wetman 06:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
A good ol' Kiwi Pav!
Red Ranger PictureI don't understand what's wrong with my Red Ranger picture. Can you please explain to me why it's bad to have it on any page in Wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) 07:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey youWTF? Why do you kill my edits in "God"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.50.41.158 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Christine DolceHi there. I was joking at first about the fake tits. Turns out I was right. I'm not good enough at HTML to link to the FAQ on her home page. sick burn! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.182.131.4 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
HowdyI see you doing Vandal patrol usually when I'm on as well. Just wanted to drop a friendly "Hello". Have a great weekend! Rsm99833 20:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC) yeh that france thing was funny tho........and true —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.4.174.177 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC) A little help?151.202.237.10 is going spam-wild. Has been reported. Rsm99833 21:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC) E-mail from User:OmbudsmanDear Omicron Thanks for injecting a humorous quasi-bot revert into the disturbed Wikigaming over on the Wikiality article. However, given that some disturbing user keeps reverting, editing has become more difficult, especially after running into an edit conflicts, like when you joined the disturbing editor's Wikigames. Not sure how you can possibly make so many edits in so short of a time frame, but i guess i happen to know all too well the consequences of such situations: when you are dealing with mentally short circuited shit disturbers all the time, your counterattacks will tend to mirror the disturbances of their preemptive attacks. Respectfully yours, Ombudsman 21:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Change it backMy addition to the Jack Thompson artical is a key part of it. It shows how many people feel about him and is critical to understanding the enigma that is Jack Thompson. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ifiveyearsold2 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Babylonian Brotherhood Exposed!!!I know you are a member. I am exposing you in public. Go back to Draco! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.140.99.70 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Illuminati are scum!!! In this war you are with us or against us. Which are you?86.140.99.70 02:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
questioni had to sign in, but when i did it said i typed my screen name wrong, but i didnt, and now when i made my new acount, it signs in as my old name, what happened? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pomadeguy (talk • contribs) 03:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) UserboxHey man just though you might be interested in my userbox - {{User:Ido50/Userboxes/User OP8}} George W BushI was merely putting a better and more accurate picture, and I do not believe it should have been removed. Please revert, I am merely trying to improve this encyclopedia. MasterEagle 03:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) I was not attacking himI was merely using swear words, are you too conservative to handle a few "bad words" ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.189.97.150 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks again for reverting the vandalism on my user page. That particular one got rather obsessed with me after I warned him. -- Gogo Dodo 04:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC) Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp
WP:AIV entryI removed User talk:WallyFromColumbia from AIV, a review of their contributions does not appear that they are even close to being a "vandlism only account", please correct me if I am wrong, or check to see if you listed the right person. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 01:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
DMThttp://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dmt/dmt.shtml COMMON & BRAND NAMES Okay, okay, Fine, Sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.34.18.151 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Barnstar Defender of Kevin FederlineThe individual (Federline's wife) was indeed bloated, which was understandable given the circumstances. If you felt the usage was pejorative (it wasn't), you could have just as easily edited the passage to make it more readable. Leaving pregnant in the line twice was redundant, stylistically clumsy, and obviously less descriptive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.36.244 (talk • contribs) 12:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I have a good reason for editing 11th millenniumI am adding the 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th 19th and 20th millennium articles so they are more spread out you should be smarter then reverting something back right away —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.196.67.73 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Good job guarding Steve IrwinI was impressed to find that the Steve Irwin page is not protected this morning. Looking at the history, it seems that is due mainly to your vigilance. Nicely done. --Doradus 13:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
you are such a nerdWhen was the last time you saw sunlight? (this is for a scientific study) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.119.232.70 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Let's not be patronizing.I wasn't testing a damn thing. Stingrays are assholes, and you know it. That's a fact. You could look it up in an encyclopedia, but it was REMOVED due to what I'm sure is some aquatic agenda backed by the Communists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.52.142.106 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC) YOU NASTY A Bear is Satanic Creature that is a Godless Killing Machine that steals are Pic-A-nic Baskets and are honey jars.Hey you fool, I was stating a fucking truth, stephen Colbert does state that 'A Bear is Satanic Creature that is a Godless Killing Machine that steals are Pic-A-nic Baskets and are honey jars.' You can go check his myspace blog if you dont believe me, bitch. (Link deleted) Copy and paste it into your browser. I HATE YOU>. LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE. Your wikiality saddens me. Bitch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.215.92 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC) The last 3 commentsI don't know how you put up with it, I really don't. I mean, 3 comments like that in a row... :) Don't people ever learn? --Alex (talk here) 14:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Steve IrwinSorry, mate, it's getting a bit hard to revert to the proper version with all of the new edits. Shadow1 14:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Great work managing Steve Irwin! You seem to have a good handle on it. Jasonid 15:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep up the good work the loss of occassional good stuff is a small price to pay, besides when things settle down the missed good stuff will be returned. Gnangarra 15:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Hey, don't associate me with those idiots.Just because I hate goddamn stingrays (like all red-blooded patriots should), doesn't put me on the same level as those morons. Down with the rays! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.52.142.106 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Regarding VSHey, I was looking at your contribs (I was trying to make a case to get Stingray protected) and I saw that it said you reverted one of my edits on Steve Irwin [1]. Now, I don't know if this is a really big deal or anything, but maybe that could be a bug with the program? Just wanted to let you know. --Nishkid64 16:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Millennia FoundationHi - just wondering why you edited (deleted half) of our Foundation page, including the scholarship information. tks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.91 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
5 Sep 06: Odd, today the article is completely missing. Gone. No trace. The Millennia Foundation is a non-profit benevolent organization focused on social justice, resources sustainabilty, and post-foundational education. The short entry has been on Wikipedia since June 06. Are small NPO's not considered encyclopedic? Shouldn't NPO's be included? Who removed it? And why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.91 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank youThanks for the barnstar the other day. See you at AIV. Regards, DVD+ R/W 00:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Thank youThank you so very much for catching the vandalism of 168.9.42.206.TonyCrew 15:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC) TrollcruftI didn't mind it being removed. If I ever want a laugh, I'll just visit the history. PrometheusX303 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksFor the revert. I have blocked the anon user. --Guinnog 17:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Possible sock-puppetryIf it's not too much problem, could you check out user Dead-kennedys [3] and user RobertW [4]. It appears that he's sock-puppeting himself. Have a good week Rsm99833 04:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
You tagged this with a db as author request when in fact the request came from an anonymous IP editor, not the owner. If you think this person is using their userpage as a free webhost, please bring it to MfD. - Mgm|(talk) 07:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the block on 212.248.233.1. Im new around here and Im gonna try to help out with reverts. I was going to revert the vandalism to the My Chemical Romance article myself, but you beat me to it. Good job.Lamentingvampire09 08:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Administrator intervention against vandalismHi, you removed my request for admin intervention against vandalism for User:203.129.36.199 who has been vandalising Alex Rafalowicz by removing images. If you aren't going to handle my request what should I do next? Catchpole 13:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Allegations of sock puppetry on the Ben Best pageAs someone who has edited the Ben Best page recently, you may have been aware of the allegations of sock puppetry. As this has continued for six weeks now, I have started the appropriate Wikipedia handling process. If you wish to make a contribution, please go to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CRANdieter and add your views to the Comments section. Nunquam Dormio 13:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks as usualMany thanks for the fast revert of the vandalism to my userpage. Much appreciated, Gwernol 14:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
CommunismU are gay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 98smithg2 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 16:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Alex Raf's page is entirely unnotable comedy, and should be removed as it is plainly him and several friends stroking his ego. However, that aside, the photo really is a step too far. Actually notable people have no photos, there is no reason why the equivalent of "the girl who was a stunt double for Shirly Temple on August 15th" should have one. Delete, or alternatively make the farce complete and expand it with multiple photographs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.236.244.105 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
hiThank you for your welcome message. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Outsid3r (talk • contribs) 23:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Your bot request has been approved for trials, please see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Cronbot for details. — xaosflux Talk 01:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC) WOW WAH WEE WAHThat was quick. Obviously vandilised a lot for abvious reasons. *laughs* Yakshimash —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.70.232.246 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Michael Savage (commentator)Your recent edit to Michael Savage (commentator) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I admit it: I put him up to it. I don't have Asperger's, I just wanted my name dropped in a completely random, inexplicable context. I think he did the job! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks yet again......for undoing the vandalism on my user page (I'm beginning to sound like a broken record). I reported the IP on WP:ANI and he was blocked. Just came out of nowhere with his first edit. On a side note, you seem to be slowing down a little, I've been able to catch vandalism while you're patrolling. =) Just teasing you. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
WHASSAUP MAN STOP CHANIGING MY EDIOTS TO PATRIKCAS SWAYZE,R I LIKE HIM A LOT AND GOFST IF MY FAVE MOVIE EVERRRRR, I REALLY LIKE THE XSCENE WITH DEMIMO MOREE AND THE POTS, IT'S RYMATNIC, RTITE ON! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.206.230.233 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
AIVI reverted your entry on AIV because I already blocked that vandal. Sorry about that. I was just trying to remove it faster. Academic Challenger 07:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Faulty sprotect tag?On the Rockhurst High School article, Omicronpersei8 deleted the sprotect tag, (anti-vandalism.) I am still not fully aquainted with all the tags at wikipedia and am not sure why my use of sprotect was faulty. If you could explain it on my usertalk page (Rockhurst Singer) I would sincerely appreciate it. Rockhurst Singer P.S. I couldn't find any description of it on wikipedia, but like I said, I'm sort of a newbie, so I didn't really know where to look —The preceding comment was added by Rockhurst singer (talk • contribs) 15:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC) After Post - thanks for replying :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rockhurst singer (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC) WarningsHey Omicronpersei8, it's me again, Rockhurst_singer. I was just wondering if regular users are allowed to warn other users or other anonymous users. You can reply on this or on my talk page again. Thanks :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rockhurst singer (talk • contribs) 20:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
OIOi i got to the college and my edits are of playful and merely trivial facts- which you cannot dispute unless you go to the college... Basically- leave the page as it is - i will change the category once more ok- to make it clear what is fact and what is trivial :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.206.249.36 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Woman articleWhy are you disrespecting my beliefs and why are you allowed to revert me, but I get into trouble if I revert you? Wikipedia must not publish offensive material. It will cause outrage among any Muslim and many other religious people who see offensive pictures. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you switched IPs or what, but:
This is what the trouble is. You should respect our beliefs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.134 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
At it againThe user switched IPs again and resumed attacking the Woman page. Can you please block him/her? -Neural 17:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
HelloI added it simply as an educational source for I feel that site helps users to learn German. There is a lot of free useful information there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Learngermanwords (talk • contribs) 17:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
SiteI won't keep doing it then. I thought of it as a wonderful way to give my site some links because I have put alot of time into creating the site. Yes it does sell some products but the vast majority is free information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Learngermanwords (talk • contribs) 17:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC) HiI wanted to add new sub-title "Invitation to Islam" and was just going to add more informative and related sites under it. i'm not doing Spam/Vandalism. Kind Regards, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ColdFire (talk • contribs) 17:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Blocking this IPhi, Just to let you know, this IP is from a public terminal at Walter Library on the University of Minnesota campus, so I imagine blocking it won't do much good in stopping the abuser you are after. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.101.29.11 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks!Just wanted to thank you for all the reverting you've been doing over at Masada College. You've beaten me a couple of times, but at least the page is semi-protected now. Lets hope he gives up! -- benzo ? ♠♠ 03:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC) VandalSnipeYour VS doesn't work very effectively, it keeps reverting constructive edits of mine that are far from vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC) I'm sorry, you're rightOf course, I'm angry. I was attacked by a sock puppet of Sceptre for responding to an attack he made on me. His clique and/or sock puppets are trying to prevent me from documenting the case, and I'm fairly upset about that. 70.5.174.56 06:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks guyAlways glad there's an ally in this ongoing battle against vandals. Especially the ones that try to bully their edits :D. Rsm99833 08:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and just so you know, our buddy is doing redirects as well. I smell sockpuppet. Rsm99833 08:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC) User:64.12.117.9 whom you have warned is making exactly the same edits as User:141.149.54.179 Who has been already blocked for various reasons. I suspect they are one and the same person. --Blue Tie 08:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I actually agree with you. The problem is, you don't realize *you're* one of those idiots. An even-handed account of O'Reilly *is* good for the world, no matter how much your agitprop tendencies tell you otherwise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, if I had your IQ, I wouldn't attempt to formulate an "argument" either. I am SOOOO looking forward to your attempt to try to explain how "flung" legal principles apply here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 09:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC) You seem more of a "duh" guy than a "wut" guy. Or maybe just a flabby, girlfriend-less D&D type. Be monosyllabic if I'm getting warmer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.117.10 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
About New York CityHi! I removed the section about Further Reading into its own article called Books on New York City, I discussed that on the talk page. Also, I added architecture into Geography because it works better there, since the arhictecture is somewhat irrelevant to the article. Hope that pretty mcuh explains it all. Do-do 09:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC) New York City editsThankyou for you’re reply. Yeah, I think the edits that I made should stay, but apart from that the article is looking fine. Cheers :). Do-do 09:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Edit Conflicts
Recent ChangesDo you live in Australia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Broodycaveman (talk • contribs) 10:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC) My talk pageThank you for reverting my talk page - I am going to revert back however, as I want to keep an archive of every message left, be it nice or not nice. You could help by adding in any unsigned signatures. Thanks. --Alex (talk here) 11:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
yeah can you change it back or does it stay that way? i was just experimenting —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ohmygodimonfire (talk • contribs) 11:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC) my friend showed the page to me and i thought he had made it or something because he had written some of it, but it seems he had just edited a part of it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ohmygodimonfire (talk • contribs) 11:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Hello."Since 17 May 2006, I have screwed up while doing RC patrol at least 15 times, according to this talk page. (Sorry.) Click here to inform me of another error." Here is one more. No big deal, but you reverted to the wrong version. There were three edits all of which were vandalism and you only reverted over the most recent of the three. Here is your edit: [6] ~a (user • talk • contribs) 16:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Dude get a friggin life he asks us to change it mind your own business don't you have a stamp collection that needs your attention —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghost Who Walks (talk • contribs) 09:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Omicron, I intentionally removed the content as it was copyrighted, trademarked, trade-secret protected intellectual property. Please remove the content immediately as it violates both trade secret laws and the ethics of the magic industry. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.58.170.107 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
test meeeYou forgot to give me test1 warning, shame on you!--212.219.63.226 14:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 62.253.219.157
Hi, I noticed this entry in AIAV, but I'd like to point out that although this IP made edits after the final warning, these edits were constructive, so it looks like at least some (and the lastest) of the edits coming off of this IP are not vandalism. Just thought you'd like to know. -- Deville (Talk) 15:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
i dont want to be blocked :(i am sorry. i am oh so sorry. it is my mistake, oh my own mistake. i want to talk, talk to the universe, and the letters i write come from my soul, down in the basement of my soul, where the dog masturbates against the walls, and ocassionaly, when he it has the chance and the correct body temperature, it masturbates with grandma´s corpse. that, usually happens on christmas time. however, i am sorry, dont block me dear wikipolis, you are so clever and i am so clever too, that i believe we can sit and talk, and talk for hours and drink tee and coffee and eat sugar and build sculptures made out of mustache´s wastes. i love you all, dear wikipolis, ese oaxaco, who is deeply sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ese oaxaco (talk • contribs) 16:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Grammar: singular "they"I notice from your grammar boxes that you support gender neutral language but do not like singular "they"; how do you refer to a single person in a neutral fashion? --Lucifer 16:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
stopIf u get rid o' my shit one more time i will come to your house and slit ur fukin throat bitch. i am going to change an article about george bush next. Ifou change it I WILL EAT YOUR SPLEEN! I am NOT KIDDIBG!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.35.198.75 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC) I WILL FUK UR GRANDMA!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.35.198.75 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC) This anonymous user's inappropriate comments, personal attacks, and death threats have resulted in a one week block against the IP address. --Yamla 18:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
S-I-D-A-W-A-YThanks. You spell goode. Ya ya ya ya ya ya 19:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Sorry about that.It's something to do with Safari. Sometimes I forget it does that when I use pop-ups, and even though I backed up as soon as I saw what it was going to do, it still makes the change, and then I can't even revert it back. --Maxamegalon2000 20:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Hold on Ill give u places where this say this. Zionism is bad and I want my own perspective. Is there any way I can put a place where there are people saying that they do this at all? You can list it as conspiracy theory i could care less i just want people to know this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.111.107.78 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
on sharapova's heightJust a quick aside on your edit comment about the hidden comment I added re: Sharapova's height. You wrote: "The thought of a six-foot-two girl having a growth spurt of one inch amuses me." It was actually a six-foot-zero girl going to six-foot-three. There was a minor edit war going on between advocates of 6' 0" (which is listed many places), 6' 2" (which is from reports earlier this year), and 6' 3" (which is from reports at the US Open Final). My comment may have been a bit unclear, but at least it ended the war! :) Anyway, this is all truly trivial, but I just wanted to address your amusement. Keep up the good work! -- Xtifr 00:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
And, of course, right after posting this, I noticed another anon had changed it back to 6'2" and removed the warning comment. Love that careful fact checking so common of Internet John Doe. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC) what?I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO ANYONES PAGE OR WHATEVER YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT I DONT EVEN KNOW HOW TO DO THAT,THE ONLY REASON I HAVE ANACCOUNT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE WRITING VERY ,VERY UNTRUE THINGS ABOUT THE STATE OF ALABAMA SO WHATEVER HAPPENED I ASSURE YOU IT WASN'T ME SO PLEASE STOP TRYING TO BLOCK ME. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
ThanksFor reverting vandalism to my user page again. MER-C 08:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC) IchessUHi! I saw that you removed IchessU.com from learning chess sites. IchessU is first real international chess universtity. We are very serious organization, specializes on giving live audio and video chess lessons. IchessU.com was also the company covered exclusively Blitz World Championsip, took place recently in Israel. We are very famous and serious education organization and not spammers. Please don't remove our links in the future. Thanks in advance —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ichessu (talk • contribs) 16:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Reverted change ?Hello, Can you please tell me why you reverted the change I made to the DJ disambiguation page ? Thanks, --RohanDhruva 15:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Out of context quoteHey, remember when you said "Not everyone likes WP:BALLS and WP:DICK either"? Yeah, that was funny. Just thought I'd remind you :) BigNate37(T) 15:26, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!Thanks for welcoming me to wikipedia ! :) I wish alert people like you help me learn the wikipedia conventions, like the DJ one you just informed me of ! --RohanDhruva 15:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Diff link seems broken in your essayLooking at User:Omicronpersei8/Counter-vandalism practices#Naive drive-by judgments, I can't tell which diff from this history might be the right one to replace it with. Looks like the page you linked the diff of got moved along with its history. BigNate37(T) 15:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Collapse of the two towersYep, i know, that there is one GIGGG mistake,so... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.61.128.51 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC) (link snip) ThanksThanks for the welcome —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Interestedscholar (talk • contribs) 16:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting vandalism of my userpage --BostonMA 17:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Steve Irwins death. I want to tell Terri Irwin and the children, Bindi and Bob how sorry I am about his death. This has really hurt me deeply. He was "in my home" every chance I got to watch his show. CronbotGuess I missed this when it first came up, I've had a python script which obtains the tor list directly and can list out which ones are unblocked, guess I could have saved your some work. (Doesn't do the check for warnings though). One thing to be aware of is that there are several tor nodes which are on dynamic addresses and change address on regularly. In fact I've been capturing the data since 15th August, at time of writing 309 nodes are active but my database which is refreshed every hour and works out the IP address/node availability over time has 10106 entries on it... (That's not to say that they've used 10106 distinct IPs). I've also got scripts to use the tor control interface to allow selection of a single tor out proxy and then retrieve data through it, it needs some work but could be used to demonstrate that the IPs are in fact correct --pgk 19:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I accidently reverted your revert while nabbing other vandalism. It ends up the same way either way but still sorry about that. Agne 22:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Userpage vandalism revertThanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page twice! Cheers --AbsolutDan (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
ApologiesI'm sorry,my kids were messing around with the computer.I wont let it happen again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.23.67.86 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Who do you think you are, the popes defender? Where do you get off making all these reverts, and then apologizing for them? Pope Benedict said he was sorry his islamic frienss were offended by his remarks in early September. This is a classic non-apology apology. Please alloe others to interpret the truth before you hit the revert button. In September, 2006, Pope Benecict the sixteenth, after quoting an ancient text critical of Islam, made a similar non-apology. Rather than regret his intemperate remarks, the pope stated that "he was sorry he caused offense", rather than retract his statements.Hank chapot 01:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC) what's the deal with the tooth fairy message? don't bother people with nonsense. i reverted the page back to where it had erroneously claimed the page didn't exist. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.16.15.150 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC) and looking at your page, everyone is apologizing to you, who do you think you are? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.16.15.150 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC) CheersThanks for cleaning up that trolling, but I prefer to keep comments like that on the talk page unless they're particularly malicious, slanderous, or rude. Fortunately my ego isn't so fragile that being accused of a lack of a sense of humour is going to irreparably damage it :) All the best, Ziggurat 04:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks
Any Chance?...of going up for RfA? I'd feel a lot better about the level of vandalism on enWiki if you were a sysop. I know you have posted messages saying that you don't want it, but I really think that you would be a great addition, and would do a wonderful job. alphaChimp(talk) 06:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
selfishh? ok...... 8=====D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.11.222.21 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks againFor clearing my user page of "insightful" personal attacks left by vandals. Cheers. Canadian-Bacon t c e 05:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksAs I've wandered around Wikipedia, reading for knowledge, editting where needed, and reverting when necessary, I have often come across you reverting vandalism. Granted, you probably stand out because of your A+ choice for a username, but I just figured I'd pass along a "Thanks" from the community. JPG-GR 05:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
BIG thanks!I have no idea what I did to torque off that user, but I thank you for watching my back. I owe ya one. Or two. - Lucky 6.9 07:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC) why did you edit niallstown?you said you deleted "nonsense"
-- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Radio NitroFine, be a bureaucrat. An admin would have totally deleted it though. Now you're just gonna let it hang around for a few days for no good reason. Desertsky85451 22:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
User talk:68.9.69.21Guess what? That person is still causing trouble. FullMetal Falcon 23:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
ThanksFor rolling back the edits of 81.206.231.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) It is much appreciated! M100 23:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Your revert on this page had the most hilarious edit summary I've seen in a while. Good job. --Wafulz 02:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Edit on Michael SavageFirst off, thanks for taking RC patrol. You're the first line of defense against vandals. That said, I've tried to edit the Michael Savage page a couple of times to clarify a wiki link, in the MSNBC section, where Savage's quote says "...eat a sausage, I hope you choke on it" (or something to that effect.) The word sausage is a wiki link to the article for real sausages, but it is almost certainly NOT what Michael "I Hate Gay People" Savage meant in this context. Readers may be confused by the reference and, when following the wiki link for clarification, be all the more confused. I tried to change the link twice, first to "Penis" and then to "Fellatio", which you may agree is more correct in context. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.226.170.248 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Love your work with Ed Kavalee wikiAlso love your wiki name! Good Futurama reference..
Thanks for the revert --Mikecraig 03:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC) ThanksHi, thanks for reverting vandalism to User:MartinBot - I appreciate it :). Martinp23 17:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC) This user has messed with my user page several times today. RobJ1981 00:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
MY DELETION
I posted that because that user had deleted my article which he had no reason to. My God! I have people deleting webpages with no problem no profanity, but an opinion slightly in it... I have people deleting my webpages for absolutely no reason at all, and now I have people deleting my opinion about someones opinion. I SWEAR WIKIPEDIA'S ARTICLE CREATING IS SO MESSED UP IT'S AS IF THE SITE IS USELESS! I mean why should I bother creating an artcle because it'll most likely be deleted because it has the word "the" in it... If you don't see the problems in it then you must be blind because wikipedia is about teaching, and I'm not even being allowed to teach... It's a wonder articles get created like "mastrubation" but an article talking about a school speech class is deleted... WHERE'S THE EQUALITY WIKIPEDIA???!!!!!!!
Thanks againI will never get tired of saying it. Thank you! Thank you for catching the vandalism of DaveShaw508 and 24.10.29.154. in the Langston Hughes article. It's nice to know there are good guys at Wiki like you who are making a difference with your diligent efforts to fight vandalism. Again, thank you so very much.TonyCrew 01:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not revert CrazyComputers Talk Page to previous edit.My identity, including photographs and private information has been posted against my will on the site, including crazycomputers talk page. Please re-delete this information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MntnClimbr (talk • contribs) 03:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Al QaedaWith all due respect, your editing of the Al Qaeda article is unnecessary. Adding the word "alleged" does NOT inflict my bias on the subject. I was implying that it may or may not have definately been Al Qaeda responsible. I did not say it was, nor did I say the converse. That's the epitome of neutrality. It may very well be Al Qaeda that was behind the attacks, but, if you look at the handful of books and documentaries that contest this (from all around the world) you can see that it is FAR from confirmed, as many people do not believe they had anything to do with it. Again, this is not my personal opinion, but to more than claim, but to INSIST that they were behind the attacks, with little evidence and much less than a unanimous agreement, is violating the neutrality policy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by All5Horizons (talk • contribs) 04:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC) I'm not quite sure that that applies, as you yourself told me to contact you if I had any disagreements, and so I did. Thaaaanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by All5Horizons (talk • contribs) 06:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC) greetingsthank you for explaining me why i got blocked. it seems i added too many times my link to may pages. yes indeed i added a link in pages that actually didnt have any links like in the majority of pages about mauritania for example. which means that, they are not good pages in terms of content. i do think i was enriching the content of the page while addind a link to my photo archive page in the section of mauritania. http://photosaroundtheworld.wordpress.com/tag/photos/africa/north-africa/mauritania/ so how come this is considered to be bad? i mean links are good as they result on a external way of getting more stuff from a specific place. while surfing in the other pages i was trying to add my link, i notice other link to photos, and i have to say mine is indeed quite aucrate and with good information. i don't consider it to be my site, or my personal website. my personal website is www.joaoleitaofoto.com which i never related it to anything. strange to see how in this case spam cops (hehe sorry about the name) were not accurate. sorry bt i do not agree. thank you yours Re: SPSorry, but i'm not actually an administrator, the blocking admin was User:Raul365 he may be able to help you though, or you could try #wikipedia on freenode, hope that helps
{{hangon}}The information contained in entry "Sean Reed" is accurate. Reed is both an acclaimed author and the frontman for the band Poster Child. This information is verifiable. I have been contacted by various people who are perturbed that this article has been declared unworthy of submission to Wikipedia. Please reverse your decision. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yankees4364 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC) vandalisingI have no idea whats going on i havent been to wikipedia in a while i believe someone is farudulently doing this —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.101.10 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Reverting weblinksConcerning your comments below;
Goodmorning, The "FISC EuroTour" external link has been unnecessarily removed. Should you check the eligibility page of our website at http://fisc-europe.org/Eligible_Cars_EMC.php , you will recognize that the Triumph Herald is listed and welcome to race with us at some of the great historic F1 circuits. Thanks 81.206.231.18 05:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Zeus page revert, 09/26/2006Omi, I visited the Zeus page shortly after your revert today, and found some minor vandalism still present - it was introduced in one of the early edits on 9/25. I fixed this up manually and documented the vandal on the Talk page for that article. Just dropping an FYI in case you wonder why I edited the page you reverted. Keep up the good work. :) Wingchild 17:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorryyeah sorry about what I did, I wont vandalise any more —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.44.58.220 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Precious WilliamsI reverted the recent changes (before yours) to Precious Williams because it seems like the editor actually stripped out a lot of content. I was about to replace the prod with an AfD but I see you beat me to it. I see you also reverted my reversion, though. I'll leave it as it currently is but you may want to check out the diffs to see if content really hasn't been lost. --Yamla 22:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Wrongful accusationDear Omicronpersei8, I recieved a message about supposed vandalism. I don't know why, but you got the wrong person and I wish for an explaination or an apology as to why I have been wrongfully accused of vandalising the article in question- I didn't even know that that article exsisted. Thanks for reading. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.134.111.194 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC) DO YOU MIND??? MALCOLM POOLE IS MY TEACHER AND IS A VERY GOOD FRIEND OF MINE...IF YOU BE SO KIND NOT TO DELETE THE CONTENT I AM ADDING ABOUT HIM AS HE WILL FIND IT VERY HUMEROUS... I CAN GIVE YOU HIS EMAIL IF YOU WOULD LIKE MPOOLE@WESLEY.WA.EDU.AU I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT HE WILL NOT BE HAPPY WITH YOU. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.168.244.233 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Ummm, i didnt vandalise anything mate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.107.102.96 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC) Your Edits to the Dell ArticleIts interesting to me that you think you know more about Dell than i do. I am sure that you have worked for Dell for years since you beleive that what i put into the article was false, or even vandalism. The store in the mall in Dallas was just recently opened and everything i wrote was factual. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.166.255.40 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC) He doesn't tell the truth about Dick Cheney and John Stossel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frazierhockey03 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Darn it!14:11, September 28, 2006 King of Hearts (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "74.70.39.175" - didnt get to add my block summary: dont attack my mates :( Glen 02:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry.Sorry for vandalism. Honestly, I didn't think you could trace me. Stupid of me, won't happen again. I'm justa YTMND member and I did it for kicks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.177.212.117 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Get ThisTotally agree about this article and it's blatent vandalism...does not help when the radio hosts of this show make fun and light of the vandalism and help "fuel" further hijinks to the wiki --Mikecraig 03:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Have requsted semi protection at this stage...lets see what happens --Mikecraig 00:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC) Ann CoulterI was testing the integrity of wikipedia. You are very quick on your feet! I tip my hat to you sir. --Storyteller15 03:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC) DefenderYou sir, are a defender of the wiki barnstar. You should be very proud. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.84.49.52 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Autism editDear Sir, I finally looked at the message about editing the Autism page. Honestly, I don't think it was me personally, as I have only edited one page in my time using Wiki. That was the page of the Wisconsin men's hockey team with regard to their conference affiliation. I changed it from CCHA to WCHA, which is factually accurate. This is a work computer so I'm not sure if others share this IP. I believe I have been to the Autism page at one time quite some time ago, but I don't think I edited it for anything. I really value the Wiki and take any attempt at editing very seriously, which is why I've only done it once. I'm sorry if it was my fault. I think I will be creating an account to avoid this anonymity problem from now on. I hope you were able to recover any lost content from my or anyone else's mistake. Peace, ---I did create an account, piojohnnybutt... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Piojohnnybutt (talk • contribs) 16:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep an eye on this user... it appears his reign of terror only lasted on the night of the 14th, but he might come back for more. He kept posting "haced_la_red_de_Rad" and "haker killer" everywhere. I commented on his talk page, and looked for his IP in the Block Logs and didn't see it. Just a heads up! Thanks // 164.106.159.18 18:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC) ActuaryIt is a fact that an actuary is a bookmaker to an insurance or assurance company insofar as they are both interested in the probabilities of an outcome. Please state why my edit is not factual and why i should not restore it.
revertwhy revert without explanation? --84.30.90.199 00:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC) You know what you can just shut up. it's a fan site *Morning Show Central Chat, Forum, Profile, Much More!for bob and tom and many more show we do not sale crap on our site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.10.136.118 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
This link i added to bob and tom o@a Rover the site is a fan site for the shows if you look you will see fans talking about the shows on the forums —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.10.136.118 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC) Global WarmingChange the Revision back. Global Warming Doesn't exist. If you think I'm wrong, go to <snip>. And read State of Fear, by Michael Crichton. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.111.182.89 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC) I own roversarmy.com Another Self Appointed Small Minded BureaucratIt doesnt matter that you just blindly reverted something I wrote and silenced my opinion on a talk page. What matters is by your own descriptions of yourself you represent everything thats wrong with Wikipedia. Self appointed bureaucrats like yourself are as bad as the people who cancel out edits to forward their own moral agenda. Wikipedia rewards jerks like you who put in so much "effort" even though by your own admission you are an expert on nothing. And since I know you are sensitive to criticism, let me say "go die in a fire". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.10.18.77 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
That guy is right. Listen to him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jadura450 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
NoteAnd I'm not talking about you, whatever your name is. I mean the guy who said you are a "Another Self Appointed Small Minded Bureaucrat". Don't use what people say to your advantage. It's cruel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jadura450 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Omicronpersei8 don't let all this get you down...you are doing good work! --Mikecraig 02:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Userpage vandalism and personal attack revertThank you for reverting a vandal's childish personal attack on my talk page. Have a nice day. Sensi.fr
Thanks!I know I'm doing my job when vandals mess up my page. They get blocked...I just revert. Or in this case, you reverted it. Thanks for watching my back. - Lucky 6.9 02:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
The edit's I made to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Machine_%28software%29 were valid. Time Machine is a trademarked name for Solutionsoft's date testing software. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Michaelmorrison (talk • contribs) 05:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm new to this. Not wikipedia, but editing/contributing on it. The problem is that Solution-Soft has had a copyright on a software application, Time Machine, for a decade now. Apple may have a slight problem if they actually release their software under this name as it is somewhat similar in descriptions. Basically both allow applications to move forward in date or time. The original posting for the Apple "Time Machine" negatively affects SolutionSoft by causing confusion in the market place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Michaelmorrison (talk • contribs) 05:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
torstuffI've responded on the bot approval page. But yes you should be able to get every node from the tor directory, the client selects it's routing based on the directory, so if it isn't in the directory it'll never be routed that way. Regarding signing, it wasn't a probem I thought to deeply about I guess I took a view that if someone did that, tough. The problem with signing is it relies on people checking the validity of the signature, something I believe won't happen (or at least not as often as it should), that said there is clearly no harm in doing the signing. On the pywiki front, my code doesn't use that to do the updating. If you want copies of my stuff to see if it's of any use to you, then email me and I'll send it you. (Includes objects to get the tor node list, a urllib2 opener for socks4a proxies, and very basic stuff for updating WP) --pgk 09:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC) I have reported User:69.255.0.91 for violating the 3RR. You might want to add a comment on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR since I see you've been battling it out with them as well. Thanks for helping keep the article clean! - antiuser 21:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
The persistent Matthew Savage on July 22I've never heard of the kid before, but if you look over the press clippings here, the Matthew Savage with a Wikipedia bio seems pretty notable (certainly more than a lot of the cruft that builds up on those day-of-the-year pages). But that Matthew Savage was born in New Hampshire on May 9, 1992. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
