Hello, Omar418! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being " adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! TFOWR 18:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Getting Started
|
|
|
Getting Help
|
|
|
Policies and Guidelines
|
|
|
The Community
|
|
|
Things to do
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely! TFOWR 23:27, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm assuming you've got User talk:TFOWR/Sandbox/Ethel MacDonald on your watchlist so I don't need to ping you every time I reply? Anyway, I have replied ;-) TFOWR 23:51, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Aye--Omar418 (talk) 00:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Indentation as I notice your discussion postings don't conform well with community practice. No big deal, but it can get messy when many people join a discussion. __meco (talk) 09:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Green Brigade. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Green Brigade. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It has been pointed out to you a few times that whatever can be found on Photobucket is not a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Green Brigade, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Enough. Drmies (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok I will cite other sources --Omar418 (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Omar, just to make matters clear--you made a few edits that I thought were not OK, I placed these templates here, you responded, and then you made some edits to the article that in my opinion were constructive--for which I thank you. Any administrator or other editor who walks by here, disregard the previous warnings. Omar, a word of advice, though: explain in your edit summaries what you're doing and why. All the best, Drmies (talk) 04:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- YAY! I wish I could just remove this stuff...--Omar418 (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I've done that here. I don't think your edit making all the sub-sections was so good as the page now reads like a collection of events rather than much information about the group. Maybe after the vandalism dies down - if you want to - you could try putting them all into a more coherent sections like "Political demonstrations" or something like that which may be better. If you are wanting to improve the page that would be good though as it could use some work. Feel free to ask if you need any help with anything else. Adam4267 (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
