User talk:Ode+Joy

Ode+Joy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ode+Joy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Villa Pallavicino (Stresa) (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Villa Pallavicino (Stresa) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Villa Pallavicino (Stresa), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it so it just points to Stresa. It is a very nice place, if you want to go there and see it after this pandemic thing. Then you may decide to build the page yourself. Ode+Joy (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Museums of Florence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Museums of Florence, is not suitable as written to remain published. It's not clear at this stage what this small article about a very general topic brings to the encyclopedia. In addition, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JBchrch talk 22:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Museums of Florence moved to draftspace

This article reads like an essay. I think it should be kept as a draft until it can be improved. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For this wonderful article suggestion JBL (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I generally think that if we are to do things, we should do them with fun. It works better that way. Ode+Joy (talk) 22:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Museums of Florence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Museums of Florence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museums of Florence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you reconsider

As a welcome, this is perhaps to late, but I hope you will reconsider your retirement. I have been close to giving up on Wikipedia myself a number of times, even quite recently. Editing Wikipedia can be frustrating experience, and there are days when I feel overwhelmed by rampant philistinism and contempt for experts. I find it's best for my own mental health not to comment on individual editors, even when they are wrong, and go do something else for a bit. Anyway, if there's something I can do to make you feel more at home here, feel free to get in touch. Vexations (talk) 13:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of governors of Texas by age for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of governors of Texas by age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of governors of Texas by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

List of governors of California by age has also been included in the nomination with List of governors of Texas by age. OCNative (talk) 22:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ode+Joy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, A comment, not a question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antiquarium of Milan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antiquarium of Milan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 15:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Limoges Fine Arts Museum

Hello, Ode+Joy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Limoges Fine Arts Museum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Limoges Fine Arts Museum

Hello, Ode+Joy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Limoges Fine Arts Museum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Antiquarium of Milan

Hello, Ode+Joy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antiquarium of Milan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]