en User talk:OceanHok Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:OceanHok. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Thank you

Thank you for your helpful comments with draft:Phoenix Point. I expanded on the gameplay section as you suggested, and the article is better for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoWorries (talk • contribs) 07:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@NoWorries: - I am glad to help! I think the article is ready to pass WP:AFC. However, to ensure that the transition is smooth, you should ensure that most of the sources you have used are reliable. For instance, I don't think onlysp.com, pcgamesn, and crowdfundinsider.com are not considered as reliable sources. You can try either replace them or remove them completely from the article. AdrianGamer (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: - Thank you again! This is my very first Wikipedia article, and all of your feedback has been very helpful. My article is much stronger for it. I've removed or replaced those three sources. In so doing, I was able to find some more reliable content that allowed me to add additional, interesting info to the article. Again, thank you!

A barnstar for you!

The Video game Barnstar

I'm not part of the Video Game project, but wow. The massive revamp you did for Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege just blew me away with how good it looks from just a day ago. From adding more reliable sources and for swapping any replaceable primary sources to including more content about the game as a whole with various pictures, statements, and extensions of sections. Keep up the outstanding work! Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 15:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@Adog104: - Thank you very much! AdrianGamer (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supermassive Games logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supermassive Games logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bandai Namco Entertainment logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bandai Namco Entertainment logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Reverting the edit of Arms article.

I am going to assume you hold absolute no knowledge regarding the video game in discussion. You reverted the entire edit rather than adjust it to a more suitable format. Do not think that you can just throw the "inappropriate content" tag around and revert anything you want. I have added in content in accordance to the format of the Chinese and Japanese pages. If that is non-applicable to the English Wiki, then we can also follow the format used in other fighting game pages. Let's take a look at one of the more recent fighting game releases - Injustice 2. I would like you to take a look at it. If listing the voice actors is too much, then the Arms page can readjusted to follow the same format as Injustice 2. Yet, you did not do that. Please remember that it says "It is almost never appropriate to create a standalone list of characters", but not "it is never appropriate". There are certain situations where this is allowed - especially for fighting games. It is not wrong to list characters for fighting games, but I acknowledge that it could be done better on the Arms page. What was frustrating was that you did not seek to enact any sort of change to the content. It's as if you're not interested in the topic itself. Honestly, it's preferable if you do not apply general rules without bothering to understand the context. Reverting edits are mostly done to prevent vandalism or to prevent misinformation. If you believe that the content lacked secondary sourcing, then you could add it. You could have let me know, or added it yourself. If you truly believe that you have made the appropriate decision, then I suggest you to remove character lists from all fighting video game pages. General applications of rules are not the way to go. You should have properly reassessed the article and added to it instead of removing content. Such an action can be a hindrance to other contributors. You can take it up to the admins if you feel that fighting video game pages have violated article guidelines. You can also attempt to remove content from all of those pages if you would like, but I do not think you share the community's perspective on this matter. Samhiuy (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@Samhiuy: - I know what Arms is when I revert your edit. There is an obvious difference between Injustice 2 and Arms. Injustice 2 has established characters that may mean something to the audience. Most readers probably know who Batman is and care about him, but I don't think most care about Twintelle and Kid Cobra. Given that they know nothing about them, it is very hard to convince readers about their significance. Is players being able to play as Spring Man really that important to note? If you look at other games whose characters affect gameplay like Dota 2, Battleborn, Evolve, Rainbow Six Siege, or the upcoming Agents of Mayhem, you will find that they don't have a standalone character list in their article. That is simply because there is no point in listing characters that aren't very notable even if they have an important role in gameplay. I am not ruling out that maybe Arms become super popular in the future and all characters are all famous and notable, but right now, it is not. Just because other fighting games have a character list doesn't mean that all fighting games need a character list. Furthermore, what you have listed is more similar to a voice actor list than a helpful character list, which is a direct violation to the rules. So there is basically nothing I can do to imporve other than reverting your edits assuming good faith. AdrianGamer (talk) 05:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Metro Exodus

Hello! AdrianGamer. I need your help in the metro exodus discussion, I have seen some sources saying that it is not a complete open world game. Certain levels takes place in large environments but there are linear levels too like other first-person shooters. Therefore I kindly request you to help me. Thank you in advance! ☺ Pure conSouls (talk) 13:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I'll give you that because I've seen the developer say that. There's also the chance they could be saying that because they think of open world as being such games as Skyrim or GTA though, so I'd keep an eye on Exodus, just in case that's what they actually meant. However, you still need reliable sources for edits, such as the one on Code Vein. I've not seen one reliable source state that it has an open world. Same for many other edits you've been making recently, you need to provide reliable sources to back up your edits.Dohvahkiin (talk) 13:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Prey

While we're on the subject of games we're on the fence about, I'd like to bring up Prey. I've seen the developers call that game open space station, but not necessarily open world. However, an editor on that article convinced me that it's open world, even though there are limited sources which state such. I'd like to have your input on this.Dohvahkiin (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Question About An Article You Work On

Im very new to all of this editing and such and therefore am seeking someone elses opinion on all of this. You know alot about C3 and I wish to know how in depth to go in the article. For instince I could make subheadings for all of the weapons of the multiplayer or dive into the history, development, and creators of each multiplayer map. Is this a wise desicion? I could provide a summary of each data patch or describe some of the well known players from C3's community. ThanksThe Alpha Ceph (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Also please stop fighting me over the wording of the "rip and throw' ability. I am confident that my edit was more accurate.

@The Alpha Ceph: - Hello! I feel that you are very passionate about the game (so do I) but I am very sorry to disappoint. Information about individual weapons, maps and creators are considered as something you would find in a game guide, which is not ideal for an encyclopedia. We seldom mention anything about players unless they are notable, such as some popular eSports players and YouTube influencers. Excessive details should be avoided, and everything should be supported by secondary reliable source, meaning that the content should not be from any user-generated source due to the possibility of original research. You can dive into the development of some of the official maps, but I personally don't recommend diving too deep into it. All you add must be supported by reliable sources as well. AdrianGamer (talk) 03:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

The article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

The article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:41, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:TinyBuild Games

A tag has been placed on Draft:TinyBuild Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Old draft redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lordtobi (✉) 17:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bohemia Interactive

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bohemia Interactive you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bohemia Interactive

The article Bohemia Interactive you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bohemia Interactive for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bohemia Interactive

The article Bohemia Interactive you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bohemia Interactive for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheSandDoctor -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Marvel’s Spider-Man listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marvel’s Spider-Man. Since you had some involvement with the Marvel’s Spider-Man redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Naraht (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bohemia Interactive

On 2 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bohemia Interactive, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bohemia Interactive bought a T-72 tank, stating: "A massive tanks goes out to everyone who has supported the studio and its games throughout the past 16 years"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bohemia Interactive. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bohemia Interactive), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 00:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peggle 2 for Xbox One.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peggle 2 for Xbox One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Music of Watch Dogs

May we start a discussion about the deletion of the page. You did not inform me prior to removal of the page. I am the original creator. The discussion should state if the page should be merged into the main one or not. Thank you. --TudorTulok (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@TudorTulok: - The redirect shouldn't be controversial because it is against our guideline at WP:GAMECRUFT. The 15th item states that non-notable soundtrack shouldn't be included. The article in its current state consists of only tracklists and a list of composers, which the main article can handle. I am not saying that the soundtrack of Watch Dogs is not notable, but you have the burden to show that it is notable (since you are the article creator). You need to expand the article and provide more information to show its notability. I am not saying that it must be of extreme high quality but at least it should look like these two articles (Dead Space 2 Original Videogame Score, Wolfenstein: The New Order (soundtrack). AdrianGamer (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

GR

Just outa curiosity: Would you point me to the discussion/rule about GR? I wasn't aware of it. Thanks! 95.90.220.185 (talk) 12:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@95.90.220.185: - Template:video game reviews. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. 95.90.220.185 (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego Ninjago Shadow of Ronin cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lego Ninjago Shadow of Ronin cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Paragon (video game)

Hello, I would like to know why you undo my changes on the article about Paragon? I made these changes because I know pretty everything around the development of the game. Thanks You!Philippe16Create (talk) 01:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

ZombiU copyedit

Hello, OceanHok. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for ZombiU at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 22:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

@Miniapolis: - Thank you very much! AdrianGamer (talk) 12:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Alpha Protocol

Hello, OceanHok. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Alpha Protocol at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rabbids Invasion The Interactive TV Show artwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rabbids Invasion The Interactive TV Show artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Need help with Ark: Survival Evolved

Hey, since you’re one of the more avid editors in the video game sector here, I thought you could help. It seems someone has taken it upon themselves to blank the article for Ark: Survival Evolved. I undid the two most recent edits, but could not undo the third. I fear the user (using only an IP Address), May attempt this again. Just a heads up. You can check this out over in the history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ark:_Survival_Evolved&action=history.Dohvahkiin (talk) 12:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Done, I have issued him a warning. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of ZombiU

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ZombiU you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 75.117.17.134 -- 75.117.17.134 (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AdrianGamer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alpha Protocol

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alpha Protocol you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alpha Protocol

The article Alpha Protocol you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alpha Protocol for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alpha Protocol

The article Alpha Protocol you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alpha Protocol for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of ZombiU

The article ZombiU you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:ZombiU for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Darkwarriorblake -- Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Watch Dogs: Slouching Toward GA

I have been rewriting Watch Dogs recently, via User:Cognissonance/drafts/Watch Dogs, and am approaching the stage where it can go live (I'll contact someone to do a histmove at that point). The problem is I always dread writing the post-release reception section. If you were willing to write this section (I will be asking the Guild to refine the entire article later, so it doesn't have to be perfect, although you were integral to The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt), I could review a GAN, FAN, or write a Peer Review for you when needed. Cognissonance (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Cognissonance: - I really want to help but I won't really be able to write anything until later this year. There are some real-life matters that I must settle and it is going to take a long while. I am very sorry. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

That's fine, good luck man. Cognissonance (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Monster Hunter World

The only thing in your Monster Hunter: World page that is wrong from my kowledge is that MH: World is the fifth entry to the series and it says sixth. I may have forgotten something but capcom has said that it will be the Monster Hunter 5 so to speak. The titles since MH4U are generations, stories, and double cross barring the horse race promotion game for Monster Hunter: World.

Titanfall 2

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Titanfall 2 has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: - Thank you very much for your help! AdrianGamer (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Ninja Theory

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ninja Theory has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: - Thank you very much! AdrianGamer (talk) 11:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome! Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:OceanHok. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

→