User talk:Njol

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Njol}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

November 2013

You're mean :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by MySceneFan101 (talk • contribs)

Feel free to experiment with Wikipedia in the Sandbox or your userspace, but please do not conduct tests in the main article namespace. To e.g. test creating a new article, create a page with a name like User:MySceneFan101/testpage. – Njol #T·C 11:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Akim Hoste

Hello Njol. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Akim Hoste, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims of international exhibitions are claims of importance (plenty of mentions in reliable sources too). Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More info on Speedy deletion

Hi Njol,

Could you please give me some more information on what I need to remove from my article (NaMedia Namibia Media Monitoring) according to you that its not "promotional". I'm new here and open to constructive criticism.

Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gesche Pinsenschaum (talk • contribs) 10:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue with the article was that is seemed to be a plain copy-paste from the company's website (or some other description of the company), as it was badly formatted and was not written like an encyclopaedic article. If you want to re-create the article, I suggest that you first read through some other companies' articles here on Wikipedia and create your article in a similar manner, e.g. using the same template to describe key information about the company (name, headquarters, website, etc.), and also make sure to look for reliable second or third party sources on the web or even in books (try to not rely on primary sources, i.e. the company's own website) and reference any claims made in the article. A single reliable reference and a few sentences about the company that you wrote yourself should be enough for the article to be kept, assuming that the company is notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. – Njol #T·C 14:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kay Robertson

Hello, I saw that you added a tag on my page Kay Robertson, because it wasn't cited. I cited it and hope you will look at it again. Thank you. -lovecherry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovecherry (talk • contribs) 05:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the page's history I myself removed the PROD template when you added a reference. I strongly recommend to add more references though and to expand the article; you can take other family members as starting point: Phil Robertson, Si Robertson, Willie Robertson and Jase Robertson. A good start would be to include the {{Infobox person}} in your article, and add similar sections like in the other articles. You might be able to find more information about Kay by looking at the references in the other articles. – Njol #T·C 06:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: to sign your comments use ~~~~, this will automatically add a link to your profile, your talk page, and the current date and time.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

v

Wa9ila (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Njol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Njol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Njol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]