|
User talk:Nishkid64/Archive 50
JSR's editsJSR's edit was to removing the sourced information, thus a vadalism, I don't see how a complete re-written would make a different, different scholar's opiinons are to be included anyway. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC) You can believe JSR for all you like, that's your personal bais towards him. See the article talk page for my reply. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
What a prick, don't act like an matured 'adult' (even if you're old) when you have neither the guts nor intelligent to speak up. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I revert your removal not edits, what edits you made had revert by me? Shown me. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC) I don't care what time you work tomorrow, I have my own life too, so is on your burden besides lying on this page. Get used to it. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
So what? Do you know that 3RR rules doesn't even cover user talk page? If you indend to discuss the matter you should had been discussing on article talk page and take it seriously. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Lol, you're very funny, I did it because you're annoying that's why, not because I wanna cover up my ass. There is nothing for me to hide. As for I engaes in vandalism, shown me again. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Nish, keep me posted on the FAC in terms of how you want to proceed; I know you're trying to get your hands on some additional sources. Of course, it would be better if the French editor would come on board to help, but he too seems to have misunderstand WP:V policy and comments about reliability of Wiki as a source. We need to overcome 1) translation concerns, 2) sourcing concerns (including some English language issues that surfaced) and 3) comprehensive concerns. If you think you can do that, I'll continue to leave it open. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Cla caseThe PD page says 9 active arbs but the PD talk page says 8. You need to figure out which is correct. The required majority is still 5 though, but the numbers need to be right. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia Weekly Episode 62Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 62 has been released. It's the first episode since Wikimania and it packs a lot of content! You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 05:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC) You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. ORISSA COMMUNAL VIOLENCEOrissa violence is merely clashes between missionaries and converted Christians clashing with Hindus. There is nothing ethnic about it. Jobxavier (talk) 21:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC) RELIGION-BASED VIOLENCEThe population of Orissa practise many religions; not Hinduism or Christianity alone. However, only Christians and Hindus fight and kill each other. It is as such only 'Christian - Hindu clashes'; not religious violence in Orissa. And the issue is not religion; it is allurement-based conversions and benefits of affirmative action, that cause the clashes; as the Page itself says. Jobxavier (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Military history WikiProject coordinator electionThe September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30! :oYou play rs? I found you Here II MusLiM HyBRiD II 23:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC) My RfA
On disruptions by new userNish, I'm crying 'bias' now. My edits are being reverted and I just spent the night arguing with someone who wrote that I did it because you're annoying. Is there really no procedure for obvious vandalism (content misrepresentation, foul language, POV pushing, revert warring with the same content, verbal abuses, talk page blanking, vandalizing edits made by other people, and disruptive behavior) on Wikipedia? I want to continue editing here without vandals disrupting me. Regards, JSR (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Oh by the way, you're the one who failed to accept a source for the sake of your dislike, so don't blame on me. Btw, I don't think that your label as other's as vandal is vaild either. So Nish you should provide him a warning just like what you did over my talk page eariler. You can't continue editing Wikipedia, simply because you lack the will to accept a source nor the time you had to do so. My advice to you is to quit removing source for no reason, and stop acting like a profession because you obviously ain't. Oh and next time, don't bother to tell me that your boss had fired you because you engaged an editing war with some new user over the Wikipedia. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC) I starting to think that JSR dont even bother to handle the matter seriously, just take a look at what he was writing, I can't let anyone attack an article for whatever level of experience one has, He neither has the source, nor has he read it, Childish cries of 'believing' and 'bias' are disruptive, thanked him for taking it easy once are his way of defending things but vandalism remains vandalism, an entire article hostage and is taking his sweet time to write one line replies, I'm crying 'bias' now, are those the things I should accept? Tell me. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 01:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry if I have been troubling you in the recent past. As far as I'm concerned I called a spade a spade but will refrain once his block expires (I'm not sure his fascination with me is about to end though). This was my first dealing with an uncivil person on Wikipedia and I was under stress, exhaustion, and frankly irritation while dealing with him. I hope I have not soured things too much. JSR (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I am currently busy with my work, but just for a note. I had face those who were more amicable than you, frankly I not interested in them. Your "amicable“ isn't the reason for me to be uncivil with you, even though a Tamil nationalist like you does makes me feel annoying, is more on the soft language you used on an admin talk page and the wrongly assuming as well, but that's your own general pattern. I think the heart of the issue was that I am unable to provide more ref in the meantime, however I still would try, given if I had more time on Wikipedia. Thanks Anpersonalaccount (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
rensehey fella. noticed that you were the last to edit jeff_rense page. i don't care either way for opinions expressed... but just wanted to say that www.rense.com has disappeared from global dns and cant be accessed. wanted to add this to the wikipedia page as its hard to find information about. its a 'hot' topic i know but is a bit odd that vanished. freedom of speech and all that. Farkah (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)farkah Today's DYK'sWhats the deal with some of todays DYKs? DYK is supposed to be based on pure fact. The tagline for Geoffrey Ballard is clearly based on a POV "Hero" proclamation by Time magazine, not exactly a solid factually based line and the tagline for Ru Ba Bu or wahtever the Indian film is named, it syas it is the "cinematic adaption" of the "film". This looks very poor in that is clearly isn't a cinematic adaption of something as they are both cinematic media in which one would't need to be "adapted". I heard that they were tightening up regulations on DYK's but I think the regulators are focusing far too much on length of the articles or length of the tagline and referencing rather than the quality and legitimacy of the taglines themsevles. I've noticed "facts" on the front page many times recently based on POV that somebody was called a "Wonder of the Twentieth Century" etc etc and it is an easy target for the media to pick up on and to continue reporting wikipedia in a negative way in terms of neutrality. The Bald One White cat 17:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC) HiDidn't know you were in college (read it off a post on Nikkul's page). From the 64 part, I thought you were born in 1964, since you did undergo a serious operation some time back. =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC) Gabon: a Neo-Colonial Enclave of Enduring French InterestDo you have access to this article from your university? If so, could you e-mail it to me? Your friend Eddy of the wiki[citation needed] 21:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC) Hello Nishkid !
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC) RfA thank youWhy did you get rid of the Carl Newman aesthetic analysis? It was well written. Any analysis like that on a classical musician wouldn't be taken down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.74.213.161 (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)  — JGHowes talk - 19 August 2008 Well, it has appeared on fr.wiki. Should we entirely replace your text or try to mesh the two? (Up to 1960, that is - the French version goes all the way to his death.) Either way works for me, but let's come up with a plan first. Biruitorul Talk 21:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that you are a portal peer review volunteer. I have worked much for the improvement of my portal, but some concerns may remain:
Wikis Take Manhattan
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well. LAST YEAR'S EVENT
WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more! WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration. WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)! REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand. WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:
FOR UPDATES Check out:
This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency. Thanks, You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list. 3RR blockHi Nish, could you enforce the 3RR violation penalty upon User talk:72.81.208.215 on the article Ahmed Deedat. Cheers. Trips (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC) My RfAThank you for supporting me; I passed with a count of (154/3/2). I would give you the templatespam, but I figured you're one of the few that get a handwritten-note. :-) Aside from supporting my RfA, I'd like to thank you for spending the time to coach me in the past, as I firmly believe your efforts at User:Juliancolton/Admin coaching have helped get me where I am as an administrator. Thanks again! –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC) CreazySuit mentorshipI'm sure you already have this in hand, but do you suppose you could leave a message on CreazySuit's user talk page about his mentorship? It would be helpful if he knew what the "new rules" were before he gets back into editing articles. -- ChrisO (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Answering your questionThe AN/I thread is horribly long, and does not need any more tangents, so I will answer your question here. I helped create Wikipedia:Editing restrictions and Wikipedia:General sanctions. As a result, I am more familiar than I want to be with most of the hot spots on Wikipedia. I have a collection of methods and tools that help expedite tedious tasks like analyzing protection logs and contribution histories. I also get tips from Wikipedians via email almost daily, and keep an eye on a collection of pages that seem to be magnets for disruptive editors. For instance, search engine optimization attracts a large number of spammers. Per WP:BEANS, I don't want to reveal too many details. In this case, I was NOT canvassed by ChrisO nor Dbachmann. I found the thread and the evidence independently of them. Jehochman Talk 19:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Yo Nish. Could you please e-mail Ceoil a copy of "Gabon: A Neo-Colonial Enclave of Enduring French Interest"? S/he is copyediting Paul Gondjout. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 20:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC) A new FL contestWikipedia's epic FL directors Matthewedwards and Scorpion0422 have decided to try another FL contest as a follow up to the one held last June. As you entered the first contest, you may be interested in taking a look at the new one, which will have different rules. Although they are still being fiddled with, three FLs in different topics will be required this time around. For more information, see here. A start date has not yet been determined, but it will likely begin some time within the next week or so. Thanks for the time, Scorpion0422 15:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:Whatpulselogo.JPGThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Whatpulselogo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Asenine 21:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Fair use rationale for Image:Ss Whatpulsesettings.PNGThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ss Whatpulsesettings.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Asenine 21:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Update from JSRI'll be trying to bring up Indian astronomy to a fully sourced version in the near future (One-two days or sooner. I have a draft ready). If you can find time then please make sure to take a look. Also make sure to read Ayurveda; Its stable and fully sourced now. Regards, JSR (talk) 18:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 63Hello! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 63, an interview with Florence Devouard, has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 07:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC) You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. Thanks for fixing the PD tag at the image and leaving a note on the FAC. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC) CheckuserNish, congratulations on your appointment!! Welcome to the checkuser team :) - Alison ❤ 03:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Actually, congratulations doesn't even begin to describe it. You miffed your chance. Shame on you! J.delanoygabsadds 20:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Sir, user User:Srirangam99, who brings no sources to the table, has deleted large amounts of info from this FA, which I have reverted. Please do leave a warning message on his user's page to bring sources and discuss. He has tried this earlier also and faced blocks. If he continues his deletions, I will open a ANI. He is also targetting Chola Dynasty, the original reason for his multipe blocks.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Notice
Deletion review for Holiday ParadeAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Holiday Parade. Since you are a member of my class at GW, I thought you may be willing to take a look for me. Baselineace (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 2 recently live Jarlaxle/Grawp accountsUser:Lkjhgdw and User:London in ruins. Care to exercise your awesome new powers? :) NawlinWiki (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC) I'm confusedCould you explain to me how this[3], and this[4], and this[5], and this[6] isn't edit warring? Thanks. Kansas Bear (talk) 18:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Two more CU requests for ResearchEditorNishkid, I've added two more requests to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor. Thanks for your attention.PelleSmith (talk) 22:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC) Thanksfor the latest RFCU on Astutescholar (talk · contribs) Toddst1 (talk) 06:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC) HulloHullo, I just observed that you've blocked User:Anwar saadat. I wish to point out that I just stumbled upon this edit of his with an extremely objectionable edit summary. -RavichandarMy coffee shop 18:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
TenerifeHi. Can you do the honors for the translation tagging for Tenerife? Thanks Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Thank You!
HeyHappy birthday! SpencerT♦C 01:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Attacks on User talk:NancyCan you do something about the underlying IP(s)? Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC) For your FAs
FA-Team new missionHi Nishkid, You've probably noticed that the FA-Team has just launched a mission to help WikiProject AP Biology 2008 and WikiProject North of the Rio Grande improve articles towards featured quality. I'm hoping you would like to join in and support a few articles, especially from the biology project. If you can, please add your name to the articles you are watchlisting on the mission page. Thanks, Geometry guy 20:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC) Professional translatorsHey Nish, just wondering who those professional translators are who helped you with M'ba. Of course the problem has arisen at the new 1964 Gabon FAC [rolls eyes]. ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 01:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Alex2706Actually, I did post comments [7] and [8] to User talk:Alex2706, but they were almost immediately deleted by the user. In addition to these messages, I also posted a message to Talk:Fidel Castro, to attempt to engage the user in discussion. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 01:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
