User talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:NeverTry4Me. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajid Mir (Terrorist) has been accepted

Sajid Mir (Terrorist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 16:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Assessment for A Class

Previously, this was assessed A class. Though, the military Wikiproject says that To receive an A-Class rating, a candidate article must undergo the formal military history A-Class review process. Could you please tell me where’s the discussion, I unfortunately couldn’t find any here. I’ve reassessed it to B now as there are sources that are not RS (ref 22, 38, 40, 46). If I’ve made a mistake and there’s a discussion, please let me know and ping me! Many thanks for your help. VickKiang (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

VickKiang about which page you are talking? _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 01:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

I've clearly linked the page above, see this, many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

VickKiang got it now. If you use rater, you will see that it's near to 97% scope for A class. You can nominate for A class. Or I shall? _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 02:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

All good now, but next time please assess A class after nomination in the WikiProject. You can nominate it, it's all right, but usually A class has a higher requirement than GA, so consider doing the latter if you are a major contributor. Otherwise, happy editing, thanks for your work! VickKiang (talk) 02:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

VickKiang I am now removing the YouTube, IMDB refs and will work on that article. I liked the article so, want to work on that. :) _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 02:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

VickKiang I forgot the article name. Do you support Operation Bajrang for A-Class which is nominated by others in A-Class review? _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 13:34, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mintong has been accepted

Mintong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 12:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tal Pathar has been accepted

Tal Pathar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laitkor Lumheh has been accepted

Laitkor Lumheh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niz Juluki has been accepted

Niz Juluki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 DIVINE  00:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Indian states

Hi, this is just to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian states is a project for Indian states only, not for settlements within those states. e.g. Draft talk:Tal Pathar shouldn't be added to that wikiproject. You can (and should) add it to the project of the particular state (Assam in this case). 04:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

MPGuy2824 Ok. I won't repeat this mistake. Thanks for informing. Can you please review the WP:GEO drafts pending for many days? Regards- _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry NeverTry4Me, I'm not part of WP:AFC. I don't think you should keep submitting it for AFC, before a reviewer has looked at it. I'd assume that older submissions get higher priority and by re-submitting you are pushing this draft back to the end of the queue. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

MPGuy2824 Thanks for replying. I'd assume that older submissions get higher priority; actually not so. The Draft:G Bidai is pending for months. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

According to this, you last submitted it on 27th June. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

MPGuy2824, that was because some editors with reviewer rights edited the page but didn't either declined or accepted. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

MPGuy2824, BTW, Wikiproject Assam is Inactive. Hence, no point adding that tag anymore. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Most of the individual state wikiprojects are dead. But, they could get members who could re-activate them. That said, even if i don't add that wikiproject, someone else probably would (at least once it comes to article space). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Hey, you did this again for Draft:Lapalang. I've fixed it. Another point: I think you can move pages to mainspace yourself. You don't need to submit to AFC. See Wikipedia:Drafts#Publishing a draft. Please continue the AFC submissions for your articles that were draftified by someone else. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

MPGuy2824 I am restricted till 7 September. Moving to mainspace is under restriction, only AfC submission is allowed. Rest about the concern you have raised, you too created many pages with the same tag. Why blame me alone while Wiki suggested that for the improvement of speedy review? _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

I got your point about you being restricted. I can't understand the rest. Please explain "you too created many pages with the same tag" What tag are you talking about? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824 As per your Please explain "you too created many pages with the same tag" What tag are you talking about?, just one example is here. The rest is here. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, i've created pages, including talk pages. So have you. That's not the problem at all. What i was trying to tell you was: Please don't add the Indian states template to articles that are clearly not Indian states. You can and should add relevant wikiproject templates to all articles/drafts that you create. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

MPGuy2824 you don't review Draft:G Bidai, then why you are using the New page reviewer right as per this? _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers is for articles in the mainspace. WP:AFC is a separate group that looks at drafts, that are requested to be moved to mainspace. There are folks who work on both, but not me. Hopefully, this explains the situation. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)