User talk:Nemov/Archives/2020/December

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nemov. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Happy New Year Nemov!

Happy New Year!

Nemov,
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! @Eggishorn:, Happy New Year to you as well! - Nemov (talk) 01:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring at Zack Hample

Hello Nemov. You've been warned as the result of a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@EdJohnston:What rule did I violate to receive a warning? I have addressed the user's talk page, the article talk page, and I have been careful to avoid multiple revisions. I have requested a third party to assist build consensus, but the user continues to make disruptive edits anyway.- Nemov (talk) 04:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Nobody is entitled to keep reverting forever. If you are the only one willing to discuss, you will eventually get some help at the admin boards. EdJohnston (talk) 05:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@EdJohnston:The user has reverted the article again. This user has been making disruptive edits on this page for a long time. - Nemov (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Davefelmer

Since he doesn't seem inclined to raise the issue at WT:BASEBALL, this probably needs raised there anyway. I'm trying to stay out contentious issues, for obvious reasons :) , so I won't do it myself. It does seem to me that simply changing the wording of the section title in the Infobox would solve his issue, but only if there's a consensus to do it. Personally, I don't think it needs to be changed, but whatever :) - BilCat (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

I got the sense based on the user's edit history that the person may not understand baseball? You are right about the infobox though so I can kind of understand the user's issue there. That box should probably be named something else. I'll raise the question at WT:BASEBALL. - Nemov (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

I got that sense too. And honestly, the label is minor, but including the division and wildcard is standard in the Big 4 infoboxes, and they should remain. He apparently doesn't understand that part of American/Canadian sports culture. - BilCat (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

I added a section over at WT:BASEBALL. I can't imagine there will be much motivation to change it. Maybe the user will relent. This is the 3rd or 4th time that user has made these changes. Thanks for the suggestion. - Nemov (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Truist Park Logo.png

The file File:Truist Park Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to RedWarn

Hello, Nemov! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 80 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 03:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Zack Hample

I took a long look at Yankees999's edits. There's a good chance that's Zack Hample himself. He uploaded the picture to Commons, and as justification for it being free of copyright, stated "because Zack hample on his website". His edit attempting to removed the "banned from 3 stadiums" bit was around the same week that Hample's Twitter account was campaigning to have it removed. Anyway, I submitted the picture for deletion due to the copyright issue. You can see that here.

You could be right, but I lean no based on a couple of the edits during the Fort Bragg fiasco. Also, I'm pretty sure the user Yellow lights who made edits in the past was Hample and both accounts were active at the same time. Might have been a sock puppet thought. Nemov (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Wow, good call on the Yellow lights user. I missed that one. That's absolutely Hample, based on the edits made to his article and his father's article, and adding unsourced stuff to Stoo Hample that probably no one else would have known. Also the edit to Arkanoid that added his own self as a world record holder. Nice catch. JimKaatFan (talk) 16:07, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)