User talk:Nathan B2/Archive 2021

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pentecostalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apostolic Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Baptists

added a link pointing to Rivas

Christian views on marriage

added a link pointing to Rivas

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Evangelicalism in Zimbabwe

A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelicalism in Zimbabwe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 14:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Evangelical Christianity in Myanmar

A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelical Christianity in Myanmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Evangelical Christianity in the Ivory Coast

A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelical Christianity in the Ivory Coast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Christian denominations in Nicaragua

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian denominations in Nicaragua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Christian denominations in Honduras

A tag has been placed on Category:Christian denominations in Honduras indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Protestant megachurches has been nominated for merging to Category:Megachurches

Category:Protestant megachurches has been nominated for merging to Category:Megachurches. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 08:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Nathan B2 — thank you for taking some time and effort to edit content on Tyndale University. I am directly associated with this institution. I have no issues with your edits — they are all very well done.

I was hoping to reach out to you as a seasoned Wikipedia contributor for some related advice. Please let me know if you are open to having this conversation. I am open to connect in any way you feel comfortable.

Thank you

AndySmith-ca (talk) 15:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AndySmith-ca (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. If you have any questions, you can leave them on this page. I also recommend reading this page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical Christianity. Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy of Ephesus

Where was the request or consensus for such a major name change? Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Laurel Lodged (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. Timothy of Ephesus is a more neutral (ecumenical) form and is used in several languages. I recommend reading this page: Wikipedia:Moving a page. Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 20:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelical theology

Your recent editing history at Evangelical theology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Anupam^Talk 02:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropological reading, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SIL International

Thanks for your recent edits on SIL International, which are mostly helpful. But in one edit you stated that SIL is a member of the Wycliffe Global Alliance, which is not correct. The source you quoted in that matter states that "SIL also partners with other faith-based organizations that are committed to the social and justice needs of minority peoples. SIL is a member of the Micah Network and the Forum of Bible Agencies International. Primary partners for funding and volunteer staff are organizations affiliated with Wycliffe Global Alliance." So this means that although WGA and its affiliates are important partners, SIL is in fact not a member of that alliance. Since I am a member of SIL myself, I should not make that correction to the article; therefore I kindly request that, if after checking you confirm my assertion, you take out the claim that SIL is a member of the WGA. Thanks! LandLing 06:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Landroving Linguist (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. The nuance has been added. Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Graham

And you're edit warring at Billy Graham. Seriously? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Walter Görlitz (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. I think there is certainly a misunderstanding. For the field of study, the word evangelical is not there, but the College website mentions https://www.trinitycollege.edu/admissions/about-trinity/ : « We are distinctly evangelical » and the College article mentions evangelical in the intro. So I moved the word evangelical next to the word College. The wtsp.com article mentions well 2 times « In 1940 Graham graduated from the Florida Bible Institute ». It is possible to do a search for the word "graduated" in the article and also a search on google. Several google books and these 3 other references confirm: https://billygraham.org/about/biographies/billy-graham/ https://billygrahamlibrary.org/commencement-program-from-florida-bible-institute/ and https://www.tampabay.com/news/obituaries/Billy-Graham-found-his-calling-as-a-Bible-college-student-in-Tampa_165698073/ I have added the reference of Bill Adler's book (p. VIII), which confirms his bachelor of theology in 1940. I know the seriousness of your work Walter. So I know that is not a bad intention on your part. I have great respect for your quality contributions. Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelical theology and believer's Church

User:Nathan B2, are you aware that the largest denomination of the holiness movement, the Church of the Nazarene (as with the Free Methodist Church), normatively practices infant baptism? If that is the case, how do they fit in with the so-called definition of the Believers' Church. Note that these denominations all belong to the World Methodist Council. Kind regards, Anupam^Talk 15:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. Yes, I knew some denominations in the movement did not have the Believer's Church doctrine. However, you raise important information. One of the main holiness denominations that adheres to the believer's Church doctrine is the Alliance World Fellowship, but in reality, were also influenced by the Higher Life movement, without being in one of the two movements. Thus, I corrected the information with 2 references that are more precise and say the same thing. I also specified the "main" movements. Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 15:18, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Church of the Brethren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellefontaine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anabaptism

added a link pointing to Brethren

Fornication

added a link pointing to True Love Waits

Mennonite World Conference

added a link pointing to Kitchener

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anabaptism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brethren.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baptists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Smyth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Full Gospel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Evangelicalism in Belize

A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelicalism in Belize indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Respectfully sir why the change in icon? The baptism of Jesus by John was a particular relevant picture for the subject - same as the Lutheran Rose for Lutheranism, Dirk Willems for Anabaptism, Calvin for Calvinism and so on... There is already a cross icon for the Protestantism and Christianity templates which Baptists are of course apart of. I don't mean to do an edit war with you so I apologize if I came off on the wrong foot, however I believe there was "nothing broken" so I don't see why the old icon was changed. Have a good day sir. 24.44.73.34 (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 24.44.73.34 (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. The other file is not representative of global beliefs (Baptist, Brackney 2020, p. 35) (Wikipedia:Systemic bias). The new file is an international representation of the movement. Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't have access to that book right now so I can't understand your point? 24.44.73.34 (talk) 20:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 24.44.73.34 (talk · contribs). Thank you for the comments. The cross is the only symbol that is accepted by the majority of churches worldwide (Baptist, Brackney 2020, p. 35) (Wikipedia:Systemic bias). Thanks for your help. --Nathan B2 (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU NATHAN

Thank you Nathan for you correct and intuitive definition of sanctification. I have much to share with you if you ever are led to talk with me. GOD'S SPEED. [e-mail] TY KEVEN 107.88.177.63 (talk) 01:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]