User talk:Nath1991/Archives/2011 Archives

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nath1991. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Please be more careful about labeling vandalism

This edit that you called vandalism was not. Even if an edit seems suspicious, assume good faith and do some research before acting.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 19:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi Nathan: Sorry to insert a seemingly irrelevant comment here, but could not figure out how the heck to post a talk. This is about my Michael Owen edit which you just reverted back. I had merely changed the sentence to what the headline of the article is. How is that irrelevant? Michael Owen And The Future Of Newspapers - http://www.techtaffy.com/2011/10/michael-owen-does-an-entire-q-who-needs-journalists/ Please do some research before acting. I second the comment.

Please be more careful about labeling vandalism

The edit to NSW that you called vandalism was not. Even if an edit seems suspicious, assume good faith and do some research before acting. Will undo your change in 7 days time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.70.215 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Warning for false labelling as vandalism

On Albion Park Rail, New South Wales you removed a contribution by 27.32.101.44 labelling it as vandalism. The edit was not vandalism, and was widely reported in the media at the time. Please check more closely before making negative statements about the work of our contributors. If you continue to behave in this way you may be blocked. Consider yourself warned. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for responding, you are correct in that the text is unreferenced, and that some in the location may not be proud of the fact. But it would be a matter of debate as to whether the text should be in or not. But my real point is that it is not vandalism. So please do not label the removal as removing vandalism. I note your edit about the famous people in Oak Flats did not have a reference, it was not vandalism either, but I found a reference for it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Mitch Nichols

Almost certainly an April Fools joke. The source is just on someones webhosting, not the Brisbanetimes site. If I'm wrong then sorry, but let's wait for a reliable source. Camw (talk) 02:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem, always best to be extra skeptical about anything today and into tomorrow with US sites! Camw (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NBN State League.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NBN State League.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Tyler Simpson

There may not be a article about his passing due to the circumstances, but it was mentioned in the Blacktown City v South Coast recap at the NSW Premier league site..can confirm he passed away on thursday so i think it would be correct as to update it. hope that helps Triggerbit (talk) 11:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 2010 Antarctica helicopter crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 Antarctica helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Antarctica helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Fung Kai Hong

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fung Kai Hong, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/xu-deshuai/club-career.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Vataj

The article Robert Vataj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

SFC Squad Numbers

Hey Nath,

Those squad numbers are likely legit, they were confirmed by someone that works for the club on SFCU. You are right that we should wait for a reliable source, but I don't think classing it as vandalism is correct and something like uw-unsourced might have been a better talk page template to use. Camw (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Daniel Severino

A tag has been placed on Daniel Severino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hack (talk) 02:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Future of WikiProject Association Football in Australia

There is a discussion on the future direction of WikiProject Association Football in Australia. To view the discussion see here. You have received this message because you are listed as a member of the WikiProject. Hack (talk) 06:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Sydney FC W-League squad

W-League teams have there own articles eg. Sydney FC W-League. There is no need to publish the Women's squad in the main Sydney FC article for the mens team. A simple link to the women team in the squad section is sufficient. Youth squad is fine as it is an extension/feeder team for the senior squad.

Simione001 (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dánjal á Lakjuni

The article Dánjal á Lakjuni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andri Ólafsson

The article Andri Ólafsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sebastian Bertran

The article Sebastian Bertran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Nath1991/Archives/2011 Archives! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Sydney meetup

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dulwich logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dulwich logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Lefranc cyprus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lefranc cyprus.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nath1991. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Lefrance2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lefrance2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Images: File:Lefranc cyprus.jpg & File:Lefrance2.jpg

Added what I believe to be appropriate and accurate copyright information on both images, that were tagged by this bot and alerted to me on November 21, 2011. Please check, and confirm these are OK. Cheers Nath1991 (talk) 06:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

You provided the information the bot was asking for (since the images are free images, the {{Information}} template is a better choice for organizing it). You got the license for File:Lefrance2.jpg slightly wrong, though: wiki.lexcel.be uses the Belgian variant of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license, but you marked it as the generic 3.0 version. --Carnildo (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)