User talk:Napoli0079

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 20:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moxy🍁 17:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok at least tell me what I am doing wrong, all my edits have a logic and sources behind them, they're all correct and unbiased, and don't overcomplicate the history. Why are they getting reverted? Napoli0079 (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You'll simply have to start a NEW talk page discussion..... as the first one was rejected. Moxy🍁 17:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who decides to reject it? I feel like even If I start a new page discussion trolls will shoot it down or deny it for unjust reasons. is there any resolution to this dispute that can be given from maybe an outside source? I don't use the internet much I'm just trying to make Romanian History more accessible to readers like every other wikipedia page on another country has already done. Napoli0079 (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're suddenly not responding, and I posted on the talk article and no one is responding, I'm editing again, and if you block me I'll appeal correctly. I've nothing against you and I've done nothing wrong. Napoli0079 (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

pls see Canada or Japan for how a lead looks Moxy🍁 18:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue my lead is BETTER then Canada or Japan, it follows the same general formula as them whilst covering key dates and acts that built Romania's identity, giving insight to a random reader (which is the most important thing). Slovakia and Hungary look and coverr nearly identical topics to mine, why aren'y you taking them down? Napoli0079 (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles may be best modeled on the layout of an existing article of appropriate structure and topic - Our best WP:FA articles (the ones that have gone through a community review) are lsited at WP:COUNTRYSIZE where we talk about size of a lead. Moxy🍁 19:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Albert Wass have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Albert Wass was changed by Napoli0079 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942284 on 2025-02-02T20:06:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National awakening of Romania moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to National awakening of Romania. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~~~~". OrionNimrod (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me pls

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Napoli0079 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here I promise I will never attack someone on Wikipedia through racist personal strikes or vandalise an article, those days are already behind me, I won’t ever do it again from this point onwards you have my word, however I also urge whoever reviews this to investigate the racist undertones of OrionNimrod, if you investigate his editing pattern he is 100% an ultranationalist whose sole mission is to belittle and diminish Romanian and Slovakian history, he even alters the Romania wikipedia page and seeks to over enunciate the fact that Vlachs are mountain, dumb pastoralist shepherds and that they originate from Albanians which if you investigate his history, he clearly thinks are an inferior people, he also goes on wikipedia pages about sensitive subjects like massacres and either takes away from number of Romanian lives lost to sugarcoat it or states that some Hungarians actually helped Romanians to take away from the massacre perpetrated by Hungarian Troops, these subtle, malevolent changes cannot go unnoticed

Decline reason:

All of those things you say you're not going to do if unblocked? You not only repeated them, you doubled down. Ponyo^bons mots 21:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Both Ponyo and I declined your unblock request. There was an edit conflict. I'm happy to leave Ponyo's decline up. But basically, no unblock request even remotely along these lines will ever be favourably considered. --Yamla (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (and Ponyo too!) declined this while I was still typing, but perhaps my decline rationale will prove useful: Based on this edit, you are the racist bigot and ultranationalist. I'm not sure there is anything someone who posted that screed could say that would convince me that they could possibly be a productive editor here. But this "I'm sorry but they made me" request is not it. I am tempted to remove talk page access so you do not waste anyone else's time, but I'll give you one more attempt to think about what you want to say. Use it wisely, perhaps after a few weeks reflection. The next unblock request will be your last chance unless there is a serious improvement in your self-awareness. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My son’s fault, on behalf of him I deeply apologise

Hello everybody, I’m appalled at what has happened on this website within the span of such a short period of time, I had my son come up to me crying about being “attacked online” so naturally I took a look only to realise he was the instigator, around last month he had been begging me to make a Wikipedia account because he was curious about things such as history and so on and so forth, I asked him to explain to me what it is and he said a site where you can contribute to random topics that the whole internet can see, eventually I gave over and let him make an account and that was a really bad decision on my part, he behaved like a moron! I’m genuinely speechless as to the things he has posted, my deepest apologies to OrionNimrod and everyone involved in reviewing this account, I’m sure this wasted a lot of your time and it’s absolutely humiliating on my part as a father that I can let him share these hideous views on the internet. I assure you he will never use this platform again and he will be severely punished. Once again my deepest condolences. Napoli0079 (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I'll make sure @OrionNimrod sees this. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I please ask how do I delete his account? It irritates me seeing what things he's said, I find it petty and shameful, I want it all gone if that's all right. Napoli0079 (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit suspicious about this. What are the odds that both the dad and the child write run-on sentences and why does he know the password? This also overall doesn't feel like something a parent would write as a gut feeling I have.

In response to the later reply, if this is indeed the user's parent, you cannot delete accounts. The account is already blocked. QwertyForest (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So WP:LITTLEBROTHER is where we're going? That tack is basically guaranteeing this account will not be unblocked. As Qwerty says, accounts are not deleted on Wikipedia. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 19:01, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]