|
User talk:NZFC/Archive 1SquadsBest if you don't re-add the squad. You've show your incompetence and lack of any research assuming players are English because they play in England. Amadou Tangara is Ivorian, Adeyinka Cole is Nigerian, Nathan Campbell isn't Portugese, Lartey Sarpong - despite having a Wikipedia page isn't Portugese either. You also missed off the two of the only four players to have been signed this season. The rest aren't confirmed as you're clearly not aware, players not on a permanent contracts become free agents as of 1 June. You're showing exactly why this template doesn't work at this level, because of ignorance, a lack of any knowledge of and all round incompetence. RTB. ReallyThinBread (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Robert Cristian TrifJust to clarify how A7 works, it applies to importance or significance, which is different from notability. A person can be important but not notable. See WP:CSD#A7 for more information. GiantSnowman 20:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Notable means also imortant.The person is visible in hundreds of news papers and is a famous personality in Romania. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orex22 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC) July 2017 Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Re:Speedy deletion nomination of User:Saphina123/MTPHello, very nice to meet you. I saw you putting a speedy deletion of my draft page. Just to clarify the article is not in anyway a promotion nor a spam. The article is about a significantly notable album in Vietnam, and the article will also dealt fairly with the album's controversies of plagiarism tracks (you can check out a small part that I'm writing here). I'm sorry if my writing style in the article made you think the page is commercialized, but please understand that it's still currently under construction. If the final draft in the future still make you unconvinced, you can still help the article be better in its writing. Thank you and I hope you have a nice day. Saphina123 (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017
(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Pending changes reviewer granted Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also:
Malinaccier (talk) 18:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC) Rollback granted Hi NZ Footballs Conscience. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm ♠ 06:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Side note about editingIt seems that on Draft:2017–18 New Zealand Football Championship, you based it off of the 2015–16 New Zealand Football Championship season. I would recommend in general to model new seasons off of the latest season, as that way you get all the most recent corrections and fixes. ;) --SuperJew (talk) 08:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image use of File:National Women's League.jpgHi NZ Footballs Conscience. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of a file such as Image:City of Montgomery Great Seal.png must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. There are various problems with using this file in 2016 National Women's League (New Zealand). The first one is WP:NFCC#10c, which says that a seperate specific non free use rationale needs to be provided for each use. This file is currently lacking such a rationale for the article in question, which means it can be removed per WP:NFCCE. The question then is whether it such a rationale can be written and I don't think that one can in this case. This is because of WP:NFCC#8, which requires that a particular non-free use significantly improve the reader's understanding to such a degree, that omitting the image would be detrimental to that understanding, and items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Item 14 states the logos used for perennial events (such as the logo for a professional sports league) are generally not allowed to be used in individual occurances of said events unless they are somehow specific to the particular year or season in question. The non-free use of the logo in National Women's League (New Zealand) seems fine since the logo is being used as the primary means of identification of the league and appears to be the branding choosen by the league to represent itself. The use in the individual season articles, however, is not so clear. Simply adding the main logo to the infobox of each season article because it is used in the main league article is almost certainly not going to be considered to comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, unless there is something particular about the logo which ties it specifically into a particular season; for example, anniversary logos, commerative logos, change of sponsorship, etc. Item 17 basically states that reusing the logos of parent entities in the article of child entities is typically not allowed, but logos specific to the child entity may be used. The main league article would be considered to be the parent entity and the individual season articles would be considered child entities, so once again you're going to have to clearly establish that non-free use is justified if you want to use the logo in the 2016 article. The default is not to use the parent logo in the child entity's article simply because no child-entity-specific logo exists. In such cases, a link the parent article is typically considered sufficient per WP:NFCC#1 and item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. If you feel that the non-free use of the file in the article can be justified, then please provide the required non-free use rationale explaining how. The rationale needs to be specific enough to clearly show how (at least how you feel) the particular use meets all 10 non-free content criterion; in other words, simply copying-and-pasting a rationale for another use and changing the article parameter/name is typically not sufficient. Furthermore, providing a rationale is only 1 (actually only 1 part of 1 criterion) of the 10 criterion and does not in and of itself justify non-free use; the file's non-free use can still be discussed at WP:FFD or the file can be tagged with {{di-disputed fair use rationale}} if another editor feels the rationale is not valid. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask as WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
how do i add citation? - article " List of oldest dogs"Hi, I saw that my pending review was not approved. may I know how to do proper citation? I have included 2 citations.\ Please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luvmeci (talk • contribs) 04:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Hi Luvmeci your referencing was fine how you did it. It was the fact that the link that you added for reference goes to a generic page. It doesn’t link to show that this dog is older [1] NZ Footballs Conscience(talk) 05:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC) I see. I have the hardcopy of the certificate. does it need to be put up online for the citation to be valid? Thanks so much for your fast reply.
Thanks!! I will ask them this question. Thanks again for being so helpful Reverting for no reasonIf you are going to undo edits that I have spent time and effort on, you need a much better reason than "removal of content". Unless, that is, there is a policy or guideline that somehow supports what you did. Is there? 95.145.130.78 (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Melissa benoist's personal informationI give a link to her verified account on Instagram she just posted it with alink to the website her you go instagram Bonaniiiia (talk) 22:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Please don't edit if u don't know realityVarun dhavans real height is 168 cm if u don't believe then compare him from srk who is 170 Correct height editor (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Kōbe Rapid Transit RailwayBeing aware it might have been a controversial issue, I explained my removal of Kōbe Rapid Transit Railway from the list on the talk page beforehand (about three weeks ago), feel free to go there and motivate your undoing my edit. I also reaffirmed my reasons on the user talk page of Oknazevad (talk), who had reverted my previous attempt of deleting that entry from the List of metro systems: in the end, he agreed whit me about Kōbe Rapid Transit Railway not being a metro system at all. 93.57.255.93 (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Phoenix keepersHey, do you know what is the status of Oliver Sail and Keegan Smith? I didn't see Sail on Phoenix's site, but he's meant to be on a two-year senior contract... it's weird that Smith started and Sail wasn't even in the line-up (unless he's injured or something?) And they both seem to be with the #30 guernsey. --SuperJew (talk) 07:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Not seeing it as an attack especially as was tagged for advert and user has created an identical user talk facebook page-- did you mean G11?Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
To Cite or Not To Cite, That Is The Question (I'm getting conflicting instructions here!)Hi NZFC -- you've just requested that I stop citing entries on Day of the Year pages. Unfortunately, I am getting conflicting instructions on this topic. Last week, I began adding new entries to these pages, and I did NOT cite them, because I could clearly see (as you just pointed out) that names were linked to the originating articles, and therefore did not need to be cited. However, I was stopped by an editor called Toddst1, who informed me that the formatting guidelines for Days of the Year pages had just recently changed. Due to these changes, all new entries are required to be cited directly. Toddst1 began deleting/reverting my uncited entries, which is why I began citing entries. You can see my discussion on Toddst1's talk page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Toddst1#Sources_for_lists_of_articles....3F So... can you please tell me: do I, or do I not, cite sources for new Days of the Year page entries? I'm getting quite tired of being told that I'm doing it wrong, and I would like one single solid answer so that I can start doing it right. Thanks, Alanna the Brave (talk)
Hi, please avoid 'squeezing' text per MOS:IMGLOC. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Stop Out page.Just a heads up. I saw your comment "Removed original research that wasn't really related to the club. ". Whilst I follow your 'original research' line the material in place was very much related to the club. Stop Out was much more than a football club. Edwina Jones (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Ignoring 'original research' for the moment. I am puzzled. How can restoring something 'violate copyright'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwina Jones (talk • contribs) 03:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you again for your help with the Alasdair Gray page. I figured out how to reinstate Nude on a Red Chair; and Mr Gray sent in permissions to Wiki permissions yesterday for it's use, so the CCA copyright is in perfect good order. I've come around to your way of thinking about photo placement. The page is done! (by me, for now). Heartoftheworld88 (talk) 07:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter message Hello, NZ Footballs Conscience. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Edit Needed ASAPHi! Thank you so much for updating the Lycee Francais de Chicago Wikipedia page. However, the number is still incorrect. Instead of reducing the tuition listed to $19,820 (per: https://www.lyceechicago.org/admissions/tuition-and-fees), it now says a whopping $139,820. There is an accidental extra "3" in the amount. Can you change it to: $19,820. Thank you again! --Sarah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.132.157.247 (talk) 19:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Main image of Kim Jonghyun's article changeHi. I'd like to ask if it's possible to change the main image of Kim Jonghyun's article to avoid bad judgement for those seeking mental health support and to avoid stigmatization of depression with this gloomy, hopeless, stern dark connotation. Aside from this issue, the image is not portraying the job of the artist. Considering that many other news sources can use the wikipedia image for future news and articles, it could lead to bad judgement about Jonghyun's mental state from those who don't know about his personality or work. I can not post images on mobile version of wiki, but If possible, I'd like to ask for some image taken in the event: Healing Story by Jonghyun - that happened on 19th of september in 2015. As a depressed person myself and a sincere fan, It would be good to count with your understanding and help. Thank you in advance. Have a nice day. AuraAcqua (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
BRD: reaching a consensusRegarding your reversion to this entry:
While it is true that a number of articles are cited, each of those articles cites the same original article---a Page Six gossip column which cites a single anonymous source. This runs contrary to wikipedia's policy for biographies of living persons, and its policy against tabloid sources. If you check those references, I believe you'll agree. Some of those references are quite clearly attempts to smear the subject (e.g. calling her "israel-hater"). Please reconsider the reversion. thanks for the work you do and for your efforts on behalf of wikipedia! @GrosvenorMetro:, thanks for that information. I can't look at each reference properly now as I've left home for a few hours. I will have a look later and double check what you are saying about the references each just copying the first un-reliable source, if that is the case we can remove it. NZFC(talk) 01:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks for taking care of this, @NZ Footballs Conscience:. Really appreciate your work maintaining the community.
DUID articleHello, I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to leave a msg? I'm not a pro at Wikipedia. I wrote the original article and titled it DUID when I was writing a law review article that was later published (I left the citation in the DUID article). With regard to the levels of metabolites used for drugs in the US, the values came from Department of Transportation adoption of numbers that the Dept of Health and Human Services adopted in response to the drug crisis perceived in the 1980s and under then President Regan. Here is the citation to the US Federal Register that explains the first adoption and how these values were determined to rule out people who simply have used drugs in the recent past. at page 164 These values were never initially meant to indicate intoxication. Because it is difficult to determine an objective standard of intoxication with all the illegal drugs, the states simply adopted these values. This is a logical problem and is the reason I wrote the law review article. There is a basic fairness violation in the per se framework of DUID absent a genuine and reasonable determination of metabolite levels that actually demonstrate intoxication to some degree and it should be stated as such in discussing the topic. It is perfectly acceptable to believe that since they are illegal, there should be a conviction, but it should be know that this is actually the case and not let people erroneously believe that it is like the alcohol standard. I am not skilled at wiki editing so I hope you might put it together? Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdova (talk • contribs) 18:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Suge KnightIt says he is going to be portrayed in the DPG movie by Reggie Noble, this is Redman from Wu Tang. I can find no confirmation of this anyhwere and no reference is given so I assume this information is fake. I just found this that confirms my suspicions I think https://www.instagram.com/p/7UcOpFNIdA/ that isn't Redman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:9706:6F00:D8B5:AB14:5269:D669 (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC) 2017–18 NFL playoffsThanks for your reversions on this page. However, the game between the Tennessee Titans and Kansas City Chiefs has concluded as of a few minutes ago, so WP:LIVESCORES does not apply. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Brockhampton (band)Hello! I am new to Pending Changes Reviewer and I apologize for my multiple edits on Brockhampton (band). It is past midnight here and I planned on making that my last edit but it is completely my fault for not checking other edits first. I just wanted to apologize to you for all the edits because you have a track record of editing on that page. If you have any tips for new Pending Changes editors I'm all ears! I really just want to combat vandalism, like you say on your user page, but that one slipped by me. But again, just wanted to apologize. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC) HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Your contributions.I just had a look at your profile. Mate, how much have you done on football!! That's quite an effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.79.125.247 (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Kim JonghyunThere was never an official statement saying that Jonghyun left SHINee. In fact, Onew said that Jonghyun will always be a member. Therefore Jonghyun is not a past member, but a current one. (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Sybil Shearerif 2 is the obit how does it relate to the sentence, and she did not die at here home in northbrook but at the hospital in Evanston as in the local newspaper etc. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sybil+Shearer%2C+(1912-2005)-a0141700184 50.254.21.213 (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
This is more than i can handle http://nyshistoricnewspapers.org/lccn/sn88074234/1970-03-12/ed-1/seq-15/ because of this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sybil_Shearer&diff=next&oldid=818527584 miehle is a German press and blommer was http://www.fold-pak.com/AboutUs/History.htm 50.254.21.213 (talk) 04:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Isn't she more of an artist or dancer than just person-person, and is it bad to have resting place ash-scattering,? there is a lot more to the template that is not being used? 50.254.21.213 (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
@NZ Footballs Conscience: Can you read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Barek#external_links and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Externial_Llink's 50.254.21.213 (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
About cricket templatesWell. I noticed that you support football. And you mentioned Unless we are going to do one for every sport played at the stadium, there isn't much point just doing it for one. But those template does not support to every sport. I believe it's only cricket that display those options. I myself am a huge football fan. But I can't help it. So I suggest that we gonna keep that like every stadium that host international cricket matches. Thanks - Price Zero|talk 08:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
RevertI don't agree with your reversion. I have zero desire to defend Florida's gun laws, but it feels like editorializing to put "the municipality is under Florida's gun laws" in the lede of the Parkland, Florida article. Don't revert my edit. 2602:306:CFEA:170:E454:2D75:EF1B:BC1F (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018She stated in an interview that the original French pronunciation of her surname was "benoît" . Another source [1] Solidaires2 (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC) References
Hello NZ Footballs Conscience, I removed the date of birth which you had added using a BBC profile as a source. That profile cites the Wikipedia article as its source, which is circular referencing. We need several reliable sources which have done independent fact checking. The subject of the article objects to including the birth date. Please read WP:DOB. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Edit warring.Your constant reverts have been noted on the edit warring noticeboard. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
ResultsThere were discussion(s) about that earlier somewhere and was decided not to have those, a simple results table is enough. I seach for that discussion or start a new one if i am unable to find it. Kante4 (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Edit warringI have closed your report and blocked MAXXII12. Be advised that you were edit warring too, and the main reason you are not also getting blocked is because you have stopped, you were restoring consensus, and the other party looks like a long-term disruptive influence on the article. Next time, pop a note on the talk page first so we can see you were trying to resolve the dispute. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Cindy Ross FriedmanThank you for inviting me to add to your talk page regarding undoing Cindy Ross Friedman's edits. Her name no longer appears on Thompson Rivers University's website or staff list. If you go to the Department of Biolgical Sciences faculty list website you will not see her name. She is not employed there and the staff directory and department staff list website back that up. I was merely correcting her employment history as she does not work at Thompson Rivers University, to leave that on her Wikipedia page i incorrect. Truthandrealfacts (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Opps!Did i make a mistake on Alvizaman's talk page? Sorry. Thegooduser Let's Chat 01:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Is that User blocked yet? Thegooduser Let's Chat 01:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
WOSO Task Force News: April 2018
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 7Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Greenhithe Catimba
My editsHi. Please understand that my edits to the SHINee page were made out of respect to the deceased and to the remaining members of the group who wish to acknowledge SHINee as five. I have also edited the language of the page which implies SHINee never consisted of five members as that is inaccurate. Please allow this to stand, as I am only respecting the wishes of those closest to the deceased artist by ensuring that the image published in their name accurately reflects the group's view of themselves. Additionally, please allow this to stand because it most accurately represents the group in this past decade. Message me with any concerns, I'm still unsure how the communication here works. Thank you and have a really great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213roses (talk • contribs) 23:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
"Sources"Just a heads up but if you insisted that you go off sources, try actually extrapolating the information from the source. Saying something in paragraph one and retracting it on paragraph 7 doesn't establish the claim as "sourced". Just thought you should know. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Sorry my mistake. Saying something in sentence 4 and admittedly discrediting it in sentence 5 does not make for "cited claim" on a wiki page. Had to be more specific to display how little effort was put into your revision. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
There's not that much to disagree on when you actually reference the "sourced material". It's not subjective in the slightest, the wording of that "source" spells out it cannot establish the number it just quoted you. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Editsyou need to stop trying to get pages deleted that are notable and provide reliable sources from first hand parties. as you did with Jersey Crew Soccer Club and Sam Allington — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footballandsoccer (talk • contribs) 06:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Ross PorterRe Ross Porter. If you are going to make edits or additions then provide balanced accurate reporting and tell the complete story You are amateurish and represent yellow journalism and opening yourself up to libel and defamation. Continue if would like litigation expedited Jazzidiot (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Karl Kjer RefHello We had talk earlier on help page to remove as the reference is just a attack agienst the guy Karl kjer. Thats what they are doing this article got brought back to have these details only. Article reference less of his work where are there are tuns of thing one should write. The Aggies story is published after one year of the incident happened. Which clearly look like not with a well intention. Thanks user:Blueparticle(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Lifegem Proof which includes patent with mentioned discrepancy.You asked for evidence for the edits I included on Lifegem's page. Here is a summary of there patent with their claims and a expert in gemology as well as insurance breaking it down. The main thing to note is that on their patent they state they use sublimation which means CVP not HPHT. Sublimation or Chemical Vapor Deposition is not possible to form diamonds out of carbon ashes, it's only possible with HPHT, which they state is not used on their patent. In follow up the owners stated they actually do not handle the process, which is incorrectly stated on the wikipedia page. http://cremationdiamondreport.com/lifegem2007.html Please note I am writing this for you to consider families who are grieving and in sorrow who are being misled into thinking the diamonds are made from their relatives, even when that has not been proven or indicated anywhere. For the Lifegem page to exist it needs to contain factual information, it currently has no scientific articles or journals backing it's claim. In fact a quick visit to the talk section shows it is highly controversial page and others have pointed out the lack of due diligence from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pformenti (talk • contribs) 03:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
NZFC, where do I put the withdraw request I see the code is withdrawal request. Do I just place it on the article, and should I mention the article with the relevant counterarguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pformenti (talk • contribs) 21:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi again, could you do it on my behalf and I can explain I read the instructions but I'm still a little unclear with the instructions. I'm very un-tech-savy. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pformenti (talk • contribs) 22:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:New Zealand Football Women's Knockout Cup.jpg Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Football Women's Knockout Cup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC) Tyler Boyd article date formatHi, I can perfectly understand your logic for reverting the date format. However, MoS guideline I followed in making my edits is the following (MOS:DATERET), quoted below:
Currently, all three point to DMY, starting with the first date placed in the article (on 8 October 2012) and the majority of existing dates being DMY. That is why I made the edits that I made. Assuming there is enough consensus to change the format ("strong national ties" being made somewhat more complicated due to dual citizenship), are you going to undertake the change of all the instances of DMY to MDY? Again, I see your point entirely. But when I've done the same change that you did (and for the same reason), someone else reverted it for the reasons above. Therefore, I figured going with the existing format was the safest edit. Clearly, it's not a straightforward issue, no matter which way we go. ;) Respectfully, 1980fast (talk) 23:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC) Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) Disambiguation link notification for August 13Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Chatham Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Seth Ward and Michael White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 13 August 2019 (UTC) OFC U23 Tournament ASSISTSHello NZFC! I've been trying to add the assist ranking to the OFC U23 article but it's been deleted twice. Well, I actually don't have a reliable source like Oceania Football Confederation official website. But I watched 5 times each goal in the championship to make this ranking so I can assure it's right. You can do the same to check this list, if necessary. All goal videos are available on Youtube (highlights videos) or in MyCujoo (Full matches) We have some groups to discuss football in Oceania with people from all over the world, if you interest just message me Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amadeu1997 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you...for stepping in to the situation of excessive reverting editing by the Texas teenager. Please keep an eye on these sitations? Because I am not editing as a registered editor, I am not well positioned to institute restraints to prevent disruptive editing. I will be happy if others can take such steps if they become necessary. An article in question is that of Evan O'Neill Kane, and my editing is very close to my professional expertise, and certainly has been undertaken with very great care. Cheers. 2601:246:C700:9B0:6D4C:597C:72AB:665E (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
KYTV (TV) fileHi NZFC. I'm sure you meant well, but the file had actually been provided with a non-free use rationale for the KYTV article before you made this edit. The rationale was added after the bot correctly removed the file but before you incorrectly removed it a second time. Perhaps you didn't notice this because you're using Twinkle, but it's easy to miss this type of thing if you actually don't take a look at the file's page to verify there's no rationale for the file's use. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Thanks for the Invite!Hey! I just want to say thanks for the invite! I am currently a semi-amateur wikipedia page writer. I am currently working on Butler's single seasons (As I am an Indy native). It's been a pleasure working with ya! I will see the invite out and join you on that. Thanks so much! - Gears
Update on NCAA DI Tournament Team NamesAs per the previous made edit with St. John's and St. Mary's, the team names are added with that in the official NCAA website on the bracket page. Following that, my belief was that they should have their state names next to their University Name, no matter if there is no other school with that name in Division I. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrGearsKaktus1234 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 19An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NCAA Division I men's soccer First-Team All-America teams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Booth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC) Sources needed for Days of the Year pagesI see you recently accepted a pending change to December 23 that did not include a direct source. You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out. All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC) Hi NZFC, Pls note that the height is as per sherdog.com for all MMA fighter - the source info is at the bottom of the page - see sherdog Tony Ferguson. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 10:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Your objections to my editsI have added the citation to the Kreis Schubin page as you suggested. Please inform me before you delete any other edits done by me, so that I can address your objections and make the necessary changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fereydoonshah (talk • contribs) 10:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Could you tell me why you have raised this incident about my editing? It was a single page in which I had forgotten to mention the citation. I have mentioned the source in all other edits. As I mentioned, I requested you to inform me personally in case of errors on my part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fereydoonshah (talk • contribs) 11:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 7An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Action Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC) AIVI've blocked 138.0.116.11 per your report. Just a tip for AIV - admins patrolling it are not looking to do research, they're looking for obvious vandalism that needs a block now. When you get an editor like that where every individual edit looks reasonable on the face of it (Sure, Japan might be playing France. Sure, Kim Jong Un might be attending that event. Sure, Japan might be having a friendly against Nagoya Grampus) it's quite helpful if you can pick out an individual edit and explain briefly why it's specifically wrong or disruptive. If an admin at AIV can't (a) read your summary, (b) check the contributions, and (c) agree that it needs blocking within, say, 30 seconds, they're just going to move on. I just thought I'd mention this, as I actually saw your report this morning and just moved on because there was other, more clear and urgent, stuff to deal with. Cheers and keep up the good work. ~ mazca talk 19:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Recreation enquiryHi NZFC, just letting you know this article you added to AFD that resulted in delete was recreated. I don’t know what the previous version looked like so won’t be able to check if there has been any improvement. If you wouldn’t mind checking that would good, thanks Steven (Editor) (talk) 09:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Upcoming US vs Australia matchHey mate, just wanted to point out that the upcoming US vs Australia soccer match isn't "fake". See the reports for example on Fox Sports and MLS. I haven't restored it to the page since it hasn't been officially confirmed and finalised yet. But it does seem that it will happen :) --SuperJew (talk) 06:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The editor can blank their talk page if they like. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Roy KrishnaHi NZFC - please follow the template guidelines as laid out by WikiProject Football when making edits to articles like you've done on Roy Krishna. You can find the guidelines here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. Thanks. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Rovers FC Logo.pngThanks for uploading File:Northern Rovers FC Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Football Barnstar
Double Plus Ungood, thank you! That is really nice of you. NZFC(talk)(cont) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC) Page on osteoporosis.The page on osteoporosis is wrong. However, I do not have any experience editing Wikipedia articles so when I cited my sources in the editing part I just put on the links. Still the studies clearly show that the current version is supporting a myth about dairy. However, my version was declined because of lack of sources. I guess the problem is I didn't edit the citations properly and the links alone are not enough. Current version however has NO studies to back it up. So if you can do a better job editing - please do - here is an article heavily backed up by studies showing that dairy is good for bone health and protein leading to acidosis is one of the dumbest myths ever: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/is-dairy-good-for-your-bones Educate yourself and fix it yourself since you do not like my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.126.34.134 (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Kolkata DerbyTotal Derby number is 370. Competitive Derby number is 328. Mohun Bagan won 120 Derby. Your edit in Mohun Bagan AC Wikipedia is wrong. You can see Kolkata Derby Wikipedia. SAIKAT MARINERS DEY (talk) 08:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
That stuff isn't unsourcedHe's unsourced he says the cramp twins ended in August 2006 when google litterly says it ended in September 2006 Pieboy999 (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Catdog didn't end In 2005 it actually ended in 2000It actually ended in 2000 if you look on google Pieboy999 (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC) I'm tired if this catdog never ended in 2005 period.blank Pieboy999 (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Active departments in Mohun Bagan ACWhat's the problem in copying a template from some other page? It was done just to save time. There is no unique coding or any copyright on codes. The same codes are used by every other football club pages. I see no difference in copying a public code and writing the same code line by line. Debankan Mullick (talk) 22:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Sarah Fuller (athlete) On 20 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sarah Fuller (athlete), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that shortly after winning a conference tournament championship with Vanderbilt's soccer team, Sarah Fuller became the first woman to play football in a Power Five conference game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sarah Fuller (athlete). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sarah Fuller (athlete)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC) Comment in my talk pageWhy do you bother asking me why i'm not updating the entire page 2020-21 New Zealand Football Championship. I already do part of it and I also have other things to do. — Martijnvdam97 (talk) 16:31 10 January 2021 (CET)
SPIThe oldest named account is considered the sockmaster, not the IP. Thanks for the report. Cabayi (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC) RE Wilding.You are being more patient than I would be in your position. Only in death does duty end (talk) 22:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Player statisticsPlease refer to here for player's career statistics. Kingjeff (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Denied edit on Discrimination against asexual peopleHi, I see you denied the edit on Discrimination against asexual people. The quote in the article:
is inherently wrong, unless proper citation is given that proves otherwise. The cited Buzzfeed article makes no mention of "spaces designed for asexual people" as being ageist or racist, or centering on a specific race. Even if it were, which is not, it'd still be hardly any evidence to make such strong assumptions on the matter. Quoting the possible source of contention:
Please, review this passage on the article, and take the proper measures. CapoFantasma97 (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Why do you keep wanting me blockedI feel I do alot of good edits and correct mistakes. But you always want to get me blocked for something you don't like for some reason. Bigboy 691 (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
My bad man didn't mean to cause troubles I'm just trying to help update players stats and I feel I was doing it right but wasn't and I'm correcting my mistakes so if you could give me a chance without blocking again. Thanks 2021 New Zealand National LeagueHello NZFC, I'm fairly new to editing on here and don't want to cause any troubles by making lots of mistakes. Just wondering what we are able to add to this page in terms of data. Are we able to add a fixtures/results table and top scorers for each of the regional leagues so long as we have the proper references? Just don't want to add stuff if it's not allowed to be there. (any feedback is appreciated as well) Cheers. Kezyfooty (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2013 Chatham Cup Hello, NZFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2013 Chatham Cup". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Fixed your talk page archivingHi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 10:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC) New Zealand football league systemHi — are you happy with the way the large table is displayed in New Zealand football league system? On my monitor, I have to scroll sideways to see the right half of it. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Northern League Auckland teamsHey NZFC, just thought I may as well explain why I had the Auckland map for the teams. Had just seen other league pages such as the Premier League and the National League and how they do it for the London clubs so thought it could be worth doing. Understand why you don't want it there and that's all good. Think having it for the National League Championship would be a good idea though. Kezyfooty (talk) 12:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your reversion of my edit to "Template:2021 New Zealand National League"Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to Template:2021 New Zealand National League. I grant you that I was lazy and did not create a proper reference, such as this one:
Note that I fudged the title of the page by adding "Competitions:", so that it is obvious to which of the topbar's menu items that is being used, and archived the current URL/page using the Wayback Machine's "Save Page Now" function. I am puzzled by the lack of use of proper references, since otherwise the bare URLs are subject to link rot. Note that I had to use a different URL (https://www.nzfootball.co.nz/COMPETITIONS/Football/National-League) than the one (https://www.nzfootball.co.nz/COMPETITIONS/National-League) in the version of the article that you reverted because the current one redirects to the site's front page—i.e, the link has already rotted. Just because some is "the way it's done here" doesn't mean that it is a good idea. I suggest that you be bold and change it—here's a reference template, completely filled out:
Or at the very least let me change this example of it for you. —DocWatson42 (talk) 08:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC) Removing some areas on the University of Canterbury pageHi NZFC I would just like to query on why you deleted the section on halls of residence at the University of Canterbury as well as student culture. Bothered were not advertising and were simply informative, this is similar to other University pages such as the University of Otago and Harvard. It seems you want to monitor and adminster the page to your standards but not contribute towards. Cheers MitchellMatchbox MitchellMatchbox (talk) 22:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Both* MitchellMatchbox (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Also why was the University Alumni page changed as well, I only altered the layout which is exactly the same as the Harvard University Alumni page. The Information put up about the halls was historical. Also what do you mean take it to the talk page... it hasn't been used for the last 4 years. MitchellMatchbox (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 National Women's League table (New Zealand)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2017 National Women's League table (New Zealand)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2018 National Women's League table (New Zealand)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
