User talk:NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM

NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thiagarajar college

Hello, NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Thiagarajar college, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Thiagarajar College. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

1. a link to the article you copied from
2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question has been answered

You can find it here --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Madurai Junction railway station. This goes for the same just as before. looking at the history of your talk page, you are a recipient of numerous warning from multiple users. It's high time you stop or you would end up being blocked by admins. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Madurai Junction railway station shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

block now
NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 08:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spend your time in something useful like understanding policies of wikipedia instead of irrationally reverting. It's high time you stop and get acquainted with WP:NOT. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Go ahead, vandalize and degrade the quality of the article by adding unworthy stuff just like you have been doing on Mysore. Your talk page history shows a whole number of warnings from various users and it just shows that you are adamant in adding what you feel is right and not as per the interests of the project! — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

whenever I made mistakes in wikipedia, then I accepted it and even apologised for the mistakes. but not for what you are doing? you better read the last comments which you wrote, that is about yourself not about me. you are the one doing vadalize and degrade the quality of the article by disruptive editing. NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you have learned from your mistakes, you wouldn't be adding content which is not notable and you wouldn't be receiving numerous warnings like you have been as is evident from the history of your talk page. This just shows that you are adamant and do not want to understand our policies and just want to add what you feel is right. Your reasons for reverting are just irrational. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

you have no quality to talk about learning from mistakes, first you read whatever you wrote here and follow that in your life, then come and preach others. NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Madurai Junction railway station, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 14:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if somebody has to be banned then it is you, because of having difference of opinion with me, you are destroying other people contributions in wikipedia like you did in Madurai Junction railway station NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Blocked for personal attacks and persistent reintroduction of unencyclopedic material. LeoFrank, remember that it takes two to edit war, and that "final warnings" don't mean much if they're not final. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

a recent survey about about top 10 cleanest railway stations in India was added to an article Madurai Junction railway station which is to be the original dispute. but later other contributions made by various persons regarding Madurai Junction railway station were also deleted one by one, so I made a strong protest against deleting other's contributions, which leads to unblock my account from further editing. other railway stations in India as well as other countries railway stations too have more informations but in Madurai Junction railway station issue not only I am blocked more than that other informations contributed by various people were also deleted for invalid reasons.

Grand Central Terminal in New York,  Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus in Mumbai,  Bangalore City railway station in Bengaluru,  Chennai Central in Chennai,  Mysore Junction railway station in Mysuru are some of the railway station which has similar informations to the Madurai Junction railway station but in Madurai Junction railway station issue most of the contributions were deleted. NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 17:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. It's rather obvious that unblocking you would lead to a resumption of the conduct that saw you blocked in the first place. Huon (talk) 19:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Ulaga Tamil Sangam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulaga Tamil Sangam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulaga Tamil Sangam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boomer Vial^Holla! We gonna ball! 00:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]