User talk:Murtaza.aliakbar

Taslimaat

Regarding the editing work on Lisan ud Dawat by your side, I respect it. I did extensive studies on the language of both sects viz. Alavis and Dawoodis. Both have totally different approach. The studies on the same has been carried out in IIS, London. To be specific and to get beyond doubt, I added the word "Alaviyah". I request you if possible to create a different page of the Zabaan of Dawoodis and surely with the system which they incorporate. I request you not to intermingle both concepts. Yes, you can definitely give references or links.

--NoorAlavi (talk) 07:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plz create a Wikipedia page on Shz Malik ul Ashtar bs in Hmkwfrance (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hmkwfrance: do you have any published reliable source on shz biography? I don't. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 07:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have Hmkwfrance (talk) 08:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hmkwfrance: There: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malik_ul_Ashtar_Shujauddin

You're welcome to edit it, of course, and add content to it from reliable sources. Plus make sure there's enough third party sources to justify the article's notability, see: WP:NPOV, WP:NOTABILITY, and WP:VERIFY Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 08:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

Hi, regarding FGM in India, discretionary sanctions (DS) are available to uninvolved admins to deal with any problems in the affected area. This is covered by "any gender-related dispute or controversy". The following is for your information only. It does not imply wrong-doing on your part.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SarahSV (talk) 07:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barzilai Medical Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Al Hussary Murattal Quran 30 18.mp3

Thanks for uploading File:Al Hussary Murattal Quran 30 18.mp3. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Al-Husayn Mosque

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Al-Husayn Mosque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CrazyBoy826 22:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was supposed to be a redirect. Added the redirect... Not sure if that was the right thing to do? Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 13:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abazar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abu Zar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help Mohammed Burhanuddin

Hello. I hope you are fine. I’d like to explain my reversions in more detail than the edit summaries allow. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. For an essay explaining why not to use videos as sources, see: Videos as references. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GorgeCustersSabre: Sorry, I hadn't read this message. I reverted the revert and removed link to core.ac, as I assumed incorrectly that it was the only problem. So, I've removed the link, but I guess, the thesis from a graduate at National University of Singapore could be relied upon as a reliable source?


Re: video ref: Not an official policy, I see, but: mahadalquran.com is run by the office of the current incumbent Dai and successor of Mohammed Burhanuddin. I'm sure it as reliable a source as it gets for the matters pertaining to the Dawoodi Bohra community, especially relating to the titles and awards awarded to their own leaders. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 10:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@GorgeCustersSabre: Wanted to let you know: I've gotten rid of the thesis-ref for Mansur al-Yemen and managed to find a book that I now quote from! Thanks! Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 21:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sectioning of the page Lisan ud Dawah

As-Salaamo Alaykum, Dear Brother in Imaan,

With Du’aa-e-Khayr, You have been editing the Lisaan ud-Da’wat page for quite some time. In the beginning this page had certain technical things and confusion about the origin and development of the language. I edited it as per the dialect of Alavi Bohras and made reference to Dawoodi Bohras who to some extent share common vocabulary.

Brother, if you want to keep the page common for us Alavis and Dawoodis, then we should mutually agree to divide this page into 2 sections dealing with both communities differently. Thereby, minimizing any further conflict or misinformation. The title now is grammatically incorrect, it should be “Lisaan-o-Da’wat il-Bohra.” The process of the formation of this language for Alavis is through Gujarati and the same for Dawoodis is Arabic. At first Syedi Ameenji bin Jalaal (ra) in Ahmedabad and Syedi Khawj bin Malak (ra) in Kapadwanj 1005 AH wrote in their works certain fragments of texts which was like Gujarati apart from Arabic. This continued in the Da’wat and both the communities took their own course under the patronage of Da’i saheb for the progress of their own language.

Brother, I think you are well-versed with your Da’wat language and I request you to make a complete separate section so that viewers/researchers could get the clear idea about our language. With Regards. Noor


@NoorAlavi: Salaam.

Sure. I just haven't gotten around to collecting information on Lisan of the Dawoodi Bohras. I also request you to please cite the related research on the page. It barely has any references.

Just so we are clear, I haven't made any vandalising edits (or shooed in Dawoodi Bohras onto the page), since the last time we corresponded.¹ With recent edits, I only seeked to improve the layout of the page in accordance with WP:MOS.

¹ Our earlier conversation is up here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NoorAlavi#LuD_-_Alavi Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taslimaat,

Brother, please divide the page into two section, as I know very clearly that Sulaymani Bohras have very different speaking style means Urdu Oriented. I think they will be of least concerned with the Title "Lisaan o Da'wat il Bohra". Because when we speak of Bohra Sulaymanis too gets inclusive.  After our previous conversation I got to fetch a file from my Dawoodi friend in London regarding Dawoodi Bohras Lisaan. I am send you on your email. Refer it and accordingly get into the crux of Lisaan. This is your email mark.sunnyvale at gmail. Tahayyaat. --NoorAlavi (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Murtaza.aliakbar

Thank you for creating Kalema tus Shahada.

User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

If a redirect is an alternative name, or a name in another language, don't tag it as a misspelling.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: My bad. Apologies. Thanks for tirelessly reviewing my edits and fixing them no less! Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 20:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hydroxychloroquine-Covid edits

On my talk page, you said: Hi, I'm curious as to why information about the 3 of the 4 authors retracting the study was removed, because it is important information that one of the authors refused to retract.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/963105857?diffmode=source

I don't see it out of place, nor do I see it is excessive. Same goes for other edits (re: dexamethasone) where information was removed citing conciseness. Not that I don't agree, but I'm curious why such edits are made. Important information is being diluted away by such edits and I personally do not favour such edits, though, I see why anyone would make them. Is there some Wikipedia policy around this that I need to know about? Thanks. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 07:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there are two issues supporting these deletions. First is that the use of hydroxychloroquine as a possible therapeutic for COVID-19 infection is mostly concluded now with it being declared as having no benefit in the Solidarity and Discovery trials, and so should be discussed as briefly as possible. Covering the history of its earlier development in trials belongs in the hydroxychloroquine article (if warranted; I don't think it is now), not in the drug development article. If there's useful history on why the retraction of the Lancet paper occurred, it's best as a historical side note. Second is that the Wikipedia articles on COVID-19 drug development should be as brief and general as possible per WP:NOTJOURNAL #6-8 and WP:NOTEVERYTHING, and written mainly for the general user, not for medical editors more interested in all details about a drug (same applies to the dexamethasone discussion). You can reply here, if you wish further discussion. Zefr (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zefr: That answers my questions. Appreciate it very much. Thanks. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammed Burhanuddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hafiz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Murtaza.aliakbar! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Egypt copyright law (1954), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Malik ul Ashtar Shujauddin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malik ul Ashtar Shujauddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mufaddal Saifuddin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orange County, AH and Jumada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Idris Badruddin (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Idris Badruddin instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Murtaza.aliakbar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huzaifa Mohyuddin (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Huzaifa Mohyuddin instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 22:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lineage of Mufaddal Saifuddin

@Murtaza.aliakbar: sorry, but that's not how WP:NOR works. Furthermore, whenever you post a statement from a source, you have to take into account WP:NPOV, as well as WP:BALASP and WP:IMPARTIAL. The term "claim" is neutral position to take and is not an act of original research. Alssa1 (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Alssa1: Thanks. You mentioned He claims descent [sic], I don't see anywhere in sources that he's had a genetic test Can you please point me to which "sources" you are referring to here because you didn't link to them in your original edit. As for WP:IMPARTIAL the current article is about the title-subject themselves. Re: WP:NPOV, again, I don't see how claiming lineage is something that's not neutral. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Murtaza.aliakbar: No source on that page proves categorically that he is descended from Muhammad, all he can do is claim that he is. When it comes to impartiality, you don't take every single thing in there as fact, you don't assert his claims as fact; particularly when those claims offer some religious/theological benefit to him. Per WP:NPOV claiming descent would be perfectly fine, but you keep changing the statement in the page from "claims" to "is", your edits turn a neutral statement to a positive assertion which does not fit in with WP:NPOV. Finally, there is no issue with the term "descent"; in English the term has two meanings: 1.) Descending down a pit or chasm. 2.) Descent denoting ancestry. Alssa1 (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Alssa1: Thanks for clarifying your stance.
you don't assert his claims as fact Here's the problem. The initial statement was made by another editor who cited two sources whilst you have cited none. And if you claim that the cited sources contain assertions that are baseless, you'd need to point me to sources that indeed say that. As for the current sources, do you have access to them at all to know what the author has claimed is without basis and proof? If not, you'd want to contact the original editor to see why they wrote what they wrote, before you "assert" your edits as valid and binding.
positive assertion which does not fit in with WP:NPOV. I am sorry, I don't agree that positive assertions are inherently not neutral.
offer some religious/theological benefit to him Sure, but that isn't upto Wikipedia editors to decide? That should come from, preferably, reliable third-party sources. Even then, there's a small matter of WP:DUE lest someone cites a hate-group's article on the topic.
Finally, there is no issue with the term "descent" Didn't know. Thanks. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 11:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jigsaw (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammed Burhanuddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hafiz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Murtaza.aliakbar! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Delete a redirect, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amazon Web Services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cloudflare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CTO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed burhanuddin

i have edited teaching section of mohammed burhanuddin ashara mubaraka attendees and miqaat list of 50 years of mohammed burhanuddin. u go ahead n check it. bcoz some random users are reterited Mohammed.Khandwala (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stamford Bridge The Cathedral.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stamford Bridge The Cathedral.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dalai Lama with Abdulqadir Nooruddin, CDMW, 2019.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dalai Lama with Abdulqadir Nooruddin, CDMW, 2019.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dalai Lama with Abdulqadir Nooruddin, CDMW, 2019.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dalai Lama with Abdulqadir Nooruddin, CDMW, 2019.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dalai Lama with Abdulqadir Nooruddin, CDMW, 2019.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dalai Lama with Abdulqadir Nooruddin, CDMW, 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project Depiction.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project Depiction.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamford Bridge Redevelopment The Cathedral.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stamford Bridge Redevelopment The Cathedral.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm ItsSkV08. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Narendra Modi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ItsSkV08 (talk) 01:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ItsSkV08 Thanks. I've added an extended note now. The sources did exist in the article itself, just not in the lede (where references aren't really required anyway). Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Edit requests, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. What you added is an invitation to canvassing. That is not acceptable. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RandomCanadian Per my reading, I don't see how it is canvassing.

An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following:

... The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions.

On the user talk pages of concerned editors. Examples include: Editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article; Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics); Editors known for expertise in the field; Editors who have asked to be kept informed

Thanks for staying vigilant though. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Divya Gokulnath, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beccaynr I know my policies, but thanks for the reminder. I can not possibly take any one who tells me "long days at office" isn't fancruft seriously. But I'll bite this time and try to justify my edits over on the talk page. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 00:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate implementing WP:BRD, and discussing this further on the Talk page of the article. Beccaynr (talk) 00:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Beccaynr WP:BRD would have been when you'd have started the discussion on the reverts.

Revert an edit if it is not an improvement, and it cannot be immediately fixed by refinement. Consider reverting only when necessary. BRD does not encourage reverting, but recognizes that reversions happen. When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed. Look at the article's history and its talk page to see if a discussion has begun. If not, you may begin one.

Anywho, like I said above, I'll bite. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 01:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Byju Raveendran, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beccaynr No, your revert broke text-source integrity. I've reverted your revert. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 01:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I should have been more clear in the edit summary about why I also reverted your other unexplained edits, including the removal of content from reliable sources, but I have made this more clear in my next edit summary, as well as indicated that all of the sources refer to Byju as the founder or creator of the app. I am more than willing to work with you on revising this article, but let's talk about it on the article Talk page. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Beccaynr You could have taken it to the talk page to explain it. You didn't. Instead, you kept reverting edits. This is tiring. Anywho, I've put up the content-dispute on respective talk pages for a discussion and your inputs. btw, you could have considered not removing the notability tag yourself from Byju Raveendran's page since you extensively edited it, and could have waited for an independent editor to have done so. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Mentioning of Narendra Modi's marriage

Greetings,

For your information, a RfC discussion has been initiated in relation to discussion topic you were recently involved in.

Request for Comment has been started @ Talk:Narendra Modi#RfC:Mentioning of Narendra Modi's marriage


Thanks for inputs

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias are for expanding information and knowledge' (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colin Percival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EC2.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanathi Srinivasan

Someone reverted some recent edits of yours in the article Vanathi Srinivasan. That is due to mistake of some soc user you can revert it as you know that the edit is not vandalisation, you can revert. Thank You.

Conor Gallagher

Please do not re-add content that has been challenged and removed without discussion on the article talk page per WP:BRD. GiantSnowman 10:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content as per your own understanding of the policies. Take it to the talk page of the relevant page when in doubt. Thanks. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MSB Educational Institute Logo 2021.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MSB Educational Institute Logo 2021.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Zidane scores a Panenka, World Cup Final, 9 July 2006.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Zidane scores a Panenka, World Cup Final, 9 July 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project Depiction.webp

Thank you for uploading File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project Depiction.webp. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Syedna mohammed burhanuddin portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Syedna mohammed burhanuddin portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tottenham Hotspur F.C.. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hzh (talk) 07:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning. Also, be aware of WP:3RR. Seasider53 (talk) 10:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hzh: @Seasider53: My bad that I did not bother to check if a discussion was underway. I wasn't tagged. In my eyes, the edits are perfectly good and the reverts overzelaous (no wp:fixfirst, pointless wp:synth accusation, aimless discussion about origin of the term spursy). Lets talk it out. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thomas Tuchel (refactored from RfPP)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing well-sourced content claiming the sources are "outdated.". — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There's little engagement beyond calling the IP editor a "vandal," them responding with "cringe individual," and so on — no one comes out looking good in that exchange. Please take it to the talk page. El_C 20:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: How do you suggest editors wp:talk with someone / something hopping IPs?
Also, the reverts are persistent on content that's well sourced. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 22:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Something being sourced does not guarantee inclusion (see Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion), as there are issues of WP:DUEWEIGHT and other possible factors. What to do? Start a talk page discussion where you politely present your position. Next time you edit that page, state in the edit summary something like: IP/s, discussing this only though edit summaries isn't useful. I started a discussion on the article talk page @ <link> so please join me there. The IP/s may not even know talk pages are a thing, as some mobile versions don't display these (hence the <link>). El_C 03:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:R from suffix" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:R from suffix has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § Template:R from suffix until a consensus is reached. user:A smart kittenmeow 11:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve also listed Template:R from profession at RfD:
All the best, user:A smart kittenmeow 12:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lionel Messi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greatest of All Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project Depiction.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saifee Burhani Upliftment Project Depiction.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: I predict, deletionists will be the end of this god-forsaken community. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You had the opportunity to make the case for keeping the image but made no argument to do so. -- Whpq (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch at Jared Cohen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Since he's redirecting his official website to his book on Amazon, I removed it as failing ELOFFICIAL criteria, kept his twitter link, and added a link to his profile page at Goldman Sachs. What do you think?

As for the other two articles, the twitter links are redundant, and simply so. The corresponding ELOFFICIAL links go to websites that have twitter links on their font pages, so shouldn't be included per NOT and WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. - Hipal (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal: Don't agree, but I am not going to contest it. Appreciate you keeping me in the loop, though. Thx Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And why [1]? --Hipal (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hipal: I saw the other external links were really useless and since Paul's very active on Twitter, it makes sense to link to that over other links (like interview with paul graham, essays by paul graham etc). And of course, I had forgotten about this conversation. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 14:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation. No problem then. I certainly can't keep track of all the policies and guidelines. --Hipal (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ethnic cleansing. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (t · c) buidhe 17:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: Was I? An account that barely has contributed reverted changes without cause: [talk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dianagurman#tendentious%20editing] Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 00:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I realized after I posted this notice that the other account is not eligible to contribute to Israel–Palestine related topics because it's not extended confirmed. If your reverts had been marked as enforcing arbitration requirements it would not count as edit warring. However, you could still have handled it better, for example warning them and if necessary reporting to an admin, rather than just reverting. (t · c) buidhe 00:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media coverage of the Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin 100 Milad Stamp Karachi Jamea Pakistan Post.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin 100 Milad Stamp Karachi Jamea Pakistan Post.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al Hussary Murattal Quran 30 18.mp3

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al Hussary Murattal Quran 30 18.mp3. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shahzada Husain Burhanuddin Qirat Al Hashr Dallas 2008.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shahzada Husain Burhanuddin Qirat Al Hashr Dallas 2008.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deliberately misleading

You are using an old interview of Sara Ali Khan's father in which he says that even though his daughter was "born a Muslim", he does not want to thrust any religion on to her. You then use that source to claim that "she was raised a Muslim". All this when she herself does not identify with any religion. Deliberately trying to mislead readers like this will only result in permanent blocks. Please stop! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]