User talk:MureungdowonJapanese political partiesI'm in the process of updating the result tables on political pages, so please don't revert my edits :) ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diversity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Socialism in South KoreaI noticed that you re-added and expanded info to the "Socialism in South Korea" page. Have you thought about create a sidebar for it? ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 20:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2022Your recent editing history at Anti-Chinese sentiment in Korea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk) 11:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Stop trying to crowbar anti-Korean sentiment into AntisemitismStop trying to crowbar anti-Korean sentiment into Antisemitism, where it does not belong, or you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 11:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC).
March 2023Hello, I'm Vif12vf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Democratic Socialism (Chile) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Japanese war crimes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Loafiewa. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please do not accuse or otherwise imply that a specific user is a racist. That is unacceptable behavior on Wikipedia. BilCat (talk) 01:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — SamX [talk · contribs] 00:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC) Your userpageYou have a lot of inflammatory content on your userpage. You call Chinese and Japanese culture uncivilized and xenophobic, you liken Japan to anti-Semites, you launch pretty harsh attacks on those who aren't Korean nationalists ("demon traitors", likening them to neo-Nazis). Would you remove this content? It's racist and risks disrupting the project. — Czello 12:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
"Chaepo" motionI think you might have the explain what chaepo is, as Google doesn't show any results for it. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Korean nationalist historiography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minjok. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Free Democratic Party (Germany) has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Orthodox PeronismHello, how are you? Sorry for my ignorance, but where do you get the information that you are placing in the article? It seems a bit strange to me their definitions so determined. Also, many thanks for your contributions. Holiptholipt (talk) 02:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
"Pro-Polish"How come you removed it from the DPK's page? I mean it could've been worded differently, as there is no such thing as "pro-Polish", but the sentiment is there. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 14:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Political correctnessJust to explain, I reverted your additions to 'PC'. I hope my reasons are self-explanatory, the content seems more about ant-Japanism in Korea than about 'PC' itself. I cannot comment on the quality of the content, since I can't actually read the sources, but we have a long-term position on the article that simple 'examples of use' are excluded. This is partly because there are simply too many things that have been described as 'PC', and partly because examples inevitably lead to WP:OR in analysing the meaning/explanation of the example. I cannot say for sure, but your content may, legitimately belong elsewhere on WP. Pincrete (talk) 07:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC) Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussionThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Killuminator (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Japanese privilege for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japanese privilege is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese privilege until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Binksternet (talk) 06:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC) I found you had reverted my edit without any concrete reasons. You have not provided any reasonable rebuttal to the source claiming that Lee Jae-myung is associated with Trumpism. Bloomberg is considered a very neutral source, not a Japanese media outlet, and is recognized on Wikipedia as such. Additionally, Nikkei Asia is not a conservative news outlet, but rather a politically neutral media organization like Reuters or YTN in Korea. In contrast, sources related to Yoon Seok-yeol and Hong Joon-pyo are more questionable in terms of their credibility as they come from Korean media outlets that can represent certain political factions within the country. My editing does not violate Wikipedia's RSP policy. On the other hand, it seems that your editing strongly represents a certain political faction in Korea, which may violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a place to advocate for your political position, but a place to provide neutral information. Thank you. Jeff6045 (talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussionHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 13:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC) April 2023You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Trumpism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Courcelles (talk) 14:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
The need for edit summariesHello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your edit on 24 April 2023 to Bharatiya Janata Party did not have an edit summary. This made it much harder to understand what you were doing, and make a decision whether to revert your edit or not. The edit summary field is useful to explain your reasoning for an edit, and to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors (like me) and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief. The edit summary field looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC) Links in headingsMOS:LINKSTYLE says that CS1 error on Conservatism in IndiaHello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Conservatism in India, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 30An automated process has detected that when you recently edited People's Democracy Party (South Korea), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minjok. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Nippon Kaigi parliamentary membersDo you have any sources that indicate how many of them there are in parliament. The reason being is so it can be expressed in the infobox on the page, with notes to indicate the breakdown of which parties they are a part of. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC) CategorizationAs I believe you've been told before, in order to add a category to an article, the article must have information in it which specifically supports being placed in that category. Your addition of several articles without such information to the category "Axis war crime denial" have been reverted. Please do not continue to make this error again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC) Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Anti-American sentiment in Korea into Korean nationalism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., Blocked as a sockpuppetYou have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Storm598 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Storm598. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Bbb23 (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Mureungdowon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The reason I created new account is not to avoid blocking, I just wanted to be free from stalking. I didn't create multiple accounts for malicious reasons. I want to continue editing with this account. I'm not going to edit with my strom598 account, and I'm not going to create another account. Decline reason: In that case, you should have gotten the block removed first. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Mureungdowon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The reason I created new account is not to avoid blocking, I just wanted to be free from stalking. I didn't create multiple accounts for malicious reasons. I want to continue editing with this account. I'm not going to edit with my strom598 account, and I'm not going to create another account. (I wasn't in a block with a strom598 account.) Decline reason: You violated your topic ban by creating this account. Your only hope now for reinstatement is to ask for unblock on your original account under the standard offer, six months from now. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Axis war crimes denialA tag has been placed on Category:Axis war crimes denial indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 20An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jo Jeong-rae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minjok. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Mureungdowon. Thank you for your work on Tochak Waegu. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments: Preliminary new page patrol review Thanks for the work put into this. IMO this article needs to get renamed or merged. On the face of it, it is a definition of a Korean Language word/term, and the coverage of the term is very brief. Wikipedia isn't a disctionary, and doublly so not a Korean language dictionary. The bulk of the article is basically content on certain areas of South Korean politics. Sincerely,}} To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with North8000 (talk) 02:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Category:Anti-Korean propaganda has been nominated for deletionCategory:Anti-Korean propaganda has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. toobigtokale (talk) 02:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Race privilegeHello, Mureungdowon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Race privilege, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Anti-Korean sentiment in JapanTemplate:Anti-Korean sentiment in Japan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. NotBartEhrman (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC) Deletion request of Category:ROK nationalism
|