User talk:Mubashirsyed014

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tablighi Jamaat

Hi Mubashirsyed, Thanks for your edit to the Tablighi Jamaat. Please add the page number of the book to the citation there. Otherwise, I would need to delete it for being unverifiable. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok bro Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Salafi movement, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. . Changing Egypt to Saudi Arabia is not a minor edit. And your edit summary[1] added Wikipedia link is sneaky and misleading. Toddy1 (talk) 08:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok will definitely do that.thanks. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop marking edits as "minor" when they are nothing of the kind. You appear to be doing it as a deliberate deceptive tactic. These edits[2][3][4][5][6] are not minor. You have been told about this before, and you agreed to stop doing it. Toddy1 (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Toddy1 (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was by mistake. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to this, so don't mind. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ikhwaan movement started in egypt. But, salafism started in najd, saudi arabia. So, technically i am right. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 09:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick(Talk) 10:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC) _____________________________________________________[reply]

Ah alright.Thanks. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pushing personal POV

Please stop editing pages with inflammatory attacks like "they reject the Quran and Sunnah". This is not a battlefield, edits should be neutral and unbiased. Also, stop wiping sourced content because it goes against your POV and adding weak content sourced by Wordpress blogs. Thanks. — LissanX (talk) 04:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Muhammad. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, for continuing leaving misleading edit summaries and inappropriately marking edits as minor.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to 9/11 Commission Report, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. These two edits[7][8] are not minor edits, nor are these two edits to the article on the Salafi movement.[9][10] Toddy1 (talk) 08:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Salafi movement in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. In this edit you added a chunk of text with a citations but your edit summary said "Added a link as well as some citations."[11] Toddy1 (talk) 08:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Salafi movement.[12] This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation of this behaviour may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Changing Egypt (which is what the citations say) to Saudi Arabia was not a minor edit, and was not "Added Wikipedia link" as you claimed in your edit summary. Toddy1 (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Please could you help with this. Toddy1 (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to my user page was not minor either.[13] Please do not edit other users' user pages. If you want to post a message use the talk page. Toddy1 (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You labelled edit[14] as minor. The edit was to the article on the Grand Mosque seizure and changed wahhabi to [[Salafi movement|Salafi]]. The edit summary was "Added Wikipedia link." This is dishonest and disruptive. Toddy1 (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This indeed suggests that you currently lack competence to edit Wikipedia. If I see it again, I will likely block your account for a longer term.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop marking your edits, such as the following edits to Wahhabism, as "minor" when they are no such thing.

• 11:43, 29 April 2020 m (Added a link and some text.)
• 11:45, 29 April 2020 m (Added a link.)

A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". You added two new citations that you stuck between the existing text and the existing citation. This of course gives the impression that the citations support the text. They do not.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ikhwan, you may be blocked from editing. The rubbish you added had a citation that did not mention Ikhwan or Akhwan. You also falsely marked it as a minor edit, when in reality it was an attempt to promote religious hatred.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Bilal Erdoğan, you may be blocked from editing. In addition you dishonestly claimed that it was a minor edit.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at William Wilson Hunter, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

This edit,[15] which added a link was not a minor edit; but you marked it as one. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Salafi movement, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you engage in subtle vandalism on Wikipedia, as you did at Salafi movement. Stop trying to change information (like numbers and dates) without explanation. The citations in the article support Egypt. You have yet again changed this to Saudi Arabia, and you also added two irrelevant citations next to your change separating them from the real citation that support Egypt.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But i gave a link sir. Trust me, i would never misuse this platform. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 11:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree, use the article talk page and explain how the links you gave support the change.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Baghdad International Airport airstrike. WikiHannibal (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salafi movement. WikiHannibal (talk) 08:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Israr Ahmed, you may be blocked from editing. WikiHannibal (talk) 08:18, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm AaqibAnjum. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. More than that, the addition was a patent nonsense which didn't belonged to this article. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --WikiHannibal (talk) 17:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (including competency issues).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 18:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mubashirsyed014 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not do anything wrong but if you want I will not edit your edits, please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Your page is littered with warnings. This is your second block. If you truly believe you did not do anything wrong, I am forced to agree with the blocking administrator. WP:CIR applies. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mubashirsyed014 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please help me get unblocked Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.